Understanding "Monster" by Walter Dean Myers
Understanding "Monster" by Walter Dean Myers
Monster
Reading Level Lexile 670
Genre/Length Contemporary Fiction; 209 pages THE EXCHANGE QUESTION
Language Register Technical, Legal, and Movie Terms; Slang Is everyone considered innocent
Content Load Criminal Trial, Teen Issues, Discrimination until proven guilty?
Selected Awards Michael L. Printz Award
National Book Award Finalist
This book contains mature content. Educators and parents should read the
book and determine its appropriateness for use with their students.
Overview
Background Walter Dean Myers writes about the hardships children face growing
up in harsh urban environments. He uses his own experiences growing up in
Harlem, New York to construct stories that represent experiences that young
African Americans can relate to. His stories portray positive aspects of a community
that society has labeled in a negative way. Myers’s characters are complex and
as tough as their environment. Although his protagonists learn from their mistakes
and become stronger individuals, they do not completely reform themselves. For
this reason, critics continue to praise Myers for the authenticity that distinguishes
his work.
Book Summary Monster is the story of Steve, a 16-year-old African American boy
on trial for murder. Steve fits the image of a large population of inmates in prison
and because of this, everyone involved in his trial has labeled him a monster. Steve
knows he is a good person and struggles with the way he is perceived by his
lawyer, his parents, and everyone else. Steve decides to write about his experience
in the form of a screenplay.
Pages 2–4
Due Date Discussion Date
complete the corresponding Student Journal pages, and meet Pages 11–52 Pages 5–6
to discuss. When they finish the book, they meet again for The Pages 53–98 Pages 7–8
Exchange. Use the planner on Student Journal, page 1 to Pages 99–149 Pages 9–10
Assessment
Getting Started
and discuss the scenario. Encourage students to describe the A week after you and your best friend are in the computer lab, it is
discovered that someone vandalized the school computers. You know it
similarities and differences between the scenario and their lives and was your friend. But the school is blaming you! The principal has proof
that you were in the lab because you sent an e-mail to a teacher.
imagine how the situation would affect them.
Make notes about how this would affect you.
• Have students write their responses to the three questions below • What would you do?
• Is it possible to be judged fairly in this situation?
the scenario and compare answers with a partner or the group. • Would you believe that you were innocent until proven guilty?
Journal, page 3. you understand key concepts in the book. Knowing them will help you
discuss and write about the book.
After you read the Introduction, answer these questions to check your
understanding.
filmmakers movie
Key Concept
screenplay
directions script
On a separate sheet of paper, create a similar Word Web for each of the
Key Concept words. Then write a sentence for each one.
go through the motions and lock him up. So people are He includes a flashback scene of something Mr. Sawicki
said to him about films. Viewers judge the quality of a film
already assuming he’s guilty. just like a jury judges the person on trial.
PAGE 42 4. Generate Questions Write a question about this section for someone
else reading this book. Exchange questions with them. Do you agree
1. Assumption What does Steve assume that makes him write with their answer?
To make the reader question whether Steve takes Respond to Pages 11– 52, continued
responsibility for any of his actions. 5. Character’s Point of View The trial begins by the lawyers giving their
opening statements. Think about the main ideas of each statement.
List the differences and similarities between the opening statements.
2. Conclusions Why does Briggs object to the way Detective 2. Mood What is the mood in prison like? How does it make Steve feel
Karyl gets witnesses to give information? He objects to the about what is going to happen to him? How is Steve depending on the
judicial system? Use the word judicial in your response.
PAGE 73 3. Text Features What do the Close Ups (CU) and other screenplay
directions reveal about how Mr. Harmon feels about Steve’s situation?
1. Paraphrase O’Brien says, “You’re young, you’re Black, and Steve’s father sees his son on trial for murder. The Close
Ups reveal that he is in pain and not completely convinced
you’re on trial. What else do they need to know?” What does of his son’s innocence. He has started to believe the same
stereotypes as everyone else involved with the trial.
she mean? The jury may assume Steve is guilty because he
4. Generate Questions Write a question about this section for someone
fits the stereotypical description of a young criminal. else reading this book. Exchange questions with them. Do you agree
with their answer?
page 107?
