0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views6 pages

Rwanda's Child Protection Progress 2024

Rwanda has made significant progress in child protection, achieving 85.6% birth registration and successfully de-institutionalizing over 90% of children in care since 2012. However, challenges remain, including high rates of violence against children, adolescent pregnancies, and a lack of adequate support for children with disabilities and those without parental care. The child protection system is underfunded and lacks a cohesive data management system, necessitating further development and resource allocation to improve outcomes for vulnerable children.

Uploaded by

gmdukabale
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views6 pages

Rwanda's Child Protection Progress 2024

Rwanda has made significant progress in child protection, achieving 85.6% birth registration and successfully de-institutionalizing over 90% of children in care since 2012. However, challenges remain, including high rates of violence against children, adolescent pregnancies, and a lack of adequate support for children with disabilities and those without parental care. The child protection system is underfunded and lacks a cohesive data management system, necessitating further development and resource allocation to improve outcomes for vulnerable children.

Uploaded by

gmdukabale
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

© UNICEF/UN0550415

January 2024

Child Protection in Rwanda


A situation analysis

Key achievements Key strategic issues

h Rwanda is on course to achieve universal, free h Violence against children remains high, with
birth registration, with 85.6 per cent of births physical violence affecting 60 per cent of boys and
registered in 2019/20, up from 56 per cent in 2014- 37 per cent of girls, and sexual violence affecting
2015. 24 per cent of girls and 10 per cent of boys in 2017;
more recent data are required.
h De-institutionalization has been a major success
with over 90 per cent of the 3,782 children who were h Adolescent pregnancies are a cause for concern;
in institutional care since 2012 now placed in family in 2020, 5 per cent of 15–19-year-old girls were
care. mothers or pregnant with their first child. In 2023,
there have been around 2,000 new adolescent
h The child protection workforce continues to be pregnancies every month.
developed; workforce around care reform is now
available for all child protection work. h Some children remain deprived of family and
parental care: while there are no recent data on
h There are now 29,674 community child children on the streets, over 4,000 were reunified with
protection volunteers, known as Inshuti z’ their families in 2020 and 2021 during the COVID-19
Umuryango or just IZU (Friends of the Family), pandemic, but close to 2,000 children with disabilities
50 per cent of whom are female. remain in institutional care.

h Rwanda has recently developed and launched h Children with disabilities are disproportionally
a National Child Protection Case Management discriminated against due to negative cultural
Framework to standardize and coordinate service perceptions and social stigma, a lack of specific
provision. interventions for their special needs and parental care
support, financial barriers and higher poverty rates.

h Children in conflict with the law face punitive


justice due to processes and practices that are less
sensitive to their needs, and do not divert children to
more friendly processes.
UNICEF/2021/Nzaramba

h Child protection is underfunded; there are no


child protection social workers in the civil
service structure, with the lack of budget tagging
complicating analysis of child protection financing.
2 Child protection in Rwanda:
A situation analysis

1. Introduction
Every child without distinction by gender or any other characteristic has the right to grow up free from
violence, exploitation, abuse, neglect and harmful practices. This right is embedded in the Convention on
the Rights of the Child (CRC) and multiple Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets. For example,
SDG target 16.2 commits the international community to “end abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all
forms of violence against children”; target 5.2 to “eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls”;
and SDG targets 16.9 and 17.19 are intended to ensure that all children have their births registered.

Rwanda’s child protection system is currently developing and strengthening. Considerable efforts
have been made to strengthen key pillars of the child protection system. However, more needs to be
done as the system solidifies and progresses, to provide an ecosystem of support, care and
protection for all children in Rwanda.

