2020 Interventional Radiology Coding Guide
2020 Interventional Radiology Coding Guide
coding update
2020
2020 Interventional Radiology Coding Update
Edition 2020
Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the American College
of Radiology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication covered by the copyright
hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopying, taping or information storage and retrieval
systems—without written permission of the publishers.
CPT® five-digit codes, nomenclature and other data are copyright © 2019 American
Medical Association. No fee schedules, basic units, relative values or related listings are
included in CPT. The AMA assumes no liability for the data contained herein. CPT is a
listing of descriptive terms and five-digit numeric identifying codes and modifiers for
reporting medical services performed by physicians. This edition of the Update contains
only CPT terms, codes and modifiers that were selected by SIR for inclusion in this
publication.
Disclaimer
The Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) and the American College of Radiology
(ACR) are providing this billing and coding update for educational and information
purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal, medical or any other kind of advice.
The update is meant to be an adjunct to the American Medical Association (AMA)
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®2020/©2019). It is not comprehensive and
does not replace the CPT® 2020 Professional Edition. Our intent is to assist physicians,
business managers and coders. Therefore, a precise knowledge of the definitions of the
CPT descriptors and the appropriate services associated with each code is mandatory
for proper coding of physician service.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this update, but SIR
and ACR and their employees, agents, officers and directors make no representation,
warranty or guarantee that the information provided is error-free or that the use of this
update will prevent differences of opinion or disputes with payers. The publication is
provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including,
but not limited to, implied warranties or merchantability and fitness for a particular
purpose. Neither SIR nor ACR will bear any responsibility or liability for the results or
consequences of the use of this manual. The ultimate responsibility for correct use of
the Medicare and AMA CPT billing coding system lies with the user. SIR and ACR assume
no liability, legal, financial or otherwise for physicians or other entities who utilize the
information in this update in a manner inconsistent with the coverage and payment
policies of any payers, including but not limited to Medicare or any Medicare contractors,
to which the physician or other entity has submitted claims for the reimbursement of
services performed by the physician.
Preface
This 2020 edition of the Interventional Radiology Coding Update is intended to provide
physicians and coders with practical advice and information on coding for common
interventional radiological and endovascular procedures. When possible, the Coding
Update provides patient care scenarios and FAQs to highlight how codes should be used
and what codes may be appropriately reported.
In recent years, coding for IR has undergone major changes. Coding for interventional
radiology procedures can be complex and often not easily decipherable. In this Update,
we make our best effort to suggest accurate coding, but we are always open to
questions or comments on scenarios that are not addressed in this document. We also
encourage providers and coders to work with carriers on difficult coding issues.
In preparing this 2020 Update, the Society of Interventional Radiology and American
College of Radiology gratefully acknowledge the time and expertise that our physician
and clinical associate members volunteer to support the coding process and the
education of our membership.
Acknowledgments
SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (FAIRFAX, VA.)
Timothy L. Swan, MD, FSIR, FACR, SIR CPT Adviser, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wis.
Waleska M. Pabon-Ramos, MD, MPH, Chair, SIR Economics Committee, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
Ammar Sarwar, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass.
Michael Hall, MD, FSIR, SIR RUC Alternate Adviser, Beacon Health System, South Bend,
Ind.
C. Matthew Hawkins, MD, SIR Alternate CPT Adviser, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
Curtis Anderson, MD, PhD, SIR RUC Adviser, Florida Endovascular and Interventional,
Miami Lakes, Fla.
Contents
8 Glossary of acronyms
10 Categories of CPT® codes
12 The basics of coding and reimbursement
21 Evaluation and management (E&M) codes
24 Bundled services
25 Deleted interventional radiology codes
25 Interventional radiology procedure codes
26 New and revised 2020 interventional radiology procedure codes:
A brief introduction
26 Endovascular repair of the infrarenal aorta
27 Spine injection, drainage or aspiration
28 Anatomic model 3D printing
29 Duplex scan for preoperative mapping of
hemodialysis access
30 Interventional radiology/radiology procedure codes
30 Fine needle aspiration codes
31 Soft-tissue marker
32 Aspiration/injection of integumentary system
32 Breast biopsies and placement of localization devices
35 Musculoskeletal system (biopsy, aspiration, injection)
37 Knee arthrography
37 Bone ablation
37 Vertebroplasty and vertebral augmentation
39 Arthrogram
39 Lungs and pleura
40 Ablation therapy—pulmonary
41 Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta
42 Endovascular repair of the infrarenal aorta
45 Endovascular repair of visceral and infrarenal aorta using fenestrated endograft
47 Intravascular injection/catheter placement
48 Cervicocerebral angiography
51 Renal angiography
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 6
52 Venous procedures
52 Lower extremity venous insufficiency treatment
56 Central venous access procedures
61 Central venous access device procedures
62 Portal decompression procedures
62 Transcatheter therapy and biopsy
63 Mechanical thrombectomy
65 Vena cava filter
66 IV infusion for intracranial thrombolysis
66 Foreign body retrieval
66 Transcatheter biopsy
66 Transcatheter thrombolytic infusion therapy
68 Carotid stent placement
70 Lower extremity endovascular arterial revascularization
74 Transcatheter stent procedures
76 Vascular embolization and occlusion procedures
77 Transluminal angioplasty
78 Intravascular ultrasound
78 Hemic and lymphatic systems
79 Liver/biliary procedures
80 Percutaneous biliary procedures
84 Sclerotherapy of fluid collection
84 Drainage of abscess
86 Percutaneous gastroenteric tube procedures
88 Percutaneous genitourinary interventions
94 Intracranial and extracranial endovascular interventions
98 Lumbar puncture
98 Myelography
100 Destruction by neurolytic agent (e.g., chemical, thermal, electrical or
radiofrequency), chemodenervation–somatic nerves
104 Radiological supervision and interpretation codes
110 Biopsy and drainage catheter
110 Imaging guidance
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 7
Glossary of acronyms
AAA Abdominal aortic aneurysm
ACR American College of Radiology
AMA American Medical Association
APC Ambulatory payment classification
APM Advanced alternative payment model
AV Arteriovenous
CF Conversion factor
CMD Carrier medical director
CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
CPT Current procedural terminology
E&M Evaluation and management
EVLA Endovenous laser ablation
FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration
GPCI Geographic practice cost index
GSV Great saphenous vein
HCFA Health Care Financing Administration
HCPCS Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System
HOPPS Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System
IDE Investigational device exemption
IVUS Intravascular ultrasound
MAC Medicare administrative contractor
MACRA Medicare Reauthorization and Children’s Health Act of 2015
MIPS Merit-based incentive payment system
MOCA Mechanicochemical ablation
MP Malpractice
MPFS Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
MPPR Multiple-procedure payment reduction
MRgFUS MR-guided focused ultrasound
MUE Medically unlikely edit
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 9
CATEGORY I CODES
These represent established services and procedures, performed by a variety of
providers, in multiple geographical locations, with appropriate U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approval for all aspects of the procedure.
CATEGORY II CODES
These codes are used to track performance measures. They are intended to facilitate
data collection and not serve for billing purposes. Category II codes also are used in
the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) to report quality measures related to
services provided under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). The Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) PQRS is a reporting program associated with
a negative payment adjustment (penalty) for eligible professionals (EPs) who do not
successfully submit measure data to CMS. The adjustments are applied to payments for
covered MPFS services furnished to Medicare Part B fee-for-service beneficiaries.
A detailed overview of the new Medicare Reauthorization and Children’s Health Act of
2015, or MACRA, is available on the SIR website. The Quality Payment Program (QPP)
has two payment systems—the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and
Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs). In 2017, CMS commenced data collection
under MIPS. Detailing compliance with MIPS is beyond the scope of the Coding Update,
but we encourage all SIR members to familiarize themselves with how to report quality
metrics. See more at: [Link]
macra-matters/. Or visit [Link]/ quality-safety/quality-measurement.
HCPCS CODES
CMS operates a parallel coding system, known as the Healthcare Common Procedure
Coding System (HCPCS). HCPCS codes are divided into three levels: Level I codes are
five-digit numeric codes used to report physician services and are equivalent to CPT
Category I codes; Level II codes, which are five-digit alphanumeric codes (leading
alpha character followed by four numeric characters) used to report products, supplies
and services not included in the CPT codes; and Level III codes were local codes, use
of which was discontinued in 2003. More information may be found at: [Link]/
medhcpcsgeninfo.
Additionally, to take into account regional cost variations, CMS folds in what is termed
the geographic practice cost index (GPCI). The GPCI rates are reviewed annually by CMS
for their relevancy and accuracy.
CMS annually publishes a MPFS Final Rule, which contains a figure called the conversion
factor (CF), a $/RVU that will be paid for claims submitted during the year subject to the
Final Rule.
With the budget neutrality adjustment to account for changes in RVUs, as required by
law, the proposed CY 2020 MPFS conversion factor is $36.09, a slight increase above
the CY 2019 MPFS conversion factor of $36.04. As part of CMS 2020 Final Rule for Part
B services, total combined payments to interventional radiology (IR) and diagnostic
radiology (DR) for the entire mix of services these specialties billed to Medicare (based
on 2016 data) are estimated to increase by about $14.3 million in CY 2018 relative to
2017. This represents an increase in estimated payments of about 0.3 percent, reflecting
changes in RVUs and a slight increase in the conversion factor. In CY 2019, payments
made to interventional radiologists, identified clinicians who bill with specialty code
94, are expected to increase by about $3.8 million, or 1.1 percent.
PART B PAYMENT
Determining how much a service is paid is not a straightforward task. In recent years,
most of the Medicare administrative contractors (MACs) have published helpful tables
on their websites that show the MPFS for the coming year for their covered region.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 13
2020 facility pricing amount = [(work RVU * work GPCI) + (transitioned facility PE
RVU * PE GPCI) + (MP RVU * MP GPCI)] * CF
SIR has posted tables that display all the 2020 RVU component values for the common
interventional radiology CPT codes: [Link]/globalassets/018-mfs-final-rule-
[Link].
Radiology practices can also obtain current data about any CPT code by using the
tool on the CMS website at [Link]/medicare/medicare-fee-for-servicepayment/
pfslookup/[Link].
CPT PROCESS
CPT codes are developed by the AMA CPT Editorial Panel in consultation with CMS and
the CPT Advisory Committee, which includes representatives from numerous specialty
and subspecialty societies and allied medical societies. CPT Advisory Committee
membership is limited to those national medical societies seated in the AMA House of
Delegates. Seats in the AMA House of Delegates are determined by the percentage of
each society’s membership that are also members of the AMA.
Since the practice of medicine is dynamic, the need for new or modified CPT codes
to reflect changes in practice often arises. Code change proposals are submitted to
the AMA through the medical specialty societies, or individuals, through a standard
application process.
Assessment of the supporting scientific literature and informal survey by the societies of
a number of individuals performing the procedure in question helps assess the need for
the new procedural code, its validity and the language that will be proposed to describe
it. After a case can be made to support editing CPT to include a new procedure, the
application is heard by the CPT Editorial Panel, which is made up of representatives of
approximately 20 medical and allied organizations. If the new or modified CPT code
is approved by the CPT Editorial Panel, that code advances into the RUC process (see
below) for valuation.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 14
The AMA holds three CPT Editorial Panel meetings per year, most commonly in
February, May and October. The general public is allowed to register for and attend AMA
CPT Editorial Panel meetings. To ensure release of the updated CPT manual each fall,
all proposed additions or revisions to Category I CPT codes for the upcoming calendar
year must be considered by the Panel during the calendar year one year prior to the fall
publication. For example, new Category I 2020 CPT codes were approved by the Panel
during CY 2018 CPT Editorial Panel meetings. The CPT cycle has stringent deadlines
for submission of proposals that are well in advance of panel meetings to ensure all
advisors from all representative societies have an opportunity to review and comment.
Information regarding CPT submission deadlines and panel meetings can be found on
the AMA website, [Link]/ practice-management/cpt-upcoming-meetings-
calendar.
Typically, each July CMS issues a draft rule for the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
and the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (HOPPS) for the upcoming
year. In the proposed rules, CMS will review new codes, proposed RVU and PE values
recommended by the RUC (see below), while the HOPPS proposed rule focuses on
policies related to services provided in the hospital outpatient setting. CMS allows a
comment period of 60 days when specialty societies and interested parties respond to
the proposed rules. CMS considers these comments, responds to them, and may alter
the proposed rule in response to comments in the publication of the Final Rule in early
November.
insurance carriers electing to provide coverage for the performance of these “emerging
technologies.”
The RUC develops physician work RVU recommendations for CPT codes. Specialties
comprising the RUC Advisory Committee designate their “level of interest” for
developing work RVU recommendations based on recent actions taken by the CPT
Editorial Panel. Developing work values for new procedures is determined utilizing a
standardized random physician survey, with consideration given to time, intensity and
relative risk of the procedure. The survey generates data on time and intensity of the
procedure, and the necessary pre- and postprocedural work, comparing the proposed
code to a group of similar recently valued codes. Each individual surveyed is asked to
weight the procedure in comparison to a defined standard procedure with which they
are familiar.
These data are collated and summarized for the valuation process. If more than one
specialty is involved, a consensus value must be reached before recommendation can be
made to the RUC.
Once the proposed work value and practice expense inputs are derived the
recommendations are submitted for consideration to the RUC. After debate, the RUC
will either adopt a recommendation, derive a new value through on-site negotiations,
or reject the recommendation altogether. Rejected recommendations must start anew
if the sponsoring society wants to pursue RUC valuation. Adopted physician work RVU
and PE recommendations are then forwarded to CMS. CMS’ final decision on RVUs
and other payment policies usually appear each November in the Federal Register to
be implemented the following January. A copy of the MPFS is available to the general
public for download via the CMS webpage, [Link]/medicare/medicare-fee-for-
service-payment/physicianfeesched/[Link].
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 16
It is the intent of Medicare RVS (also known as the RBRVS) to pay for services on the
basis of the amount of work involved without regard to the specialty of the provider(s)
performing the service. Since 1992, all physician specialty types use the same CPT
code(s) to report the procedural component(s) of an interventional radiology service.
CMS also identifies potentially misvalued codes through its screening processes and
requests these codes be reviewed by RUC.
NCCI edits are developed by CMS through a subcontract with Correct Coding Solutions
LLC ([Link]). Most proposed new NCCI edits are distributed by
the AMA to specialty societies for comment. For all these NCCI edits, SIR’s and ACR’s
coding advisers carefully review the proposed edits, and both societies frequently
comment and submit opinion letters objecting to a proposed edit if clinical scenario and
typical patient care practices indicate that the edit might be in error.
An NCCI modifier indicator of “0” indicates that NCCI-associated modifiers cannot be used
to bypass the edit. A modifier indicator of “1” indicates that NCCI-associated modifiers
can be used to bypass an edit under appropriate circumstances (please see the Modifier
chapter for additional information). Information about NCCI edits is available on the CMS
webpage, [Link]/nationalcorrectcodinited/ncciep/[Link]#topofpage. The left
side of the NCCI page has several links to specific NCCI policy pages.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 18
Ongoing maintenance of MUEs is similar to PTP edits with specialty societies being given
an opportunity to comment/challenge existing and proposed MUEs.
MODIFIER USAGE
Modifiers are two-character suffixes (alpha and/or numeric) that are used in conjunction
with CPT codes to justify, elaborate or further clarify the reporting of a particular service.
Modifiers explain specifically how the service described by the code was rendered by
the provider. Proper use of modifiers is critical, as incorrect modifier usage is often cited
as a reason for lost or improper reimbursement. Below is a list of the most common
modifiers used in interventional radiology billing. (Refer to Appendix A of the CPT® 2020
Professional Edition for a complete list of modifiers and descriptions.)
–22 (increased service): When an extraordinary amount of time, skill and effort were
used to complete a procedure, a –22 modifier may be appended to the base service.
The documentation should support why this is considered above and beyond what
is typically encountered during this procedure. Necessary documentation elements
include a description of what technical aspects are different from the standard code,
documentation of the increased time from what is typical for the given procedure and a
description of the extenuating circumstance that made the overall service an increased
effort. Some payers may increase reimbursement rates when this modifier is used, if
appropriately documented.
–TC (technical component): Used by the hospital or surgery center to cover the expense
of the equipment, staff, etc. of the facility.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 19
–LT/–RT (left/right): These modifiers may be used to further clarify the laterality,
especially when multiple codes are being submitted in one encounter.
–59 (distinct procedural service): Used to indicate that a service was distinct or
independent of another service that was billed in conjunction. This modifier is used when
services that may typically be considered inherent to one another are actually performed
on distinct sites, systems or sessions. Documentation must support a different session,
different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision,
separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily
encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. Modifier –59 is
known to be the most widely misused modifier. To counteract its misuse, in 2015, CMS
introduced the “X{EPSU} modifiers.” These modifiers are to be used to further clarify the
reason for the distinct service.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 20
They are used in place of –59 when the scenario fit the more specific “X{EPSU}”
modifier. Not all carriers have adopted the use of these modifiers, and providers should
reach out to their billing offices for recommended use.
–57 (decision for surgery made within a global surgical period): Required when an E&M
service is provided on the same-day-of or on-the-day-before a procedure with a –090
day global period. Similar to modifier –25 above, the E&M service provided must be a
significant and separately identifiable service, above and beyond the usual pre- or post-
operative work of the procedure.
Each payer/carrier will have different rules and policies on appropriate modifier usage
for claim submission. Reimbursement and reimbursement adjustments will differ by
payer. Supporting documentation and justification for the use of some modifiers will
also differ by payer.
Why has CMS chosen this method of reporting consultations? There have always been
discrepancies between the CMS requirements for reporting consultations and the
AMA’s interpretation of these requirements. Thus, consultation services were often
reported inappropriately by not meeting the CMS’ definition of a consultation or not
having appropriate documentation to support the use of consultation codes per CMS
requirements. Further, documentation requirements for consultations have evolved.
They were initially stricter than for other types of E&M services but are now similar—
enough so that CMS indicated that higher payment for consultation was not appropriate.
With the elimination of the office consultation codes, the work RVUs for new and
established office visits were increased slightly. Similarly, the work RVUs for initial
hospital and facility visits were increased. This has increased the payments for both
services. In addition, the increased use of these visits will be incorporated into PE and
malpractice RVU calculations.
Finally, the incremental work RVUs for the E&M codes that are built into the 10-day and
90-day global surgical codes were increased as well.
Some third-party payers may choose to follow this policy and others may not. Therefore,
all physicians providing consultation services must be aware of the payment policies
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 22
from their local and regional providers to know which codes to submit when rendering
these services.
We understand that some carriers have denied payments for E&M services provided by
all radiologists because they have assumed that the services being reported were not
true E&M services but rather focused history and physicals to satisfy Joint Commission
(formerly Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) requirements
for current documentation on the chart for invasive procedures. However, Interventional
Radiology is a clinical specialty, thus it is fully appropriate for interventional radiologists
to document patient care activities with E&M codes.
Our societies have worked to educate several carriers about the nature of E&M work
provided by interventional radiologists and to differentiate these E&M services from the
pre and post-procedural work that is included in procedural valuations.
one should add modifier –57 to the E&M code. If performed and fully documented on
the same day as a minor procedure (10-day global), one should add modifier –25 to
the E&M code. These modifiers are required to designate that the E&M service involved
medical decision making and is a separate service, rendering it reportable. It is not
appropriate to report an E&M service when the decision to perform a procedure has
already been made, and the physician is merely evaluating the patient as appropriate
prior to the planned procedure or for moderate sedation purposes. Following inpatients
longitudinally (rounding) also frequently leads to changes in patient management.
However, global period rules should be followed when billing such services.
To help clarify the guidelines, SIR stated in 2006: “If you, an interventional radiology
physician, are asked by another physician to see a patient for input into that patient’s
management and you evaluate that patient to develop an assessment and plan and
then document the encounter and your recommendations appropriately, then you have
performed the work of a consultation and should bill the correct E&M code. However,
if you are seeing a patient before a previously arranged procedure and the purpose of
that visit is to confirm that the patient can go through that procedure and to obtain
informed consent for the procedure, then consider that encounter to be bundled into the
procedure itself and do not bill separately for that encounter” (“Coding for consultations
in interventional radiology,” IR News, Nov./Dec. 2006, p.14).
Bundled services
It is imperative that hospitals continue to report all services and the associated costs,
including those for services that have been bundled/packaged into others.
The 2008 HOPPS Final Rule warns that not reporting these bundled services and
associated costs can and will have a dramatic negative impact on future payment rates.