Steve means that he has not experienced kindness from
anybody in a long time. It means a lot that Miss O’Brien was
being friendly to him. 2. Dialogue How do the inmates in prison talk to each other about their
cases and the legal system? What does this suggest to you about the
type of person Steve might turn into if he is found guilty? Use the word
legal in your response.
2. Character’s Point of View Steve’s mother believes he is The other inmates admit to committing crimes. They talk
casually about their long sentences and about how the
innocent. Why does Steve think he is fooling himself into legal system works. Steve may become hardened in order
to survive in prison.
thinking he is innocent?
3. Character’s Point of View How does Steve feel after his family visits
All of the other prisoners try to convince themselves that they him in prison and his brother is not allowed inside?
their star witnesses. Why is Lorelle Henry a star witness? Respond to Pages 99–149, continued
As a local librarian, others view her as a good and 5. Conclusions On pages 99–149, we get a better idea of what
happened on the day of the robbery. List what Steve, King, and
Bobo reveal about the robbery and what this shows about Steve’s
trustworthy citizen. She was also in the store at the time of involvement.
1. Character Bobo comes to court wearing his prison clothes Steve admits that he he could have been
walked into the involved in the robbery
and looking very messy. What does this say about Bobo? drugstore but did
not do anything
Bobo does not care what he looks like or the impression he King acts like he does King is not upset
not care about the about the murder;
makes on the people in the court. Briggs thinks it is a tactic murder he is probably more
involved than Steve
to connect Bobo to King and make King look bad. Bobo does not mention maybe Steve was not
Steve much in his very involved in the
2. Inference Bobo hardly knows Steve. He says that he never description of the
crime
crime
It is possible that Steve had nothing to do with the robbery He was not involved with the planning or the actual murder.
Bobo does say that Steve was the lookout person, so it is
based on the way Bobo acts toward Steve. Maybe the jury still unclear whether or not Steve agreed to be involved. The
readers know that Steve was in the drugstore so he lied
will consider Steve innocent. which makes his innocence questionable.
King and Steve, it will make Steve look bad. Bobo showed
that Steve was involved.
2. Judgments Even though we know that Steve was in the drugstore
during the crime, the author never states whether he is guilty or not.
2. Conclusions How could the testimonies of Moore and Do you think Steve is guilty of a crime? Use the word defense in your
response.
Nipping help King? Moore said that King was with her during
the robbery. Nipping said that King was not the shooter
because King is left-handed. 3. Cause and Effect How has Steve’s life changed because of his
experience in prison and the trial?
not go to jail.
2. Comparisons How are the closing arguments that O’Brien Briggs O’Brien
Is everyone considered innocent until proven guilty? Review the work you did in your Student Journal. Take
your book and your Journal with you to The Exchange
book discussion.
EXCHANGE IDEAS
• In what ways does it seem like Steve is guilty? • Tell the group why you would recommend or not
Everyone, except his mother, treats him like he is a bad person. recommend this book.
• Compare this book to something it reminded you
Detectives Karyl and Williams handcuff Steve when they claim they of, such as another book, a movie, a TV show, or a
personal experience.
are only taking him in for questioning. The jury assumes he is like • Why do you think the author wrote this book?
other prisoners because he looks like them. Even Steve’s lawyer THE QUESTION
doubts his innocence. Is everyone considered innocent until
proven guilty?
• If you were one of the jurors, would you have found Steve to be • In what ways does it seem like Steve is guilty?
• If you were one of the jurors, would you have found
guilty or innocent? How would you have made your decision? Steve to be guilty or innocent? How would you have
made your decision?
• Think of an example in the news in which a person
• Think of an example in the news in which a person was treated was treated unfairly because of their age, gender, or
unfairly because of their age, gender, or ethnicity. Share the ethnicity. Share the story with your Exchange group.
Discussion Rubric
Evaluate the Discussion Evaluate the Discussion
Use the reproducible master from page 9 of this Teacher’s Guide Excellent Good Fair
to evaluate The Exchange discussion. The form may also be used Everyone participated. Most people participated. Only a few people
participated.
by students for group assessment. Everyone spoke clearly. Most people spoke clearly. Some people did not speak
clearly.