2. The child protection system


Rwanda has progressively developed legal and policy provisions related to child protection. Law 71/2018 on the
Protection of the Child and the Integrated Child Rights Policy (ICRP) – along with several other legal and policy
instruments – provide for both prevention and response systems, including addressing cultural norms to prevent
violence and abuse, and the criminalization of sexual violence. National legislation also includes specific provisions for
victims of crime, witnesses, children in contact with the law, those placed in alternative family care, children affected by
divorce and family law-related matters, children in institutions, orphaned and other vulnerable children, and children of
parents accused of crimes.1

The ICRP developed in 2011 includes the right to protection and children’s rights to be free from violence, abuse,
exploitation and neglect. The ICRP also establishes a national system for reporting of, referral of and response to child
protection cases. Further, it outlines conditions for children to gain Rwandan nationality for non-Rwandans and
provisions for age-appropriate sexual and reproductive health education.2 The National Child Development Agency
(NCDA) is charged with coordinating the continuum of child protection services through relevant policies and
guidelines, and promoting stakeholders’ synergic engagement
in the wider child protection system. The NCDA is guided by the ICRP Strategic Plan 2019- 2024 in
the coordination and implementation of child protection priority actions.

The roles and responsibilities of different actors are often not identified. At national level, the
Ministry of Gender and Family Promotion is charged with the overall coordination of child protection
policy implementation, but legal provisions for children are spread across different laws and policies,
requiring coordination across sector ministries. Child protection is multisectoral by nature and thus falls
within the mandate and responsibilities of several government institutions.

Rwanda has recently developed and launched a National Child Protection Case Management
Framework. Child protection service provision, including service coordination, has continued to
develop over time, culminating in the development and launch in 2023 of the National Child Protection
Case Management Framework. The Framework enables an integrated response and improves service
coordination, child-centredness, accountability and efficiency. More support is needed to staff and
resource the system as it rolls out nationally.

1 National Child Development Agency (NCDA) (2023) Assessment of the Child Protection System in Rwanda
2 Ibid.

Figure 1: 1 Identify Develop / update Implement case plan


The child all CP cases case plan / refer for services
protection case 6 7
management
system in 2 Record all
Rwanda CP cases Case
conferencing Supportive Close case

3 Screen reported supervision 9


Refer non VENA cases
VENA cases 8
for support 5
services
4 Intake VENA Assess / Monitor and

cases to CPCM re-assess case follow up / review

CP: Child Protection | VENA: Vulnerability and Essential Needs Assessment | CPCM: Child Protection Case Management
3 Child protection in Rwanda:
A situation analysis

Figure 2: The structure of the social workfoce in Rwanda’ IZU Roles


Promoting equal rights of
children with disabilities
Inshuti z’Umuryango (IZU) 29,674
Curbing early
pregnancies and school
Social worker / Professional dropouts
social workforce
psychologist at
district level Protecting children from
District violence, abuse, neglect
1 IZU and exploitation (cases
beyond their capacity
coordinator Para-professional are referred to child
per sector social workforce
protection officers)
Sector (IZU)
1 IZU
Addressing family
conflicts
coordinator
per cell
Cell Promoting positive
2 IZUs behaviours and social
change
per village
(1 woman,1 man)
Village Supporting reunification
of children separated
from their families

The child protection workforce is still developing. Rwanda developed its first professional child
protection workforce as part of care reform and this workforce has now successfully transitioned to
be available for all child protection work (see Figure 2). However, the workforce is yet to be
integrated into government structures, and remains inadequate to implement key strategies like the
National Child Protection Case Management Framework.

Rwanda’s community child protection workforce – the Inshuti z’Umuryango (Friends of the Family, or IZU)
– has been a major success. Established in 2016, there are now 29,674 IZU volunteers, 50 per cent of
whom are female. Two IZUs are available in each village in Rwanda. Among other tasks, the IZUs are
charged with monitoring and following up with affected children and their families. In their communities,
IZUs promote positive parenting, raise awareness of child rights issues and how to report child protection
issues and provide basic counselling that can prevent conflict and limit the risk of violence. The IZUs also
interact with foster carers to support the reintegration of children into communities, including children with
disabilities. Use of existing community events increases their capacity to reach a larger number of people.

