0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

PESTLE Analysis Assignment Criteria

The document outlines the grading criteria for a PESTLE Analysis assignment, detailing the scoring system from 0 to 25 marks across various categories such as use of evidence, structure, and conclusions. It specifies expectations for scholarly research, organization, and critical engagement with content. The assignment emphasizes the importance of collaboration and contextual understanding in leadership theories within the PESTLE framework.

Uploaded by

Makgotla
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views2 pages

PESTLE Analysis Assignment Criteria

The document outlines the grading criteria for a PESTLE Analysis assignment, detailing the scoring system from 0 to 25 marks across various categories such as use of evidence, structure, and conclusions. It specifies expectations for scholarly research, organization, and critical engagement with content. The assignment emphasizes the importance of collaboration and contextual understanding in leadership theories within the PESTLE framework.

Uploaded by

Makgotla
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 5: Assignment 2 PESTLE Analysis

4 x 25 = 100 marks

0 -8 9-11 12-15 16-19 20 – 25 Marks


awarded
Criteria No attainment at Approaching Attainment at Attainment exceeds Attainment at near-perfect
expected level attainment at expected level expected level level
expected level Exemplary level
Use of Does not cite Cites scholarly Cites relevant Cites many relevant, Cites many relevant recent
Evidence to relevant scholarly research to support scholarly research authentic scholarly scholarly research to support
support claim research to support arguments; but to support research to support arguments; arguments are
arguments; arguments are arguments; critical arguments logically organized and
arguments mostly mostly arguments are which are regularly substantiated with great insight.
unsubstantiated. unsubstantiated. substantiated at substantiated. Postings are near-perfect level.
the expected level. Postings exceeds the
expected level of
attainment.
Structure, Posting is Posting is Posting is Posting is organized in Posting is organized in a highly
Language disorganized and somewhat organized in a a coherent and logical critical, creative, coherent and
and Length lacks coherent consistently coherent and manner; scope of logical manner; scope of posting
Description structure; scope of organized and logical manner; posting is relevant, is appropriate and is near-
of posting is unclear attempts to guide scope of posting is appropriate and perfect level.
geographical, and superficial. reader through appropriate and is exceeds the expected Evidence of exemplary
socio- Do not understand arguments; scope at expected level. level. understanding and
economic, the PESTLE context of postings may be Evidence of near Evidence of contextualization of leadership
and political too broad/narrow. satisfactory good/appropriate theories within the broader
content Little knowledge of integration of integration of context of leadership.
PESTLE integration content in leadership in Excellent integration of the
Analysis. communities and PESTLE concept and understand
good analysis. the community setup
Pertinent No posts Postings (x 2) are Postings appear to Postings are creative, Postings are critiqued in an
risks and not critical and be critical and informative and exceptional manner with great
Threats somewhat written in an address the content of creativity.
Theoretical inconsistent and encouraging the unit in a critical
lessons poorly organized. manner. way.

Conclusion of No conclusion or Conclusions seems Conclusions are Conclusions are Conclusions are decisive and
Posting connections to the superficial and convincing and substantial and function to position
world outside of unconvincing with function to function to position discernments within an external
this research. little relevance to position acuities within an research context.
Does not the articles. perceptions within external research The posting is near-perfect with
collaborate with Collaborates with an external context. Reference to an exemplary, coherent and
other students other students, but research context. additional readings well- articulated insight into
very poorly and Collaborates well that support historical theories underpinning
inconsistently. with other perspectives on leadership.
students, takes leadership theories Collaborates excellently
initiative. within context of regarding content and expresses
workplace. ideas, viewpoints, opinion,
Collaborates perspectives with confidence.
effectively, relates to Shows great enthusiasm to
content and posts participate.
critical viewpoints.

Total score 100


and
comments

You might also like