0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

Forum Page Quality Rating Guidelines

The document provides guidelines for evaluating the quality of forum pages, emphasizing the importance of assessing the overall page rather than focusing on individual posts. It outlines characteristics of different quality ratings, from extremely satisfying to the lowest, highlighting user expertise and the depth of discussions. Additionally, it advises caution when rating YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics and encourages evaluators to consider the purpose of forums as spaces for discussion and idea sharing.

Uploaded by

ahhmmeeddali66
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

Forum Page Quality Rating Guidelines

The document provides guidelines for evaluating the quality of forum pages, emphasizing the importance of assessing the overall page rather than focusing on individual posts. It outlines characteristics of different quality ratings, from extremely satisfying to the lowest, highlighting user expertise and the depth of discussions. Additionally, it advises caution when rating YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics and encourages evaluators to consider the purpose of forums as spaces for discussion and idea sharing.

Uploaded by

ahhmmeeddali66
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

fro

m
24
Forum Pages
IP

, 20 by moor
e
7 S

y
a n Page Quality Rating
ry
, J 72.1 e\chr
6
.9
ua .254 istina
.
0
un
da
y, J
an
Tips
a 1 idg #.w
u
nd r |lio 172. ary
Su o nb nb 16. 7, 2
i rid 25
w|l ge\ 4.9 024 f
0#. chr by rom
isti IP
na
Keep these considerations in mind before assigning .m
oo
an overall
re
Page Quality rating for forum pages. Be mindful of overly
penalizing a forum page with little participation.

Evaluating E-E-A-T of a
discussion.

Consider the topic of the


Evaluate the page as a user, page to determine if
not as a participant. Experience is the most
important dimension
of Trust or if Expertise is
You do not need to be an expert
important for the topic.
in the topic of the page to
evaluate the discussion. Many
users visit forums to learn about
a topic. Do not release simply
because you are unfamiliar with
the page topic.
Assess YMYL topics
more carefully for
Trust. IP
Su m
nd
a 4 fro
y, J 2 e
0#
.w|
an
u 7 , 20 by moor
1
lio 72.1 ary 7 ry .9 .
nb n ua .254 istina
rid 6.25 , 202 J a .16 hr
ge\ 4.9Remember
chr by from
4 to evaluate the d ay, 172 dge\c
n ri
isti Su nb
na
.m
page
I P as a whole.
w|l
i o
oo
re 0#.

Don’t get caught up on a single


post. Often this can be
judged by the post/comments.
Keep in mind that the object of Posters may highlight their
forums is discussion own experience/expertise.
and the sharing of ideas.

*Ratings for Forums and Q&A Pages can be found in Section 9.3 of the General Guidelines
TELUS International
confidential
This material contains information that is proprietary and confidential to TELUS International. It cannot be shared with
third parties without TELUS International written consent. DO NOT COPY. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE.
IP
Forum Pages Rating Tips
ry 7
fro

.9
m
24
, 20 by moor
.
e
Su
n ua .254 istina nd
ay,
a
, J 72.1 e\chr
6 J
a y 0# an
nd 1 idg .w| u
Su r lio 172.1 ary 7
i o nb nb
rid 6.25 , 202
w|l ge\ 4.9 4 f
0#. c b rom
Rating SomehriCharacteristic
stin y IP of Forums
a.m
oo
re
Here are some characteristics of each rating. Keep in mind this is not
exhaustive. Review the General Guidelines and examples for more
information.

● Extremely satisfying conversations.

● Posts show a great deal of effort.


Highest
● Users display Expertise and/or Experience
on the topic, such as unique insights or
experiences that many would not have
access to.

● Satisfying conversations.

● Posts show effort, in-depth discussion.


High
● Users display Expertise and/or Experience
on the topic.

● Nothing wrong, nothing special.

● May have a mix of Low and High qualities,


Medium but has meaningful discussion.
Su IP
nd r o m
ay, J ● A newly posted question 24
f
e
which there has not
0# an 20 o r
been opportunity 7, for
y discussion.
o
.w| 1 u
lio 72.1 ary 7 a ry 4.9 b ina.m
nb u 25 st
rid 6.25 , 202 y , Jan 2.16. \chri
ge\ 4.9 4 f ● Lack a 17 dgeshallow/surface-level
chr by rom ndof effort, ri
isti IP Su o nb
na
.m conversations.
w|l
i
oo
re 0#.
Low ● Shows a significant lack of respect or
decorum.

● Off topic conversations dominate the thread.

● Contains Harmful information.

Lowest ● Contradicts well-established consensus.

● Encourages harm.

*Ratings for Forums and Q&A Pages can be found in Section 9.3 of the General Guidelines
TELUS International
confidential
This material contains information that is proprietary and confidential to TELUS International. It cannot be shared with third
parties without TELUS International written consent. DO NOT COPY. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE.

You might also like