Per CMS, “If packaged services and their charges are not reported, the payment for the
services into which their cost is packaged may be understated. Therefore, it is important
that hospitals report all services furnished and the associated charges.” (Source: The
Medicare Program: Changes to the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System
and CY 2008 Payment Rates, pages 66634–66635.) CMS asserted that the APC rates
for the procedural component of many interventional radiology services were increased
to offset the bundling of the previously separately reimbursed imaging.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 25
0254T
Endovascular repair of iliac artery bifurcation (e.g., aneurysm,
pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, trauma, dissection)
using bifurcated endograft from the common iliac artery into both
the external and internal iliac artery, including all selective and/or
nonselective catheterization(s) required for device placement and
all associated radiological supervision and interpretation, unilateral
(Deleted Dec. 31, 2019 — See 34717, 34718)
Key
+ = add-on code
= revised code
# = resequenced code
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 26
Please consult the accompanying introductory language describing the codes and
reporting instructions in the CPT® 2020 Professional Edition codebook.
A new add-on code 34717 is reported at the time of aorto-iliac artery endograft
placement (34703, 34704, 34705, 34706) for deployment of a bifurcated endograft
in the common iliac artery with extension(s) into both the internal iliac and external
iliac arteries, when performed, to maintain perfusion in both vessels for treatment of
iliac artery pathology (with or without rupture) such as aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm,
dissection, penetrating ulcer, arteriovenous malformation or traumatic disruption. The
iliac branched endograft is a multipiece system that consists of a bifurcated device that
is placed in the common iliac artery and the additional extension(s) that are placed
into both the internal iliac artery and external iliac/common femoral arteries as needed
as well as a proximal extension that overlaps with an aorto-iliac endograft, when
performed. All additional extensions proximally into the common iliac artery or distally
into the external iliac and/or common femoral arteries are inherent to these codes.
For endovascular repair of iliac artery by deployment of an iliac branched endograft, see
34717, 34718.
Report 34717 only once per side. For bilateral procedure, report 34717
twice, do not report with –50.
For placement of an isolated iliac branched endograft for rupture, use 37799
0559T Anatomic model 3D-printed from image data set(s); first individually
prepared and processed component of an anatomic structure
+0560T Anatomic model 3D-printed from image data set(s); each additional
individually prepared and processed component of an anatomic structure
(List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
0561T Anatomic guide 3D-printed and designed from image data set(s); first
anatomic guide
+0562T Anatomic guide 3D-printed and designed from image data set(s); each
additional anatomic guide (List separately in addition to code for primary
procedure)
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 29
93985 Duplex scan of arterial inflow and venous outflow for preoperative vessel
assessment prior to creation of hemodialysis access; complete bilateral
study
93986 Duplex scan of arterial inflow and venous outflow for preoperative vessel
assessment prior to creation of hemodialysis access; complete unilateral
study
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 30
10022 has been deleted. To report, see 10005, 10006, 10007, 10008, 10009, 10010,
10011, 10012.
+#10004 each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary
procedure)
(Do not report 10004, 10021 in conjunction with 10005, 10006, 10007,
10008, 10009, 10010, 10011, 10012 for the same lesion)
#10005 Fine needle aspiration biopsy, including ultrasound guidance; first lesion
+#10006 each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary
procedure)
#10007 Fine needle aspiration biopsy, including fluoroscopic guidance; first lesion
+#10008 each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary
procedure)
+#10010 each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary
procedure)
+#10012 each additional lesion (List separately in addition to code for primary
procedure)
For percutaneous needle biopsy other than fine needle aspiration biopsy, see 19081–
19086 for breast, 20206 for muscle, 20220–20225 for bone, 32400 for pleura, 32405
for lung or mediastinum, 38505 for lymph node(s), 42400 for salivary gland, 47000–
47001 for liver, 48102 for pancreas, 49180 for abdominal or retroperitoneal mass,
50200 for kidney, 54500 for testis, 55700 for prostate, 54800 for epididymis, 60100
for thyroid, 62267 for nucleus pulposus, intervertebral disc, or paravertebral tissue,
62269 for spinal cord.
(For percutaneous image-guided fluid collection drainage by catheter of soft tissue [e.g.,
extremity, abdominal wall, neck], use 10030)
SOFT-TISSUE MARKER
Percutaneous placement of a soft tissue-marker (e.g., clip, metallic pellet, wire/needle,
radioactive seeds) with imaging guidance is reported with 10035 and 10036. If a more
specific site descriptor than soft tissue is applicable (e.g., breast), use the site-specific
codes for marker placement at that site. Report 10035 and 10036 only once per target,
regardless of how many markers are placed to mark that target. It would be appropriate
to report the add-on code 10036 for a second procedure or site, on the same side or
contralateral side.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 32
To report a second procedure or site on the same side or contralateral side, use 10036.
(For drainage of breast abscess, SIR and ACR recommend code 10160).
Percutaneous breast biopsies without imaging guidance are reported with 19100.
Please refer to CPT 2020 codebook for complete instructions on breast biopsies code
set.
(For fine needle aspiration biopsy, see 10004, 10005, 10006, 10007,
10008, 10009, 10010, 10011, 10012, 10021)
20501 Injection of sinus tract, diagnostic (sinogram) For RS&I/S&I, see 76080.
20610 Major joint or bursa (e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa),
without ultrasound guidance. (If fluoroscopic, CT or MRI guidance is
performed, see 77002, 77012, 77021).
20611 Major joint or bursa (e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa)
with ultrasound guidance, with permanent recording and reporting.
KNEE ARTHROGRAPHY
27369 Injection procedure for contrast knee arthrography or contrast-enhanced
CT/MRI knee arthrography
BONE ABLATION
Both codes 20982 and 20983 include any type of imaging guidance, regardless of
type(s) of modality used (previously it had been limited to CT guidance). The descriptors
also acknowledge that the work includes treatment of any direct tumor extension
outside the bone if performed.
20982 Radiofrequency one or more bone tumors, including adjacent soft tissue,
percutaneous, includes imaging guidance.
20983 Cryoablation, one or more bone tumors, including adjacent soft tissue,
percutaneous, including imaging guidance.
sacral procedures are reported only once per encounter. These codes bundle the surgical
and radiological portions of these procedures. Category III codes 0200T and 0201T
were changed and are now specific for sacral augmentation with use of a cavity creation
device (e.g., kyphoplasty). SIR and ACR recommend that, if a provider performs a
vertebroplasty in the sacral region, the Category I lumbosacral code should be reported
(i.e., 22511).
ARTHROGRAM
Fluoroscopic guidance code 77002 is included in the RS&I/S&I for planar arthrography
procedures. Use 77002 only in cases of joint enhancement for CT or MRI-enhanced
study when planar arthrography is not also performed/reported.
24220 Injection for elbow arthrogram (for tennis elbow injection, see 20550).
(Do not report 32550 in conjunction with 32554, 32555, 32556, 32557
when performed on the same side of the chest).
32551 Tube thoracostomy has been revised to indicate that this code is used for
reporting an open procedure.
(Do not report 32551 in conjunction with 33020, 33025, if pleural drain/
chest tube is placed on the ipsilateral side).
Imaging guidance codes (76942, 77002, 77012 or 77021) and device codes (e.g.,
A4648, tissue marker, A4650, implantable radiation dosimeter or A4649, surgical
supply) are reported separately in conjunction with the interstitial device percutaneous
placement procedure codes.
Codes 32554–32557 are not to be reported in conjunction with codes 32550, 32551
when performed on the same side of the chest. Additionally, codes 32554–32557 cannot
be reported in conjunction with imaging codes 75989, 76942, 77002, 77012, 77021.
ABLATION THERAPY—PULMONARY
32994 Cryoablation of 1 or more tumors of the pleura or chest wall imaging
guidance when performed, unilateral.
Codes 32994 and 32998 are used to report either reduction/“debulking” or the
eradication of pulmonary tumor(s).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 41
Codes 33880 and 33881 include the initial graft plus additional grafts placed into the
descending thoracic aorta to the level of the celiac artery.
Codes 33883 and 33884 should be used when proximal extensions are placed in the
same setting as the initial graft or in a delayed setting.
Code 33886 should be used when a distal extension is placed in a delayed setting from
the initial graft.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 42
33886 Delayed placement of a distal extension after the initial repair of the
descending thoracic aorta.
Overall, the hierarchy of codes from 34701–34708 is based on the vascular anatomy
involved and type of endograft deployed. The new codes also distinguish between
endovascular repair “with rupture” (34702, 34704, 34706, 34708) and for “other than
rupture” (34701, 34703, 34705, 34707). Services that have been combined into 34701–
34708 and may not be separately reported include:
34701 EVAR of infrarenal aorta with aorto-aortic tube endograft, for other than
rupture.
34702 EVAR of infrarenal aorta with aorto-aortic tube endograft, for rupture.
34703 EVAR of infrarenal aorta with aorto-uni-iliac endograft, for other than
rupture.
34705 EVAR of infrarenal aorta with aorto-bi-iliac endograft, for other than
rupture.
34706 EVAR of infrarenal aorta with aorto-bi-iliac endograft, for rupture. For
simultaneous bilateral iliac artery aneurysm repairs report 34705 or
34706 with aorto-bi-iliac endograft. For isolated bilateral iliac artery
repair using iliac artery tube endografts, report 34707 or 34708 with
modifier –50.
34707 EVAR of iliac artery with ilio-iliac tube endograft, for other than rupture.
34708 EVAR of iliac artery with ilio-iliac tube endograft, for rupture. For
endovascular repair of iliac artery by deployment of an iliac branched
endograft, see 34717, 34718.
Report 34717 only once per side. For bilateral procedure, report 34717
twice, do not report with –50.
34710 Delayed placement of a distal or proximal extension after the initial repair
of the infrarenal aorta or iliac artery, initial vessel treated.
+34711 Delayed placement of a distal or proximal extension after the initial repair
of the infrarenal aorta or iliac artery, each additional vessel treated.
+34713 Percutaneous closure of femoral artery from large (12 French or greater)
sheath.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 45
(Do not report 34839 in conjunction with 34841, 34842, 34843, 34844,
34845, 34846, 34847, 34848, when performed on the day before or the
day of the fenestrated endovascular repair procedure).
CERVICOCEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY
The cervicocerebral angiography codes 36221–36228 report nonselective and
selective arterial catheter placement and diagnostic imaging of the aortic arch, carotid
and vertebral arteries. The code set is based upon a combination of location of the
catheter during the angiography and which vessel(s) were studied. Please consult the
accompanying introductory language describing the codes and reporting instructions in
the CPT® 2020 Professional Edition codebook.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 49
These codes describe arterial contrast injections with arterial, capillary and venous-
phase imaging, when performed. Accessing the vessel, placement of catheter(s),
contrast injection(s), fluoroscopy, RS&I and the closure of the arteriotomy by pressure
or by application of an arterial closure device is inherent in codes 36221–36226 and not
separately reportable. Add modifier –50 to codes 36222–36226 if the same procedure
is performed on both sides. Report add-on codes 36227, 36228 twice; do not append
modifier –50 if the same procedure is performed on both sides. Modifier –59 may be
used to indicate when different carotid and/or vertebral arteries are being studied in the
same session.
Codes 36221–36226 progress up a hierarchy in which the lesser intensive services are
included in the higher intensity code—i.e., use the code of the most intensive service
provided. For example, 36221 is reported for nonselective catheter placement, thoracic
aorta, with angiography of the aortic arch and great vessel origins. Do not report 36221
in conjunction with 36222–36226 selective codes, as these include the work of 36221
when performed.
36224 Selective catheter placement in the internal carotid artery, unilateral, with
angiography of the ipsilateral intracranial carotid circulation, includes
associated supervision and interpretation and includes angiography of
the extracranial carotid and cervicocerebral arch, when performed.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 50
Do not report 36225 with 36226 for ipsilateral angiography. Select the
most comprehensive service following the hierarchy of complexity.
CPT code 76937 for ultrasound guidance for vascular access is reportable when performed
(and documentation requirements are met) in conjunction with 36221–36228.
RENAL ANGIOGRAPHY
The renal angiography codes, 36251–36254, include arterial access and catheter
placement, contrast injection(s), fluoroscopy, flush aortogram, image postprocessing,
permanent images recording, and radiological supervision and interpretation (RS&I).
Therefore, it is not appropriate to report these services separately.
36252 Bilateral selective catheter placement (first-order), main renal artery and
any accessory renal artery(ies) for renal angiography, includes associated
supervision and interpretation, includes pressure gradient measurements
when performed, and flush aortogram when performed.
Do not report 36253 with 36251 when performed for the same kidney.
VENOUS PROCEDURES
36400 Venipuncture, necessitating physician’s skill, younger than 3 years old.
Codes 36400 and 36410 are not to be used to report routine venipuncture.
Stab phlebectomy as a means to treat varicose veins is reported with 37765, 37766.
The CPT code for venous embolization (37241) has been proposed by some individuals
as an appropriate code for venous insufficiency. However, SIR has noted in its coding
education that 37241 is to be used for venous embolization or occlusion, excluding
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 53
lower extremity venous insufficiency. The October 2014 edition of the AMA guidance
publication, CPT Assistant, contains an excellent overview of how to code lower
extremity venous insufficiency procedure.
Codes 93970, 93971 describing extremity venous duplex imaging for the imaging
services associated with the guidance and monitoring of endovenous ablation may not
be reported. However, there may be occasions when a patient requires a diagnostic
extremity Doppler ultrasound on the same day as the endovenous ablation. In this case,
one should separately report the diagnostic study using codes 93970, 93971. CMS
requires modifier use signifying the provision of a separate and distinct service.
SCLEROTHERAPY
36468 Injection therapy (sclerosing solution), spider veins.
36470 Injection therapy (sclerosing solution), single vein (other than spider).
36471 Injection therapy (sclerosing solution), multiple veins (other than spider)
same leg.
Codes 36470 and 36471 are used to report treatment of veins larger
than spider veins but smaller than varicosities in main veins such as the
saphenous vein.
Only report 36468, 36470 and 36471 once per extremity per session,
regardless of the number of needle injections performed.
ABLATION TECHNIQUES
36473 Mechanochemical, EVAT of incompetent vein extremity, percutaneous,
first vein treated.
(Do not report 36475, 36476 in conjunction with 29520, 29530, 29540,
29550, 29580, 29581, 29584, for the same extremity)
(Do not report 36478, 36479 in conjunction with 29520, 29530, 29550,
29580, 29581, 29584 for the same extremity)
(Do not report 36479, 36479 with 36000, 36002, 36005, 36410, 36425,
36475, 36476, 36482, 36483, 37241, 75894, 76000, 76937, 36942,
76998, 77022, 93970, 93971 in the same surgical field).
(Do not report 36482, 36483 in conjunction with 36000, 36002, 36005,
36410, 36425, 36475, 36476, 36478, 36479, 37241, 75894, 76000,
76937, 76942, 76998, 77022, 93970, 93971 in the same surgical field)
(Do not report 36482, 36483 with 29520, 29530, 29540, 29550, 29580,
29581, 29584 for the same extremity)
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 56
STAB PHLEBECTOMY
37765 Stab phlebectomy (10–20 incisions), one extremity.
37766 Stab phlebectomy (more than 20 incisions), one extremity. (Less than 10
incisions, use unlisted code 37799).
36500 Selective venous catheterization for venous organ sampling (use once for
each organ sampled) (for RS&I/S&I, use 75893).
Many of the CPT codes in this section are dependent on the age of the patient (younger
than 5 years or 5 years and greater). Refer to the AMA CPT® 2020 Professional Edition
manual for the differentiation related to age when noted.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 57
With the exception of peripherally inserted central catheter placement, the codes in
the central venous access family are component coded; therefore, radiologic guidance
supervision and interpretation is separately reportable when performed.
36555, 36556 Centrally inserted, nontunneled CV catheter. (See AMA CPT® 2020 and
36569 were edited in 2019 Professional Edition for differentiation related
to age).
36557, 36558 Centrally inserted, tunneled CV catheter, no port/no pump. (See AMA
CPT® 2020 Professional Edition manual for differentiation related to age).
36560, 36561 Centrally inserted, tunneled CV catheter with subcutaneous port. (See
AMA CPT® 2020 Professional Edition manual for differentiation related to
age).
36565 Centrally inserted, tunneled CV catheter, requiring two catheters via two
separate access sites; no port/no pump. (e.g., Tesio type catheter).
36566 Centrally inserted, tunneled CV catheter; requiring two catheters via two
separate access sites with subcutaneous, port.
A partial replacement code is used if only the catheter component of the device
is replaced. If the entire device is replaced through the same access site, then the
appropriate complete replacement code is reported.
Please see the central venous access device grid on the following page for a
comprehensive summary of the codes for central venous access device placement.
diagnostic venography codes 75820, 75825 and 75827, which would be applicable
when a more extensive diagnostic study than that of 36598 is provided.
Nontunneled
(PICC), without
under 5 36568
image guidance
36575 36999 99XXX **
Peripherally Inserted
Nontunneled
(PICC), with image under 5 36572
guidance 36575 36584 99XXX **
5 and older 36573
Unlike many other surgical procedures, TIPS insertion and revision procedures as
described by codes 37182/37183, respectively, have 0-day global periods and, therefore,
do not include pre- or postprocedural E&M work. E&M work performed outside of the
1-day global period is separately reported (see E&M section).
• Vessel measurement
• Roadmapping
MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY
Five codes (37184, 37185, 37186 for arterial and 37187, 37188 for venous) were
established to report mechanical thrombectomy in peripheral vessels. These codes are
not to be used for coronary or intracranial vessel. (For coronary arterial mechanical
thrombectomy, see code 92973 and for intracranial, see code 61645.) They can be used
in both native vessels or bypass grafts. Code(s) for catheter placement(s), diagnostic
studies and other percutaneous interventions (e.g., transluminal balloon angioplasty,
stent placement) provided are separately reportable. However, there are no separate
RS&I codes to report imaging services provided in conjunction with mechanical
thrombectomy.
Mechanical thrombectomy is considered primary, as the need for these other services
was not known prior to the mechanical thrombectomy. Occasionally, the performance of
primary mechanical thrombectomy may follow another percutaneous intervention.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 64
TRANSCATHETER BIOPSY
Code(s) for catheter placement(s), diagnostic studies and other percutaneous
interventions (e.g., transluminal balloon angioplasty, stent placement) provided are
separately reportable in addition to transcatheter biopsy.
Codes 37211 and 37212 are used to report the entire initial (calendar) day of
transcatheter thrombolytic infusion. This includes follow-up arteriography/venography
and catheter position change or exchange, when performed. Consequently, if initiation
and completion therapy occur on the same calendar day, only the initial code (37211 or
37212) is reportable.
Carotid stent placement codes include the following services for the vessel being treated:
A physician may elect to perform and may separately report diagnostic cerebral
angiography for the contralateral vessel not being stented at the same session as carotid
stent placement if these services have not been previously provided. Therefore, even
if the physician performs bilateral cerebral and cervical diagnostic studies at the time
of carotid stent placement, he or she may only report 36222–59 or 36223–59 for the
contralateral study.
If diagnostic cerebral angiography was completed at a prior setting and the subsequent
stent deployment is undertaken within an adequately short time (with no change in the
patient’s clinical status occurring in the interim that would mandate a repeat diagnostic
study), these repeat diagnostic services are not reportable.
If distal protection with carotid stenting is attempted but placement of the distal
protection device is found not to be possible and carotid stenting is subsequently
performed without distal protection, then code 37216 is reported.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 69
These codes take into account the fact that multiple techniques may be needed to open
areas of disease in some vessels and that these interventions may take place in different
vascular territories. In general, the codes for interventions progress up a hierarchy of
intensity with the work of the less-intense intervention included in the higher intensity
code. For example, angioplasty prior to a stent placement would be a progression up
this hierarchy and only the stent code would be reported. Each of these codes includes
the work of accessing the artery, selecting the vessel, crossing the lesion, interpreting
the images, performing therapeutic intervention(s) in the entire vessel segment, using
any embolic protection device, performing final image interpretation and closing the
arteriotomy by any method. If angioplasty is performed in addition to facilitate a more
advanced procedure, such as atherectomy, or stenting, it is included in the code for
the more advanced procedure. Mechanical thrombectomy and thrombolysis are not
included in the work of codes 37220–37235 and can be reported additionally with the
appropriate component codes when these techniques are used in combination with
PTA/stenting/atherectomy to restore flow to areas of occlusive disease. The codes apply
to the procedure if performed percutaneously or openly.
Revascularization procedures are grouped into three vascular territories based on the
anatomy and are specific to the procedures of angioplasty, stenting or atherectomy.
PTA is considered an inherent part of stenting or atherectomy procedures and is not
separately reportable. Each code applies to a single extremity.
