Scribd
Upload
127 views3 pages

QMS Work Plan Checklist for Educators

The document outlines a Quality Management System (QMS) for school-based educators, specifically detailing a work plan checklist for principals, deputy principals, and departmental heads. It includes a series of yes/no questions to assess various aspects of the school's work plan, such as implementation, target alignment, and performance indicators. The document also provides space for comments and signatures from both the monitor and the principal.

Uploaded by

muelmmety
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
127 views3 pages

QMS Work Plan Checklist for Educators

The document outlines a Quality Management System (QMS) for school-based educators, specifically detailing a work plan checklist for principals, deputy principals, and departmental heads. It includes a series of yes/no questions to assess various aspects of the school's work plan, such as implementation, target alignment, and performance indicators. The document also provides space for comments and signatures from both the monitor and the principal.

Uploaded by

muelmmety
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS)

FOR SCHOOL BASED EDUCATORS


Collective agreement No.2 of 2020

WORK PLAN CHECKLIST FOR PRINCIPALS, DEPUTY PRINCIPALS AND


DEPARTMENTAL HEADS
SECTION A
1. SCHOOL: _________________________________________
2. PRINCIPAL: ________________________________________
3. CIRCUIT: __________________________________________
4. CIRCUIT MANAGER: _________________________________
5. DATE OF MONITORING: ______________________________

SECTION B

Choose YES or NO by marking with an X against each question reflected in the table below:

DESCRIPTOR YES NO COMMENT


1. Is the year of implementation completed?

2. Does the period indicates start and end dates?

3. Are all criteria attended to ?


4. Are all descriptors attended/chosen (One per
Criterion)?

5. Is the choice of the descriptors informed by the


priorities/key challenges/ needs of the school? NB.
There should be a reason for choosing a descriptor.

6. Do the targets (activities) match (relate well with)


the chosen descriptors?
DESCRIPTOR YES NO COMMENT
7. Do the targets (activities) quantifiable and or
qualitative and time bound?
8. Do the activities in the Work-Plan serve to promote
high level of school performance?
9. Do the performance indicators match (relate well
with) targets (Activities)?
10. Are the performance indicators measurable?

11. Do the performance indicators have evidence


(Means of Verification)?
12. Are the contextual factors that may impede the
implementation of activities indicated? (If
available) Contextual factors are unique/ specific
circumstances to be considered that have the
potential to impact on the educator’s ability to
implement the activities in the work-plan.

13. Is work plan informed by the priorities of the


school, Circuit, Provincial Department of
Education, National Department of Education and
is intended to promote high-performance level of
the school?
14. Are the signatures and dates of the appraisee and
appraiser appear on the agreement section?

COMMENTS BY MONITOR
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

DISTRICT OFFICIAL’S SURNAME AND INITIALS: __________________________

OFFICIAL’S SIGNATURE: _________________ DATE: ________________


PRINCIPAL’S SIGNATURE: _________________ DATE: ________________

SCHOOL STAMP

You might also like