0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views18 pages

Risk Management in Financial Institutions

Chapter 1 of 'Risk Management and Financial Institutions' discusses the relationship between risk and return for both investors and companies, highlighting key concepts such as the efficient portfolio frontier and the capital asset pricing model. It also covers the risk management practices employed by various financial institutions, including banks and insurance companies, and introduces credit ratings. The chapter emphasizes the importance of understanding systematic and non-systematic risks in investment decision-making.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views18 pages

Risk Management in Financial Institutions

Chapter 1 of 'Risk Management and Financial Institutions' discusses the relationship between risk and return for both investors and companies, highlighting key concepts such as the efficient portfolio frontier and the capital asset pricing model. It also covers the risk management practices employed by various financial institutions, including banks and insurance companies, and introduces credit ratings. The chapter emphasizes the importance of understanding systematic and non-systematic risks in investment decision-making.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Introduction

Chapter 1

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 1
Introduction
 Risk vs return for investors
 The efficient portfolio frontier
 The capital asset pricing model
 Arbitrage pricing model
 Risk vs return for companies
 Risk management by financial institutions
 Commercial and investment banks
 Insurance companies
 Mutual funds
 Exchange-traded funds
 Hedge funds
 Credit ratings
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 2
Risk vs Return for Individuals

 There is a trade off between risk and expected


return
 The higher the risk, the higher the expected
return

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 3
Example (Table 1.1, page 2)
Suppose Treasuries yield 5% and the returns
for an equity investment are:

Probability Return
0.05 +50%
0.25 +30%
0.40 +10%
0.25 –10%
0.05 –30%
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 4
Example continued
 We can characterize investments by their
expected return and standard deviation of return
 For the equity investment:
 Expected return =10%
 Standard deviation of return =18.97%

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 5
Combining Two Risky Investments (page 5)

 P  w 1 1  w 2  2 P  w1
2
12  w 22  22  2 w 1 w 2 1  2

1  10 %

 2  15 %

1  16 %

 2  24 %
  0.2

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 6
Efficient Frontier of Risky Investments
(Figure 1.3, page 6)

Efficient
Expected Frontier
Return

Investments

S.D. of Return

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 7
Efficient Frontier of All Investments (Figure
1.4, page 6)

Expected J
Return
M
E(RM)
I
Previous Efficient
F Frontier
RF
New Efficient
Frontier
S.D. of Return

M

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 8
Systematic vs Non-Systematic Risk
(equation 1.3, page 8)

We can calculate the best fit linear relationship


between return from investment and return from
market

R  a  R M  

Systematic Risk (non-


Non-systematic risk
diversifiable)
(diversifiable)
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 9
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Figure 1.5,
page 9)

Expected
Return E(R)

E(RM)

E (R )  R F  [ E (R M
) RF ]
RF

Beta

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 10
Assumptions
 Investors care only about expected return and SD of return
 The ’s of different investments are independent
 Investors focus on returns over one period
 All investors can borrow or lend at the same risk-free rate
 Tax does not influence investment decisions
 All investors make the same estimates of ’s, ’s and ’s.

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 11
Alpha
 Alpha measure the extra return on a portfolio in
excess of that predicted by CAPM

E (R
so that P
)  R F  ( R M  R F )

  R P  R F  ( R M  R F )

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 12
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
 Returns depend on several factors
 We can form portfolios to eliminate the
dependence on the factors
 This leads to result that expected return is
linearly dependent on the realization of the
factors

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 13
Risk vs Return for Companies
 If shareholders care only about systematic risk, should the same
be true of company managers?
 In practice companies are concerned about total risk
 Earnings stability and company survival are important managerial
objectives
 The regulators of financial institutions are primarily interested in
total risk
 “Bankruptcy costs” arguments show that that managers may be
acting in the best interests of shareholders when they consider
total risk

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 14
What Are Bankruptcy Costs? (Business
Snapshot 1.1, page 15)

 Lost sales (There is a reluctance to buy from a


bankrupt company.)
 Key employees leave
 Legal and accounting costs

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 15
Approaches to Bank Risk Management
 Risk aggregation: aims to get rid of non-
systematic risks with diversification
 Risk decomposition: tackles risks one by one
 In practice banks use both approaches

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 16
Credit Ratings
Moody’s S&P and Fitch
Aaa AAA
Aa AA Investment
A A grade bonds
Baa BBB
Ba BB
B B
Non-investment grade
Caa CCC bonds
Ca CC
C C

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 17
Subdivisions
 Moody’s divides Aa into Aa1, Aa2, Aa3.
 S&P and Fitch divide AA into AA+, AA, and AA−
 Other rating categories are subdivided similarly
except AAA (Aaa) and the two lowest categories.

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 18

You might also like