1. Iliac territory: subdivided into common, internal and external iliac artery
a. 37220–37223.
c. Add-on codes used for additional iliac vessels that are treated (common,
internal or external).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 71
a. 37224–37227.
c. Since it is a single vessel, only a single code may be reported, even if multiple
lesions are treated.
a. 37228–37235.
b. Report the initial vessel treated as the primary code for the highest level of
service provided within the tibial-peroneal territory with add-on codes for
additional vessels treated (not additional lesions or procedures in the same
vessel).
If a lesion extends across the margin of a territory, but is opened with a single therapy,
report with only a single code. For example, if a distal popliteal artery stenosis extends
into the tibioperoneal trunk and the lesion is treated with a single angioplasty spanning
both lesions, only code a single vessel treatment.
If both legs are treated at the same time with different interventions, use modifier
–59 to indicate separate and distinct services performed on the same day. If the same
treatment/intervention is performed bilaterally in the same territory, use modifier –50.
When treating multiple vessels within a territory, report each additional vessel using
an add-on code, as applicable. Select the base code that represents the most complex
service using the following hierarchy of complexity (in descending order of complexity):
atherectomy and stent > atherectomy > stent > angioplasty. When treating multiple
lesions within the same vessel, report one service that reflects the combined procedures,
whether done on one lesion or different lesions, using the same hierarchy.
A “+” sign indicates an add-on code that must be used after the appropriate code for
the initial vessel treated.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 72
An editorial change was made to the lower extremity revascularization codes and
to the arterial stent codes as they pertain to lower extremity procedures. The lower
extremity revascularization code set (37220–37235) is now specifically to be used for
treatment of occlusive disease. For stenting of nonocclusive disease (e.g., aneurysm,
pseudoaneurysm, rupture/extravasation, vascular malformation or fistula) in the infra-
inguinal arteries, 37236–37237 should be used.
An additional editorial change was made to clarify that codes 37220–37223 should
be reported in conjunction with codes 34701–34711, 34718, 34845–34848, only when
iliac angioplasty or stenting is performed outside the target treatment zone of the
endoprosthesis, for the indication of occlusive disease. Category III code 0254T has been
converted to Category 1 codes 34717 and 34718, and has been deleted. Please review
the AMA CPT Professional Edition guidelines.
Codes 37236, 37237 are used to report stent insertion in an artery. These codes have
been editorially revised to exclude lower extremity artery(ies) for occlusive disease.
These codes also exclude cervical or intrathoracic carotid artery, extracranial vertebral
or intracranial arteries, and coronary arteries. There are dedicated CPT codes for these
vascular beds and the most specific CPT code should be used.
An editorial change in CPT now directs that codes 37236–37237 be used for stent
treatment of infrainguinal arterial nonocclusive disease. If both occlusive and
nonocclusive disease are treated in the same vessel, report the code for the dominant
pathology being treated.
Stents placed with the purpose of providing a latticework to assist in the embolization of
an aneurysm are included in the embolization code and are not separately reportable.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 75
Nonselective and/or selective catheterization is not included in these codes and may be
separately reported.
This family of CPT codes bundles together the surgical and radiological portions of
the procedures. The vascular embolization and occlusion CPT codes bundle together
the previous transcatheter embolization surgical code (37204) with the RS&I codes
for embolization (75894) and postembolization follow-up angiography (75898). As a
result, CPT code 37204 was deleted. In 2014, code 37210 (previously used to report
non-emergent uterine artery embolization) was also deleted; this service is now being
reported with one of the embolization codes.
The embolization codes, 37241–37244, include all RS&I, intraprocedural guidance and
roadmapping, and imaging necessary to document procedure completion. However,
selective catheterizations needed to perform an embolization should be reported
separately.
Please note that the embolization code may only be reported once per surgical field,
regardless of the number of vessels embolized on that surgical field. A surgical field is
the area immediately surrounding and directly involved in a treatment/procedure. In
embolization, different organs typically represent different surgical fields. In some cases,
the same organ may consist of more than one surgical field, such as the lungs, where the
right and left lung are separate surgical fields.
Embolization procedures involving the central nervous system or the head or neck
are reported using codes 61624, 61626 or 61710 with any associated RS&I still
reported using code 75894 (RS&I for embolization) and 75898 (RS&I for completion
angiography).
Embolization or occlusion for branch vessels of a dialysis circuit should be used with
code 36909.
TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY
CPT codes 37246–37249 are used to report transluminal balloon angioplasty, via
percutaneous approach or open exposure, which include the RS&I. Codes 37246 and
37247 are used to report angioplasty within an artery, when performed outside of
the central nervous system, coronary, pulmonary and lower extremities for occlusive
disease. There are dedicated CPT codes for these vascular beds and the most specific
CPT code should be used. Codes 37248 and 37249 are used to report angioplasty within
a vein, when performed outside of a dialysis circuit.
Multiple angioplasties performed in the same vessel or within the same lesion should
only be reported once.
When a separate and distinct lesion in a separate vessel is treated, the add-on codes
37247 or 37249 (respective of vascular bed) should be used. Do not report 37246–
37249 in combination with 37236–37239 when angioplasty and stenting are performed
in the same vessel and lesion in the same setting.
Nonselective and/or selective catheterization is not included in these codes and may be
separately reported.
INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND
37252 and 37253 should be reported in addition to the therapeutic intervention (e.g.,
stent or stent graft placement, angioplasty, atherectomy, embolization, thrombolysis,
transcatheter biopsy), during which the intravascular ultrasound is performed.
Continuous lesions count as one vessel and should be reported with one code, even
if imaging of more than one vessel is performed. For example, if a lesion bridges into
two or more vessels, it would still be counted as one vessel, and therefore, it would be
reported with code 37252. If there are two separate vessels and each has a lesion that is
not continuous, then the add-on code 37253 should be used.
Imaging guidance is not included in bone marrow aspiration and biopsy codes. Report
the appropriate imaging guidance modality code if performed.
LIVER/BILIARY PROCEDURES
LIVER BIOPSY
47000 Percutaneous needle biopsy of liver.
LIVER ABLATION
The following ablation codes do not include radiologic supervision and interpretation.
Therefore, imaging guidance is separately reportable with the following codes. Ablation
can be performed via an open approach with using intra-operative ultrasound guidance
or via a percutaneous approach using CT, MRI, fluoro or ultrasound guidance.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 80
These codes describe the placement, replacement and removal of external biliary
catheters (externally accessible drainage catheter placed in bile duct, that does not
terminate in the bowel) and internal-external catheters (externally accessible drainage
catheter that terminates in the bowel). The term “stent,” as used in this code set
describes a percutaneously placed device (e.g., metallic stent or plastic tube) that is
positioned completely internally within the biliary tree.
See page 340 in the CPT® 2020 Professional Edition codebook for introductory
guidelines.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 81
Do not report 47537 in conjunction with 47538 for the same access.
47538 Placement of stent(s) into a bile duct, via an existing access, each stent;
includes diagnostic cholangiography, all associated imaging guidance,
balloon dilation, catheter exchange(s) and catheter removal(s) when
performed.
Do not report 47538 in conjunction with 47536, 47537 for the same
percutaneous access.
47539 Placement of stent(s) into a bile duct, via a new access, each stent;
without placement of separate biliary drainage catheter. Includes
diagnostic cholangiography, all associated imaging guidance and balloon
dilation.
47540 Placement of stent(s) into a bile duct, via a new access, each stent; with
placement of separate biliary drainage catheter. Includes diagnostic
cholangiography, all associated imaging guidance and balloon dilation.
Codes 47538–47540 should be reported once per session for stent(s) placed in a single
bile duct. It would be allowable to report these codes (47538–47540) more than once
per session for the following circumstances: 1) side-by-side stents within a single duct,
2) placement of stents in separate bile ducts, or 3) placement of stents through two or
more access sites. Do not report 47540 in conjunction with 47533, 47534 for the same
percutaneous access.
47541 Placement of access through the biliary tree and into small bowel to
assist with an endoscopic biliary procedure (e.g., rendezvous procedure)
via a new access; includes cholangiography and all associate imaging.
For use of existing access through the biliary tree into small bowel to
assist with an endoscopic biliary procedure, see 47535, 47536, 47537.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 83
For endoscopic brushings, see 43260, 47552. For endoscopic biopsy, see
43261, 47553.
47556 Biliary endoscopy, with dilation and stent (Dilation with stent,
percutaneous; see also 47801).
47801 Placement of bile duct stent (e.g., endoprosthesis) (see also code
47556).
DRAINAGE OF ABSCESS
To report image-guided catheter drainage of fluid collections/abscess, four bundled
codes are used—10030, 49405, 49406 and 49407. These codes bundle the surgical and
radiological portions of the procedure into single codes. These codes include the work
of placement of a drainage catheter within the collection, including all imaging guidance
(e.g., ultrasonography, fluoroscopic and/or CT). Therefore, do not report 10030, 49405–
49407 with S&I codes 75989, 76942, 77002, 77003, 77012 or 77021.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 85
It is not appropriate to report these codes for drainage procedures such as a catheter
aspiration of a fluid collection if a catheter is temporarily placed to drain the fluid but
then immediately removed.
The code structure for reporting the treatment and management of percutaneous
image-guided fluid collection drainage procedures follows anatomical location and
approach. A critical point is that one catheter placement into a single collection is
reported with a single code (i.e., considered one drainage). If multiple catheters
are placed into a collection, the appropriate code should be reported once for each
collection drained regardless of the number of catheters required to drain that
collection. If a single catheter is placed that drains multiple collections, a single drainage
code is reported. If separate catheters are placed in separate and distinct collections in
the same setting, then the appropriate code may be used for each drain placed in each
individual collection. The appropriate modifier (e.g., –59) should be included to indicate
that separate and distinct procedures have been performed.
49460 Mechanical removal of obstructive material from gastric tube, any type,
any method, under fluoroscopic guidance including contrast injection(s).
Please consult the accompanying introductory language describing the codes and
reporting instructions in the CPT® 2020 Professional Edition codebook.
(Do not report code 50432 in conjunction with 50436, 50437, for
dilation of the nephrostomy tube tract)
NEPHROURETERAL CATHETERS
50433 Placement of percutaneous nephroureteral catheter via a new access,
percutaneous; includes all associated imaging.
URETERAL STENTS
50693 Placement of percutaneous ureteral stent via pre-existing nephrostomy
tract; includes all associated imaging.
50695 Placement of percutaneous ureteral stent via new access, with separate
nephrostomy catheter; includes all associated imaging.
(Do not report 50436, 50437 with 50080, 50081, 50382, 50384,
50430–50433, 52334, 74485)
(For injection of sclerosing agent into renal cyst, see code 49185).
+50606 Endoluminal biopsy of ureter and/or renal pelvis, any method, non-
endoscopic; includes all associated imaging.
+50706 Balloon dilation, ureteral stricture; includes all associated imaging. (List
separately in addition to code for primary procedure).
(For imaging guidance and monitoring, see codes 76940, 77013, 77022).
(For imaging guidance and monitoring, see codes 76940, 77013, 77022).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 93
BLADDER PROCEDURES
51100 Aspiration of bladder, via needle.
Code 61623, endovascular temporary balloon arterial occlusion (BOT), head or neck
(extracranial/intracranial), includes:
Selective catheterization for vessel occluded, RS&I/S&I, neurologic monitoring and post
occlusion angiography are not separately reportable when performed in conjunction
with BOT (code 61623). However, if selective catheterization and angiography of
arteries other than the artery to be occluded is performed, appropriate catheterization
and RS&I/S&I codes are reported. Additionally, RS&I/S&I for full and complete pre-
procedural diagnostic angiography of vessel occluded is reportable, as is catheterization
and diagnostic RS&I/S&I of all other vessels studied. Catheterization coding for these
scenarios follows established coding guidelines (see CPT® 2020 Professional Edition
manual). Because codes 61623 and 61624 vary significantly in what is included in the
work described by each code, special attention must be paid to use each of these codes
correctly.
times as there are separate operative fields treated. Documentation should be clear and
support the separate operative fields.
Do not report 61630 or 61635 in conjunction with 61645 for the same
vascular territory.
Codes 61640–61642 are used to report intracranial endovascular balloon dilation. This
code set includes a primary code for the dilation of the initial vessel (61640) and two
add-on codes for dilation of each additional vessel in the same vascular family (61641)
and each additional vessel in a different vascular family from the initial dilation (61642).
Do not report 61640, 61642 in conjunction with 61650 or 61651 for the
same vascular territory.
These codes are described and reported by vascular territory. For the purposes of these
codes, the intracranial arteries are divided into three vascular territories: right carotid
circulation, left carotid circulation and the vertebrobasilar circulation. They include all
selective catheterization and diagnostic and completion angiography for the treated
territory. However, diagnostic angiography of a nontreated vascular territory may be
reported separately.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 97
Do not report 61645 in conjunction with 61650 or 61651 for the same
vascular distribution.
LUMBAR PUNCTURE
62270 Lumbar puncture, diagnostic;
62328 with fluoroscopic or CT guidance
MYELOGRAPHY
There are four codes (62302–62305) that bundle the injection and image guidance
for myelography procedures. The current injection and radiologic supervision and
interpretation codes (72240–72270) for myelography are retained to allow correct
reporting when only one component of the service is provided (e.g., injection only is
performed for MR myelography and radiographic myelography is not performed). The
components may also be reported when two separate providers perform the surgical
and radiological components. However, even though the existing component codes
were retained, they should not be reported together. When the same provider performs
both components, the bundled codes should be reported.
(Do not report 62284 in conjunction with 62302, 62303, 62304, 62305,
72240, 72255, 72265, 72270).
(When both 62284 and 72240, 72255, 72265, 72270 are performed
by the same physician or other qualified health care professional for
myelography, see 62302, 62303, 62304, 62505).
(Do not report 62302 in conjunction with 62284, 62203, 62304, 62305,
72240, 72255, 72265, 72270).
(Do not report 62303 in conjunction with 62284, 62302, 62304, 62305,
72240, 72255, 72265, 72270).
62305 Myelography via lumbar injection, including RS&I; two or more regions
(e.g., lumbar/thoracic, cervical/thoracic, lumbar/cervical, lumbar/
thoracic/cervical).
62321 With imaging guidance (i.e., fluoroscopy or CT). Do not report 62321 with
77003, 77012, 76942.
Some existing codes have been revised to provide clarity on reporting these procedures
and codes 64613 and 64614 have been deleted. Six codes, 64642–64647, specify
reporting chemodenervation of extremity and trunk muscles.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 101
For guidance, see 95873, 95874. Do not report more than one guidance
code for 64615.
Do not report more than one guidance code for any unit of 64616 (64614
has been deleted; to report, see 64642, 64643, 64644, 64645, 64646,
64647).
For bilateral procedure, report 64634 twice. Do not report modifier –50
in conjunction with 64634)
+64636 Each additional lumbar or sacral facet joint, includes imaging guidance.
Trunk muscles include the erector spinae and paraspinal muscles, rectus
abdominus, and obliques. All other somatic muscles are extremity
muscles, head muscles, or neck muscles.
(Do not report 72240, 72255, 72265 and/or 72270 in conjunction with
62284, 62302, 62303, 62304 or 62305).
See CPT® 2020 Professional Edition manual for revisions of exclusionary parenthetical
notes.
UPPER EXTREMITIES
73040 Shoulder arthrography, RS&I (includes S&I for needle placement unless
CT/MR arthrography is only procedure; 77002 excluded by the NCCI).
73085 Elbow arthrography, RS&I (includes S&I for needle placement unless CT/
MR arthrography is only procedure; 77002 excluded by the NCCI).
73115 Wrist arthrography, RS&I (includes S&I for needle placement unless CT/
MR arthrography is only procedure; 77002 excluded by the NCCI).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 105
LOWER EXTREMITIES
73525 Hip arthrography, RS&I (includes S&I for needle placement unless CT/MR
arthrography is only procedure; 77002 excluded by the NCCI).
73580 Knee arthrography, RS&I (includes S&I for needle placement unless CT/
MR arthrography is only procedure; 77002 excluded by the NCCI).
73615 Ankle arthrography, RS&I (includes S&I for needle placement unless CT/
MR arthrography is only procedure; 77002 excluded by the NCCI).
GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
(For percutaneous placement of gastrostomy tube, see 49440).
URINARY TRACT
74420 Retrograde urography.
VASCULAR SYSTEM
75600 Aortography, thoracic, single shot, RS&I.
This code should be used for each selective pelvic (e.g., internal iliac or
median sacral artery) artery completely studied. Therefore, if bilateral
internal iliac vessels are catheterized and studied, then 75736 would
be used twice. If, following an internal iliac catheterization, there was
separate catheterization of several branches of that vessel, then 75774
would be used to describe the RS&I/S&I work of each of these further
selective branch catheterizations.
+75774 Artery x-ray, each vessel (each additional selective after basic exam).
Code 75774 is used to report each additional selective or subselective
vessel studied after the basic examination. Use of this code requires
selective catheterization of the additional vessel studied (with selective
catheterization separately reportable according to the selective
catheterization coding conventions; see AMA CPT® 2020 Professional
Edition manual for discussion of these coding conventions).
TRANSCATHETER PROCEDURES
75893 Venous sampling by catheter, with or without angiography, per organ
sampled, RS&I. (For procedure, see 36500).
75901 Removal CVA device obstruction, RS&I. (For procedure, see 36595).
75902 Remove CVA intraluminal obstruction, RS&I. (For procedure, see 36596).
75952, 75953, 75954 have been deleted. To report, see 34701–34711,
34718).
(Do not report 75989 in conjunction with 10030, 32554, 32555, 32556,
32557, 47490, 49405, 49406, 49407).
IMAGING GUIDANCE
76000 Fluoroscopy (separate procedure), up to one hour physician time, other
than cardiac fluoroscopy.
(Do not report 76376 in conjunction with 31627, 34839, 70496, 70498,
70544–70549, 71275, 71555, 72159, 72191, 72198, 73206, 73225, 73706,
73725, 74174, 74175, 74185, 74261–74263, 75557, 75559, 75561, 75563,
75565, 75571–75574, 75635, 76377, 77046–77049, 77061, 77062,
77063, 78012–78999, 93355, 0523T, 0559T–0562T).
(Do not report 76377 in conjunction with 34839, 70496, 70498, 70544,
70544–70549, 71275, 71555, 72159, 72191, 72198, 73206, 73225, 73706,
73725, 74174, 74175, 74185, 74261–74263, 75557, 75559, 75561, 75563,
75565, 75571–75574, 75635, 76376, 77046–77049, 77061, 77062,
77063, 78012–78999, 93355, 0523T, 0559T–0562T, for which 3D
reconstruction postprocessing is considered inherent).
ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE
76936 Ultrasound-guided compression repair arterial pseudoaneurysm (includes
DX evaluation, compression of lesion, imaging).
Liver, kidney and lung tissue are considered “parenchymal” tissue. Imaging services
provided for the guidance and monitoring of tissue ablation of these organs is accurately
reported using the modality specific imaging codes. If more than one imaging modality
is utilized for ablation guidance and monitoring only the predominant modality is
reported. This coding convention is inconsistent with and not applicable to most other
interventional radiology imaging codes.
(Note: Code 76942 should not be used to report ultrasound guidance for
vascular access; see code 76937).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 113
(Do not report 76942 in conjunction with 10004, 10005, 10006, 10021,
10030, 19083, 19285, 20604, 20606, 20611, 27096, 32554–32557,
37760, 37761, 43232, 43237, 43242, 45341, 45342, 46948, 55874,
64479, 64480, 64483, 64484, 64490, 64491, 64493, 64494, 64495,
76975, 0213T, 0214T, 0215T, 0216T, 0217T, 0218T, 0228T, 0229T,
0230T, 0231T, 0232T, 0481T, 0582T)
FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE
+77001 Fluoroscopic guidance for CVA device placement, replacement or
removal.
(For ultrasound guidance for vascular access, see code 76937; please
note the documentation requirements associated with code 76937).
Not all venous access procedures necessitate the use of imaging guidance. Therefore,
when imaging services are provided in conjunction with the placement, partial/complete
replacement, or removal of CVA these services are separately reportable.
In 2017, fluoroscopic guidance codes 77002 and 77003 were changed from stand-alone
procedures to add-on codes. See the CPT® 2020 Professional Edition manual for a listing
of appropriate primary procedure codes with which 77002 may be reported.
+77003 Fluoroscopic guidance and needle localization for spine injection procedures.
Use 77003 with these codes when fluoroscopy guidance is required. For
facet joint injections, see codes 64470–64476.
Use 77003 with these codes when fluoroscopy guidance is required. For
facet joint injections, see codes 64470–64476.
