PÚNGUÈ UNIVERSITY

Faculty of Arts, Aocial Sciences and Humanities

4th year English course

Method As Approach, Design And Procedure

Alberto Aminosse Luís

Cecília Sitoe
Crescêncio José do Jasse
Trish Joaquim José

Chimoio

February, 2025
 Alberto Aminosse Luís
Cecília Sitoe
Crescêncio José do Jasse
Trish Joaquim José

Method As Approach, Design And Procedure

assignment of Didactics of English IV, to be

submitted to the Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences
and Humanities, in the Department of Linguistic and
Translation, under orientation of Dr. Charnaldo
Ndaipa

Chimoio

February, 2025
Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4

1.1. Objecctives......................................................................................................... 4

1.1.1. Geral............................................................................................................... 4

1.1.2. Specifics ......................................................................................................... 4

2. Method As Approach, Design And Procedure ........................................................ 5

1. The direct method - principle and techniques ......................................................... 5

2.1. Principles of the Direct Method .......................................................................... 5

2.2. Teaching Techniques of Direct Method .............................................................. 6

2.3. The natural approach Krashen and Terrell .......................................................... 8

2.3.1. Stages of the Natural Approach ..................................................................... 10

2.3.2. Classroom Techniques and Strategies in the Natural Approach by (Krashen &
Terrell, 1983): ............................................................................................................. 11

2.4. The audio – lingual method and behaviourism .................................................. 12

2.4.1. Audiolingual Method's Purpose and Principles .............................................. 12

2.4.2. Principle of Audio Lingual Method ............................................................... 13

2.4.3. The Technique of Audio Lingual Method ..................................................... 13

2.5. Behaviorism ..................................................................................................... 15

2.5.1. Principles of Behaviourism ........................................................................... 15

2.6. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) ...................................................... 16

2.6.1. Key Principles of CLT .................................................................................. 16

2.6.2. Techniques and Strategies in CLT ................................................................. 17

2.6.3. Advantages of CLT ....................................................................................... 19

2.6.4. Challenges of CLT ........................................................................................ 20

3. Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 22

4. References ........................................................................................................... 23
 4

1. Introduction
In the field of language education, various teaching methodologies
have emerged over time, each reflecting different educational philosophies and theories
of learning. Among these, are the Direct Method, Audio-lingual Method, Behaviorism,
and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) represent significant approaches that
have shaped language teaching practices. These methods differ in their theoretical
underpinnings, goals, and classroom techniques, but all aim to facilitate the acquisition
of a second language by promoting practical use and [Link] work elaborates
different types of methods ,approach and procedures such as direct method, natural
approach Krashen and Terrelle, audio-lingual method,behaviorism and lastly
communicative language teaching. It further highlights the principles and techniques to
each [Link] the work in includes some Drills,cures on prompts,the call word
, variety drills and a few advantages and challenges on the communicative language
teaching.

1.1 Objectives

1.1.1. Geral
 To comprehend the Method As Approach, Design And Procedure
1.1.2. Specifics
 Analise the direct, natural approach,behaviourism and communicative
language teaching.
 To identify the principles and techniques of these methods
 To mention the the drills,cures, the call word and variety drills of some of
these methods.
 5

2. Method As Approach, Design And Procedure

1. The direct method - principle and techniques

According to Larsen-Freeman (2000) the direct method is a language teaching

approach that emphasizes direct exposure to the target language, with instruction
conducted entirely in that language and without translation. It focuses on oral
communication, pronunciation, and inductive grammar learning. On the other hand
Richards and Rodgers (2001) state that The Direct Method is characterized by the
avoidance of the learners' native language and emphasizes speaking and listening skills
through immersive, real-life communication activities. Grammar is taught inductively,
and vocabulary is learned through demonstration and use in context. Brown (2007)
defines The Direct Method as an approach to language teaching that relies on active
student participation in oral communication, avoiding translation and grammar
explanation in favor of natural language acquisition through contextual learning.