IZUs also refer children and families to government child protection welfare officers (CWPOs) or the
relevant service providers. However, there is still a major gap when it comes to professional workforce,
as CPWOs do not yet have a statutory role in the public service structure, weakening their role and
position, and in turn reducing their effectiveness and increasing turnover.

Child protection is underfunded. Budgetary allocations for child protection have remained very low
and continue to decline. There is no child protection budget tagging in all sectors that include child
protection within their mandates, making it difficult to trace and produce analytical work on child
protection financing. However, UNICEF research has found that only 6 per cent of financing for the two
child protection-focused sub-programmes in the government’s 2022-2023 budget came from domestic
resources, and the rest was funded by international partners.

Rwanda lacks a single data management system for reporting or response by various groups of
professionals working on child protection cases. Multiple systems are used to report cases, including at
district level, where reports on cases are prepared using different digitalized systems or even ad hoc
non-digital formats. At national level, a Disability Management Information System (DMIS) is under
development for disability-specific data. Crucially, there is no system to analyse and break down data
that have been collected due to interoperability challenges as oftentimes different information systems
are not designed to share information.
4 Child protection in Rwanda:
A situation analysis

3. Violence and abuse


Violence against children is slightly above the regional average – 60 per cent of boys and 37 per cent of girls in
Rwanda experience physical violence. Sexual violence rates are also high, with 24 per cent of girls and 10 per cent of
boys experiencing sexual violence before age 18. School-based violence is an issue of concern as 10 per cent of first
incidence of sexual violence for girls takes place in a school setting.3 Violence-related risks are on the increase due to
threats posed by online violence. Any form of violence against children often leads to emotional trauma for children,
with lifelong implications on mental health, early pregnancy, sexual risk taking and perpetration of violence. 57 per cent
of young women who had experienced emotional abuse as children had considered suicide compared to 30 per cent
who had not.4

Social norms contribute to creating an environment in which some forms of violence against children and
gender-based violence (GBV) are tolerated or even accepted. Episodes of violence are often kept within
the family while patriarchal rules can at times condone the use of violence by men.

The community volunteer workforce for childcare and Isange One Stop Centres provide free multisectoral
services to victims of GBV and child abuse. During 2022, 13,340 children (of whom 12,005 were girls)
were referred for professional services through Isange centres and health centres after they experienced
violence. It is widely recognized5 that this number represents only a small proportion of the child
protection violations that occur and that the child protection and welfare workforce available in the
country is insufficient.

There are limited services with specialized professionals to prevent and respond to violence – including
violence against children and GBV, particularly at local level – and to provide mental health and
psychosocial support. However, the IZU for childcare, and Isange One Stop Centres, provide free
multisectoral services to victims of GBV and child abuse. The Isange centres are present in all referral
hospital and provide medical, psychological, legal services and referrals.

4. Teenage pregnancy
Teenage pregnancies are a cause of concern. While prevalence of early pregnancy is lower than regional averages,
in 2020, an estimated 5.2 per cent of adolescent girls (aged 15-19 years) were mothers or pregnant with their first
child. A 2023 position paper by the National Child Development Agency (NCDA) reports around 2,000 cases of
adolescent pregnancies per month, with numbers still rising. Limited Rwanda-specific evidence shows that poverty and
lower economic status increase the risk of becoming pregnant early for girls. Poverty and lower education levels are
also associated with some forms of sexual and gender-based violence, and associated risks of unwanted pregnancies.
Adolescent girls are not always comfortable accessing and using the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services
that they need, due to service providers’ attitudes. Knowledge and skills on SRH rights among adolescent girls and
boys remain limited, with widespread misconceptions and taboos. Many pregnant adolescents and adolescent mothers
have experienced violence. However, adolescent girls still face barriers to reporting violence and accessing justice and
GBV services. Pregnant adolescents and adolescent mothers face difficulties in staying in school or accessing
alternative learning pathways. Adolescent mothers lack options to care for their newborn children and normally face
economic challenges in raising their children with limited support.