CT GUIDANCE
77012 CT guidance for needle placement (e.g., biopsy, aspiration, injection or
localization device) RS&I
77013 CT guidance for, and monitoring of, parenchymal tissue ablation. Liver,
kidney and lung tissue are considered “parenchymal” tissue and imaging
services provided for the guidance and monitoring of ablation of tissue
of these organs is accurately reported using these modality-specific
imaging codes. If more than one imaging modality is utilized for ablation
guidance and monitoring, only the predominant modality is reported.
This coding convention is inconsistent with and not applicable to most
other interventional radiology imaging codes.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 115
MR GUIDANCE
77021 MR imaging guidance for needle placement (e.g., injection, localization,
Bx, aspiration), RS&I/S&I.
(Do not report 77021 in conjunction with 10011, 10012, 10030, 19085,
19287, 32554, 32555, 32556, 32557, 0232T, 0481T).
X-ray, CT, ultrasound and MR for biopsy and drainage and aspiration
do not include a full examination of the organ or area. The RS&I/S&I
code only describes the work inherent in the actual guidance and
interpretation of images obtained during the intervention. If an evaluation
or localization is performed in addition, this should be separately coded.
(Do not report 77022 in conjunction with 0071T, 0072T, 20982, 20983,
32994, 32998).
RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL ADMINISTRATION
79445 Intra-arterial administration of particulate for radiopharmaceutical
therapy.
Code 79445 was created to capture the work of prescribing, handling, and administering
the radioactive agent added to the embolization agent. Procedural and RS&I/S&I
services performed prior to radiopharmaceutical therapy are reported separately.
93978 Visceral vascular study (duplex imaging aorta, IVC, iliacs, grafts,
complete).
93985 Duplex scan of arterial inflow and venous outflow for preoperative vessel
assessment prior to creation of hemodialysis access; complete bilateral
study
93986 Duplex scan of arterial inflow and venous outflow for preoperative vessel
assessment prior to creation of hemodialysis access; complete unilateral
study
CHEMOTHERAPY ADMINISTRATION
96420 Chemotherapy administration, intra-arterial (see CPT for 96425
differentiation).
There is greater caution and additional physician work in the handling and administration
of a chemotherapy agent as compared to that of an embolic agent. Due to the increased
physician work and intensity, this service is separately reportable using code 96420
(chemotherapy administration, intra-arterial, push technique) in those cases where the
interventional radiologist determines the dose, prescribes and personally administers the
chemotherapeutic agent in conjunction with the embolic agent.
Code 96420 is an “Incident To” code and will not be paid by the Medicare program
when performed in the hospital setting. The CPT® 2020 Professional Edition manual
states on page 734: “Codes 96360–96379, 96401, 96402, 96409–96425, 96521–96523
are not intended to be reported by the physician in the facility setting.”
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 118
Other applications for MRgFUS, such as pain palliation in the setting of bone metastasis,
have been FDA approved; however, they do not have a corresponding listed CPT code.
Therefore, SIR recommends the use of the appropriate unlisted code for the body part
that this treated. See codes 22899 (spine), 22999 (abdomen, MSK), 23999 (shoulder),
24999 (humerus/elbow), 25999 (forearm/wrist), 27299 (pelvis/hip joint) and 27899
(leg/ankle).
Category III codes do not go through the RUC valuation process and CMS does not
establish RVUs for these procedures. Providers are urged to contact their local carrier in
advance of providing any Category III code services to ascertain the coverage, reporting
and reimbursement policies for these procedures.
Like unlisted codes, Category III codes do not have a set relative value and thus payment
for procedures is considered on an individual basis. In fact, considerable latitude is
given to carrier medical directors (CMDs) to pay for these procedures on a case-by-
case basis. For this reason, it is crucial that the CMDs have access to information about
the procedure(s) being reported using a Category III code. Supporting documentation
including literature, an estimate of physician work, appropriate indications and, if
appropriate, cost savings associated with the procedure should be submitted to the
CMD for consideration. It would also behoove providers and their institutions to develop
a list of standard supplies, equipment costs and nonphysician clinical staff requirements
to facilitate consideration of technical component reimbursement.
Your local radiology societies and Carrier Advisory Committee members can be
excellent resources for approaching CMDs due to their frequent access. For additional
information regarding the Carrier Advisory Committee and guidance in contacting your
representatives, please see the SIR website at [Link] and the ACR website at [Link].
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 120
Category III codes 0234T–0238T were implemented on Jan. 1, 2011, to describe arterial
atherectomy above the inguinal ligaments performed percutaneously and/or through
open surgical exposure. These codes include the work of performing the atherectomy
and the RS&I of the atherectomy procedure.
Unlike the atherectomy codes below the inguinal ligaments (37225, 37227, 37229,
37231, 37233, 37235), codes 0234T–0238T do not include the work of accessing and
selectively catheterizing the vessel, traversing the lesion, embolic protection if used,
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 121
other intervention used to treat the same or other vessels, or closure of the arteriotomy
(by any method).
RENAL DENERVATION
0338T Transcatheter renal sympathetic denervation, percutaneous approach
including arterial puncture, selective catheter placement(s) renal
artery(ies), fluoroscopy, contrast injection(s), intraprocedural
roadmapping and radiological supervision and interpretation, including
pressure gradient measurements, flush aortogram and diagnostic renal
angiography when performed; unilateral.
0339T Bilateral.
(Do not report 0338T, 0339T in conjunction with 36251, 36252, 36253,
36254).
0442T Nerve plexus or other truncal nerve (brachial plexus, pudendal nerve.
(Do not report 76937 in conjunction with 0505T for ultrasound guidance
for vascular access).
Four new Category III codes have been created for anatomic model 3D printing.
0559T Anatomic model 3D-printed from image data set(s); first individually
prepared and processed component of an anatomic structure
0561T Anatomic guide 3D-printed and designed from image data set(s); first
anatomic guide.
+0562T each additional anatomic guide (List separately in addition to code for
primary procedure).
The patient must be a new patient to the consultant or an established patient with a new
problem or exacerbation of an existing problem. The consultant should not have seen
the patient in a face-to-face encounter within the last 14 days. If the telephone/internet/
electronic health record consultation leads to transfer of care or face-to-face service,
surgery, hospital visit or scheduled office evaluation for the patient within the next 14
days or next available appointment date of the consultant, 99446–99449, 99451 are
not reported.
Do not report codes 99446–99449, 99451 more than once in a 7-day interval for the
same patient.
Communications and time with the patient and/or family related to these services is not
reported with codes 99446–99449. To bill for these services, see telephone services
codes 98966–98969 and Evaluation and Management services 99441–99443. Code
99444 has been deleted. See codes 99421–99423.
A: The written or verbal request, including the reason for the telephone/internet/
electronic health record consultation from the treating, requesting physician must be
documented in the patient’s medical record.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 124
Codes 99446–99449 must conclude with a verbal opinion report and written report
from the consultant to the treating/requesting physician. Code 99451 concludes with a
written report only.
The time spent reviewing laboratory studies, pertinent medical records, imaging studies,
medications, pathology specimens is included in the telephone/internet/electronic
health record consultation and not separately reported with 99446–99449, 99451.
Verbal patient consent must be documented in the patient’s medical record for each
consultation and include assurance that the patient is aware of applicable cost-sharing.
Q: What are the requirements for the treating, requesting physician for reporting time
spent requesting and/or communicating with the specialist consultant (99452)?
A: The treating, requesting physician must spend 16–30 minutes in a service day
preparing the referral and/or communicating with the consultant to report code 99452
for the interprofessional telephone/internet/electronic health record referral service.
If the time exceeds 30 minutes, and the patient is present and accessible to the treating,
requesting physician, prolonged service codes 99354–99357 may be reported for time
spent on interprofessional telephone/internet/electronic health record discussion with
the specialist.
If the patient is not present in front of the treating, requesting physician and the
interprofessional telephone/internet/electronic health record assessment and
management service exceeds 30 minutes in a day, non-face-to-face prolonged service
codes 99358, 99359 may be reported by the treating, requesting physician.
Please consult the 2020 AMA CPT® Professional Edition for complete instructions on
reporting all evaluation and management/non-face-to-face services.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 125
Virtual check-ins
CMS has also introduced a new HCPCS code, (procedures and professional services
principally used to be reimbursed for new technology) for “virtual check-ins” with
patients who are unsure if their symptoms warrant an in-office visit. HCPCS code G2012,
allows physicians to be reimbursed for “virtual check-ins that may be “audio-only” (e.g.,
a telephone call between the patient and the physician or qualified health care provider)
or live two-way audio with video. If the virtual check-in does not lead to an in-office visit
and does not occur within 7 days of a prior E&M service by the billing practitioner, it may
be billed as a standalone service.
A: The term “tunneled PICC” is commonly being used to describe the placement of a
small-bore catheter, tunneled into the internal jugular vein. Correct coding for insertion
of a central venous access device is dependent on the device site, device type and
patient age. The placement of a small-bore central venous access catheter tunneled into
the internal jugular vein would be considered centrally placed and would be reported
using code 36557 for patients under 5 years of age or 36558 for patients 5 years of
age and older. If ultrasound guidance is necessary to garner vascular access (and the
documentation requirements met as detailed in the code descriptor), code 76937 is
also reported. The use of fluoroscopic guidance for the placement of the central venous
access device is reported using code 77001.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 126
Q: Can the venous angioplasty codes be used to report fibrin sheath disruption during
a central venous catheter procedure?
A: No. Dilating a clot or macerating fibrin sheath with a balloon is not considered to be
dilating a vessel stricture and is not considered to be an angioplasty service. If balloon
fibrin sheath maceration is performed from a separate access, the accurate code to
describe the service is 36595 (mechanical removal of pericatheter obstructive material
[e.g., fibrin sheath] from the central venous device via separate access). See CPT code
75901 for corresponding RS&I.
Q: If multiple obliquities of the target vessel being studied are obtained during
angiography, how are these extra views coded?
A: Multiple views are not separately coded when multiple obliquities of the target
vessel being studied are obtained during angiography. The code for a full and complete
examination includes all necessary views unless otherwise stated. If multiple areas are
examined, however, then these are separately coded. For example, if the abdominal
aorta is studied in an additional lateral projection, only 75625 is coded.
A: No. If one attempts in a serious and bona fide manner to perform a service and is
unsuccessful but has in the attempt performed a lesser service, then the lesser service
is coded. As an example, consider an unsuccessful attempted aortic access from a right
femoral approach (failed because of an iliac occlusion); the service should be coded as
36140 rather than 36200. If an angioplasty of an occlusion is unsuccessful because the lesion
cannot be crossed, then the appropriate access and/or selection only should be coded.
On the other hand, if the lesion is crossed and the angioplasty is performed but with an
unacceptable outcome, then the angioplasty is coded since all the work of the angioplasty
was done. If significant portions of a procedure are performed, but the procedure must be
terminated prematurely due to extenuating circumstances or those that threaten the well-
being of the patient, a –53 modifier (discontinued service) may be used.
Q: How should one report vascular catheterization services when these are performed
through a sheath already placed by another physician?
A: One may still use the coding conventions described in this Update but should use the
modifier –52 to delineate a decreased level of service for the primary access or selection
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 127
code. All codes should not be at a decreased level of service since access is only
achieved once during the typical case, whether performed by the operating physician or
already in place.
A: The CT capabilities of the new hybrid imaging systems are commonly being employed
to garner diagnostic CT imaging studies, as well as to provide imaging guidance for
interventions. Coding will depend on the procedure/service being provided and most
often for diagnostic studies performed, the existing CT CPT codes will be applicable.
When images are obtained for diagnostic purposes, one would report the applicable
anatomic-specific diagnostic CT code. These are differentiated by the use of contrast
with specific codes for studies performed with, without or both “with and without”
contrast. Any diagnostic CT exam provided using these hybrid systems will be expected
to be performed and documented within established clinical standards and guidelines.
The ACR has issued various documents detailing the clinical standards for the
performance of diagnostic CT studies of the brain, head, chest, abdomen and pelvis,
which can be obtained via the ACR website.
For limited or focused diagnostic CT studies, often code 76380 (computed tomography,
limited or localized follow-up study) will be applicable. Code 76380 would typically only
be reported once regardless of the number of localized diagnostic CT studies obtained
during a single therapeutic intervention.
There are also several existing CT guidance codes applicable for describing imaging
guidance and monitoring of an intervention performed using a hybrid fluoroscopy-CT
system when the CT imaging guidance capabilities are evoked, such as the following:
77013
Computerized tomography guidance for, and monitoring of, tissue
ablation.
75989
Radiological guidance (e.g., fluoroscopy, ultrasound or computed
tomography) for percutaneous drainage (e.g., abscess, specimen
collection), with placement of catheter, radiological supervision and
interpretation.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 128
If both fluoroscopy and CT guidance were used for the placement of a needle, one would
not report 77002 (fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement [e.g., biopsy, aspiration,
injection, localization device]) in addition to 77012; rather, only 77012 is reported.
76376
3D rendering with interpretation and reporting of computed tomography,
magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound or other tomographic modality;
not requiring image post-processing on an independent workstation.
(Do not report 76376 or 76377 in conjunction with 31627, 34839, 70496,
70498, 70544–70549, 71275, 71555, 72159, 72191, 72198, 73206, 73225,
73706, 73725, 74174, 74175, 74185, 74261–74263, 75557, 75559, 75561,
75563, 75565, 75571–75574, 75635, 77046–77049, 77061–77063,
78012–78999, 93355, 0523T, 0559T–0562T).
or CT services provided for which there is not an existing code that accurately
F
describes the service/procedure, the use of an unlisted CPT code may be warranted
(76497—unlisted computed tomography procedure [e.g., diagnostic, interventional]).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 129
A: The short answer is yes, you can charge for 3D rendering with image postprocessing
if performed on a separate workstation (76377) when performing carotid or cerebral
angiography. Code 76377 is used to report 3D rendering with interpretation and
reporting of ultrasound, CT or MRI. It is important to note that the images have to be
saved, and all of the criteria for concurrent supervision must be met. This code is not
meant to describe the work done by a technologist without a separate workstation or
the need to take a scanner offline for image processing.
76377 can only be reported once per procedure and medical necessity should
be documented. This code cannot be reported in conjunction with CTA and MRA
procedures since 3D rendering is considered an inherent component of these studies. It
should also not be reported with CT colonography, PET imaging or any nuclear medicine
study. See the parentheticals following codes 76376 and 76377 in the CPT® 2020
Professional Edition codebook for a complete listing of procedures that do not permit
the separate reporting of 3D renderings.
ARTERIAL ACCESS
Q: If the catheter is positioned in the contralateral external iliac for contralateral
leg arteriogram, and then pulled back into the ipsilateral iliac for ipsilateral leg
arteriogram, should it be coded 75710–50 or 75716?
A: 75716 would be the appropriate code for the RS&I, if there is medical necessity and
documentation of that medical necessity to perform a bilateral lower extremity exam.
Selective catheter placement would be coded with the single code 36246, as only one
vascular family was selected.
Q: Do I need to see all the way to the toes to code 75716 when performing a leg
angiogram?
A: The entire leg does not need to be imaged for the bilateral extremity angiography
code (75716) to apply as long as intent is to image beyond the common femorals. One
does not need to use reduced services modifier –52 if imaging is only done to the knees.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 130
Q: How do I code for an arch aortogram, when performed with a thoracic aortogram?
A: One would use codes 36221 and 75605 to report the services described above. Since
CPT code 36221 includes catheter placement of the catheter in the aorta, 36200 would
not be reported.
A: The horseshoe kidney is two kidneys that have fused. There may be five or more
renal arteries in this situation. For coding purposes, if both the right and left halves are
studied, a horseshoe kidney is coded using the bilateral code 36252. The unilateral code
36251 would be reported if only the right or the left half is studied.
Q: How do I code for selective catheterizations (e.g., internal maxillary and facial
arteries) off of the external carotid artery, as in during an embolization for epistaxis?
Q: CPT code 36225 is used when the subclavian or innominate is selected and
imaging of the vertebral circulation is performed. How would one code for selective
catheterization of the subclavian or innominate artery for the purpose of visualizing
the proximal vessel of the extremity only?
A: Clarification was made for 2015 that highlights two points for the cervicocerebral
codes: It is now acceptable to use CPT codes 36223 and 36225, in addition to 36224
and 36226, as the base or initial codes for the add-on code 36228 in instances when
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 131
It is now acceptable to use the CPT codes 75774 and 36218 in the scenario when
additional arteries of the upper extremities and other vascular beds of the neck
are performed in the same session as vertebral angiography. For example, if the
costocervical artery is selected in addition to the vertebral artery, it would be
appropriate to use the bundled code 36226 (for the vertebral) and component codes
36218 and 75774 (for the costocervical artery).
Q: Is abdominal aortogram, CPT 75625, included in the visceral angiography codes for
the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries?
Q: When I select and perform angiograms of the following arteries in order, how is
it coded: celiac artery (first order), common hepatic artery (second order), right
hepatic or left hepatic artery (third order) and subselective arteriography (beyond)?
I know that the CPT codes for visceral angiography are 36245–36248. If I select and
document arteriography for each successive artery, do I code for each or just the
highest level?
medical record and in the image archive. Note that documentation of the catheterization
includes description of the catheter location in the operative note and the S&I includes
imaging archival and an interpretation of the angiographic images (description of what
the angiographic images demonstrated) in the medical record. If either documentation
requirement is absent, then the respective code may not be reported.
VENOUS
Q: Are selective catheter placements and venography reportable when performing
bilateral main renal vein renin samples with venography and peripheral sampling?
A: No, selective catheter placements and venography are not reportable when
performing bilateral main renal vein samples with venography and peripheral sampling.
The NCCI edits exclude billing for a selective venous catheterization access code when
using 36500. Therefore, 36011 should not be billed. Likewise, RS&I codes associated
with diagnostic venogram (75831 or 75833 for renal venography) should not be
reported. The procedural code for renal vein renin sampling (36500) should be used for
each organ selected but is not used for nonselective sampling from the IVC. The RS&I
code for venous sampling (75893) is likewise used for each selective organ sampled and
includes venography. Code 36500 is not coded multiple times when multiple samples
are obtained from the same organ through the same access site. When separate and
distinct samples from separate organs are obtained, code 36500 should be used for
each organ sampled.
DIALYSIS CIRCUIT
Q: What if I am asked to perform a dialysis circuit evaluation on a patient who is
coming to me directly from the dialysis unit with needles already in place within the
graft?
A: Report code 36901 with modifier –52 when a dialysis A-V circuit evaluation is
performed through existing access that has been placed outside of the angiography
suite (e.g., if the patient presents from dialysis with needles placed within the graft or
fistula, and contrast is injected through the needle to image the graft and its outflow).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 133
A: CPT code 36904 includes the work of all punctures into the thrombosed graft
or fistula, as well as the imaging to the central outflow vein performed during the
procedure. This code also includes all methods of percutaneous removal of a clot from
the dialysis access to restore patency: any type of mechanical thrombectomy, Fogarty
maneuver and use of thrombolytic agents within the circuit, regardless of the technique
for infusion such as “lyse and wait,” pulse spray, bolus injections and prolonged
infusions.
It also includes all means of removing the arterial plug by any method. The thrombolysis
codes (37211–37214) would only be used if the patient left the department with lysis
catheter in place.
A: Extensive guidance is provided in the CPT Professional Edition that addresses coding
of the dialysis circuit. For the purposes of AV access interventions, the AV access is
divided into two vessel segments; the peripheral dialysis segment and the central
dialysis segment. The peripheral dialysis segment is the portion of the circuit that begins
at the arterial anastomosis and extends through the axillary or cephalic veins.
Furthermore, the perianastomotic region (the short segment of the circuit immediately
adjacent and encompassing a short segment of the parent artery) is also included
within the peripheral segment of the circuit. The central dialysis segment includes the
subclavian and innominate veins through the SVC. Therefore, in the scenario above,
CPT code 36902 would be reported to account for the PTA at the arterial anastomosis
(which includes all PTA performed in the peripheral segment). In addition, the add-on
code 36907 would be reported for the PTA for the subclavian vein. The current coding
conventions would not allow for separate reporting of arterial PTA code (new CPT
code 37247) in this scenario. Only when a stenosis within the native arterial system is
identified and treated would reporting of 37247 be appropriate.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 134
Q: A patient presents with poor right upper arm dialysis graft function. Access
towards the arterial and venous anastomoses is obtained and an arteriovenous circuit
evaluation is performed. To further examine arterial inflow, a catheter is advanced
beyond the arterial anastomosis into the axillobrachial artery and angiography is
performed. Is the catheterization of the native artery considered a part of the initial
access code 36901?