Everyone listened carefully. Most people listened Some people did not listen
carefully. carefully.
We stayed on the topic We stayed on the topic We did not stay on the
throughout the discussion. most of the time. topic all the time.
Most people used examples Many people used Only a few people used
from the book to support examples from the book examples from the book
their points. to support their points. to support their points.
Most people gave detailed Many people gave detailed Only a few people gave
answers using their answers using their detailed answers.
experiences and even other experiences.
texts.
Notes:
Everyone spoke clearly. Most people spoke clearly. Some people did not speak
clearly.
Everyone listened carefully. Most people listened Some people did not listen
carefully. carefully.
We stayed on the topic We stayed on the topic We did not stay on the
throughout the discussion. most of the time. topic all the time.
Most people used examples Many people used Only a few people used
from the book to support examples from the book examples from the book
their points. to support their points. to support their points.
Most people gave detailed Many people gave detailed Only a few people gave
answers using their answers using their detailed answers.
experiences and even other experiences.
texts.
Notes:
© Hampton-Brown
Monster
1. Which of the following is the best plot 2. Petrocelli is the attorney representing the State
summary for Monster? of New York. She is also known as the—
How you administer the Assessment depends on your objective. A Steve Harmon is on trial for a murder that A prosecutor
happened during a drugstore robbery.
You may choose to use the test as: Steve believes that the prosecutor thinks B judge
he is a monster. And he worries that his C defendant
parents don’t believe he is innocent. He
D witness
• an open-book test to allow students to continue practicing decides to record the events of the trial
as a movie. Ultimately, Steve is found
3. Why does O’Brien call George Sawicki to
innocent and released from prison.
reading strategies and/or become familiar with a typical B Steve Harmon’s mother is shocked when
the stand?
A To prove that Steve lives in a rough and
standardized test format the police come to her house one day and
take Steve away. There is a robbery and
violent neighborhood
Steve is suspected as being part of it. One B To help the prosecutor make a stronger
of the accused, James King, wears a brown case against King
• a closed-book test to check students’ comprehension of the suit to trial. But another accused, Bobo,
comes to the trial in a wrinkled prison outfit. C Because Mr. Sawicki is the only friend
that Steve has
book and their abilities in various reading skills Most of the prisoners think they are not
considered innocent until proven guility. D To allow the jury to listen to someone who
C Steve Harmon loves making movies. He is in
knows Steve’s character
prison and writes a screenplay about being 4. Which sentence suggests that O’Brien is not
• a take-home test to allow students to practice reading strategies on trial for murder. When Steve’s prosecutor
calls him a “monster,” he decides this is
convinced that Steve is innocent?
as well as test-taking skills a good name for his film. His film teacher
comes to his trial one day and talks about
A She smiled at me, and I felt embarrassed
that a smile should mean so much. We
how honest Steve’s films are. After Steve talked awhile longer and I realized that I
is released from prison, he sometimes sets did not want her to go.
Suggested point values are as follows: up a camera and films himself.
B And that’s all I ask of you: to reach into
D Steve Harmon is accused of robbing a your hearts and minds and bring forth that
Assessment Part I: 5 points per question for a total of 50 points drugstore. During the robbery the owner is
shot and killed. Steve is really scared and
measure of justice.
C Is your stomach still upset?
doesn’t think his lawyer believes that he is
innocent. He used to look up to King and D Before she left, Miss O’Brien warned me
Assessment Part II: 40 points possible (see Scoring Guide, Bobo who planned the crime. He thought not to write anything in my notebook that I
they were tough. Osvaldo was also involved did not want the prosecutor to see.
page 14) in the crime. When they ask Steve to be the
lookout, he shrugs, so we’re not really sure
if he wanted to be part of the crime or not.
Assessment Part I
Circle the best answer.
1. Which of the following is the best plot 2. Petrocelli is the attorney representing the State
summary for Monster? of New York. She is also known as the—
A Steve Harmon is on trial for a murder that A prosecutor
happened during a drugstore robbery.