2.1. Principles of the Direct Method

 Oral Approach: The Direct Method places a strong emphasis on oral

communication, aiming to develop the student's ability to use the target language
for real-life conversation. Teaching focuses on speaking and listening, with a
minimal focus on reading and writing (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).
 Target Language Use: the target language is used exclusively for instruction,
avoiding translation from the mother tongue. This immersion technique aims to
foster a natural learning environment where students associate words with their
meanings directly, without intermediaries (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).
 Inductive Teaching of Grammar: grammar is taught inductively, meaning that
students are not explicitly taught grammatical rules. Instead, they learn grammar
through exposure to the language in context and by inferring the rules from
examples they encounter in communication. This method contrasts with more
traditional approaches that focus on explicit grammar instruction (Richards &
Rodgers, 2001).
 Focus on Everyday Vocabulary: the vocabulary taught is centered around
common, everyday words and phrases that are likely to be used in daily
conversation. This ensures that students can engage in basic communication in the
target language early in their learning (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).
 6

 Active Student Participation: It encourages active involvement from students.

They are expected to participate in conversations, respond to questions, and
produce language in a variety of contexts. This active learning approach helps
students develop fluency through practice and immediate use (Richards &
Rodgers, 2001).
 Correct Pronunciation: correct pronunciation and intonation are emphasized
from the start. Since the focus is on speaking, learners are guided to imitate the
teacher's pronunciation closely. This helps students develop a natural accent and
clear speech patterns (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).
 Teacher as Model: the teacher plays a central role in modeling the target
language, providing examples that students can mimic. Teachers demonstrate
proper use of the language and correct mistakes, ensuring that students learn to
use the language accurately in context (Richards & Rodgers, 2001).

2.2. Teaching Techniques of Direct Method

Realia

Realia refers to the use of real-life objects in teaching. Harmer (2007) stresses
the importance of incorporating physical items or visuals that are directly related to the
target language in order to make learning more concrete and relevant. For example, a
teacher might use actual fruits to teach vocabulary, or real-world images to demonstrate
concepts. By utilizing real objects, teachers can help students make direct associations
between words and their meanings, thus facilitating understanding without needing
translation.

Demonstration

Demonstration is a vital technique in the Direct Method, where the teacher

physically demonstrates actions or behaviors to communicate meaning. This could
involve showing how a particular action is performed (e.g., "open the book") or using
gestures, facial expressions, and body language to reinforce understanding. By using
these non-verbal cues, the teacher conveys meaning directly, helping students to
internalize the language without relying on the native language. This method ensures that
students engage with the language in a natural and intuitive manner (Harmer,2007).
 7

Question and Answer

In the Direct Method, the technique of questioning plays a key role in

reinforcing language learning. Harmer (2007) notes that teachers regularly ask students
questions in the target language, encouraging immediate responses. This promotes active
student participation and fluency, as students need to think and respond quickly. The use
of questioning allows teachers to guide students through the learning process, addressing
specific language points and providing practice opportunities in a contextualized setting.
For example, the teacher might ask, "What is your favorite color?" in the target language,
prompting the student to respond appropriately.

Use of Context

The Direct Method relies heavily on context to teach vocabulary and grammar.
According to Harmer (2007), the context helps students infer meanings of words or
structures naturally. Rather than providing direct translations or explicit grammar rules,
teachers create situations where students can deduce the meaning of the language from
its usage in context. This method encourages students to think critically about language
in realistic settings. For instance, a teacher might introduce a new verb by demonstrating
its action in a specific scenario, allowing students to grasp its meaning through experience
rather than translation.

Repetition

Repetition is a technique commonly used in the Direct Method to reinforce new

language items. This can be done through drills, where students repeat words, phrases, or
sentences multiple times until they become familiar with them. Repetition helps students
solidify new vocabulary and grammar structures in their memory, promoting fluency and
retention. For example, after introducing a new phrase like "Can I help you?" the teacher
might ask students to repeat it several times to ensure they pronounce it correctly and
become comfortable using it in conversation (Harmer,2007).

Dialogues

According to Harmer (2007), dialogues are frequently used in the Direct Method
to expose students to authentic language use. Teachers often model conversations or role-
play scenarios to demonstrate how language is used in real-life situations. Dialogues offer
 8

students the opportunity to hear and practice realistic language in context, which is
essential for building communicative competence. For example, the teacher might present
a dialogue between two people ordering food at a restaurant, and students are then
encouraged to practice the dialogue themselves. This technique builds both vocabulary
and fluency.