A: In this scenario, because the catheter is advanced beyond the arterial anastomosis/
perianastomotic region, the selective catheterization of the native artery is reported
separately. It is appropriate to report code 36215 for selective catheterization of the
upper extremity or 36245 for selective catheterization of the lower extremity in addition
to CPT code 36901.
A: CPT code 36901 would be reported to account for the direct access and diagnostic
fistulogram performed. It is also appropriate to report CPT code 36010 to account for
catheter or device placement into the SVC since it is via a separate access site, as well as
the CPT code for venous angioplasty, 37248. A modifier may be necessary to indicate to
the payer that a distinct procedure was performed. The use of the add-on code 36907
would not be appropriate in the scenario because the angioplasty was not performed
through the dialysis circuit.
Q: The CPT® Professional Edition states that the work of all catheterizations during
dialysis AV shunt are included in CPT code 36901 but also goes on to explain some
exceptions. Are the selective catheterizations of multiple side branches performed
during an embolization reportable?
A: No. CPT code 36901 includes catheterization of additional venous side branches or
accessory veins. If embolization is performed, then the add-on code 36909 would be
reported in conjunction with 36901. 36909 is reported once per session, regardless of
the number of branches embolized.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 135
VASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Q: How would the following be coded? A diagnostic aortogram and runoff angiogram
of the left lower extremity is performed via retrograde puncture of the right common
femoral artery. Based on diagnostic angiographic findings, an antegrade left femoral
puncture for SFA recanalization followed by SFA angioplasty and stenting is then
performed.
A: In this scenario, the first (retrograde) access that was obtained was for diagnostic
purposes and is separately reportable with the appropriate modifier: 36246–59 for
this case. Additionally, if full and complete diagnostic angiograms are performed and
appropriately documented, the RS&I codes 75625–59 and 75710–59 would be reported
as well as the appropriate lower extremity revascularization code (37226 in this case).
Code 37226 includes catheter placement; therefore, the antegrade left femoral access
would not be reported.
Q: How would I code for the following? Diagnostic arch aortogram and bilateral
selective common carotid angiograms are performed, supporting indication for, and
performance of, right cervical carotid stent placement using an embolic protection
device.
A: Code 37215 would be used for the cervical carotid stent placement code, which
includes the following services for the vessel being treated:
The diagnostic study and catheterization of the vessel not being stented is separately
reportable when clinically necessary and when no recent previous angiogram is
available. Even though bilateral cervical diagnostic studies were provided, only the
appropriate bundled code for the vessel not being stented is reportable. In this case,
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 136
36222–59 would be coded for the left, which also includes imaging of the aortic arch
when performed. RS&I modifier –59 must be appended to the diagnostic angiography
codes to signify that a separate site other than that of the cervical carotid stent
placement is being examined.
A: While the carotid stenting codes (37215–37218) include all ipsilateral imaging and
selective catheter placement, it would be appropriate to code for 36221 if a full and
complete diagnostic arch study is performed and reported. It is recommended that one
should append a –52 (reduced service) modifier to CPT code 36221 since it is a bundled
code that includes the work of catheterizing the aorta.
A: Clear delineation between diagnostic RS&I services and RS&I services provided during
the therapeutic intervention must be provided.
Page 487 of the 2020 CPT® Professional Edition describes in detail the scenarios in which
diagnostic angiograms are billable with transcatheter therapies. In general, it would be
considered appropriate to bill for the diagnostic angiography in the following scenarios:
All services should be documented in the patient’s written record. Therefore, the exact
nature of the procedural (surgical) services should be clearly delineated. If services
are combined into one report, the individual types of services (surgical, radiological,
management) should be clearly separated and identified in the body and impression of
the report. Alternatively, separate reports may be generated for each of the services.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 137
Q: What are the proper codes for a stent-assisted coiling of a right supraclinoid ICA
aneurysm? Are multiple follow-up angiograms billable if performed?
A: In this scenario, CPT codes 37184 (primary thrombectomy, initial vessel) and 37185
(primary thrombectomy, subsequent vessel) would be reported because the native
vessel is considered an additional, separate vessel than graft.
Q: Are multiple lesions within the same vessel or a long lesion within the same vessel
treated with angioplasty coded with multiple angioplasty codes?
A: No, any necessary angioplasty within a single vessel is coded with only one procedural
angioplasty and one RS&I angioplasty code. Multiple vessels treated at the same operative
setting are coded separately. In the new lower extremity revascularization (LER) codes,
the femoral and popliteal vessels are one vessel. Similarly, the tibioperoneal trunk is not
considered a separate distinct vessel from the peroneal and PT.
A: The code for the most acute indication should be reported. In the example above,
code 37244 would be reported because the most acute indication is hemorrhage.
Q: When a stent is used for embolization or occlusion, is the embolization code or the
stent code reported?
A: Depending on the circumstance, either the embolization code or the stent code is
reported. If stent-assisted coil embolization is performed (the stent is placed to provide a
latticework for subsequent deployment of coils), only the embolization code is reported.
If a covered stent is deployed to exclude a site of extravasation, only the stent code is
reported. For example, treating an aneurysm with stent-assisted coil embolization would
be reported using code 37242, while treating an aneurysm by deploying a covered stent
to prevent flow into the aneurysm would be reported using the appropriate stent code.
Please note that, like the embolization codes, the intravascular stent placement codes
(37236, 37239) include RS&I.
VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION
Q: When several accessory veins of an upper-extremity arteriovenous fistula are
embolized in a single session, are the embolizations considered to be in one or
multiple surgical fields?
A: One upper extremity is considered one surgical field, so whether one or four
accessory veins are embolized, only one embolization code (37241) is reported for this
encounter.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 139
When transcatheter embolizations of the accessory veins are performed, then the
selective catheterizations are reported separately.
A: No. The embolization codes are not used to report these services. Venous sclerosis
of telangiectasia or extremity veins and endovenous ablation of incompetent extremity
veins are reported using codes 36468, 36470, 36471, 36475–36479.
Q: Is embolization for pelvic congestion considered one or two surgical fields? Also,
how do I code for the diagnostic venograms that are performed during pelvic/gonadal
venography?
A: The answer depends on what veins are embolized to achieve retrograde occlusion
of the pelvic venous system. If bilateral gonadal veins are embolized in the distal
pelvis, closer to where the left and right systems meet, this may be considered one
surgical field (analogous to an embolization for uterine fibroids) and 37241 would be
reported once. However, if the central outflow portion of the bilateral gonadal veins
are embolized, this would be considered two separate surgical fields (analogous to a
bilateral renal artery embolization) and 37241 should be reported twice.
Selective left gonadal venography should be coded as 36012 and 75831, since the left
gonadal vein in males and females is typically a branch of the left renal vein. Selective
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 140
right gonadal venography is more difficult to code, since the right gonadal vein typically
arises directly from the inferior vena cava (therefore a first-order selective code
36011) and does not typically include a renal venogram; therefore, it does not have a
corresponding RS&I code.
A: No. This service is excluded from code 37242 and is reported using code 36002
(Injection procedures [e.g., thrombin] for percutaneous treatment of extremity
pseudoaneurysm).
Q: Given that code 37210, previously used to report uterine artery embolization, has
been deleted, which of the embolization codes is used to report this service?
A: If one metastasis is located in one surgical field, only one embolization code (37243)
is reported for this encounter regardless of how many branches are embolized. The
selective catheterizations are reported separately.
A: In addition to the embolization code 37243, code 96420 is reported to capture the
work of intra-arterial chemotherapy administration.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 141
A: No. The code for the most acute indication (tumor chemoembolization) should
be reported (37243). Coil embolizing of the vessel at risk is not separately reported
because it involves an embolization on the same surgical field as the tumor (the area
immediately surrounding and directly involved in a treatment/procedure). However,
selective catheterizations needed to perform the embolizations should be reported
separately.
right gastric artery and the gastroduodenal artery to mitigate the risk of nontarget
embolization of subsequently administered Y-90. CPT code 37242 would represent the
work of the embolization in this setting. Note that this embolization is considered to take
place in one “operative field” so even when more than one vessel is embolized, only a
single embolization code is reported. Also note that angiography performed during and
following the embolization is an included service within the new embolization codes and
is not separately billable. This session is completed by intra-arterial administration of Tc-
99m MAA to simulate planned Y-90 therapy (the simulation injection is not considered
an embolization and is separately reportable with CPT 77290).
Third stage: When the patient presents for the day of the procedure, the angiograms
performed in the treatment session can simply be confirmatory if no change in
hepatic arterial flow is expected. In this case, the associated RS&I codes should not be
billed since they were performed in the preplanning session. However, in the current
multimodality treatment algorithm, previous systemic chemotherapy and previous
embolization therapy are common; therefore, diagnostic angiography (CPT codes 75726
and 75774, if appropriate) is warranted to identify new vascular flow patterns, the
effect of chemotherapy on vessels and to ensure safe distribution of radioembolization
therapy. Additionally, all selective catheter work performed in this session is separately
billable (36245–36248); note that the single, final catheter placement in each artery
catheterized is reported. Do not report for multiple recatheterizations of the same
vessel in a single setting. Once the appropriate artery selection is achieved, the Y-90
dose is delivered, monitored with fluoroscopy and angiographic sequences as needed
to document progress and completion of the therapy. This is reported with the
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 143
IR not the AU: Alternative coding conventions may be appropriate in the scenario when
the IR involved is not an AU to deliver microsphere therapy. A second, licensed physician
(acting as the AU) may be involved in the planning and delivery of the Y-90 dose.
In this two-doctor model of treatment, CPT code 77778 describes the work of
application of an interstitial radiation source (complex). If the second physician—the
AU—has material involvement in the planning, dosimetry and administration of the
microspheres, CPT code 77778 may be used. These codes should not be reported by
an authorized user for intraoperative work with another physician who surgically places
catheters interstitially unless the authorized user also applies the radiation source at the
same patient encounter. Additionally, if the AU is billing 77778, CPT code 79445 should
not be billed in that same encounter.
A: No. The embolization code (37242) should be reported only once, since all the vessels
embolized are in the same surgical field (i.e., the area immediately surrounding and
directly involved in a treatment/procedure). However, selective catheterizations needed
to perform the embolizations should be reported separately.
Q: If a multitrauma patient presents with bleeding from the pelvis and the spleen, and
both sites are embolized in the same session, are multiple embolizations reported?
A: Yes. In this setting, two embolization codes (37244) are reported with the
appropriate modifier (e.g., modifier –59) because the pelvis and the spleen are two
different surgical fields. The codes for catheter placement are reported separately as
well as any imaging used for diagnostic evaluation.
Are the inferior mesenteric arteriogram and all superselective left colic arteriograms
reported separately, or are they bundled into the embolization code?
Q: Can I use one the new embolization codes (37241–37244) to report gelfoam
injection for biopsy tract closure?
A: No. Any maneuvers to close a biopsy tract is considered incidental to the biopsy
procedure and should not be separately coded.
A: Use codes 75625–59, 75716–59, 37231, 37224. Diagnostic imaging is not included
in the lower extremity revascularization codes and may be separately reported as long
as the requirements set out by CPT are met. Those requirements are described in detail
under the above codes in this coding update.
In this case, an aortogram (75625) and the bilateral lower extremity arteriogram (75716)
are performed and interpreted. The decision to perform an intervention is then based
on these findings so that the diagnostic procedure is separate and distinct from the
intervention and, therefore, the –59 modifier is necessary. The interpretation of the
arteriogram and the justification for the intervention should be clearly defined in the
report. If the same access was used for the intervention and the diagnostic arteriogram,
no additional catheter code is used. However, if the intervention is performed from an
access separate from the diagnostic arteriogram access, the appropriate catheterization
code for the diagnostic study would also be reported with a –59 modifier. Code 37224 is
used for the angioplasty of the popliteal artery lesion. If stent placement was performed
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 145
at the popliteal segment, then the angioplasty would not be coded separately, but only
the stent placement (37226) would be coded.
Code 37231 includes all the interventions performed to recanalize the tibioperoneal
trunk and posterior tibial artery, including the atherectomy and stent (and angioplasty if
performed). No additional codes if distal embolic protection is employed.
Q: When using the Category III codes for atherectomy of the iliac artery (0238T),
the catheter placement is separately reportable. If we perform a common iliac artery
angioplasty (CPT code 37220) in combination with atherectomy in the same iliac
vessel, are we allowed to charge for the catheter placement?
A: If performed in the same vessel and through the same access site, the answer would
be no, the catheter placement is not separately reportable. However, if the interventions
are performed in opposite iliac arteries, via separate access sites or if a more selective
catheter placement was obtained to perform the atherectomy, then the appropriate
catheter placement code would be billable. Keep in mind that the use of a modifier may
be necessary to avoid denials.
Q: How are selective catheterizations of the renal veins to delineate anatomy during
IVC filter placement coded?
Q: What code should be reported to describe the placement of IVC filters when placed
in a duplicated IVC?
A: Report code 37191 twice to describe the placement of two vena cava filters in a
duplicate IVC system. Use modifier –59 with the second code to denote to the payer
that this is a separate and distinct study and to ensure appropriate reimbursement.
Q: Can you define “initial treatment day” for the thrombolytic therapy codes that were
introduced in 2013 (CPT codes 37211 and 37212)?
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 146
A: The definition of “initial day” is a calendar day; therefore, if a patient is brought back
to the suite within the same calendar day, the second setting is not billable.
A: Yes, one would code the appropriate embolization code. See codes 37241 or 37244,
depending on the indication for the embolization.
A: Yes, with the proper documentation, CPT code 37221 (iliac stent, including
angioplasty) could be used in this scenario because the stenosis is outside of the
treatment zone and unrelated to the repair of the aneurysm.
Q: How do I code for internal iliac artery embolizations at the time of EVAR?
Code 37242 and typically 36245 are both appropriate to report this procedure. Use
of a selective catheter placement code for embolization obviates the use of 36200 for
placing a catheter in the aorta under coding convention rules. Typically, a second aortic
catheter placement is performed via a separate access site, which is reportable.
Q: If I place two extension cuffs in the same vessel to treat endoleak of an AAA
endoprosthesis, after initial endograft placement, how many times can I report 34709?
A: Cuff placement services are reported per vessel treated, not per cuff or device
placement, therefore 34709 would be reported once. However, if extensions are placed
in separate vessels (for example, the right and left iliac arteries), then would be reported
also. See codes 34710 and 34711 for extensions placed in a delayed setting.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 147
NONVASCULAR INTERVENTION
Q: How do I code for the dilatation of distal ureter?
A: Dilation of ureter is reported using the add-on code 50706. This code should be used
in conjunction with 50382, 50384, 50385, 50386, 50387, 50389, 50430, 50431, 50432,
50433, 50434, 50435, 50684, 50688, 50690, 50693, 50694, 50695, 51610.
Q: How does one code for a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram with external
biliary drain placement?
A: Code 47533 describes the work of external biliary drain placement and includes
diagnostic cholangiography and imaging guidance.
Q: When a patient returns at a later date for conversion of their external biliary drain to
an internal-external drain, is this coded as an exchange?
A: These tunneled, cuffed catheters are used for vacuum bottle assisted removal of fluid
from either the pleural or peritoneal spaces. After placement, this subsequent removal
can be performed by the physician, nurse or even properly instructed patient.
Tunneled peritoneal catheter placement: Code 49418 is used to report the initial
placement of a tunneled peritoneal catheter and it includes all imaging guidance.
Code 49422, removal of permanent peritoneal catheter, should be used to report
the subsequent removal of a tunneled peritoneal catheter.
Q: How do I code for paravertebral facet joint injections at L2-L3 and L3-L4 performed
under fluoroscopic guidance?
A: Code 64493 accounts for the first level performed and includes the imaging guidance
used for the procedure. Code 64494 accounts for the second level performed and also
includes the imaging guidance. Code 64494 is an add-on code and can only be used
when 64493 is used as well. Moderate sedation is reported separately when performed.
A: Code 49185 was introduced in 2016 for sclerotherapy of fluid collections, such as
those mentioned above. This code does not include placement of the catheter within
the collection, which should be separately billed. Note that there is a difference between
lymphocele and lymphatic malformations, this code is not intended for use highly
complex lymphatic malformations.
Q: What are the appropriate codes to use when microwave ablation is the energy
source used for liver, lung or renal lesions?
A: The existing CPT codes for tumor ablation are defined for radiofrequency ablation.
This definition has led to some confusion, occasionally resulting in the use of unlisted
procedure codes for microwave ablation. SIR does not recommend the use of unlisted
procedure codes for microwave ablation of kidney, lung or liver tumors. Microwave is
part of the radiofrequency spectrum and uses a different part of the radiofrequency
spectrum to generate heat energy to destroy abnormal soft tissue. Microwave ablation
equipment is substantially comparable to operate in practice, which is also reflected
in the FDA approval of microwave devices under the 510(K) clearance process as
equivalent to radiofrequency. As such, SIR recommends that CPT codes 32998, 47382,
and 50592 be used for both microwave and radiofrequency ablation in their respective
anatomic locations, in conjunction with the appropriate imaging guidance code, if
imaging is separately reportable.
47382
Ablation, one or more liver tumor(s) percutaneous, radiofrequency; with
appropriate image guidance code: 77013 (CT), 77022 (MRI), 76940 (US).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 149
32998
Ablation therapy for reduction or eradication of 1 or more pulmonary
tumor(s) including pleura or chest wall when involved by tumor
extension, percutaneous, radiofrequency including imaging guidance
when performed, unilateral; radiofrequency.
(Do not report 76940, 77013, 77022 in conjunction with 20982, 20983,
32994, 32998).
50592
Ablation, one or more renal tumor(s), percutaneous, unilateral,
radiofrequency; with appropriate image guidance code: 77013 (CT),
77022 (MRI), 76940 (US).
Q: How many times should a biopsy code be used when multiple passes are made to
obtain tissue from a lesion?
A: If only core biopsies are obtained, then a single core biopsy code for the lesion
in question should be used. If core and aspiration biopsies are performed, then the
appropriate core biopsy code should be used together with the appropriate aspiration
biopsy code. If two separate lesions in two different organs are sampled during the
same patient encounter, then multiple biopsy codes should be used corresponding with
the number of different organs investigated. If multiple lesions within a single organ are
sampled (such as multiple liver lesions) then one might consider appending the modifier
–22 to the code (47000 for a core liver biopsy).
Q: Do you have to leave a catheter in place with the abscess drainage codes (10030,
49405–49407)?
A: Yes, the intention of the codes 10030, 49405–49407 was that a catheter would be
secured and remain in place when the patient left the imaging suite. These codes should
not be used when a catheter (e.g., Yueh or Skater) is placed and removed in the same
setting. These codes include all imaging guidance that is used in the placement of the
drainage catheter.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 150
Q: There were new myelogram codes introduced for 2015, but the old codes weren’t
deleted. Why?
A: It is believed there is still a need for the ability to report injection and the imaging
supervision when these are separately performed by two different physicians. Therefore,
the component coding remained. If both the injection and the imaging guidance are
performed by the same provider, then that provider must report the bundled codes
(62302–62305).
Q: Does code 50693 include the replacement of the existing nephrostomy tube
following the placement of the ureteral stent?
A: Yes. CPT code 50693 includes all drainage catheter manipulations and exchanges
(when performed), as well as diagnostic nephrostograms and/or ureterograms (when
performed), imaging guidance (e.g., ultrasonography and/or fluoroscopy) and all
associated radiological supervision and interpretation. Do not report code 50435 in
conjunction with 50693.
Q: Can I report 50706 for ureteral dilation for each lesion dilated in the ureter?
A: No, this code should only be reported once per ureter, regardless of the number of
treated lesions within the ureter.
Q: How does one code for the initial placement of a ureteral stent via an ileal conduit?
A: When performing contrast injection only to confirm location of the needle, one
should not code for formal epidurography. In these instances, it is appropriate to code
62321, 62323, with imaging guidance (i.e., fluoroscopy or CT). Do not report 62323
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 151
Formal epidurography, rather, is coded with 72275, which includes 77003. Therefore,
77003 should not be additionally coded when performing formal epidurography. 72275
should only be used when an epidurogram is performed for diagnostic purposes (e.g.,
assessing flow of contrast to assess area[s] of scarring, nerve constriction or possible
nerve inflammation, images are documented, and a radiologic report is issued describing
the findings of the epidurogram).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 152
[PATIENT NAME] has presented with symptoms consistent with PCS, which is a
well-defined condition. Namely, she has experienced longstanding [LIST RELEVANT
SYMPTOMS: cyclical pelvic pain and pressure that correlates with her menses, pain
during/after sexual intercourse, pelvic pain worse upon standing/sitting/walking]. She
has been seen by [PHYSICIAN, MD] and has undergone a rigorous clinical evaluation
to determine the cause of her symptoms. Both Dr. [REFERRING MEDICINE PHYSICIAN
NAME]’s and my findings are consistent, confirming that [PATIENT NAME] has physical
findings that are commonly found with PCS, including recurrent varicose veins in the
lower extremity(ies) [ADD OTHER RELEVANT SIGNS: vulvar varices, hemorrhoids].