5. Children without parental care


In Rwanda, concerns persist about children deprived of family or parental care, with 9 per cent
of children not living with either parent. 6 Over 2,800 children were living and working on the streets in
2017 and most of them – 63 per cent – were not in school as a result. 7

Between 2020 and 2021, 4,186 children connected to the streets were placed in family care, indicating
that the numbers have doubled since the 2017 survey. The current approach by the authorities is to
round up and remove all identified children on the streets and transfer them to rehabilitation facilities. This
system provides limited potential for holistic social work-supported reintegration back into family care that
would recognize the importance of addressing both the child’s family environment and the child’s
personal behavioural problems.

3 UNICEF (2017) Violence Against Children and Youth Survey, 2015/2016.


4 Ibid.
5 See for example: NCDA (2023).
6 2022 Census.
7 National Commission for Children (2019) A Comprehensive Assesment of the Street Children Phenomenon in Rwanda.
5 Child protection in Rwanda:
A situation analysis

De-institutionalization of children has been a major success. Over 90 per cent of the 3,782 children
without disabilities who were in institutional care since 2012 had been placed in family care by the end of
2022. This has been mainly due to the success of the Tubarerere Mu Muryango (TMM) programme, part
of the national childcare reform strategy.

However, more still needs to be done to achieve similar levels of success for children with disabilities
remaining in institutional care. Only 150 of the 2,040 children and young people with disabilities who
had been placed in residential care were in family care by the end of 2022.

Meanwhile, a 2023 Ministerial Order includes a provision for registration of social well-being institutions.
This may lead to the re-emergence of residential care institutions and placement of children in such
institutions. The Ministerial Order would need to be supported by well-defined gatekeeping
mechanisms, to reduce the likelihood of new institutional placements.

The country has not yet fully developed an alternative care system that caters for different care arrangements in
special circumstances – short, medium to long-term, including foster care. When a child is abandoned or neglected,
but no temporary foster care has been established, there are no arrangements for emergency alternative care.
Similarly, some children with disabilities require specialized care for short periods, but such services have not yet
been developed to safeguard against institutionalization.

6. Birth registration
Rwanda is on course to achieve universal, free birth registration. The proportion of children under
5 years of age whose births have been registered with the civil authorities has increased over time,
from 56 per cent in 2014-15 to 86 per cent in 2020, and to 94 per cent of those aged under 18 in 2022. 8
This achievement is due, in larger part, to a strong civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) system
established and digitalized in close collaboration with the health-care system and local governance.
However, only 77.8 per cent of children under 5 from families in the lowest income quintile are
registered compared to 90 per cent from the richest income quintile. 9

Administrative data also show that non-registered children are frequently those born to teen mothers,
due to societal stigma, the marital status of the mothers, the absence of fathers, lack of information on
legal rights, and biases by service providers.

Proportion of children under five whose births have been registered with the civil authorities, by
Figure 3: income quintile, 2020
Birth 100
registration 80
rate by income 60
quintile, 2020
40 Total Lowest Second Middle Fourth Highest
20
85.6 77.8 86.9 87.2 87.6 90.1
0 per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent per cent

7. Children in contact with the law


Child justice processes and practices are not sensitive to children in contact with the law. The
justice system is currently punitive and there are no diversion mechanisms for children facing justice.
This contradicts international standards, which uphold that diversion should be preferred for dealing
with children in most cases, and that governments should continually extend the range of offences for
which diversion is possible.

No guidelines are in place for child-sensitive justice services for children in conflict with the law, child
witnesses, victims and survivors. Limited coordination and cross sectoral referral links mean that
children passing through the justice system are not supported with child protection and social work
services, leading to disconnect with families throughout the justice process.

