0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views14 pages

Aspirin Synthesis Experiment Results

The experiment focused on synthesizing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) from salicylic acid and acetic anhydride, achieving a high purity of 91.27% but a low yield of 41.18%. The melting point of the synthesized ASA ranged from 131.2–137.4°C, aligning closely with the standard melting point, indicating effective synthesis despite procedural inefficiencies. The study highlighted the importance of optimizing laboratory techniques to enhance yield and product recovery while confirming the synthesis through Beer’s Law calibration.

Uploaded by

Aaditya Bhola
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views14 pages

Aspirin Synthesis Experiment Results

The experiment focused on synthesizing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) from salicylic acid and acetic anhydride, achieving a high purity of 91.27% but a low yield of 41.18%. The melting point of the synthesized ASA ranged from 131.2–137.4°C, aligning closely with the standard melting point, indicating effective synthesis despite procedural inefficiencies. The study highlighted the importance of optimizing laboratory techniques to enhance yield and product recovery while confirming the synthesis through Beer’s Law calibration.

Uploaded by

Aaditya Bhola
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Name: Aaditya Bhola

Student Number:169071771
Date Report Submitted: 21/11/2024
Partner Name: Noah Lee
Lab Section: 6
Name of IA/TA: Caillen Goenadi

EXPERIMENT 5: ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID (ASPIRIN) SYNTHESIS

Abstract:
The experiment was the synthesis of aspirin through the reaction of salicylic acid with acetic
[Link] was 0.17g of “impure” ASA that was put through the filtration of a Hirsch
funnel. The remaining prepared ASA was mixed with NaOH, combined with FeCl₃, and the
absorbance was measured using a calorimeter. The synthesized ASA exhibited a melting point
range of 131.2–137.4°C, closely matching the standard ASA melting point of 130.9–143.1°C,
indicating high purity. Calculations revealed a percentage purity of 91.27%, demonstrating that
the reaction was effective at producing a high-quality product. However, the percentage yield of
the synthesis was 41.18%, reflecting inefficiencies likely due to product loss during transfer and
incomplete reaction. The findings suggest that while the synthesis was successful in producing a
pure sample of ASA, procedural improvements could significantly enhance yield. This
experiment highlights the effectiveness of the esterification process for synthesizing ASA and
underscores the importance of optimizing laboratory techniques to improve overall efficiency
and product recovery.

Procedure:
“For the procedure, see lab manual (CH 110 Laboratory, Manual Fall 2024.) . Experiment
[Link] Acid (Aspirin) Synthesis. Pages 110-113. In this experiment no deviations were
made. The following procedure is for use of the Digimelt station specified in Part C of the lab
manual’s procedure.

Preparation of Aspirin Sample for Melting Point Determination

Part 1:

1. Weighing and Powdering the Sample:


○ Weigh approximately 2-3 mg of aspirin using an analytical balance.
○ If the aspirin sample is in tablet form, crush it to a fine powder with a mortar and
pestle.
2. Filling the Capillary Tube:
○ Use a spatula to transfer a small amount (1-2 mm) of powdered aspirin into a
capillary tube. Ensure it is packed evenly by gently tapping the tube on the bench.

Part 2: Determination of Melting Point Range Using DigiMelt

1. Setting Up the DigiMelt Device:


○ Turn on the DigiMelt device and set the starting temperature to 20-25°C below
the expected melting point of aspirin (135-136°C).
○ Set the DigiMelt to increase the temperature at a controlled rate of 2°C per minute
for accurate results.
2. Measuring the Melting Point Range:
○ Insert the capillary tube into the DigiMelt device.
○ Record the temperature at the onset of melting (when the sample first begins to
liquefy).
○ Continue observing and note the temperature at which the sample is completely
liquefied.
○ The melting point range is the interval from the onset to the complete melting
temperature.
Results:

Table1: Observations of Solutions Before, During, and After From Part A-E
Part Specified Solutions Process

A SalicylicAcid: PhosphoricAcid: Acetic Mixture Before:White, powder,fine


White, clear, colorless, Anhydride: During:Liquid, milky, opaque
crystalline, liquid clear, After:Gradually white crystal lattice covered the
grains. colorless, top of the solution's surface.
liquid

B Mixture: Before:White,opaque,paste with small solid crystals particles,


During: Half transparent, white opaque, liquid with small solid crystals particles.
After :Dry, white, sandy, granules.