Active Student Participation

The Direct Method encourages students to be actively involved in the learning

process. In contrast to traditional methods where students may passively listen or
memorize rules, the Direct Method requires students to actively participate in speaking,
listening, and interacting with the language. Activities such as role-playing, question-
answer exchanges, and peer interactions ensure that students practice the language in a
dynamic and engaging way. This constant engagement is crucial for developing fluency
and confidence in using the language spontaneously (Harmer,2007).

Self-correction

The teacher may have the students self-correct by asking them to make a choice
between what they said and an alternative answer that the teacher supplied. The teacher
might simply repeat what the student has just said with a questioning voice to signal that
something is wrong. The teacher repeats what the student has said, stopping just before
the error so the student knows that the next word is wrong (Shahid, 2017).

Dictation

Shahid (2017) says that the teacher reads the passage three times. First, the
teacher reads at normal speed, and the students just listen. Then, the teacher reads the
passage phrase by phrase, pausing long enough for the students to write down what they
have heard. Then, the teacher reads again at normal speed, and the students check their
work.

2.3. The natural approach Krashen and Terrell

According to Long (1996) the Natural Approach is a language teaching

methodology developed by Stephen Krashen and Tracy Terrell in the late 1970s and early
1980s. It was formally introduced in their book tittled “The Natural Approach: Language
Acquisition in the Classroom” which was published in 1983. This approach is based on
 9

Krashen’s Second Language Acquisition (SLA) Theory and aims to replicate the way
people naturally acquire their first language. It prioritizes comprehensible input,
communication, and a stress-free environment over traditional grammar drills and explicit
correction.

The Natural Approach is grounded in Krashen’s five interrelated hypotheses about

language acquisition (Krashen, 1982):

1. The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis.

Krashen distinguishes between two ways of developing language proficiency:

I. Acquisition: A subconscious process similar to first-language acquisition,

where learners pick up language naturally through exposure and meaningful
interaction.
II. Learning: A conscious process focused on grammar rules, memorization, and
formal instruction (Krashen, 1982)

The Natural Approach prioritizes acquisition over learning, arguing that true language
fluency comes from meaningful communication rather than explicit instruction.

2. The Monitor Hypothesis

This hypothesis suggests that conscious learning acts as a "monitor" for self-
correction, but it plays only a minor role in spontaneous speech because (Krashen,
1982):

I. The speaker must know the rule.

II. The speaker must focus on form rather than meaning.
III. The speaker must have time to apply the rule (which is impractical in
normal conversation).

Thus, Krashen argues that overemphasis on explicit grammar instruction can slow fluency
because it causes learners to hesitate and self-edit excessively.

3. The Input Hypothesis

This is the core principle of the Natural Approach. It states that (Krashen, 1982):
 10

 Learners acquire language when they receive comprehensible input that is

slightly beyond their current level.
 Understanding the message is more important than mastering individual
words or grammar structures.

For example: A beginner (i) may understand: "This is a dog."

To progress, they should hear: "This is a big brown dog."

4. The Affective Filter Hypothesis

This hypothesis highlights how emotional factors influence language acquisition

(Krashen, 1982)::

 A low affective filter (low anxiety, high confidence, strong motivation)

promotes better learning.
 A high affective filter (fear, stress, embarrassment) blocks language input.

Thus, the Natural Approach emphasizes stress-free environments where students feel
comfortable taking risks without fear of correction.

5. The Natural Order Hypothesis

Krashen (1982) argues that language structures are acquired in a predictable

sequence, regardless of explicit instruction. Some grammatical features emerge before
others. Example: Learners often acquire present progressive (-ing) before past tense (-
ed). Teaching grammar out of sequence does not speed up acquisition; it must emerge
naturally.

2.3.1. Stages of the Natural Approach

Terrell (1983) identified three stages that learners go through in the Natural Approach:

1. Preproduction (Silent Period) – Learners listen and absorb but do not speak yet
(Krashen & Terrell, 1983). They respond using gestures, pointing, nodding, or
single words. Teachers should focus on comprehensible input (pictures, gestures,
realia).