As of December 2021, there were 426 convicted minor inmates (406 boys and 20 girls) between the ages of 14 and
18 years in the Nyagatare Juvenile Prison, a slight fall from the 557 minors (15 of them girls) in prison in 2020. The
number of minors incarcerated in the Nyagatare Juveniles’ Prison increased quickly, from 209 in 2017, 385 in 2018,
440 in April 2019, 557 in August 2020, before falling to 426 in December 2021. 10
8 2022 Census
9 Demographic and Health Survey (2020)
10 Ministry of Justice reports
6 Child protection in Rwanda:
A situation analysis

The reasons boys are overrepresented in the juvenile prison could include peer influence and
pressure, societal expectations and influence of patriarchy, mental health and other factors.

About 35 per cent of minors in conflict with the law remain in detention for more than a month before they
meet a judge.11 Most children in prison are not visited by relatives, sometimes because they lack money
for transportation, which can affect them psychologically over time and complicates their reintegration
back into society at the end of their sentence.

Mothers with infants below 3 years of age also get custodial sentences and serve prison terms with their
babies. According to the latest available data from the Ministry of Justice, 487 women were in prison
with infants under three years of age in 2021. In addition, there is no proper mechanism in place to cater
for children whose parents are in conflict with the law and are sent to jail. Children whose parents,
especially mothers, are sent to jail remain without parental care and support, thus exposing them to risk
of poor development, separation from support systems, interruptions to education, and exposure to
neglect, all forms of abuse, trauma and stigma. More than 5,000 women are currently in prison.

8. Children with disabilities


Children with disabilities face disproportionate discrimination. A 2022 UNICEF study12 concluded that negative
cultural perceptions and social stigma, lack of specific interventions to meet their needs, financial barriers and higher
poverty rates exacerbate inequalities for children with disabilities. The report emphasizes that social stigma often
causes families and/or caretakers to hide their children with disabilities.

The study showed that stigma and discrimination remain major challenges: 52 per cent of the
respondents agreed that most families of children with disabilities are ashamed of them and 43 per cent
indicated that most parents of children with disabilities would try to hide them. 82 per cent of the
respondents agreed that the best place for a child with a disability is an institution, while 64 per cent
agreed that students with disabilities create too much confusion in the classroom. 13

In 2018, UNICEF and the Government of Rwanda published a qualitative study showing that children
with disabilities living in communities and families experience multiple forms of violence. This may be
due to negative beliefs around disabilities, lack of guidance or time on how to care for children with
disabilities, and lack of services. Boys and girls with disabilities are often surrounded by people who
have minimal expectations for what they can contribute and accomplish in their lives, which has a
damaging impact on these children. This can result in children with disabilities being isolated,
discriminated against, or deprived of services and being placed into institutional care. An assessment of
children with disabilities in institutional care in 2020 established that there were over 2,000 children and
youth with disabilities in various institutional care settings.

9. Opportunities and recommendations


The following areas of action emerge as crucial. If they are placed at the heart of national efforts they
can accelerate progress towards addressing the remaining barriers and bottlenecks that hamper the
realization of every child’s right to protection:

Build a comprehensive, strengthened child protection system supported by adequately developed


and supported social services workforce. Prioritize investments and resourcing for the continued
development and strengthening of an inclusive and effective child protection system including a strong
social services workforce that promotes a protective environment for children while preventing and
responding to child protection violations.

Consolidate and sustain an inclusive alternative care system that focuses on preventing child-family
separation and links to child protection case management to provide for short-term, medium-term and
long-term care of different categories of children, including children connected to the streets.

Strengthen mechanisms for ending all violence, exploitation and abuse of boys, girls and women,
to effectively address the social, cultural and economic determinants of violence at scale and effectively
prevent and respond to all forms of violence against children and women offline and online in both
development and humanitarian situations.

Strengthen the juvenile justice system, including promotion of restorative justice and ending all forms
of detention for children and stronger linkages with the child protection sector.