C Before:Dry, white, sandy, granules.


During: Half clear ,liquid with some powder like solid in the bottom
After:

D NaOH: FeCl₃: ASA: Mixture:


Clear, Yellow, clear, White, Upon adding FeCl₃, a transparent
colorless, liquid opaque, Reddish-Brown liquid was formed.
liquid granular
solid

E A:Dark Brown With Red Hue, liquid, transparent


B:Brown, liquid ,transparent
C:Light Brown, liquid, transparent
D:Light Brown/yellow, liquid, transparent
E:Yellow With A Light Brown Hue, liquid, transparent
OUR SAMPLE: Reddish-Brown liquid, with light hue, transparent.
Table 2: Data collected to be interpreted
Mass of Salicylic Acid (g) 0.17

Volume of Acetic Anhydride (mL) 0.34

Mass of Filter Paper (g) 0.79

Mass Of“impure”ASA+FilterPaper (g) 0.89

Mass Prepared “impure” ASA (g) 0.1

Melting Point Range of Prepared ASA (°C) 131.2 → 137.4

Melting Point Range of Standard ASA (°C) 130.9 → 143.1

Table 3: Absorbance Reading for each sample of ASA provided + Prepared sample
Sample Absorbance Reading

Sample A 1.35

Sample B 1.10

Sample C 0.82

Sample D 0.53

Sample E 0.27

Prepared ASA 0.59


QUESTION AND CALCULATIONS:

Q1)
Q2) Sample Calculation #1: To determine the Concentration and Mass of Pure ASA prepared.
Q3)

Sample Calculation #2: To determine % purity of prepared ASA sample


Q4)

Table 4: Standard Reaction table For Synthesis of ASA


Reactants Products

C₇H₆O₃+ C₄H₆O₃ (H₃PO₄) → C₉H₈O₄ + CH₃COOH

Reactants C₇H₆O₃ C₄H₆O₃ C₉H₈O₄ CH₃COOH

Molar Mass (g/mol) 138.12 102.09 180.16 g 60.052

Mass (g) 0.17 N/a N/a N/a

Moles (0.17/138.12) 0.00353 0.00123 0.00123


= 0.00123

Volume (mL) N/a 0.34 N/a N/a

Mass of salicylic acid: 0.16g


Volume of Acetic Anhydride: 0.34mL
Density of Acetic Anhydride: 1.08g/mL
Mass of pure ASA: 91.27mg
Molar mass of salicylic acid: 138.12g/mol
Molar mass of acetic anhydride: 102.09g/mol
Molar mass of ASA: 180.157g/mol
Academic Integrity:

I hereby affirm that the work presented in this report is my own and has been completed in
adherence to the principles of academic integrity as outlined by Wilfrid Laurier University. I
have neither given nor received unauthorized assistance on this assignment and have properly
acknowledged all sources of information, data, and ideas that are not my own.

I understand that breaches of academic integrity, including but not limited to plagiarism,
falsification of data, or unauthorized collaboration, are serious offenses and are subject to
disciplinary action as per university policies.

By submitting this work, I affirm my commitment to uphold the highest standards of honesty,
trust, and responsibility in my academic pursuits.
Discussion:

The synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), commonly known as aspirin, was carried out with
the goal of assessing the efficiency of the reaction in terms of yield, purity, and overall process.
Throughout the experiment, careful observations were made at each stage of the synthesis,
followed by analyses to determine the percentage yield and percentage purity of the final
product. The findings highlight the successes and limitations of the process, as well as the impact
of potential sources of error. Overally, this experiment can be considered a success, as, even
though we only yielded 91.27 mg out of the potential 221.63 mg, we had a relatively high purity
of 91.27%, which is arguably, most significant in a synthesis experiment.

The experiment began with salicylic acid, a white crystalline solid, and acetic anhydride, a clear,
colorless liquid, as the primary reactants. Phosphoric acid served as the catalyst for the reaction.
Initially, the reaction mixture was milky and opaque, indicating the progression of the
esterification reaction. As the reaction proceeded, a white crystalline lattice began forming on the
surface of the solution, marking the crystallization of acetylsalicylic acid.

Upon cooling and filtration, the intermediate product was observed to transition from a pasty
texture to a dry, sandy crystalline form. A qualitative test using ferric chloride (FeCl₃) confirmed
the presence of ASA through the formation of a reddish-brown transparent solution, indicative of
the phenolic group characteristic of ASA. The Beer’s Law calibration curve and the absorbance
readings of the prepared ASA sample further validated the synthesis and provided an accurate
concentration measurement of the product.