PCS symptoms
[PATIENT NAME] is not alone in suffering from the symptoms of PCS. It has been
estimated that almost 40 percent of all women will experience chronic pelvic pain
during their lifetime and that 15 percent of all women between the ages of 18–50
experience chronic pelvic pain. Of note, 15 percent of all hysterectomies and 35 percent
of all diagnostic laparoscopies are performed due to chronic pelvic pain. Ovarian vein
incompetence has been shown to occur in approximately 10 percent of women. This
phenomenon can lead to PCS and its associated symptoms in 60 percent of these
patients. Despite this incidence, PCS is significantly underdiagnosed. It typically results
in pelvic pain that is often described as dull and aching. The pain is typically worse in an
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 154
upright position and becomes more severe with walking and postural changes. It may be
associated with dyspareunia or a postcoital ache.
Once a patient such as [PATIENT NAME] has been diagnosed with PCS, it is important
to direct treatment towards eliminating retrograde flow in the abnormal ovarian vein(s).
Doing so reduces pressure in the pelvic veins, which in turn alleviates or improves
symptoms.
The largest study with the longest follow-up was just completed in Europe; Laborda et
al. (2013) prospectively followed 202 patients over 5 years and showed an astounding
93.9 percent clinical success rate and a significant reduction in the visual analog pain
scale from 7.3 (out of 10) to 0.8. Gandini et al. (2008) demonstrated statistically
significant improvement in pelvic pain, dyspareunia, urinary urgency and menstrual pain
in 38 women treated with OVE. Kim et al. (2006) demonstrated an 83 percent success
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 155
rate in 127 patients treated with OVE, with an impressive 4-year follow-up. Kwon et al.
(2007) reported symptomatic improvement in 82 percent of 67 patients treated with
OVE. Venbrux et al. (2002) reported symptomatic improvement in 96 percent of the 56
patients 12 months after being treated with OVE. Other reports by Mowatt et al, Capasso
et al, Sichlar et al, Tarazov et al, Maleux et al, and Cordts et al. have reported similar
data to the studies outlined above. In select patients with the “nutcracker” syndrome
described above, a less than 50 percent stenosis of the renal vein may be safely treated
with OVE to relieve the pelvic pain caused by reflux into the ovarian vein. In summary,
patients who present with clinical signs and symptoms as well as imaging findings
consistent with PCS are excellent candidates for OVE.
OVE is performed on an outpatient basis. The OVE procedure begins with an ovarian
venogram to confirm that retrograde flow is present. If reflux and retrograde flow is
identified within the left and/or right ovarian vein, the vein is embolized to eliminate this
reflux and reduce the pressure within pelvic varicosities.
OVE emerged because of its safety, efficacy and noninvasiveness compared with
surgery; in a Korean study, in which patients with documented PCS were randomized to
hysterectomy (with either oopherectomy of ovary on the side of an incomplete gonadal
vein or bilateral oopherectomy) or OVE, OVE demonstrated significantly better results
than surgery.
Painful dilated veins in the scrotum of men, caused by a refluxing testicular vein,
result in varicoceles that are successfully treated with gonadal vein embolization.
Painful dilated veins of the uterus and pelvis in women results in PCS. These are
comparable syndromes with a common etiology. Given that the safety and efficacy of
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 156
embolotherapy for both conditions are well supported by the literature and that male
varicocele is routinely covered, it would not be fair to deny women coverage for the
same condition. As such, we respectfully request that you reconsider and reverse this
inappropriate determination. Please extend coverage to [PATIENT NAME] for ovarian
vein embolization to treat pelvic congestion syndrome.
I hope that you will find this information helpful in reversing the previous denial [FOR
PREAUTHORIZATION/OF COVERAGE]. Please feel free to contact me if you require any
further information.
Sincerely,
I am writing this letter to appeal your decision to deny coverage for an MRI of the pelvis
for [PATIENT NAME], (DOB: [INSERT DATE OF BIRTH]; [PATIENT ID]) prior to a uterine
artery embolization (UAE) procedure to treat symptomatic uterine fibroids.
As you know, UAE is a uterine-sparing procedure that effectively treats the symptoms
associated with uterine fibroids and reduces both uterine and fibroid volume due to
fibroid infarction. Prior to UAE, the interventional radiologist performing the procedure
needs to be certain that the procedure is being performed for an appropriate indication.
When fibroids were treated exclusively with hysterectomy, pre-procedure imaging was
not critical to gynecologists because the uterus, in its entirety, was being removed.
As a result, a pathologic evaluation performed on the uterus after surgery was the
primary means of determining the etiology of the presenting symptoms. Uterine artery
embolization is different. Since the uterus is remaining in its anatomic position and the
fibroids are not being removed, it becomes incumbent upon the physician responsible
for performing this procedure to obtain definitive imaging of the pelvis prior to the
procedure.
The standard imaging modality used to evaluate patients with suspected uterine fibroids
is ultrasound. In fact, almost all patients presenting in consultation for UAE have been
evaluated previously with a pelvic ultrasound that has demonstrated fibroids.
An MRI can accurately determine the location and size of fibroids within the uterus. As
described by
Cura et al. (Acta Radiol 2006; 47:1105–1114), UAE may not be the appropriate therapy
if a patient’s symptoms do not correlate with the size and location of their fibroids. For
example, a small subserosal fibroid is not likely to be responsible for abnormal bleeding
so UAE may not be indicated in this particular type of patient. In addition, MRI is helpful
in differentiating degenerated fibroids from cellular fibroids, which is important since
cellular fibroids typically have the best response to UAE.
Cellular fibroids have characteristic MRI findings with high signal intensity on T2
weighted images and enhancement after contrast administration (Yamashita et al,
Radiology 1993; 189:721–725) so fibroids with these characteristics may be expected
to respond best to UAE. This has been supported by Burn et al. (Radiology 2000;
214:729–734), who reported on the good response of fibroids with high signal intensity
on T2-weighted images, and by Jha et al. (Radiology 2000; 217:228–235), who reported
that hypervascular fibroids which enhanced after contrast administration had a greater
response to UAE. Therefore, an MRI can help determine which patients are appropriate
candidates for UAE on the basis of size, location, signal characteristics and degree of
enhancement after contrast administration. The findings on MRI can also help determine
if vessels other than the uterine arteries provide arterial supply to the fibroids. Kroencke
et al. (Radiology 2006; 241:181–189) determined that contrast-enhanced MRI can help
predict the presence of ovarian arterial supply to uterine fibroids. This information is
important to have prior to UAE because if these vessels are not recognized, the ability
of this procedure to induce infarction within the treated fibroids becomes significantly
limited. In addition, knowing that ovarian arteries may need to be treated during a UAE
procedure is something that is important to discuss with a patient prior to UAE since
treating these vessels could increase the possibility of postprocedure amenorrhea.
Finally, MRI is very helpful in determining if patients are potentially at risk for
complications after UAE. For example, pedunculated submucosal fibroids are potentially
at risk for transcervical expulsion or infection and pedunculated subserosal fibroids
can potentially separate from the uterus and result in intraperitoneal complications.
Pelvic MRI is able to define the morphology of pedunculated fibroids far better than
ultrasound and therefore help determine which patients are potentially at risk for these
complications. This was well described by Verma et al. (AJR 2008; 190:1220–1226),
who reported on the utility of MRI in defining the interface between pedunculated
submucosal fibroids and the endometrium. They found that this helps define the risk of
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 159
fibroid migration into the endometrial cavity with subsequent transcervical expulsion
after UAE.
In summary, an MRI of the pelvis provides the information that is necessary for an
interventional radiologist to determine if a patient with symptomatic uterine fibroids
is a suitable candidate for uterine artery embolization. It can potentially provide
information regarding the cellular morphology of fibroids, the presence or absence
of other pathology that could explain a patient’s symptoms, the contribution of other
blood vessels responsible for the arterial supply of fibroids, and the potential risk of
complications associated with pedunculated fibroids.
As a result, MRI has been shown to potentially change the treatment plan in a significant
number of patients, underscoring its importance as a pre-procedure imaging test. It
is my hope that this information will help support a reversal of your decision to deny
coverage to [PATIENT NAME] for an MRI of the pelvis prior to her planned uterine artery
embolization procedure.
Sincerely,
[PATIENT NAME]
[PATIENT ID]
[GROUP NO.]
[CLAIM NO.]
[PATIENT NAME] has been seen and evaluated by a [SELECT REFERRING PHYSICIAN
TYPE: thoracic surgeon/oncologist/oncology physician team] who [is/are] in
agreement that pulmonary tumor cryoablation is the best treatment option for
management of this lung tumor.
This letter is an appeal for approval of cryoablation for treatment of lung [and pleural
metastatic disease] to be rendered at [CENTER]. The use of radiofrequency ablation
(RFA) ablative techniques for treatment of lung cancer and metastasis has already been
established. Once a candidate is deemed eligible for ablation, the choice of ablation
modality should lie with the performing physician to be able to use the modality to best
serve the patient with comparable efficacy and equal safety.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 161
This letter will describe in limited detail the technique of cryoablation for lung cancer or
metastasis therapy and review the literature on efficacy and safety of cryoablation.
Technique
While RF ablation in the lung is hindered by the cooling effect of circulating air,
cryoablation is relatively resistant to the cold-sink effects of ventilation.11
The ability to precisely control the ablation zone makes cryoablation especially
advantageous for treating tumors that are relatively close to the mediastinum, chest
wall or blood vessels, whereas RFA risks causing mechanical or thermal injury to these
structures.12
Safety
As with the emergence of any rapidly evolving technology and its application, early
published literature regarding the clinical application of lung cryoablation consists of
technical descriptions, case series and early procedural outcomes. Cryoablation has now
matured enough with significant accumulated data to support a safe procedure with
comparable and even better efficacy to RFA.
• Wang H et al. performed more than 200 cryoablations of the thorax on primary
lung cancer (88 percent) and metastasis (12 percent) in nonsurgical candidates.
Cases were followed up for 12 months to evaluate the post-cryoablation response.
By 6 months, 86 percent of treated areas were smaller or stable than the original
tumor. The study was too short to determine long-term benefit, but patients
did experience palliative benefits—their general health, appetite and weight
gain improved, and their Karnofsky Performance Status increased significantly
(p<0.01).19
• Inoue et al. (2012) evaluated feasibility and safety during cryoablation of 396 lung
tumors in 117 patients (104 with metastatic disease) in 193 sessions, with a mean
follow-up period of 899 ± 778 days. All patients tolerated the procedure well,
with minimal pain. No CTCAE grade 4 or 5 events and only three grade 3 events
were observed. The most common complication was pneumothorax, which was
observed in 61.7 percent of the treatment sessions. Of these, 10.9 percent of the
cases required chest tube insertion, comparable to that associated with RF ablation.
• Bang et al. (2012) used cryoablation on 10 patients with colorectal lung metastases
(33 tumors) and, during 2 years of follow-up, only 6 out of 33 tumors recurred. The
authors also concluded that the cryoablation was safe and cost-effective.22
• Recently, Moore et al. (JVIR 2015) published their 5-year survival on 47 T1N0M0
NSCLCs in 45 consecutive patients between 2006 and January 2011. Major
complications occurred in only 6.4 percent of patients, including two cases of
hemoptysis and a prolonged placement of a chest tube requiring mechanical
sclerosis in one patient. There were no deaths in the first 30 days after treatment. In
their conclusion, cryoablation is associated with a good overall long-term survival
with minimally significant complications.25
Efficacy
Many studies have now shown that cryoablation does produce benefits equivalent to RF
ablation in the short and longer term (2–5 years).
Kawamura et al. (2006) treated 20 patients with 35 lung tumors with cryoablation
and followed them for up to 28 months (median 21 months for 18 patients). The
primary endpoint of this study was the early outcome and feasibility of cryoablation
for metastatic tumors <3 cm. The secondary endpoint was tumor control. There were
no treatment-related deaths or conversion to surgical intervention. Two patients had
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 164
complete response, eight had partial response, eight had stable disease and two had
progressive disease, thus resulting in a 50 percent response rate with 90 percent tumor
control rate. The overall tumor recurrence rate was 54.3 percent. During the 9–12 month
period, seven of the 18 (35 percent) patients developed a local recurrence of seven (20
percent) tumors. Five patients underwent additional cryoablation treatments without
complication or local recurrence. Pneumothorax was reported in 50 percent of the
cases, 27 percent experienced pleural effusion, 41 percent hemosputum and 4.5 percent
phrenic nerve palsy. The Kaplan Meier survival was 89.4 percent at 1 year and 83 percent
at 28 months.26
• Yamauchi et al. (2011) reported the use of percutaneous cryoablation for colorectal
pulmonary metastases in 24 patients with 55 tumors during 30 treatment sessions.
Follow-up scans were performed every 3–4 months after treatment. Pneumothorax
was reported in 19 sessions with only 1 session requiring insertion of a chest tube.
• At least two studies have directly compared outcomes for cryoablation of lung
tumors with other ablative technologies or surgery. Choe et al. (2009) carried out
76 ablative procedures in 65 patients with NSCLC (stages I-IV); 67 procedures
were RF ablations and 9 were percutaneous cryoablations. Efficacy was judged
by contrast CT immediately after the procedure, 1 month later and at 3-month
intervals. Complete ablation was attained for 43 percent of the RF ablation patients
and 67 percent of the cryoablation patients. For both modalities complete ablation
was more likely for smaller tumors. Complete RF ablation was 76 percent for
tumors < 3 cm and 28 percent for tumors > 3 cm; cryoablations were complete
for 86 percent of tumors < 3 cm and 0 percent for 2 tumors > 3 cm. Patients
undergoing cryoablation had no pain after the day of the procedure, but 37 percent
of patients undergoing RF ablation experienced pain for longer. Survival rates were
not reported separately for the two modalities. For all patients 1-, 2- and 3-year
overall survival rates were 67 percent, 46 percent and 27 percent. For patients
whose tumors were completely ablated, 1- and 2-year progression-free survival
rates were 72 percent and 39 percent, respectively, compared to 1- and 2-year rates
of 31 percent and 16 percent for patients with partial ablations.30
• Zemlyak et al. (2010) treated 64 patients with stage 1 NSCLC; 25 underwent single
lobe lung resection (SLR), 12 had tumors treated with RF ablation (RFA) and 27
with percutaneous cryoablation (PCT). The probability of 3-year survival for the
SLR, RFA and PCT groups of 87 percent, 88 percent and 77 percent, respectively,
was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The 3-year cancer-specific and cancer-
free survival for SLR, RFA and PCT groups was 91 percent and 61 percent versus 88
percent and 50 percent versus 90 percent and 46 percent, respectively, indicating
that cryoablation is as effective as RF and nearly as effective as lung resection.31
was 97.5 percent. Two-year follow-up data are currently being gathered, and data
collection will continue for 60 months.32
Thus, it is in this regard that this appeal is written for reconsideration and ultimate
reversal of the decision of ineligibility for cryoablation rendered by the [INSURANCE
COMPANY]. Please contact me directly for questions and concerns at [CONTACT
INFORMATION].
Sincerely,
[PHYSICIAN’S NAME]
References:
1. Girard P, Baldeyrou P, Le Chevalier T et al. Surgery for pulmonary metastases. Who are the 10-year survivors? Cancer 1994; 74:2791–2797.
2. Inoue M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Ito N, Izumi Y, Yamauchi Y, Hashimoto K, Asakura K, Tsukada N, Kawamura M, Nomori H, and Kuribayashi S. 2012.
Percutaneous cryoablation of lung tumors: feasibility and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 23: 295–302.
3. McTaggart R and Dupuy D. 2007. Thermal ablation of lung tumors. Tech Vasc Interventional Rad. 10:102–113.
4. Petre EN, Jia X, Thornton RH, Sofocleous CT, Alago W, Kemeny NE, and Solomon SB. 2013. Treatment of pulmonary colorectal metastases by radiofrequency
ablation. Clin Colorectal Cancer 12: 37–44.
5. Sonntag PD, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Brace CL, and Lee FT Jr. 2011. Thermal Ablation of Lung Tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 20: 369–387.
6. Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee FT Jr, and Brace CL. 2014. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what
should you use and why? Radiographics. 34: 1344–1362.
7. Jones GC, Kehrer JD, Kahn J, Koneru BN, Narayan R, Thomas TO, Camphausen K, Mehta, MP, and Kaushal A. 2015. Primary treatment options for high risk/
medically inoperable early stage NSCLC patients. Clin Lun Cancer, in press. Available online [Link]/10.1016/[Link].2015.04.001.
8. Inoue M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Ito N, Izumi Y, Yamauchi Y, Hashimoto K, Asakura K, Tsukada N, Kawamura M, Nomori H, and Kuribayashi S. 2012.
Percutaneous cryoablation of lung tumors: feasibility and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 23: 295–302.
9. Roberton BJ, Liu D, Power M, Wan JM, Stuart S, Klass D, and Yee J. 2014. Pulmonary ablation: a primer. Can Assoc Radiol J. 65:177–85.
10. Sonntag PD, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Brace CL, and Lee FT Jr. 2011. Thermal Ablation of Lung Tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 20: 369–387.
11. Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee FT Jr, and Brace CL. 2014. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what
should you use and why? Radiographics. 34: 1344–1362.
12. Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee FT Jr, and Brace CL. 2014. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what
should you use and why? Radiographics. 34: 1344–1362.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 167
13. Alexander ES and Dupuy DE. 2013. Lung cancer ablation: technologies and techniques. Semin Intervent Radiol. 30: 141–150.
14. Choe YH, Kim SR, Lee KS, Lee KY, Park SJ, Jin GY, and Lee YC. 2009. The use of PTC and RFA as treatment alternatives with low procedural morbidity in non-
small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 45: 1773–1779.
15. Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee FT Jr, and Brace CL. 2014. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what
should you use and why? Radiographics. 34: 1344–1362.
16. Inoue M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Ito N, Izumi Y, Yamauchi Y, Hashimoto K, Asakura K, Tsukada N, Kawamura M, Nomori H, and Kuribayashi S. 2012.
Percutaneous cryoablation of lung tumors: feasibility and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 23: 295–302.
17. Jones GC, Kehrer JD, Kahn J, Koneru BN, Narayan R, Thomas TO, Camphausen K, Mehta, MP, and Kaushal A. 2015. Primary treatment options for high risk/
medically inoperable early stage NSCLC patients. Clin Lun Cancer, in press. Available online [Link]/10.1016/[Link].2015.04.001.
18. McTaggart R and Dupuy D. 2007. Thermal ablation of lung tumors. Tech Vasc Interventional Rad 10:102–113.
19. Wang H, Littrup P, Duan Y et al. Thoracic Masses Treated with Percutaneous Cryotherapy: Initial experience with more than 200 procedures. Radiology
2005;235: 289–298.
20. Kawamura M, Izumi Y, Tsukada N, Asakura K, Sugiura H et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of small pulmonary tumors under computed tomographic guidance
with local anesthesia for nonsurgical candidates. J Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006;131:1007–1013.
21. Inoue M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Ito N, Izumi Y, Yamauchi Y, Hashimoto K, Asakura K, Tsukada N, Kawamura M, Nomori H, and Kuribayashi S. 2012.
Percutaneous cryoablation of lung tumors: feasibility and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 23: 295–302.
22. Bang HJ, Littrup PJ, Currier BP, Goodrich DJ, Choi M, Heilbrun LK, and Goodman AC. 2012. Percutaneous cryoablation of metastatic lesions from colorectal
cancer: efficacy and feasibility with survival and cost-effectiveness. ISRN Minim Invasive Surg 2012: Article ID 942364.
23. Pusceddu C, Sotgia B, Fele RM, and Melis L. 2013. CT-guided thin needles percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in patients with primary and secondary lung
tumors: a preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol. 82:e246–53.
24. de Baere T1, Tselikas L2, Woodrum D3, Abtin F4, Littrup P5, Deschamps F1, Suh R6, Aoun HD5, Callstrom M3. Evaluating Cryoablation of Metastatic Lung
Tumors in Patients—Safety and Efficacy: The ECLIPSE trial -Interim analysis at 1-Year. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul 29. [Epub ahead of print]
25. Moore W, Talati R, Bhattacharji P, and Bilfinger T. 2015. Five-year survival after cryoablation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer in medically inoperable
patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 26: 312–319.
