Introduction
Chapter 1
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 1
Introduction
Risk vs return for investors
The efficient portfolio frontier
The capital asset pricing model
Arbitrage pricing model
Risk vs return for companies
Risk management by financial institutions
Commercial and investment banks
Insurance companies
Mutual funds
Exchange-traded funds
Hedge funds
Credit ratings
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 2
Risk vs Return for Individuals
There is a trade off between risk and expected
return
The higher the risk, the higher the expected
return
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 3
Example (Table 1.1, page 2)
Suppose Treasuries yield 5% and the returns
for an equity investment are:
Probability Return
0.05 +50%
0.25 +30%
0.40 +10%
0.25 –10%
0.05 –30%
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 4
Example continued
We can characterize investments by their
expected return and standard deviation of return
For the equity investment:
Expected return =10%
Standard deviation of return =18.97%
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 5
Combining Two Risky Investments (page 5)
P w 1 1 w 2 2 P w1
2
12 w 22 22 2 w 1 w 2 1 2
1 10 %
2 15 %
1 16 %
2 24 %
0.2
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 6
Efficient Frontier of Risky Investments
(Figure 1.3, page 6)
Efficient
Expected Frontier
Return
Investments
S.D. of Return
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 7
Efficient Frontier of All Investments (Figure
1.4, page 6)
Expected J
Return
M
E(RM)
I
Previous Efficient
F Frontier
RF
New Efficient
Frontier
S.D. of Return
M
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 8
Systematic vs Non-Systematic Risk
(equation 1.3, page 8)
We can calculate the best fit linear relationship
between return from investment and return from
market
R a R M
Systematic Risk (non-
Non-systematic risk
diversifiable)
(diversifiable)
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 9
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (Figure 1.5,
page 9)
Expected
Return E(R)
E(RM)
E (R ) R F [ E (R M
) RF ]
RF
Beta
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 10
Assumptions
Investors care only about expected return and SD of return
The ’s of different investments are independent
Investors focus on returns over one period
All investors can borrow or lend at the same risk-free rate
Tax does not influence investment decisions
All investors make the same estimates of ’s, ’s and ’s.
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 11
Alpha
Alpha measure the extra return on a portfolio in
excess of that predicted by CAPM
E (R
so that P
) R F ( R M R F )
R P R F ( R M R F )
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 12
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Returns depend on several factors
We can form portfolios to eliminate the
dependence on the factors
This leads to result that expected return is
linearly dependent on the realization of the
factors
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 13
Risk vs Return for Companies
If shareholders care only about systematic risk, should the same
be true of company managers?
In practice companies are concerned about total risk
Earnings stability and company survival are important managerial
objectives
The regulators of financial institutions are primarily interested in
total risk
“Bankruptcy costs” arguments show that that managers may be
acting in the best interests of shareholders when they consider
total risk
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 14
What Are Bankruptcy Costs? (Business
Snapshot 1.1, page 15)
Lost sales (There is a reluctance to buy from a
bankrupt company.)
Key employees leave
Legal and accounting costs
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 15
Approaches to Bank Risk Management
Risk aggregation: aims to get rid of non-
systematic risks with diversification
Risk decomposition: tackles risks one by one
In practice banks use both approaches
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 16
Credit Ratings
Moody’s S&P and Fitch
Aaa AAA
Aa AA Investment
A A grade bonds
Baa BBB
Ba BB
B B
Non-investment grade
Caa CCC bonds
Ca CC
C C
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 17
Subdivisions
Moody’s divides Aa into Aa1, Aa2, Aa3.
S&P and Fitch divide AA into AA+, AA, and AA−
Other rating categories are subdivided similarly
except AAA (Aaa) and the two lowest categories.
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 1, Copyright © John C. Hull 2015 18