11 Transparency International Rwanda (2019) Analysis on the Effectiveness of Legal Representation for Minors in Rwandan Courts; 2019, p.39.
12 UNICEF (2022) Disability Inclusion in Rwanda: Cross-sectoral community-based integrated support to children with disabilities. p.2
13 Ibid.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Rwanda has implemented several strategies to combat violence against children, including the establishment of Isange One Stop Centres, which provide multidisciplinary services for victims of gender-based violence (GBV) and child abuse. Moreover, community child protection volunteers, known as IZUs, play a crucial role in grassroots awareness and reporting. However, key obstacles remain, such as entrenched social norms accepting violence, limited professional workforce, insufficient mental health services, and a lack of comprehensive data systems to support effective interventions .

In Rwanda, child protection financing faces significant challenges due to low domestic budget allocations and heavy reliance on international support. Specifically, only 6% of financing for child protection sub-programmes comes from domestic sources, the rest being reliant on international partners. Additionally, there's no dedicated budget tagging for child protection within the governmental structure, complicating financial analysis and coordination across relevant sectors .

The underrepresentation of girls in the Nyagatare Juvenile Prison compared to boys may result from several social and cultural factors, including different societal expectations for girls and boys. There is also greater societal surveillance and control over girls, which may lead to fewer girls entering into activities that result in legal conflict. Furthermore, peer pressure and societal norms, which contribute more intensely to boys' involvement in criminal activities, create a gender disparity in incarceration .

Community child protection volunteers, Inshuti z’ Umuryango (IZU), have proven to be effective in supporting Rwanda's child protection framework. There are 29,674 volunteers, half of whom are female, offering grassroots support which enhances the reach and impact of child protection initiatives. They facilitate connections between families and services, although effectiveness is limited by the overall underfunding of child protection and need for more systematic professional training .

The lack of a unified data management system critically hampers Rwanda's child protection efforts by preventing efficient data collection, analysis, and response coordination. The fragmentation across various digital and non-digital systems, particularly at the district level, leads to inconsistencies in reporting and a lack of interoperability. This obstructs evidence-based policy-making and efficient allocation of resources, as well as timely interventions for at-risk children .

The absence of diversion mechanisms in Rwanda's juvenile justice system leads to punitive experiences for children in conflict with the law, contravening international standards that prioritize rehabilitation over incarceration. With no guidelines for child-sensitive justice and limited cross-sectoral referrals, children face extended detention, lack of support during proceedings, and challenges in family reunification post-detention, affecting their psychological well-being and reintegration into society .

Social stigma significantly undermines the treatment and opportunities for children with disabilities in Rwanda by perpetuating discrimination and exclusion. Many families hide their children due to shame, with a large proportion agreeing that the best place for such children is in institutions rather than integrated settings. This societal attitude leads to limited access to education and social services, isolating these children and limiting their potential .

Economic and social factors critically contribute to the institutionalization of children with disabilities in Rwanda. These include financial barriers, higher poverty rates, and social stigma that lead families to place children in institutions as they struggle with costs and societal pressures. This situation is compounded by the lack of specific interventions to meet the needs of these children within family and community settings, leading to a reliance on institutional care as a perceived more supportive environment .

Economic barriers are closely linked to the high prevalence of teenage pregnancies in Rwanda. Poverty and low economic status increase vulnerability by reducing access to education and health services, propelling girls into early pregnancies due to lack of alternatives. Additionally, poverty exacerbates incidents of gender-based violence, which can lead to unwanted pregnancies, while also limiting the ability of adolescents to access sexual and reproductive health information and services .

Rwanda's de-institutionalization efforts have been notably effective, with over 90% of children who were in institutional care since 2012 now placed in family environments. This suggests significant strides towards integrating children back into societal norms, enhancing family-based care models. However, challenges remain, especially for children with disabilities who are disproportionately left in institutional settings due to inadequate support systems tailored to their needs .

You might also like