26. Kawamura M, Izumi Y, Tsukada N, Asakura K, Sugiura H et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of small pulmonary tumors under computed tomographic guidance
with local anesthesia for nonsurgical candidates. J Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006;131:1007–1013.
27. Yamauchi Y, Izumi Y, Kawamura M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Tsukada N, Inoue M, Asakura K, Ohtsuka T, Kohno M, Kawamura M, and Nomori H. 2011.
Percutaneous cryoablation of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. PLoS One 6:e27086.
28. Yamauchi Y, Izumi Y, Hashimoto K, Yashiro H, Inoue M, Tsukada N, Goto T, Anraku M, and Nomori H. 2012. Percutaneous cryoablation for the treatment of
medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 7: e33223.
29. Chou HP, Chen CK, Shen SH, Sheu MH, Wu MH, Wu YC, Chang CY. 2015. Percutaneous cryoablation for inoperable malignant lung tumors: midterm results.
Cryobiology 70: 60–65.
30. Choe YH, Kim SR, Lee KS, Lee KY, Park SJ, Jin GY, and Lee YC. 2009. The use of PTC and RFA as treatment alternatives with low procedural morbidity in non-
small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 45: 1773–1779.
31. Zemlyak A, Moore WH, and Bilfinger TV. 2010. Comparison of survival after sublobar resections and ablative therapies for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J
Am Coll Surg. 211: 68–72.
32. de Baere T1, Tselikas L2, Woodrum D3, Abtin F4, Littrup P5, Deschamps F1, Suh R6, Aoun HD5, Callstrom M3. Evaluating Cryoablation of Metastatic Lung
Tumors in Patients -Safety and Efficacy: The ECLIPSE trial -Interim analysis at 1-Year. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul 29. [Epub ahead of print]
33. Moore W, Talati R, Bhattacharji P, and Bilfinger T. 2015. Five-year survival after cryoablation of stage I non-small cell lung cancer in medically inoperable
patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 26: 312–319.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 168
[CARRIER ADDRESS]
[CARRIER CITY, STATE ZIP]
Dear Colleague:
Endovenous MOCA is a procedure that is used to close refluxing saphenous veins and
their primary tributaries utilizing a mechanism of direct intimal injury within the lumen
of the vein which purposefully abrades the intima and causes venospasm to allow for
better efficacy of the sclerosant which is simultaneously injected. Since this ablation
method does not use thermal energy, the potential for saphenous or sural nerve damage
is minimized.
Following ultrasound imaging and marking of the patient’s anatomy on the skin and a
sterile prep and draping of the patient’s extremity, a disposable catheter connected to
a disposable motor drive is inserted into the target vein and advanced to just below the
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 169
deep vein junction. As the catheter is slowly pulled back, a wire rotates at 3500 rpm
within the lumen of the vein, abrading the intima. At the same time, a liquid sclerosant
(sodium tetradecyl sulfate) is infused near the rotating wire. It has been demonstrated
that the combination of the mechanical and chemical effect results in vein closure
better1 than either method alone. The closure occurs with less pain2 and reduced risk of
saphenous or sural nerve injury (since there is no heat to injure the nerves) without the
need for the tumescent anesthesia used with thermal endovenous ablation techniques
(radiofrequency ablation [RFA] and endovenous laser treatment [EVLT]).
In terms of evidence supporting MOCA, I would submit that the published data has
demonstrated a high rate of success and low complication rate, and the procedure has
some advantages over some of the alternate available treatments. ClariVein® achieved
FDA clearance through the 510(k) process in March 2008.
Supporting data
A number of comparative trials and prospective cohort studies have drawn similar
conclusions. Among these studies was one by Ozen3 which looked at the 2-year results
for MOCA treatment of the refluxing great saphenous vein. At that time interval, the
saphenous occlusion rate was 95 percent, which was seen along with a significant
decrease in a physician derived score of the severity of venous disease in the treated
limb (venous clinical severity score or VCSS).
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 170
Boeersma5 demonstrated the safety and efficacy of MOCA in the small saphenous vein as
well, with a 94 percent 1-year occlusion of the treated vein with no major complications
and decrease in the VCSS and patient reported pain score.
Vun et al.12 assessed procedural pain for MOCA, RFA and endovenous laser ablation
(EVLA) in 127 patients/147 veins (MOCA: 57; RFA: 50; EVLA: 40). Pain scores were
collected by a nurse, blinded to the procedure, using VAS. Median pain scores were
as follows: MOCA-1, RFA-5, EVLA-6. Technical success as evidenced by occlusion was
similar for all three modalities with no major complications reported.
Van Eekeren et al.10 studied postoperative pain and early quality of life after RFA and
MOCA in 68 patients (34 to each group). Occlusion rates were over 90 percent in each
group. Pain was assessed with a 100 mm VAS and found mean procedural pain to be 22
mm for MOCA and 27 mm for RFA. Postoperative pain was measured at days 3 and 14
with MOCA mean pain to be 6.2 mm and 4.8 mm, while RFA mean pain was 20.5 mm and
18.6 mm. This demonstrated a 74 percent comparative reduction in postoperative pain at
day 14. RFA patients were shown to use postoperative analgesics for 2.8 days on average
compared to 0.5 days for MOCA patients. The median VCSS at week 6 showed a decrease
from 3.0 to 1.0 for MOCA, while the RFA group decreased from 4.0 to 3.0. Quality of life
outcomes were measured using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) at 6
weeks and showed a change for the MOCA group from 7.1 to 5.0, and 9.5 to 4.5 in the RFA
group. The authors stated that this was not clinically significant. MOCA and RFA patients
returned to normal activities in one day, but the RFA group tended to take an extra day
before returning to work. There were no major complications in either group.
Finally, I would like to note that the Society of Interventional Radiology, in partnership
with the Society of Vascular Surgery and the American College of Phlebology, presented
supportive testimony at the October 2015 CPT panel meeting for this procedure. The
AMA CPT panel decided that mechanochemical procedures (MOCA) met the criteria for
a CPT Category I code, and two new codes describing MOCA went into effect in 2017.
Thanks for the courtesy of your review of this request, and I am available to go into
further detail at your convenience.
Respectfully,
Selected bibliography
1. Tal MG, Dos Santos SJ, Marano JP, Whiteley MS. Histologic findings after mechanochemical ablation in a caprine model with use of ClariVein Journal of
Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorder; 3 (1):81–85.
2. Bootun R, Lane TRA, Dharmarajah B, Lim CS, Najem M, Renton S, Sritharan K, Davies AH. Intra-procedural pain score in a randomized controlled trial
comparing mechanochemical ablation to radiofrequency ablation: The Multicenter Venefit versus ClariVein for varicose veins trial. Phlebology 2014, DOI:
10.1177/0268355514551085.
3. Ozun Y, etal. Mechano-Chemical Endovenous Ablation of Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: Two-Year Results. Daer cer Derg 2014;23(3). doi: 10.9739/
uvcd.2014-41766.
4. Bishawi M, Bernstein R, Boter M, Draughn D, Gould C, Hamilton C et al. Mechanochemical ablation in patients with chronic venous disease: A prospective
multicenter report. Phlebology 2013 Jul 12; Epub ahead of print.
5. Boersma D et al., Mechanochemical Endovenous Ablation of Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency Using the ClariVein Device: One-year Results of a Prospective
Series, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (2012). [Link]/10.1016/j. ejvs.1012.12.004.
6. Deijen CL, Schreve MA, Bosma J, de Nie A, Leijdekkers V, van den Akker, Vahl A. ClariVein mechanochemical ablation of the great and small saphenous vein:
Early treatment outcomes of two hospitals. Phlebology. 2015 Aug 24. pii: 0268355515600573. [Epub ahead of print]
7. Elias and Raines. “Mechanochemical tumescentless endovenous ablation: final results of the initial clinical trial.” Phlebology 2012; 27(2): 67–72.
8. Elias S. Mechanochemical ablation: MOCA. 2 year follow up, lessons learned. SVS Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, June 2012
9. Ozen Y, Cekmecelioglu D, Sarikaya S, Rabus MB, Aydin E, Dedemoglu M, Kirali K. Mechano-Chemical Endovenous Ablation of Great Saphenous Vein
Insufficiancy: Two Year Results. Damar Cer Derg 2014;23(3):176–9
10. Van Eekeren Ramon R.J.P., Boersma Doeke, Elias Steven, Holewijn Suzanne, Werson Debbie A.B., de Vries Jean-Paul P.M., Reijnen Michel M.J.P. Postoperative
pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg
2013; 57: 445–50.
11. Van Eekeren Ramon R.J.P., Boersma Doeke, Elias Steven, Holewijn Suzanne, Werson Debbie A.B., de Vries Jean-Paul P.M., Reijnen Michel M.J.P. Mechanical
endovenous ablation for the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency. J Vasc Surg: Venous and Lym Dis 2014;2:282–8.
12. Vun SV, Rashid ST, Blest NC, Spark JI, Lower pain and faster treatment with mechanico-chemical endovenous ablation using ClariVein. Phlebology. 2015
Dec;30(10):688-92. doi: 10.1177/0268355514553693.
2 0 2 0 INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CODING UPDATE 172
Charge sheets
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
SPINAL PROCEDURES Provided By Others
CPT S&I ARTHROGRAMS
Puncture Shunt Tubing 61070 75809 CPT S&I
Cervical Puncture w/o Inj. 61050 77003 Ankle 27648 73615
Lumbar Puncture Diagnostic 62270 X No image Elbow 24220 73085
Lumbar Puncture Diagnostic w/ Fluoro or CT 62328 Included Hip w/ anesthesia 27095 73525
Lumbar Puncture Therapeutic 62272 X No image Hip w/o anesthesia 27093 73525
Lumbar Puncture Therapeutic w/ Fluoro or CT 62329 Included Knee Inj. (for arthrogram or CT/MRI arthro) 27369 73580
Inj. Epidural Blood or Clot Patch 62273 77003 Shoulder 23350 73040
Diskography (Lumbar) Ea. Level 62290 X 72295 X SI Joint Inj. (CT or Fluoro is included) 27096 Included
Diskography (Cerv/Thoracic) Ea. Level 62291 X 72285 X Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) 21116 70332
Aspiration Nucleus Pulposus 62267 77003 Wrist 25246 73115
Celiac Nerve Block 64530 77003
Sinogram Diagnostic 20501 76080 ARTHROCENTESIS/ASPIRATION/INJECTION
Sinogram Therapeutic 20500 76080 CPT S&I
Inj. Diag or Therapeutic, Cerv/Thor w/o Image 62320 No image Fluoroscopic Guidance 77002
Inj. Diag or Therapeutic, Cerv/Thor w/ Image 62321 Included Ultrasound Guidance 76942
Inj. Diag or Therapeutic, Lumb/Sac w/o Image 62322 No image Computed Tomography Guidance 77012
Inj. Diag or Therapeutic, Lumb/Sac w/ Image 62323 Included Magnetic Resonance Guidance 77021
Inj. Indwelling Cath, Cerv/Thor w/o Image 62324 No image Small Joint or Bursa; w/o US 20600 By modality except US
Inj. Indwelling Cath, Cerv/Thor w/ Image 62325 Included Small Joint or Bursa; w/ US 20604 Includes US
Inj. Indwelling Cath, Lumb/Sac w/o Image 62326 No image Intermediate Joint or bursa; w/o US 20605 By modality except US
Inj. Indwelling Cath, Lumb/Sac w/ Image 62327 Included Intermediate Joint or bursa; w/ US 20606 Includes US
Nerve Root Blk/Transforaminal C/T w/Image 64479 Included Major Joint or Bursa; w/o US 20610 By modality except US
Nerve Root Blk/Transforaminal C/T Ea. Add +64480 X Included Major Joint or Bursa; w/ US 20611 Included
Nerve Root Blk/Transforaminal L/S w/Image 64483 Included Ganglion Cyst(s) Any Location 20612 By modality
Nerve Root Blk/Transforaminal Ea. Add. +64484 X Included Bone Cyst 20615 By modality
Facet Inj Cerv/Thor 1st W/Imaging 64490 Included
Facet Inj Cerv/Thor 2nd W/Imaging +64491 Included MYELOGRAM
Facet Inj Cerv/Thor 3rd & More +64492 Included CPT S&I
Facet Inj Lumb/Sac 1st W/Imaging 64493 Included Cisternal/lateral C1-C2 puncture w/o inj 61050*
Facet Inj Lumb/Sac 2nd W/Imaging +64494 Included Cisternal/lateral C1-C2 puncture w/ inj 61055*
Facet Inj Lumb/Sac 3rd & More +64495 Included Injection for myelogram, Lumbar 62284*
Neurolytic Inj/Inf Subarachnoid 62280 77003 Cervical myelogram, via lumbar inj. 62302 Included
Neurolytic Inj/ Cerv. Or Thor 62281 77003 Thoracic myelogram, via lumbar inj. 62303 Included
Neurolytic Inj/Inf Single Epidural 62282 77003 Lumbosacral myelogram, via lumbar inj 62304 Included
Intercostal Nerve Block, Single 64420 77003 Myelogram, two or more regions 62305 Included
Intercostal Nerve Block, Multiple 64421 77003 *For radiological supervision and interpretation, see the
Stellate Ganglion Block (Cervical) 64510 77003 Radiology section in CPT.
Trig Pt Inj Sing/Multi 1-2 Muscles 20552 77002
Trig Pt Inj Sing/Multi 3or > Muscles 20553 77002 VERTEBROPLASTY/ VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION
Sphenopalatine Inj with Fluoro 64505 77002 CPT S&I
Destruction cerv/thor facet jnt; single 64633 Included Vertebroplasty (Cervicothoracic) 22510 Included
Destruction cerv/thor facet jnt; each add'l +64634 Included Vertebroplasty (Lumbosacral) 22511 Included
Destruction lumbar/sacral facet jnt; single 64635 Included Vertebroplasty ea add. C/T or L/S 22512 Included
Destruction lumbar/sacral facet jnt; each add'l +64636 Included Sacroplasty, unilateral (1 or more needles) 0200T Included
Injection, paravert w/US; cerv/thoracic single 0213T Included Sacroplasty, bilateral (2 or more needles) 0201T Included
Injection, paravert w/US; cerv/thor 2nd level +0214T Included Kypho Thoracic One Vert Body 22513 Included
Injection, paravert w/US; cerv/thor 3rd + level +0215T Included Kypho Lumbar One Vert Body 22514 Included
Injection, paravert w/US; lumbar/sacral 0216T Included Kypho Eac add T or L Vert Body 22515 Included
Injection, paravert w/US; lumb/sac 2nd level +0217T Included
Injection, paravert w/US; lumb/sac 3rd + level +0218T Included + = Add-on code
Paravertebral block (PVB); thoracic 64461 Included
PVB; 2nd & any additional injection site(s) +64462 Included
PVB; thoracic; continuous infusion by catheter 64463 Included
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
BIOPSY PROCEDURES Provided By Others
CPT S&I ABLATION PROCEDURES
Fluoroscopic Guidance 77002 CPT S&I
Ultrasound Guidance 76942 Computed Tomography Guidance 77013
Computed Tomography Guidance 77012 Magnetic Resonance Guidance 77022
Magnetic Resonance Guidance 77021 Ultrasound Guidance 76940
Abdomen/Retroperitoneal Perc 49180 By modality Bone Tumor(s), Cryoablation, Perc. 20983 Included
Bone, Deep 20225 By modality Bone Tumor(s), RFA, Perc. 20982 Included
Bone, Superficial, Percutaneous 20220 By modality Breast Tumor(s), RFA, Perc. 19499 By Modality
Diagnostic bone marrow; aspiration(s) 38220 By modality Liver Tumor(s), Cryoablation, Perc. 47383 By Modality
Diagnostic bone marrow; biopsy(ies) 38221 By modality Liver Tumor(s), RFA, Perc. 47382 By Modality
DX bone marrow: biopsy(ies) and aspiration(s) 38222 By modality Liver Tumor(s), RFA, Open, US guide 47380* 76940
Liver 47000 By modality Inj. Ablative Agent, Liver 47399 By Modality
Lung, Percutaneous or Medastinum 32405 By modality Lung Tumor(s), RFA, Perc., Unilateral 32998 Included
Lymph nodes Sup. percutaneous 38505 By modality Lung Tumor(s), Cryoablation, Perc., Unilateral 32994 Included
Muscle, Percutaneous 20206 By modality Renal Tumor(s), Cryoablation, Perc. 50593 By Modality
Pancreas Percutaneous 48102 By modality Renal Tumor(s), RFA, Perc. 50592 By Modality
Parotid Bx / Salivary Gland 42400 By modality Renal Tumor(s), Cryo, Open, w/ US 50250* Included
Pleura, Percutaneous 32400 By modality Peripheral nerve, Upper extr distal, Cryoablation 0440T Included
Prostate 55700 By modality Peripheral nerve, Lower extr distal, Cryoablation 0441T Included
Renal. Percutaneous 50200 By modality Nerve plexus or other truncal, Cryoablation 0442T Included
Spinal Cord 62269 By modality *Use modifier -62 when service is provided by co-surgeons.
Thyroid, percutaneous 60100 By modality Inpatient Only Procedures
Transcatheter Biopsy 37200 75970
DRAINAGE PROCEDURES ENDOVASCULAR VARICOSE VEIN TREATMENTS
CPT S&I CPT S&I
Fluoroscopic Guidance 77002 Inj of non-compounded foam sclerosant, single extr. truncal vein 36465 Included
Ultrasound Guidance 76942 Inj of non-compounded foam sclerosant, multi extr. truncal veins, same leg 36466 Included
Computed Tomography Guidance 77012 Endovenous ablation by transcath delivery of a chemical adhesive, first vein 36482 Included
Magnetic Resonance Guidance 77021 Endovenous ablation by transcath delivery of a chemical adhesive, subseq veins 36483 Included
Abscessogram (Tube Check) 49424 76080 RFA extremity, perc., 1st vein 36475 Included
Asp Abscess, Bulla, or Cyst, by needle 10160 By modality RFA ext. perc., 2nd & [Link](s) +36476 Included
Asp. of Bladder by Intracatheter 51101 By modality Laser EVAT, extrem., perc., 1st vein 36478 Included
Asp. of Bladder w/ Insert Suprapubic Cath. 51102 By modality Laser EVAT, perc., 2nd & [Link](s) +36479 Included
Aspiration of Bladder by Needle 51100 By modality Endovenous mechanochemical; first vein 36473 Included
Change of Abscess Drain 49423 75984 Endovenous mechanochemical; ea. addtl vein(s) +36474 Included
Drain Spinal Cord Cyst 62268 By modality Catheterization is considered inherent to EVAT
Drainage by Cath, Peritoneal or Retroperitoneal 49406 Included
Drainage by Catheter, Soft Tissue 10030 Included OTHER VARICOSE VEIN TREATMENTS
Drainage by Catheter, Visceral 49405 Included CPT S&I
Fistula or Sinus Tract Study/Sinogram 20501 76080 Inj. of sclerosing sol.-spider vein, limb/trunk 36468 N/A
FNA Bx w/o Imaging, first lesion 10021 No image Inj of sclerosant, single vein other than spider vein 36470 76942
FNA Bx w/o Imaging, ea addt'l +10004 No image
FNA Bx w/ Ultrasound, first lesion 10005 Included Inj. of sclerosant - multi veins, same leg, other than spider veins 36471 76942
FNA Bx w/ Ultrasound, ea addt'l +10006 Included
FNA Bx w/Fluoro, first lesion 10007 Included Stab phleb of var veins; 1 extremity; 10-20 37765 N/A
FNA Bx w/Fluoro, ea addt'l +10008 Included
FNA Bx w/CT, first lesion 10009 Included Stab phleb of var veins; 1 extremity; 21+ 37766 N/A
FNA Bx w/CT, ea addt'l +10010 Included
FNA Bx w/MR 10011 Included Do not report 36470, 36471 in conjunction with 37241 in
FNA Bx w/MR, ea addt'l +10012 Included
Insert Indwelling Tunneled Pleural 32550 75989 the same surgical field
Pericardiocentesis including imaging 33016 Included
Pericardial drainage w/indwelling cath, (6 yrs or older) 33017 Incl. Fluoro/US
Pericardial drainage w/indwelling cath, (Child < 6) 33018 Incl. Fluoro/US
Pericardial drainage w/indwelling cath 33019 Incl. CT
Insert Peritoneal Tunneled Cathw/Imaging 49418 Included
Para/Peritonecentesis w/ Imaging 49083 Included + = Add-on code
Para/Peritonecentesis w/o Imaging 49082 No image
Peritoneal Lavage 49084 Included
Pleural Drainage w/ tube w/o Imaging 32556 No image
Pleural Drainage w/ tube with Imaging 32557 Included
Renal Cyst Aspiration w/ Needle 50390 By modality
Sclerotherapy of a fluid collection 49185 Included
Thoracentesis with Imaging 32555 Included
Thoracentesis without Imaging 32554 No image
Wire Localization of soft tissue 10035 Included
Wire Localization of soft tissue, ea. add. 10036 Included
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
All RightsCopyright
Reserved.2018
Copyright
Society2019
of Interventional
Society of Interventional
Radiology. All
Radiology
Rights Reserved
All Rights Reserved.