Beer’s Law establishes a direct relationship between the absorbance (A) of a solution and its
concentration (C), described mathematically as:

A=ε⋅l⋅C

Where ε is the molar absorptivity, l is the path length of the cuvette (typically 1 cm), and C is the
concentration. In this experiment, a Beer’s Law calibration curve was generated by measuring
the absorbance of standard ASA solutions at known concentrations. The linearity of the
calibration plot (with a regression equation y=6.448x+0.0015) confirmed that Beer’s Law was
obeyed, as absorbance increases proportionally with concentration, demonstrating through a
linear calibration curve, the validity of the analytical method.

This relationship was crucial for determining the concentration of the synthesized ASA solution.
By substituting the absorbance value of the prepared ASA (A=0.59) into the calibration equation,
the concentration of the ASA solution was calculated to be 0.09127 mg/mL. Subsequent dilution
calculations and volume adjustments were applied to determine the total mass of ASA in the
sample, ultimately leading to the calculation of the percentage purity.
Thus, Beer’s Law not only validated the quality of the synthesized ASA but also provided the
quantitative basis for purity and mass calculations.

The theoretical mass of ASA was calculated to be 221.63 mg, while the actual mass obtained
from the synthesis was 91.27 mg, resulting in a percentage yield of 41.18%. This low yield
highlights potential inefficiencies in the reaction or procedural losses, such as incomplete
reaction or loss of product during filtration or transfer.

The purity of the synthesized ASA was evaluated based on the mass of the pure product relative
to the total mass of the impure sample. The calculated purity was 91.27%, suggesting that the
synthesized ASA was of high quality, with only minimal impurities likely resulting from
unreacted reagents or environmental contamination. This high purity is further supported by the
melting point analysis, which showed a range of 131.2–137.4°C, closely aligning with the
standard ASA melting point of 130.9–143.1°C.

Several sources of error were identified during the experiment, which could have impacted the
results in different ways:

Loss of Product During Filtration or Transfer: One of the primary contributors to the low
yield was the physical loss of product during the filtration or transfer processes. Inefficient
transfer of the solid ASA from the reaction vessel to the filter paper or from the filter paper to the
weighing apparatus would directly reduce the mass of the final product, resulting in a lower
percentage yield.

Incomplete Reaction: Another significant source of error was the possibility of an incomplete
reaction. The stoichiometric imbalance between salicylic acid and acetic anhydride, insufficient
mixing, or suboptimal reaction conditions could have left some salicylic acid unreacted. This
would lower the actual mass of ASA obtained, negatively affecting both yield and purity.

Impurities and Environmental Contamination: Impurities in the starting materials or


contamination during the drying and handling processes could also affect the results. For
instance, residual moisture or dust particles could increase the apparent mass of the impure ASA
sample, thereby reducing the calculated percentage purity. Such contamination could also
obscure the melting point range, making it less definitive.
Conclusion:

The synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid yielded a product with a high purity of 91.27%,
demonstrating that the reaction effectively produced ASA with minimal contamination.
However, the percentage yield of 41.18% reflects areas for improvement in the reaction and
procedural methods. The linearity of the Beer’s Law calibration curve further validated the
results, enabling accurate quantification of the product concentration and [Link], the
experiment was successful in achieving the synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid and provided
valuable insights into the reaction mechanics and analytical techniques used to evaluate its
outcomes.

References:

[Link]

CH 110 Laboratory, Manual Fall 2024

Common questions

Powered by AI

The synthesized acetylsalicylic acid had a purity of 91.27%, which is considered high and is demonstrated by a melting point range of 131.2–137.4°C, aligning closely with the standard ASA melting point range of 130.9–143.1°C. This purity was determined using both melting point analysis and the Beer’s Law calibration curve for absorbance measurement. The consistency of the observed melting point range with the standard ASA indicates minimal impurities. Furthermore, the absorbance of the synthesized ASA was measured and compared against a calibration curve to confirm the concentration and, consequently, the purity of the sample .

The experimental percentage yield of 41.18% was significantly lower than the theoretical yield, considering the initial mass of salicylic acid used and its complete conversion to ASA. The purity, however, was relatively high at 91.27%, closely matching the expected standard purity. These comparisons indicate that while the reaction conditions were successfully optimized for purity, procedural inefficiencies or loss mechanisms affected the yield. Improving these aspects could lead to a more efficient overall synthesis by minimizing product loss and ensuring complete conversion of reactants .