B judge
Steve believes that the prosecutor thinks
he is a monster. And he worries that his C defendant
parents don’t believe he is innocent. He
decides to record the events of the trial D witness
as a movie. Ultimately, Steve is found
3. Why does O’Brien call George Sawicki to
innocent and released from prison.
the stand?
B Steve Harmon’s mother is shocked when
A To prove that Steve lives in a rough and
the police come to her house one day and
violent neighborhood
take Steve away. There is a robbery and
Steve is suspected as being part of it. One B To help the prosecutor make a stronger
of the accused, James King, wears a brown case against King
suit to trial. But another accused, Bobo,
C Because Mr. Sawicki is the only friend
comes to the trial in a wrinkled prison outfit.
Most of the prisoners think they are not that Steve has
considered innocent until proven guility. D To allow the jury to listen to someone who
C Steve Harmon loves making movies. He is in
knows Steve’s character
prison and writes a screenplay about being 4. Which sentence suggests that O’Brien is not
on trial for murder. When Steve’s prosecutor convinced that Steve is innocent?
calls him a “monster,” he decides this is
a good name for his film. His film teacher A She smiled at me, and I felt embarrassed
comes to his trial one day and talks about that a smile should mean so much. We
how honest Steve’s films are. After Steve talked awhile longer and I realized that I
is released from prison, he sometimes sets did not want her to go.
up a camera and films himself.
B And that’s all I ask of you: to reach into
D Steve Harmon is accused of robbing a your hearts and minds and bring forth that
drugstore. During the robbery the owner is measure of justice.
shot and killed. Steve is really scared and
C Is your stomach still upset?
doesn’t think his lawyer believes that he is
innocent. He used to look up to King and D Before she left, Miss O’Brien warned me
Bobo who planned the crime. He thought not to write anything in my notebook that I
they were tough. Osvaldo was also involved did not want the prosecutor to see.
in the crime. When they ask Steve to be the
lookout, he shrugs, so we’re not really sure
if he wanted to be part of the crime or not.
© Hampton-Brown
Monster Name:
5. O’Brien is the attorney representing Steve. 8. The journal passages in the story are
She is also known as the attorney. important because they—
A judicial A describe what happens in court
© Hampton-Brown
Monster Name:
Assessment Part II
Choose one question to answer. Write 3–4 paragraphs. Use
3 examples from the text to support your answer. Continue
your essay on a separate sheet of paper if necessary.
A. Pretend you are a reporter. What questions would you ask Steve before
and after the trial? Write an article about the results of the trial. Include
details from the case, and make the questions focus on the trial.
© Hampton-Brown
Monster
A. Pretend you are a reporter. What questions would you ask Steve before and
after the trial? Write an article about the results of the trial. Include details
from the case, and make the questions focus on the trial.
Responses should include questions like, “Who do you think will be called to testify in this
case?”, “How does it feel to be so young and on trial for murder?”, “Do you feel that the
jury was fair?”, or “What will you do now that you are free?” Students should write an article
based on answers from the questions. It should include opinions about whether Steve was
truly innocent or not.
B. This book is written as a screenplay and diary entries. What purpose do the
diary entries have? How might this book have been different if the people
involved in the trial had access to Steve’s diary entries?
Responses should include a statement that says the diary entries allowed the reader to
know Steve as a person rather than as a stereotype. If the people involved in the trial had
access to Steve’s thoughts and feelings, they might have treated him more like a human
being instead of judging him based on a stereotype.
Scoring Guide
Description of the response:
4 • Interpretation is accurate and thoughtful
• Explanation is fully developed
• Support includes specific and relevant text evidence
• All parts of the question are clearly addressed
3 • Interpretation is adequate
• Explanation is developed but may lack some insight
• Support includes most specific and relevant text evidence
• All parts of the question are addressed to some degree
1 • Interpretation is weak
• Explanation is vague
• Support includes few, if any, relevant details from the text
• Only one part of the question is minimally addressed
The relationship between Steve and his father mirrors broader societal issues like doubt, trust, and the impact of stereotypes during the trial. Steve's father begins to doubt his son's innocence as tears of doubt suggest a transformation influenced by societal stereotypes of young Black men . This reflects the broader theme of how societal prejudices permeate personal relationships, leading to internalized stereotypes and strained familial bonds . This relationship underscores the personal ramifications of societal judgments and legal battles on family dynamics .