Example activity: Students listen to commands and respond non-verbally (Total Physical
Response - TPR).
 11

2. Early Production – Learners begin using simple words and short phrases. Their
speech is often fragmented and grammatically incorrect. Teachers do not force
correction; they rephrase errors instead of pointing them out (Krashen & Terrell,
1983).

Example activity: Yes/No questions, multiple-choice responses, or short dialogues.

3. Speech Emergence – Krashen & Terrell (1983) say that learners start forming
longer and more complex sentences. Their vocabulary expands, and they can
engage in basic conversations. Mistakes still occur, but fluency takes precedence
over accuracy.

Example activity: Storytelling, role-playing, and open-ended discussions. Terrell

emphasized that students should not be pressured to speak until they feel ready.

2.3.2. Classroom Techniques and Strategies in the Natural Approach by

(Krashen & Terrell, 1983):

Comprehensible Input Strategies

 Teacher Talk: Speaking slightly above students’ level, using gestures, visuals, and
real-world objects.
 Scaffolding: Gradually increasing language complexity while maintaining
comprehensibility.
 Paraphrasing & Repetition: Repeating ideas in different ways to reinforce
understanding.

Meaningful Communication Over Grammar Instruction

 Dialogue Journals: Students write freely without worrying about grammar.

 Storytelling & Narratives: Listening and responding to engaging stories with
visuals.
 Task-Based Learning: Completing real-life activities (ordering food, asking for
directions).

Error Correction Strategies

 Minimal correction: Instead of direct error correction, teachers model correct

language through rephrasing.
 12

 Implicit feedback: Example: Student: "He go to school. "Teacher: "Yes, he goes

to school every day!"

Reducing the Affective Filter

 Encouraging risk-taking: Students should feel comfortable making mistakes.

 Games & Role-Playing: Interactive, stress-free activities help students practice
language naturally.

2.4. The audio – lingual method and behaviourism

Audio-lingual Method

According to Mei (2018) audio -lingual method is an oral-based approach that

focuses on drilling students in grammatical structures and sentence patterns. It
emphasizes listening and speaking before reading and writing, prioritizing the acquisition
of structures and patterns in common dialogues rather than understanding individual
words. Through repetition and testing, learners develop automatic responses in the
foreign language. Contrarlly, Harmer (2007) argues that Audio- lingual method is rooted
in behaviorist principles, promoting habit formation through repetition and
reinforcement. The method relies on pattern drills and dialogue-based exercises,
discouraging the use of the native language to enhance immersion. However, the author
highlights that Audio-lingual ’s influence declined over time due to its rigid structure,
lack of meaningful communication, and excessive reliance on memorization rather than
authentic language use.

In addition to the elaborated definitions above Tehrani et al (2013) supports

the same idea by explaining that this method emphasizes repetitive drills, vocabulary
memorization, dialogues, and reading exercises to develop communicative competence
in English without relying on the native language. Similar to the Direct Method, it focuses
on habit formation through repetition, helping students acquire automatic and reflexive
language skills. Successful implementation depends on commitment from both teachers
and students.

2.4.1. Audiolingual Method's Purpose and Principles

The Audiolingual Method aims to develop English proficiency as a foreign

language through four key objectives (Bagheri et al., 2019). These include:
 13

 Enabling students to understand spoken English at a normal pace in everyday

conversations,
 Ensuring learners can speak with clear pronunciation and correct grammar,
 Helping students comprehend written texts with ease,
 Allowing them to write at an acceptable standard.

According to Mart (2013), the principles of this method emphasize that

language consists of arbitrary vocal symbols used for spoken communication, while
writing and printed text serve as representations of spoken language.