The procedure for determining the melting point range of synthesized aspirin involved setting up a DigiMelt device to increase temperature at a controlled rate of 2°C per minute. A small amount of powdered aspirin was placed in a capillary tube, which was then inserted into the device. The onset of melting and the temperature at which the sample became completely liquefied were recorded to define the melting point range. This measurement is crucial in evaluating purity, as pure substances have a specific melting point range, while impurities tend to lower and broaden the range. In this experiment, the observed melting point range of 131.2–137.4°C aligned well with the standard, indicating a high purity level of the ASA .

The low percentage yield of 41.18% in the synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid is attributed to two main factors: loss of product during filtration or transfer, and incomplete reaction. During the transfer processes, solid ASA can be physically lost, which reduces the final mass of the product. Incomplete reaction can occur due to stoichiometric imbalance between salicylic acid and acetic anhydride, insufficient mixing, or suboptimal reaction conditions, leading to unreacted salicylic acid. To address these issues in future experiments, more efficient transfer techniques can be adopted, such as using more precise equipment for filtration and transfer. Additionally, optimizing reaction conditions, such as ensuring complete mixing and correct stoichiometric ratios, could enhance the completeness of the reaction .

Phosphoric acid served as a catalyst in the synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid, facilitating the esterification reaction between salicylic acid and acetic anhydride. The choice of catalyst is critical as it influences the reaction rate without being consumed, thereby enhancing the efficiency and yield of the process. Phosphoric acid, being a relatively safe and effective acid catalyst, improved the reaction by lowering the activation energy needed for ester formation, allowing for the successful synthesis of ASA while minimizing unwanted side reactions .

Monitoring the reaction mixture's color change is significant as it provides visual cues about the reaction's progress and completion. Initially, the mixture was milky and opaque, indicative of the ongoing esterification process. As the reaction proceeded and ASA crystallized, the mixture's physical state transformed, signaling key stages such as the formation of ASA and completion of the synthesis. Observing such changes enables prompt adjustments if unexpected variations occur, ensuring reaction reliability and product quality .

The potential sources of error in the ASA synthesis include: loss of product during filtration or transfer, incomplete reaction, and impurities or environmental contamination. Loss of product during the filtration or transfer could lead to a decreased mass of final ASA, reducing the percentage yield. An incomplete reaction due to a stoichiometric imbalance, insufficient mixing, or suboptimal conditions could mean that not all salicylic acid was converted to ASA, impacting both yield and purity negatively. Impurities or contamination, such as moisture or dust, could alter the perceived mass of impure ASA, thereby skewing purity calculations, and obscure melting point readings, which would affect the purity assessment .

Beer’s Law played a crucial role in the aspirin synthesis experiment as it was used to determine the concentration of the synthesized acetylsalicylic acid through absorbance measurements. Beer’s Law establishes that the absorbance of a solution is directly proportional to its concentration. In this experiment, a Beer’s Law calibration curve was constructed using standard ASA solutions of known concentrations. The linearity of the calibration plot confirmed the law's validity, allowing for the accurate use of the equation y=6.448x+0.0015 to calculate the concentration of the synthesized ASA, where y is absorbance and x is concentration. This analytical technique enabled the determination of purity by linking the absorbance of the prepared ASA to its concentration, thereby validating the synthesis quality .

The use of a Hirsch funnel in the filtration process helps in obtaining a purer product by efficiently separating the solid acetylsalicylic acid from unreacted reagents and by-products dissolved in the liquid phase. The design of the Hirsch funnel aids in quick filtration and minimizes product loss, contributing to higher purity of the isolated ASA. However, incomplete filtration or retention of impurities can still affect the final purity, making it essential to ensure proper technique during use .

The reaction conditions, such as temperature, mixing, and reactant concentrations, impacted the physical state of acetylsalicylic acid during synthesis. Initially, the mixture was milky and opaque, indicating the progression of the esterification reaction. As the reaction proceeded, it crystallized, forming a white crystalline lattice on the solution's surface. After cooling and filtering, the ASA transitioned from a pasty texture to a dry, sandy crystalline form. The changes in physical state were indicative of the reaction's advancement and ASA crystallization, crucial for obtaining the final solid product .

You might also like