Scribd
Upload
20 views3 pages

II MCA Project Review Schedule 2025

The document outlines the project review schedule for II MCA students at E.G.S. Pillay Engineering College, detailing specific dates for the Zeroth, First, Second, and Third Reviews in 2025. It includes a structured format for presentations across the reviews, with specific content requirements and marks allocation. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of attendance, evaluation criteria, and submission guidelines for project reports and plagiarism checks.

Uploaded by

Vishnu Vishnu
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
20 views3 pages

II MCA Project Review Schedule 2025

The document outlines the project review schedule for II MCA students at E.G.S. Pillay Engineering College, detailing specific dates for the Zeroth, First, Second, and Third Reviews in 2025. It includes a structured format for presentations across the reviews, with specific content requirements and marks allocation. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of attendance, evaluation criteria, and submission guidelines for project reports and plagiarism checks.

Uploaded by

Vishnu Vishnu
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

E. G. S. PILLAY ENGINEERING COLLEGE(AUTONOMOUS), NAGAPATTINAM.

DEPARTMENT OF MCA

Project (2004CA401) Review for II MCA students is scheduled as follows:

Review Scheduled Date


Reopening day 06.01.2025
Zeroth Review 20.01.2025
First Review 21.02.2025
Second Review 21.03.2025
Third Review 21.04.2025

 The contents of the presentation should be as below:

Zeroth Review First Review Second Review Third Review


(10 marks) (15 marks) (15 marks)
 Abstract  Abstract  Abstract  Abstract
 Introduction  Introduction  Introduction
 Literature Survey  Literature Survey  Literature Survey
 Objectives  Objectives  Objectives
 Existing System  Existing System  Existing System Limitations
Limitations Limitations  Proposed System
 Proposed System  Proposed System  System Architecture
 System Architecture  System Architecture  List of Modules with screenshot
 List of Modules  List of Modules with  Conclusion
 References screenshot  References
 Conclusion  Finding Conference/Journal
 References  Paper Communication
 Finding  Project Demo
Conference/Journal
 Paper Communication

Document Document Document


Chapter 1,2,3,4,5 Chapter 6,7,8,9,10 Full Document

E.G.S. PILLAY ENGINEERING COLLEGE(AUTONOMOUS)


DEPARTMENT OF COMOUTE APPLICATIONS
ACADEMIC YEAR 2024-2025
BATCH 2023-2025 II MCA III SEMESTER
2004CA401 Project Work
[Link] REG NO STUDENT NAME GUIDE NAME
1 8208E23CAR002 R. Abinaya
2 8208E23CAR006 [Link]
3 8208E23CAR011 [Link]
4 8208E23CAR022 [Link]
5 8208E23CAR031 [Link]
6 8208E23CAR033 [Link] selciya
[Link] /Profssor/HOD/MCA
7 8208E23CAR035 [Link]
8 8208E23CAR038 [Link]
9 8208E23CAR040 [Link]
10 8208E23CAR043 [Link]
11 8208E23CAR054 [Link]
12 8208E23CAR058 [Link]
13 8208E23CAR001 A Aarthy
14 8208E23CAR004 [Link]
15 8208E23CAR010 [Link]
16 8208E23CAR015 [Link]
17 8208E23CAR021 [Link]
18 8208E23CAR025 G. Jonesvictor
19 8208E23CAR034 [Link] [Link] AP/MCA
20 8208E23CAR037 [Link] Raj
21 8208E23CAR045 [Link]
22 8208E23CAR046 [Link]
23 8208E23CAR055 [Link]
24 8208E23CAR056 [Link]
25 8208E23CAR060 [Link]
26 8208E23CAR009 K M Asha
27 8208E23CAR012 [Link]
28 8208E23CAR019 [Link]
29 8208E23CAR023 [Link]
30 8208E23CAR027 V.M Juwairiyya
31 8208E23CAR032 [Link]
[Link] AP/MCA
32 8208E23CAR039 [Link] devi
33 8208E23CAR041 [Link]
34 8208E23CAR044 [Link]
35 8208E23CAR048 [Link] ranjani
36 8208E23CAR050 [Link]
37 8208E23CAR052 [Link]
38 8208E23CAR003 [Link]
39 8208E23CAR005 S. Alexzandar
40 8208E23CAR007 [Link] [Link] AP/MCA
41 8208E23CAR008 [Link]
42 8208E23CAR013 [Link]
43 8208E23CAR017 [Link]
44 8208E23CAR018 [Link]
45 8208E23CAR028 [Link]
46 8208E23CAR030 [Link]
47 8208E23CAR042 [Link]
48 8208E23CAR057 [Link]
49 8208E23CAR059 [Link]
50 8208E23CAR014 [Link]
51 8208E23CAR016 M.K Dhakshanya
52 8208E23CAR020 [Link]
53 8208E23CAR024 [Link] marks
54 8208E23CAR029 R. Kaviya
55 8208E23CAR036 [Link] muhsin
[Link] AP/MCA
56 8208E23CAR047 [Link]
57 8208E23CAR049 [Link]
58 8208E23CAR051 [Link]
59 8208E23CAR053 [Link]
60 8208E23CAR061 [Link]
61 8208E23CAR062 [Link]