2.4.2. Principle of Audio Lingual Method

According to Mart (2013) states that the principles of the ALM are:

 Speech precedes writing – Emphasis is placed on oral skills (listening and

speaking) before reading and writing (Harmer, 2007).
 Accuracy is crucial – Learners must minimize errors through guided practice
(Harmer, 2007).
 Language can be broken down into there major component parts: the sound
system, the structure, and the vocabulary (Mart, 2013).
 One can learn to speak and understand a language only by being exposed to the
spoken language and by using the spoken language using and by using spoken
language (Mart, 2013).
 Grammar should never be thought of as an end itself, but only as a means to the
end of learning the language (Mart, 2013).
 Use of the students’ native language in class should be avoided or kept to
minimum in second language teaching (Mart, 2013).
 The structures to which the students are exposed to should always sound natural
to native speakers (Mart, 2013).
 All structural material should be presented and practiced in class before the
students attempt to study it at home (Mart, 2013).
2.4.3. The Technique of Audio Lingual Method

Drilling is a technique that consists of the repetition of oral patterns and

structures ( Kartikasari & Salam, 2015). In approaches based on a Behaviourist view
of learning, such as Audiolingualism, drills are considered a key element in the
 14

learning process. In this approach, drills are used to foster the formation of positive
habits and focus mainly on the presentation and practice of grammatical structures.

Repetition Drill – This drill is the simplest drill used in learning language patterns. It is
used at the very beginning of language class. Language learners merely repeat what the
teacher says or the tape recorder produces.

Example: Teacher : I study in the morning

Students : I study in the morning

Teacher : I study in the afternoon

Students : I study in the afternoon.

Substitutions Drill – language learners are required to replace one word with another.
They may replace a word of the model sentence with a pronoun, number, or gander
and make some the necessary change.

Harmer (2007) also highlights other techniques that include: Transformation Drill,
Question-and-Answer Drills, Dialogue Memorization.

Harmer (2007) posits that in Transformation Drill students transform sentences

from one form to another, such as changing affirmative sentences to negative or
converting statements into questions. This helps in understanding syntactic structures;
Harmer (2007) further posits that Question-and-Answer Drills, it has to deal with teacher
asking questions, and students respond quickly with practiced answers, promoting
automaticity in language use; Dialogue Memorization, learners memorize and perform
dialogues that illustrate specific language points, enhancing their ability to use language
in context (Harmer, 2007).

On the other hand Larsen-Freeman (2000) posits other techniques of Audio-

lingual include: Backward Build up (Expansion Drill), Chain drill, Single-slot
substitution drill, Multiple-slot substitution drill, Use minimal pairs analysis, Complete
the dialog, Grammar games.

According to Larsen-Freeman (2000) Backward Build up (Expansion Drill)

develops learners memorize words, phrases and texts quickly. Teacher breaks a line into
several parts student repeat each part starting at the end of the sentence and expanding
 15

backwards through the sentence, adding each part; Chain drill, students ask and answer
each other one in a circular chain around the classroom in sequence ( Larsen-Freeman,
2000); Single-slot substitution drill, teacher states a line from dialogue, and then uses a
word or phrase as a “cute” that students, when repeating the line, must substitute into the
sentence in the correct place ( Larsen-Freeman, 2000); Multiple-slot substitution drill,
same as the single slot drill, except that there are multiple cues to be substituted into the
line ( Larsen-Freeman, 2000); Use minimal pairs analysis, teacher selects a pair of words
that sound identical expect for a single sound that typically poses difficulty for the
learners-student are to pronounce and differentiate the two words ( Larsen-Freeman,
2000); Complete the dialog, selected words are erased from a line in the dialog-students
must find and insert ( Larsen-Freeman, 2000); Grammar games, various games designed
to practice a grammar point in context, using lots of repetition ( Larsen-Freeman, 2000).

2.5. Behaviorism

Richards and Rodgers (2014),state that behaviorism is a theory of learning that

emphasizes habit formation through stimulus-response associations. It suggests that
language learning occurs through repetition and positive or negative reinforcement.

2.5.1. Principles of Behaviourism

Harmer (2007) outlines several key principles of behaviorism in English

Language Teaching (ELT), focusing on the idea that language learning is a process of
habit formation. According to behaviorism, learners are seen as passive receivers who
respond to stimuli and can be conditioned through reinforcement. Key principles include:
Reinforcement, Conditioning, Imitation and Practice, Stimulus-Response (S-R) Model,
Controlled Practice, Drills and Rote Learning.

