Draculan, Franz Reiniel F.
BSCPE 602
05 Task Performance 1
The Fire Code of the Philippines
1. Read Rule 10: Fire Safety Measures in the Fire Code of the Philippines text and pick a
provision to evaluate.
The provision utilized to assess an exit's fire resistance is called "Protective Exit Enclosure" and
is included in Rule 10: Fire Safety Measures of the Philippines Fire Code. This section assesses
the materials and assemblies used in buildings and infrastructure to guarantee that they can
survive fire, as established by testing. It is simply a separate section of the building from which
inhabitants can leave in the case of a fire.
2. Briefly describe and cite your chosen section from the text.
This guideline effectively demands that all buildings, houses, and enterprises have their fire exits
segregated from the interior of the structure. The RIRR (Revised Implementing Rules and
Regulations) monitored this part and imposed tight limitations. This indicates that the exit must
last and give protection to the building's residents for a sufficient period.
3. Evaluate the provision if it fits the Philippine setting. Is it widely observed and followed?
Yes, it is compatible with the Filipino mindset, considering that, as we all know, our nation's
infrastructure and structures have been subjected to several fires throughout history. These
disasters have claimed many lives, therefore having such a provision is critical for our country.
To the second question, no. When you say "extensively observed and obeyed," you mean that all
buildings across the country have followed the RIRR's criteria for fire exit assembly. The issue is
that certain structures in our country lack a safe fire exit. Consider for a moment that the building
owners are budgeting for the project's development while also seeking to save money. It is not
commonly observed or followed, which I believe is due to inefficiency and corruption.
Nevertheless, a number of these structures were able to obtain a permit to operate despite the
absence of a safety fire exit, even though the building cannot be permitted to operate without the
inclusion of "B. Protective Exit Enclosure.”
4. In your opinion, which is the strongest message of the provision? Which is the
weakest? Elaborate on your answer.
Although an exit's protective cage is the most weak, access to exits and message organization are
the most effective. I believed this was the most powerful structure I had ever seen. I'm constantly
mindful of the fire exits. This is one of the easiest ways for the community to know where they
should go if the building catches fire. This also contains blinker lights and sirens. Based on my
research, I believe it is rather straightforward to reach these fire exits. Building floor areas have
allowed visitors to examine and comprehend how each building's exits are planned out. This
ensures that everyone is informed of their personal safety precautions in the event of a building
fire.
I feel the weakest link is the protective cage around the exit. Why? Because, there is access to
exits and their configurations. The floor plan may be viewed. Despite the presence of signs and
blinkers, the organization is unorganized. Will the fire escape area be able to contain or resist the
fire's intensity? I haven't seen all of the constructions that require a Protective Enclosure of Exit
to comply with RIRR requirements. I'm at a loss for words, but our country's structure,
components, and assembly, in my opinion, cannot sustain a fire for one hour. The major purpose
of this provision is to survive flames and conduct fire resistance tests.
5. Make recommendations on how to revise or improve your chosen provision.
I recommend that each building adhere to and understand the RIRR's key values. Second, the
materials and components utilized to construct the evacuation path must be fire resistant. The
entryway must be completely separated from the structure, and the fire escape must be made
entirely of fire-resistant materials. Why is it important to restrict exits? Because there are more
holes, the fire has a better chance of entering the structure. An adequate number of escape routes
must be available. There aren't too many, just too few. If the building is somewhat conventional,
two escape routes are sufficient. Always keep the fire exit door unlocked. I frequently observe
that many people have locked the fire exit doors when I'm inside a building. And if the structure
caught fire? People will undoubtedly become frightened, and let's just say that the employees did
too. Since the fire escape is locked, it is doubtful that they will be able to utilize it. But in this
case, I think the best course of action is for the building owner to give his or her staff the right
instructions on what to do in the event that the building catches fire. Once again, the fundamental
requirements must be fulfilled and upheld.