0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views5 pages

Thermo-Fluids Assignment Marking Scheme

The document outlines the marking scheme for an individual assignment in Thermo-Fluids (AENG031-3-2), detailing learning outcomes and assessment criteria. It specifies the weightage of various components such as report documentation, analyses, discussion, and conclusion, along with grading criteria from fail to distinction. The total marks for the assignment are 100, with specific expectations for each section to evaluate students' understanding and application of fluid mechanics principles.

Uploaded by

yijay.tang25
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views5 pages

Thermo-Fluids Assignment Marking Scheme

The document outlines the marking scheme for an individual assignment in Thermo-Fluids (AENG031-3-2), detailing learning outcomes and assessment criteria. It specifies the weightage of various components such as report documentation, analyses, discussion, and conclusion, along with grading criteria from fail to distinction. The total marks for the assignment are 100, with specific expectations for each section to evaluate students' understanding and application of fluid mechanics principles.

Uploaded by

yijay.tang25
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

AENG031-3-2-TF Individual Assignment Marking Scheme Page 1 of 2

Thermo-Fluids

(AENG031-3-2)

Instruction:

 This assignment is to be carried out individually.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Upon completion of this assignment, you should be able to demonstrate the following learning outcomes:

CLO3: Evaluate fluid mechanic systems. (C5, PLO4)

PLO4: Ability to investigate well-defined problems via the identification of relevant codes and catalogues and execution of standard tests and
measurements.

Question Vs Taxonomy
AGMT Cognitive Level Psychomotor Level Affective Level
Task 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5
No.
1 100M

POM 100%

Asia Pacific Institute of Information Technology UCD2F2504ME


AENG031-3-2-TF Individual Assignment Marking Scheme Page 2 of 2

Assessment Criteria (100%):

Report documentation (85%)

a. Problem descriptions 20%

b. Design parameters of the system 10%

c. Analyses 20%

d. Discussion. 20%

e. Conclusion 10%

Tutor Assessment 20%

Asia Pacific Institute of Information Technology UCD2F2504ME


AENG031-3-2-TF Individual Assignment Marking Scheme Page 3 of 2

Name : _______________________________ Intake : UCD2F2409ME

Criteria Fail Marginal Fail Pass Credit Distinction


0-7 8-9 10 - 12 13 – 15 16 - 20

 Not done  Able to explain  The aspect is


 Barely able to explain  Able to explain briefly
 Very few are sufficiently on the explained in great
Problem descriptions the aspect on the aspect.
related to the aspect. detail.
 Few are related to the  Some are related to the
(20 marks) complex
complex engineering complex engineering
 Mostly are related to  All are related to the
[CLO3-PLO4] engineering the complex complex engineering
problem mention in the problem mention in the
problem mention in engineering problem problem mention in
assignment. assignment.
the assignment. mention in the the assignment.
assignment.

0–3 4 5-6 7 8 – 10
 Able to explain  The aspect is
 Not done.  Barely able to explain  Able to explain briefly
sufficiently on the explained in great
Design parameters of the  Those discussed the aspect. on the aspect.
aspect. detail.
can be merely  Those discussed are  Those discussed are
system.  Those discussed are  Those discussed are
linked to the loosely related to the somewhat related to the
(10 marks) mostly related to the closely related to the
complex complex engineering complex engineering
[CLO3-PLO4] complex engineering complex engineering
engineering problem mention in the problem mention in the
problem mention in problem mention in
problem mention in assignment. assignment.
the assignment. the assignment.
the assignment.

Analyses 0-7 8-9 10 - 12 13 – 15 16 - 20


(20 marks)  Design not shown.  Design parameters  Design parameters  Design parameters  Design parameters
[CLO3-PLO4]  Design not shown are chosen after shown are chosen after shown are chosen shown are chosen
described. analysis of a few analysis of a few after analysis of a few after thorough
 Design is not variables. variables. variables. analysis of all the
innovative  Selection of components  Selection of components  Selection of appropriate variables.
in the design are not in the design are not components in the  Selection of
justified using justified using design are justified components in the
appropriate facts. appropriate facts. using appropriate design are justified
 Design is described in  Design is described in facts. using appropriate
general terms. detail.  Design is described in facts.
 Design is not innovative  Design somewhat detail.  Design is described in
innovative  Design can be detail.
considered innovative  Design is innovative

Asia Pacific Institute of Information Technology UCD2F2504ME


AENG031-3-2-TF Individual Assignment Marking Scheme Page 4 of 2

0-7 8-9 10 - 12 13 – 15 16 - 20
 Did not summarise  Summarised the
 Did not summarise the  Did not summarise the
the design and design and
design and evaluation design and evaluation
 General discussion evaluation process. evaluation.
Discussion  Irrelevant
process. process.
 Related the  Related the design
(20 marks)  Did not related the  Did not related the
description of the evaluation and the and evaluation to the
evaluation and the evaluation and the
[CLO3-PLO4] design, evaluation design to the complex complex engineering
design to the complex design to the complex
Discussion and innovativeness engineering problem. problem.
engineering problem. engineering problem.
(20 marks) of the solution to the  Described the  Described the
 Did not described the  Described the
complex innovativeness of the innovativeness of the
[CLO3-PLO4] engineering problem
innovativeness of the innovativeness of the
solution to the solution to the
solution to the complex solution to the complex
complex engineering complex engineering
engineering problem engineering problem
problem problem

0–3 4 5-6 7 8 – 10
 Conclusion not done  Poor and weak
 Average conclusion with
 Sufficient conclusion  Accurate conclusion
or not related to the conclusion drawn and but some points are is made on the
Conclusion innovative solution mostly not related to the
one or two points are
unrelated to the innovative solution to
(10 marks) related to the innovation
to the complex innovation solution to innovative solution to the complex
solution to the complex
[CLO3-PLO4] engineering the complex
engineering problem.
the complex engineering problem.
problem. engineering problem. engineering problem.

0-7 8-9 10 - 12 13 – 15 16 - 20
 Able to somewhat
 Able to explain the
 Not able explain the  Able to somewhat explain explain the solution
solution to the
solution to the complex the solution to the to the complex
complex engineering
engineering problem complex engineering engineering problem
Tutor Assessment  Did not turn up for problem logically.
logically. problem logically. logically.
tutor assessment.  Able to justify the
(20 marks)  Not able to justify the  Able to justify some of  Able to justify the
explanations and
[CLO3-PLO4] explanations and the explanations and explanations and
answers on the
answers on the solution answers on the solution to answers on the
solution to the
to the complex the complex engineering solution to the
complex engineering
engineering problem problem complex engineering
problem.
problem

Asia Pacific Institute of Information Technology UCD2F2504ME


AENG031-3-2-TF Individual Assignment Marking Scheme Page 5 of 2
Total mark: ______/100 Grade_________

Asia Pacific Institute of Information Technology UCD2F2504ME

You might also like