Harmer (2007) Says that Reinforcement: Positive reinforcement, such as praise

or rewards, encourages the repetition of correct responses, while negative reinforcement
aims to reduce undesirable behaviors by removing negative stimuli when a correct
behavior is displayed on the other hand Conditioning Learning, occurs through repeated
exposure to stimuli, and students are conditioned to internalize language forms through
repetition and drills (Harmer, 2007); Imitation and Practice, Behaviorism emphasizes the
importance of imitation, where learners mimic the language forms they hear and practice
them until they become ingrained (Harmer, 2007); Stimulus-Response (S-R) Model,
 16

learners respond to stimuli (input) with specific responses (output), reinforcing learning
through repetition (Harmer, 2007) ;Controlled Practice, structured exercises are used to
help students repeatedly practice language patterns, establishing correct linguistic habits
(Harmer, 2007); Drills and Rote Learning, drills involve mechanical repetition of
language forms to help learners master pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary (Harmer,
2007).

According to Ellis (2008), behaviorist techniques in language learning include:

Imitation and repetition, Drilling, Positive and negative reinforcement , Memorization,
Conditioning through stimuli.

Imitation and repetition, it has to do with learners mimicing correct language

structures to reinforce pronunciation and grammar (Ellis, 2008); Drilling, includes
substitution and transformation drills to help learners internalize sentence patterns (Ellis,
2008); Positive and negative reinforcement, correct responses receive praise or rewards,
while incorrect ones are corrected or ignored (Ellis, 2008); Memorization, learners
commit dialogues and vocabulary to memory to develop fluency (Ellis, 2008);
Conditioning through stimuli, words or phrases are associated with specific actions or
objects to enhance recall (Ellis, 2008).

2.6. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is an approach to language teaching

that emphasizes interaction and communication as both the means and the goal of
learning. It emerged in the 1970s as a response to traditional grammar-based methods,
such as the Audiolingual Method and Grammar-Translation Method, which focused on
rote memorization and structural drills (Richards & Rodgers, 2014). CLT prioritizes
fluency over accuracy and encourages learners to use the language in real-life contexts
(Brown, 2007).

2.6.1. Key Principles of CLT

 Communication Over Accuracy – CLT prioritizes communicative competence
rather than grammatical perfection. Learners are encouraged to use language
freely, even if they make errors, as the goal is to facilitate interaction (Littlewood,
1981). Errors are seen as a natural part of the learning process, and teachers
provide feedback in a way that does not interrupt communication (Brown, 2007).
 17

 Task-Based Learning – CLT uses real-life tasks and activities as the foundation
for language learning (Richards & Rodgers, 2014). Tasks may include ordering
food at a restaurant, making a travel plan, or discussing a problem with peers.
These activities require learners to negotiate meaning and use language creatively
rather than just memorizing phrases.
 Student-Centered Approach – The role of the teacher in CLT shifts from a
lecturer to a facilitator of communication. Instead of leading the lesson, teachers
guide and support students in their learning journey, allowing them to take
responsibility for their own progress (Brown, 2007). This approach helps build
learner autonomy and confidence in using the target language.
 Authentic and Meaningful Interaction – Learning materials should reflect real-
life language use. Instead of artificial textbook dialogues, CLT encourages the use
of newspapers, advertisements, videos, and social media posts to expose learners
to natural language in different contexts (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).
 Integration of Language Skills – Traditional language teaching often separates
skills into distinct lessons (e.g., one lesson for reading, another for writing). In
contrast, CLT integrates listening, speaking, reading, and writing so that learners
develop their ability to use the language holistically (Littlewood, 1981).
 Contextualized Grammar and Vocabulary Learning – Grammar and
vocabulary are taught within the context of communication rather than as isolated
rules and lists. This approach helps learners understand how language structures
function in real-world settings (Brown, 2007).
 Use of Interactive and Cooperative Learning – CLT encourages interaction
through group work and pair activities. Students collaborate on tasks, negotiate
meaning, and learn from each other, which enhances their communicative
competence (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).

2.6.2. Techniques and Strategies in CLT

Role-Plays and Simulations – Students take on roles in real-world scenarios, such as a

doctor-patient conversation or a job interview. This technique allows learners to practice
using language in different social contexts (Brown, 2007).

