0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views3 pages

Understanding Logical Arguments

The document outlines the structure of logical arguments, including how to write verbal arguments symbolically and the distinction between valid and sound arguments. It introduces famous forms of valid arguments such as Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, and Syllogism, while also discussing how to determine the validity of arguments using truth tables. Additionally, it highlights common fallacies that lead to invalid arguments.

Uploaded by

1760358
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views3 pages

Understanding Logical Arguments

The document outlines the structure of logical arguments, including how to write verbal arguments symbolically and the distinction between valid and sound arguments. It introduces famous forms of valid arguments such as Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, and Syllogism, while also discussing how to determine the validity of arguments using truth tables. Additionally, it highlights common fallacies that lead to invalid arguments.

Uploaded by

1760358
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2-5: Forms of Logical Arguments

Logical Argument: A set of premises and a conclusion.

Writing Verbal Arguments Symbolically

Assign variables to each simple, non-negated statement.


Stack the premises and conclusion vertically, like an elementary-school addition problem. Separate the
premises and the conclusion with a horizontal line.
Use .. to represent “therefore” in your conclusion.

Verbal Argument Define variables Symbolic Argument


R = it’s raining
If it rains, you'll get wet.
C = it’s cold
If it’s cold, you'll shiver.
It’s raining or it’s cold. W = you're wet
Therefore, you’re wet or you're shivering.
S$ = you're shivering

If ! am sick, then | do not go to school


§ = lam sick
that day.
| did not go to school today. G = 1 go to school today
Therefore, | am sick.

All toasters are made of gold. T = an item is a toaster


All items made of gold are time-travel G = an item is made of gold
devices.
Therefore, all toasters are time-travel D = an item is a time-travel
devices. device

Truth vs. Validity of Arguments


Form of Argument
Valid Arguments:
Good Bad
An argument is valid if accepted forms of reasoning are
used.
2 Valid ond | \nvadid
The conclusion necessarily follows from the premises, and

g | Sound | (but sun)


pa \
is true whenever the premises are true
An argument is invalid if unaccepted forms of reasoning
are used. The conclusion does not necessarily follow from
the premises.
o Also called a “fallacy” a Y unsound \nvawid
Sound Arguments:

An argument is sound if all the premises are true.


2] (our valid) Umiourd
An argument is unsound if one or more of the premises
are false.
Famous Forms of Valid Arguments

Law of Detachment / Modus Ponens “Mode That Affirms”

If you accept p-> : as true and Example: If | study, then | get good grades.
you accept Pp as true, then you
I study.
must logically accept Q as true.
Conclusion:

Symbols: Therefive, Le oer


P>%
Pp

Law of the Contrapositive / Modus Tollens “Mode That Denies”


ee eee ee ee ee ee ee
If you accept D me as true and Example: i
7 If | study, then I get good grades.
1
I
you accept nA as true, then you i}
i | did not get a good grade,
!

must logically accept — ) as true. !


1

i Conclusion:
!

Symbols: Therefore, TL did mr sual


I
!
I
i}
i}
1

Law of Syllogism sees es Serie + ey ee Y aS 12 Rm a 1 Po


; If you give a mouse a cookie, he’ll ask for
If you accept p~4 as true and Example: ; .
- some milk.
you accept 4 —>y_as true, then you
: If a mouse asks for some milk, he’ll ask for a
must logically accept pir as true. ' straw. :

' Conclusion:
Symbols: r i
pina a Therefire, © Yor. ive oO MGUSE
a Code, yun nee (| ES
ask at-for
De ee ee ee ee ee i ee i -

Determining Validity

The three forms above are not the only forms of valid logical arguments; there are many, many more! To
determine whether any logical argument is valid, check its truth values using a truth table.

Example: The cake has chocolate frosting or it has vanilla frosting. CV V


The cake does not have vanilla frosting. ~~

Therefore, the case has chocolate frosting.

Argument as a compound conditional: [(premise 1) A (premise 2) A (premise 3) ... ] > conclusion

(tw) a aV Oo
Truth Table:

nJala}alto
milinaml/odaialis

TN


The argument is valid if the last column is all ).
Otherwise, the argument is invalid.

Famous Forms of Invalid Arguments Weg


Fallacy of the Converse
[ay
he

po
A

hb_
m1A])m]
a
my

p FL miss the lous, then


my

Lim late for school,


At am lle for Schiod
arherehre, L mised $e bus.
Fallacy of the Inverse
Symbols:
AYA PRN pp
=lal=lahe

P74
+

i
re
Example:

AIF
L miss the buj
Hon Lim Ime for schodl,
AT dik nyt twiss the lous,
O therefore Tan fot ge tor Scheel

You might also like