The testimonies of Osvaldo Cruz and Bobo Evans complicate the narrative by introducing elements of self-preservation and reliability. Both characters have incentives to testify in ways that benefit them, potentially leading to unreliable testimonies that cast doubt on the guilt or innocence of others, including Steve Harmon . Osvaldo's claim of coercion contrasts with his tough demeanor, while Bobo connects Steve to the crime, yet their motivations for deals and reduced sentences raise questions about the truth of their accusations . This complexity challenges the court's ability to discern factual innocence or guilt amid strategic legal maneuvering .
In court, Osvaldo Cruz acts differently compared to his street persona, presenting a more vulnerable side and claiming he was forced into the crime, suggesting an attempt to elicit sympathy and reduce responsibility . Steve Harmon, on the other hand, must navigate a portrayal that is heavily influenced by stereotypes of young Black men, as pointed out by O'Brien . This difference indicates that Osvaldo's defense relies on portraying him as a coerced victim, while Steve's challenges involve overcoming preconceived notions and proving his character .
The theme of justice versus stereotyping is central to Steve Harmon's trial, impacting the defense strategy as they must combat preconceived notions about Steve based on his age and race . O'Brien's comment about Steve fitting the stereotypical description of a criminal highlights this challenge . The defense must emphasize justice by focusing on facts and evidence that support Steve's innocence, while also addressing and mitigating biases that could influence the jury's decision . This dual approach is crucial in ensuring a fair trial amidst pervasive stereotypes .
The harsh and dangerous mood in the prison setting heavily influences Steve Harmon's reliance on the judicial system for a fair trial, underscoring his desperation and vulnerability . His fear and self-consciousness about becoming hardened like other inmates drive his hope that the judicial process will recognize his innocence and restore his life . However, the pervasive atmosphere of despair and his observation of how inmates discuss their cases with resignation create a tension between sustaining hope and succumbing to the system's harsh realities . This duality reflects his internal struggle between hope for justice and the oppressive environment's impact on his outlook .
Steve Harmon's feeling of disconnection from his trial suggests a deep sense of alienation and helplessness. He has not been granted permission to speak, and he intentionally distances himself, possibly as a defense mechanism against the overwhelming nature of the trial process . This implies a loss of identity and agency, as he becomes more of an observer in a legal battle where his fate is being determined by others .
The defense's opening statement emphasizes that 'everyone is innocent until proven guilty', suggesting a protective stance that focuses on the presumption of innocence . In contrast, the prosecution presents a more powerful opening, labeling Steve as potentially being a 'monster' who must be found guilty . This stark contrast likely leaves Steve feeling alienated and dehumanized, as he is depicted in a way that might cause him to see himself as a monster .
Steve's diary entries provide an intimate insight into his thoughts and feelings, allowing readers to understand him as a complex individual rather than a stereotype . If shared with the jury, these entries might humanize him, countering the prosecutor's depiction and providing a personal perspective that challenges the narrative presented in court . This could significantly influence the jury's perception by invoking empathy and doubt about his guilt .
Steve Harmon's reflection on honesty in filmmaking serves as a metaphor for his struggle with identity and authenticity in the face of the trial. Mr. Sawicki's statement that 'only an honest person can make an honest film' suggests Steve's intrinsic value lies in his honesty and creative expression . As Steve records the trial as a screenplay, he negotiates his self-identity, contrasting the 'monster' image imposed by the prosecutor with his true self, which he believes is conveyed through his honest portrayal in his films . This duality highlights his internal conflict and desire to remain true to himself amidst external perceptions .
O'Brien's strategy focuses on proving the lack of concrete evidence against Steve and highlighting his positive character traits, emphasizing a broader view of justice that includes humanity and character . Petrocelli, representing the prosecution, argues that factual evidence should be paramount, irrespective of personal character, thereby portraying guilt in a more binary sense based solely on presented facts . These divergent strategies reveal differing legal philosophies: O'Brien values a holistic understanding of justice, while Petrocelli emphasizes a more rigid factual determination of guilt .