Information Gap Activities – In these activities, one student has information that the
other needs, requiring them to communicate to complete the task. For example, one
 18

student may have a map, and the other has directions, so they must work together to
navigate (Littlewood, 1981).

Pair and Group Work – Small group discussions, debates, and collaborative tasks
provide students with opportunities to practice speaking in a low-pressure environment.
Pair work encourages peer learning and allows students to correct each other’s mistakes
naturally (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).

Problem-Solving Tasks – Activities like puzzles, case studies, or hypothetical problem

discussions help students develop their critical thinking skills while using the language
(Brown, 2007). For example, students might be given a survival scenario where they must
decide which items to take on a deserted island.

Games and Interactive Activities – Language games such as "20 Questions," "Find
Someone Who," or "Charades" make learning fun and encourage spontaneous
communication (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).

Authentic Listening and Speaking Exercises – Using real-life audio recordings,

podcasts, or videos, students engage with authentic spoken language and practice
responding naturally. For example, listening to a weather report and then planning an
outdoor activity based on the information (Brown, 2007).

Jigsaw Activities – In jigsaw activities, students receive different pieces of information

and must communicate with each other to complete the full picture. This technique
encourages active listening and cooperation (Littlewood, 1981).

Storytelling and Narratives – Students create and share personal or fictional stories,
which helps them practice sequencing events, using appropriate tenses, and expanding
their vocabulary (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).

Debates and Discussions – Engaging students in debates on current issues or

controversial topics improves their ability to express opinions, support arguments, and
negotiate meaning (Brown, 2007).

Scaffolding and Guided Conversations – Teachers provide structured conversations

with prompts or sentence starters to help students build confidence in speaking before
progressing to more open-ended discussions (Littlewood, 1981).
 19

2.6.3. Advantages of CLT

 Enhances Communicative Competence: CLT helps learners develop both
fluency (the ability to speak and write smoothly) and accuracy (the correct use of
grammar and vocabulary). By prioritizing real-life communication, students
become more confident in expressing themselves in different contexts (Richards
& Rodgers, 2014).
 Encourages Real-Life Language Use: Unlike traditional methods that focus on
rote memorization and grammar drills, CLT emphasizes practical language skills.
Learners engage in real-life conversations, making them better prepared to use the
language in everyday situations (Littlewood, 1981).
 Develops Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills: Since CLT includes
problem-solving tasks, role-plays, and debates, students are encouraged to think
critically and analyze language use within meaningful contexts (Brown, 2007).
These skills are valuable beyond language learning and can be applied in
professional and academic settings.
 Increases Learner Engagement and Motivation: CLT makes learning more
engaging through interactive activities such as group work, role-plays, and games.
This student-centered approach fosters motivation, as learners feel more involved
and enjoy the learning process (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).
 Encourages Learner Autonomy: Students are encouraged to take responsibility
for their own learning by exploring language independently. This promotes self-
directed learning, where students develop strategies to improve their language
skills outside the classroom (Littlewood, 1981).
 Integrates All Language Skills: CLT does not separate listening, speaking,
reading, and writing but integrates them naturally. For example, a role-play may
require students to listen, read, and write before engaging in speaking, making
learning more comprehensive (Brown, 2007).
 Encourages Cultural Awareness: By using authentic materials and real-life
communication, CLT exposes students to different cultures and social norms. This
helps learners understand cultural nuances in language use, such as politeness
strategies, formal vs. informal speech, and idiomatic expressions (Richards &
Rodgers, 2014).
 Reduces Language Anxiety: By focusing on communication rather than strict
grammar correction, CLT lowers anxiety levels among learners. Since errors are
 20