Points to Note:

 Total Internal marks = 40, External Marks=60

 100% Attendance is compulsory for attending the review.


 Review will not be rescheduled for the absentees.
 Each review performance will be evaluated and review marks will be taken for
internal calculation.
 Paper should be presented in the International conference or submitted to Scopus
Journals which will be evaluated for 5 marks in the third review .
 It is must to attach plagiarism report along with project report

Project Coordinator
Dr. C. Mallika

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the zeroth review, students are expected to present an abstract, objectives, existing system limitations, and a proposed system . These tasks serve as foundational steps aimed at aligning students' projects with overarching goals early in the process. By establishing these elements, students set a clear path for subsequent research and development while facilitating initial critical discussions and feedback .

Internal marks constitute 40% of the evaluation and are derived from performance in scheduled reviews, while external marks account for the remaining 60% . The internal assessment encourages consistent progress and adherence to the review schedule, whereas the external assessment provides a capstone evaluation of the completed project . Together, they ensure a balanced and comprehensive evaluation, reflecting both continuous effort and final product quality .

The third review requires the completion of the project document, including abstracts, conclusions, module screenshots, a system demo, and submission to a conference or Scopus journal, which is evaluated for 5 additional marks . This dual requirement ensures students engage in academic rigor through detailed documentation while encouraging dissemination of their work through reputed conferences or journals .

100% attendance is critical for participating in the reviews as it ensures students are present for feedback and adjustment phases crucial for successful project completion . The strict attendance requirement underscores the institution's emphasis on active participation and continuous engagement, leading to a deeper commitment from students to their projects, enhancing both learning and project quality .

The review process is structured to build knowledge progressively, beginning with basic project elements such as the abstract and introduction in the initial reviews, moving towards more complex elements like module screenshots and system architecture by the second review, and culminating in a full project demonstration and publication requirements in the third review . This incremental build-up ensures that students steadily develop a comprehensive understanding and refine their projects over time .

Requiring students to present their work at international conferences or submit papers to Scopus journals pushes them towards producing high-quality research with potential scholarly impact. This requirement not only enhances the credibility of their projects but also integrates professional academic standards and real-world relevance into their work . The evaluation of this activity for additional marks further incentivizes students to engage meaningfully with broader academic communities .

Including a plagiarism report ensures projects adhere to academic integrity standards by verifying originality and preventing intellectual property violations. This aligns with ethical practices in academia, encourages originality, and cultivates a culture of credibility and trustworthiness in student submissions . Highlighting this necessity underlines the institution's commitment to fostering ethical research practices .

The second review in the MCA project schedule focuses on the abstract, introduction, literature survey, objectives, existing system limitations, proposed system, system architecture, list of modules with screenshots, and ends with references . Unlike the first review, which addresses similar content but without module screenshots, the second review requires detailed visualization of the proposed modules and an additional emphasis on screenshots .

The content requirements are designed to guide students through a structured project evolution, starting with foundational elements like abstracts and objectives, then incorporating detailed analyses like literature surveys and system architecture. These gradually lead to a comprehensive documentation and demonstration with practical elements like module screenshots and a final demo in subsequent reviews . This gradual complexity ensures students develop their projects methodically, allowing for critical feedback and refinement at each stage .

Students must have 100% attendance to participate in the review sessions, and the reviews will not be rescheduled for absentees . Performance in each review is evaluated and contributes to internal marks. The total internal marks amount to 40, and external marks account for 60 .

You might also like