treated as a natural part of language learning, students feel more comfortable

experimenting with the language (Brown, 2007).
2.6.4. Challenges of CLT
 Requires Highly Skilled Teachers: One of the biggest challenges of CLT is that
it requires teachers who are proficient in the language and trained in
communicative teaching methods. In many contexts, especially in non-native
English-speaking countries, teachers may struggle with their own fluency, making
it difficult to model authentic language use (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).
 Difficult to Implement in Large Classes: In many developing countries, class
sizes are often too large for CLT to be effectively implemented. Activities such
as pair work, group discussions, and role-plays require active monitoring and
feedback, which can be difficult with 50+ students in a classroom (Littlewood,
1981).
 Lack of Authentic Materials and Resources: CLT relies heavily on authentic
materials like newspapers, videos, and real-world texts. In resource-limited
settings, teachers may lack access to these materials, making it difficult to create
meaningful communicative activities (Brown, 2007).
 May Not Provide Enough Explicit Grammar Instruction: Because CLT
emphasizes communication over accuracy, some students may struggle with
grammatical accuracy (Richards & Rodgers, 2014). This is particularly
problematic in exam-oriented education systems, where students are expected to
master grammatical rules for standardized tests.
 Assessment and Evaluation Difficulties:Traditional assessments, such as
multiple-choice grammar tests, do not effectively measure communicative
competence. Designing appropriate assessments for CLT—such as oral
presentations, interviews, or interactive tasks—can be challenging and time-
consuming (Brown, 2007).
 Resistance from Teachers and Students: Teachers who are used to traditional
methods may resist adopting CLT due to lack of training or confidence in using
communicative strategies (Richards & Rodgers, 2014). Students may feel
uncomfortable with student-centered learning if they are used to teacher-led
instruction. Some may prefer explicit grammar explanations rather than
interactive discussions (Littlewood, 1981).
 21

 Unsuitability for Certain Learners: Beginner learners who have very limited
vocabulary and grammar knowledge may struggle with CLT, as it requires a basic
ability to communicate. Shy or introverted learners may find it difficult to
participate in group discussions or role-plays, making them feel left out (Brown,
2007).
 Time-Consuming Implementation: CLT requires more time to prepare and
conduct lessons, as teachers must design communicative tasks, monitor
interactions, and provide meaningful feedback. In time-constrained curricula,
teachers may find it difficult to cover all the required topics using CLT (Richards
& Rodgers, 2014).
 22

3. Conclusion
The Direct Method, Audio-lingual Method, Behaviorism, and Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT) represent pivotal role in the evolution of language teaching. Each
methodology offers a distinct approach, shaped by its underlying educational philosophy,
and responds to the changing needs of learners and the broader societal understanding of
language acquisition. While the Direct and Audio-lingual methods emphasize structured
language patterns and mastery through repetition, CLT breaks away from rigid
frameworks to focus on authentic communication and fluency. The influence of
Behaviorism underscores the importance of reinforcement and habit formation in
learning, bridging the gap between theory and practical [Link], these
methodologies not only provide a window into how language acquisition theories have
evolved, but they also offer a variety of approaches that offer different learning styles and
contexts. Each method brings something unique to the table, making the quest for
language mastery both dynamic and fascinati
 23

4. References
Bagheri, M., Hadian, B., & Vaez-Dalili, M. (2019). Effects of the Vaughan Method in
Comparison with the Audiolingual Method and the Communicative
Language Teaching on Iranian Advanced EFL Learners' Speaking Skill.
International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 81-98.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson
Education.

Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University
Press

Freeman, D.L.(2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (Second ed).

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Pearson
Longman.

Kartikasari, E., Arifin, Z., & Salam, U. (2015). Improving Students' Speaking
Ability Through Repetition Drill (Doctoral dissertation, Tanjungpura
University). Liu, Q. X., & Shi, J. F. (2007).

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.

Pergamon.

Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in
the Classroom. Pergamon Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2nd ed.).

Oxford University Press.

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge

University Press.

Long, M. (1996). "The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language

Acquisition." Handbook of Second Language Acquisition.
 24

Mart, C. T. (2013). The audio-lingual method: An easy way of achieving speech.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,
3(12), 63.

Mei, Y. (2018). Comments on the Audiolingual Method. International Journal of

Arts and Commerce, 7(4), 90.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching
(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching
(3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Shahid, O. (2017). Direct Method in English Language.

Swain, M. (1985). "Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input

and Comprehensible Output in Its Development." TESOL Quarterly, 19(2),
235-253.

Tehrani, A. R., Barati, H., & Youhanaee, M. (2013). The Effect of Methodology
on Learning Vocabulary and Communication Skills in Iranian Young
Learners: A Comparison between Audiolingual Method and Natural
Approach. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(6).