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
GASTROINTESTINAL PROCEDURES Provided By Others
CPT S&I ERCP
G-Tube Placement, Perc. 49440 Included ERCP Biliary Ducts RS&I 74328
J-Tube Placement, Perc. 49441 Included ERCP Pancreatic Ducts RS&I 74329
Cecostomy or other Colonic Tube 49442 Included ERCP Pancreatic and Biliary Ducts RS&I 74330
Convert G-Tube to G-J Tube 49446 Included ERCP 43260 See above
Gastro Tube Change (with fluoro) 49450 Included ERCP w/ biopsy 43261 See above
Replacement Dislodged J-Tube 49451 Included ERCP for Spincterotomy/Papillotomy 43264 See above
Replacement GJ Tube, Perc. 49452 Included ERCP calculus/calculi Removal 43265 See above
Repl. GJ Tube, Perc. incl remove w/o img,/w/o revision tract 43762 N/A ERCP calculus/calculi Destruction 43266 See above
Repl. GJ Tube, Perc. incl remove w/o img/w revision tract 43763 N/A ERCP Duct Stent Placement 43274 See above
Repo. Naso or Oro-Gastric FeedingTube 43761 76000 ERCP Remove Foreign Body/Stent from duct(s) 43275 See above
Contrast Inj. for any GI Tube 49465 Included ERCP Stent Exchange with Dilation 43276 See above
Esophageal Dilation Over Guide Wire 43453 74360 ERCP Dilation or Duct(s) or Ampulla, ea. Duct 43277 See above
Nasogastric Tube Placement 43752 Included Esophagus Dilation 43453 74360
Mech. Removal Obstructed Material 49460 Included
Inj. of air or contrast into peritoneal cavity 49400 74190 OTHER INTRODUCTION (INJECTION, CHANGE,
REMOVAL) CPT S&I
BILIARY PROCEDURES Chg of ureterostomy tube/ureteral stent 50688 75984
CPT S&I Whitaker Test 50396 74425
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy 47490 Included Nephrostolithotomy <2cm 50080 See note**
Inj. for Cholangiogram, Existing Access 47531 Included Nephrostolithotomy >2cm 50081 See note**
Inj. for Cholangiogram, New Access 47532 Included Ileoconduit Injection 50690 74425
Perc. Placement Billiary Drainage (Ext.) 47533 Included Inj. Cystogram/Voiding Urethrocystogram 51600 See note***
Perc. Plcmt Billiary Drainage (Int.-Ext.) 47534 Included Cystography/VCU w/Chain 51605 74430
Convert Ext. Biliary Drainage to Int-Ext 47535 Included Urethrocystogram, Retrograde 51610 74450
Exchange of Biliary Drainage Catheter 47536 Included Change Cystostomy Tube, Simple 51705 75984
Removal of Biliary Drainage Catheter 47537 Included Change Cystostomy Tube, Complex 51710 75984
Plcmt Bile Duct Stent(s), Existing Access 47538 Included
Plcmt Bile Duct Stent(s), New w/o drainage 47539 Included FALLOPIAN DILATATION
Plcmt Bile Duct Stent(s), New w/drainage 47540 Included CPT S&I
Plcmt access thru biliary tree, perc; new access 47541 Included Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) 58340 74740
Balloon dilation biliary duct/ampulla, perc. +47542 Included HSG, w/ or w/o color flow 58340 76831
Endoluminal Bx of biliary tree, perc +47543 Included Fallopian Dilatation 58345 74742
Removal calculi/debris fr. bile duct(s)/GB +47544 Included
Intraoperative Cholangiogram 74300 TIPS
Intraoperative Cholangiogram Additional +74301 CPT S&I
TIPS 37182 Included
URINARY PROCEDURES TIPS Revision 37183 Included
CPT S&I
Aspiration/inj of renal cyst or pelvis, perc 50390 See note*
Dilation of exist tract, perc., incl img guid 50436 Included Inpatient Only Procedures
Dilation of exist tract, perc., incl img guid; new access 50437 Included
Inj. antegrade nephro/ureterogram; new access 50430 Included
Inj. antegrade nephro/ureterogram; exist access 50431 Included Notes:
Plcmt nephro cath, perc incl. diag nephrogram 50432 Included *Code 50390 for radiological S&I, see 74425, 74470, 76942,
Plcmt nephroureteral cath, perc incl. diag nephro 50433 Included 77002, 77012, 77021
Convert nephrostomy catheter 50434 Included
Exchange nephrostomy catheter 50435 Included **Code 50080 and 50081, for fluoroscopic guidance, see 76000
Remove & replace ext. nephroureteral cath 50387 Included
Endoluminal bx of ureter/ renal pelvis 50606 Included ***Code 51600, For radiological supervision and interpretation,
Plmt of ureteral stent; existing nephrostomy tract 50693 Included see 74430, 74455)
Plmt of ureteral stent;new acc w/o sep nephro cath 50694 Included
Plmt of ureteral stent;new acc w/sep nephro cath 50695 Included + = Add-on code
Ureteral embolization or occlusion +50705 Included
Transurethral destruction of prostate; by radiofrequency 53854 74485
Balloon dilation, ureteral stricture +50706 Included
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2019 Society of Interventional Radiology. All Rights Reserved.
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
Provided By Others
LOWER EXTREMITY ENDOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION
Category III codes to describe transluminal atherectomy above Inguinal ligaments percutaneously and/or
+ = Add-on code
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2019 Society of Interventional Radiology. All Rights Reserved.
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
Provided By Others
SELECTIVE CATHETER PLACEMENTS 1st 2nd 3rd Add'l 2nd &
ARTERIAL ORDER ORDER ORDER 3rd Order
Non-selective Aortic Arch Inj w/ all Imaging 36221
Selective Innominate or CCA w/ Cerv Carotid Imaging, uni 36222
Selective Innominate or CCA w/ Cerv/Cerebral Imaging, uni 36223
Selective ICA w/ Cerv/Cerebral Imaging, uni 36224
Selective Innominate or Subclavian w/ Vertebral Imaging, uni 36225
Selective Vertebral w/ Vertebral Imaging, uni 36226
Selective External Carotid Artery w/ Ext. Carotid Imaging +36227* *Do not code 36227 more than once per side
Selective Intracranial Branch of ICA or Vertebral w/ img, ea. add. +36228** **Max 2X per side
Selective extracranial vertebral or subclavian branches +36218*** ***Use in conjunction with 36225 or 36226 respectively
Selective Arterial, Spinal above Diaphragm 36215 36216 36217 +36218
Selective Spinal/Lumbar below Diaphragm 36245 36246 36247 +36248
Celiac 36245 36246 36247 +36248
SMA 36245 36246 36247 +36248
IMA 36245 36246 36247 +36248
Renal, Selective, Unilateral, angiogram included 36251
Renal, Selective, Bilateral, angiogram included 36252
Renal, Superlective (one or more second order or higher renal artery branches); Unilateral 36253
Renal, Superlective (one or more second order or higher renal artery branches); Bilateral 36254
Iliac, Ipsilateral 36245 36246 36247 +36248
Common Iliac, Contralateral 36245 36246 36247 +36248
Common Femoral, Ipsilateral, Retrograde 36245 36246 36247 +36248
Common Femoral, Contralateral N/A 36246 36247 +36248
Right Heart or Pulmonary ,Trunk only 36013 N/A N/A N/A
Left Pulmonary (Includes Pressures) N/A 36014 36015 36015
Right Pulmonary (Includes Pressures) N/A 36014 36015 36015
Bronchial Intercostal Arteries & Branches 36215 36216 36217 36218
Closure Device Placement Vascul G0269
NON-SELECTIVE VASCULAR
CATHETERIZATIONS CPT
Aorta Catheter (Femoral, Brach., Axillary) 36200
Extremity Artery, Needle/Intracath. Uni 36140
Arterial Cath. Sampling 36620
Ext. Vein Needle/Intracath, Uni 36005
Aorta (Translumbar) 36160
Carotid/Vertebral, direct puncture 36100
Retrograde Brachial 36120
Superior or Inferior Vena Cava, Catheter 36010
Jugular Vein 36299
Injection; Lymphangiography 38790
MISCELLANEOUS
CPT
Closure Device G0269
CT, limited or localized follow-up 76380
US Guidance for Vascular Access +76937
3D Reconstruction w/o Independent 76376
3D Reconstruction w/ Independent 76377
Anatomic model 3D-printed; 1st anatomic structure 0559T
Anatomic model 3D-printed; each additional anatomic structure +0560T
Anatomic model 3D-printed; 1st anatomic guide 0561T
Anatomic model 3D-printed; each additional anatomic guide +0562T
+ = Add-on code
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2019 Society of Interventional Radiology. All Rights Reserved
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
ARTERIOGRAPHY SUPERVISION & INTERPRETATION S&I Provided By Others
Thoracic Aortogram 75605 THROMBOLYSIS AND INFUSION THERAPY CPT S&I
Abdominal Aortogram 75625 Arterial thrombolytic infusion, other than coronary or intracranial 37211 Included
Abdominal Aortogram w/Run Offs 75630 Venous infusion for thrombolysis 37212 Included
Brachial, Retrograde 75658 Continued thrombolytic infusions(s) on subsequent day(s) 37213 Included
Spinal, Intercostal, Lumbar (Selective) 75705 X_ Thrombolytic infusion(s) final day of therapy 37214 Included
Extremity, Unilateral, Upper or Lower 75710 Perc Art Mech Thrombectomy/Infusion for Thrombolysis, intracranial 61645 Included
Extremity, Bilateral, Upper or Lower 75716 Endovasc Intracranial Admin of Pharma agent, non-thrombolysis, initial 61650 Included
Visceral (w or w/o aorta) Ea. Vessel 75726 X_ Endovasc Intracranial Admin of Pharma agent, non-thrombolysis, each add'l +61651 Included
Adrenal Unilateral (Selective) 75731 Thrombolysis, cerebral, by intravenous infusion 37195 Included
Adrenal Bilateral (Selective) 75733
Pelvic, Each Vessel (Selective) 75736 X_ MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY CPT S&I
Pulmonary, Unilateral (Selective) 75741 Primary Arterial Mech Thromb - initial vessel 37184 Included
Pulmonary, Bilateral (Slelective) 75743 Primary Arterial Mech Thromb -2nd/and all subsequent vessel(s) +37185 Included
Pulmonary, Non-Selective 75746 Secondary Mech Thromb- "rescue", suction, snare basket +37186 Included
Internal Mammary 75756 Venous Mech Thromb - Day 1 37187 Included
Each Add Vessel After Basic +75774 X_ Ven Mech Thromb - repeat thrombectomy on subs. day 37188 X_ Included
VENOGRAPHY SUPERVISION & INTERPRETATION S&I INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) CPT S&I
Extremity, Unilateral 75820 IVUS initial noncoronary vessel +37252 Included
Extremity, Bilateral 75822 IVUS Each additional vessel IVUS +37253 Included
IVC 75825
SVC 75827 PERCUTANEOUS ANGIOPLASTY CPT S&I
Renal, Unilateral (Selective) 75831 Except lower extremity artery(ies) for occlusive disease, intracranial, coronary, pulmonary, or dialysis circuit
Renal, Bilateral (Selective) 75833 PTA, initial artery 37246 Included
Adrenal, Unilateral (Selective) 75840 PTA, each additional artery +37247 Included
Adrenal, Bilateral (Selective) 75842 PTA, initial vein 37248 Included
Sinus or Jugular 75860 PTA, each additional vein +37249 Included
Superior Sagittal Sinus 75870
Epidural 75872 EMBOLIZATION (NON-HEAD/NECK) CPT S&I
Orbital 75880 Venous, other than hemorrhage 37241 Included
Hepatic w/Hemodynamic Eval 75889 Arterial, other than hemorrhage 37242 Included
Hepatic Wedge Pressure (no venogram) 75889-52 Tumors, organ ischemia, or infarction 37243 Included
Hepatic w/o Hemodynamic Eval 75891 Arterial or venous hemorrhage or lymphatic extravasation 37244 Included
Transhepatic Portogram/Pressure 75885 Chemotherapy administration, intra-arterial; push technique 96420 N/A
Venous Sampling (eg. Renins) 75893 X_ Radiopharmaceutical therapy, by intra-arterial particulate administration 79445
INTRACRANIAL DILATION, ANGIOPLASTY, STENT CPT EMBOLIZATION (HEAD OR NECK) CPT S&I
Intracranial angioplasty 61630 Cerebral Balloon Occlusion Test (BOT), temporary 61623 Included
Intracranial angioplasty w/ stent 61635 Embolization Central Nervous System (CNS), permanent 61624 75894
Dilatation of intracranial vasospasm; initial vessel 61640 Embolization Non-CNS, head or neck 61626 75894
each add'l vessel same vascular territory +61641 X_ F/U Angio study for transcath therapy, embo or infusion, other than thrombo 75898
each add'l vessel different vascular territory +61642 X_
Includes selective catheterization and all imaging of target vessel DIALYSIS ACCESS INTERVENTIONS CPT S&I
Intro Cath Dialysis Circuit 36901 Included
INTRAVASCULAR STENTS (Non-Coronary/Non-Carotid/ Intro Cath Dialysis Circuit w/ Angioplasty 36902 Included
Non-Vertebral/Non-Intracranial/Non-Lower Ext.) CPT Intro Cath Dialysis Circuit w/ Angioplasty and Stent 36903 Included
Intravascular Stent, open or perc., initial artery 37236 Mech Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis 36904 Included
Intravascular Stent, open or perc., ea. add'l artery +37237 Mech Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis w/ Angioplasty 36905 Included
Intravascular Stent, open or perc, initial vein 37238 Mech Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis w/ Angioplasty and Stent 36906 Included
Intravascular Stent, open or perc, ea. add'l vein +37239 Angioplasty, Central Dialysis Segment +36907 Included
INTRAVASCULAR STENTS (Cervical Carotid) CPT Angioplasty, Central Dialysis Segment w/ Stent +36908 Included
Intravascular Stent w/ distal embolic protection 37215* Dialysis circuit permanent vascular embolization or occlusion +36909 Included
Intravascular Stent w/o distal embolic protection 37216* Extremity Venogram N/A 75820
INTRAVASCULAR STENTS
(Extracranial Vertebral/Intrathoracic Carotid) CPT TRANSCATHETER THERAPY MISC. CPT S&I
Intravascular Stent, open or perc; initial vessel 0075T* Foreign Body Retrieval 37197 Included
Intravascular Stent, open or perc; each addl. vessel +0076T* IVC Filter Insertion 37191 Included
IVC Filter Respositioning 37192 Included
Stent codes include RS&I and angioplasty in the same vessel when performed IVC Filter Retrieval (Removal) 37193 Included
*Includes all ipsilateral selective cath, target vessel angiography and RS&I
Inpatient Only Procedures
+ = Add-on code
2019
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2018 Society
Society of Interventional
of Interventional Radiology.
Radiology. All Rights
All Rights Reserved.
Reserved
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Fluoroscopic Time
Diagnosis Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
Provided By Others
CENTRALLY INSERTED DEVICE CPT S&I
Fluoro guidance for CVA device plcmt/replacement/removal +77001
Ultrasound guidance for vascular access +76937
Non-Tunneled (Child < 5) 36555 By modality(ies)
Non-Tunneled (5 years or older) 36556 By modality(ies)
Tunneled (Child <5) No Port, No Pump 36557 By modality(ies)
Tunneled (5 years or older) No Port, No Pump 36558 By modality(ies)
Tunneled Cath. w/ Port (Child <5) 36560 By modality(ies)
Tunneled Cath. w/ Port (5 years or older) 36561 By modality(ies)
Tunneled Cath. w/ Pump 36563 By modality(ies)
2 Tunneled Cath, 2 Access(no port/pump) (Tesio) 36565 By modality(ies)
2 Tunneled Cath, 2 Access Sites, w/ Port 36566 By modality(ies)
S&I
REMOVAL CPT if performed
Removal non-tunneled, no port no pump E/M N/A
Removal of tunneled central venous catheter, w/o port or pump 36589 +77001
Removal of tunneled central venous access device, w/ port or pump, central or peripheral 36590 +77001
Modifier 25- To report a separate and distinct E/M service with a non-E/M service performed on the same date
*Local Medicare Part B carriers and/or A/B MACs will no longer recognize consultation codes (ranges 99241-99245, and 99251-99255) for
inpatient facility and office/outpatient settings.
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2019 Society of Interventional Radiology. All Rights Reserved.
Patient Radiologist
Date Physician # 2
Referring Physician Technologist
Diagnosis Fluoroscopic Time
Moderate Sedation Time
Provided By Same Phy
Provided By Others
AAA-TA-IA ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR
CATHETERIZATION: SELECTIVE 1st 2nd 3rd Add'l 2nd & CATHETERIZATION: NON-SELECTIVE
Arterial Vascular Family ORDER ORDER ORDER 3rd Order Report cath codes in addition to exposure CPT
IIiac, Ipsilateral 36245 36246 36247 +36248 X_ Introduction of catheter, aorta (Femoral, Brachial, Axillary) 36200*
Common IIiac, Contralateral 36245 36246 36247 +36248 X_ Introduction of needle or intracatheter; extremity artery 36140*
Common Femoral, Ipsilateral 36245 36246 36247 +36248 X_ EXPOSURE FOR ENDOPROSTHESIS CPT
Common Femoral, Contralateral 36245 36246 36247 +36248 X_ Open femoral artery exposure 34812***
Common Iliac or Femoral, Axillary or Brachial Approach 36245 36246 36247 +36248 X_ Placement of femoral-femoral prosthetic graft +34813**
Other Abdominal Aorta Vascular Family 36245 36246 36247 +36248 X_ Open iliac artery exposure 34820***
ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THE INTRARENAL AORTA CPT S&I FENESTRATED ENDOVAS REPAIR VISCERAL/INFRARENAL AORTA CPT
EVAR infrarenal aorta w/ aorto-aortic tube endograft, other than rupture 34701 Included Endo repair of visceral aorta; incl. one visceral artery endoprosth. 34841
EVAR infrarenal aorta w/ aorto-aortic tube endograft, rupture 34702 Included Endo repair of visceral aorta; incl. two visceral artery endoprosth. 34842
EVAR infrarenal aorta w/ aorto-uni-iliac endograft, other than rupture 34703 Included Endo repair of visceral aorta; incl. three visceral artery endoprosth. 34843
EVAR infrarenal aorta w/ aorto-uni-iliac endograft, rupture 34704 Included Endo repair of visceral aorta; incl. four or more visceral artery endoprosth. 34844
EVAR infrarenal aorta w/ aorto-bi-iliac endograft, other than rupture 34705 Included Endo repair viscl aorta/infrarenal abd aorta; one viscl artery endoprosth. 34845
EVAR infrarenal aorta w/ aorto-bi-iliac endograft, rupture 34706 Included Endo repair viscl aorta/infrarenal abd aorta; two viscl artery endoprosth. 34846
EVAR iliac artery at the time of aortoiliac artery endograft plcmnt, unilateral +34717 Included Endo repair viscl aorta/infrarenal abd aorta; three viscl artery endoprosth. 34847
EVAR iliac artery, not associated with plcmnt of an aorto-iliac artery endograft, unilateral 34718 Included Endo repair viscl aorta/infrarenal abd aorta; four + viscl artery endoprosth. 34848
EVAR iliac artery w/ ilio-iliac tube endograft, other than rupture 34707 Included Phys. plan patient-specific fen viscl aortic endograft- min. 90mins. phys. time 34839
EVAR iliac artery w/ ilio-iliac tube endograft, rupture 34708 Included
Plcmt of ext endograft dist common iliac/ prox renal artery(ies) same set as init plcmt +34709 Included OCCLUSION DEVICE CPT
Delayed plcmt of extension(s) in a different setting 34710 Included Endovascular placement iliac occlusion device +34808
Delayed plcmt of extension(s) in a different setting; each add'l vessel treated +34711 Included
Placement of endoanchors 34712 Included OPEN CONVERSION CPT
Percutaneous closure of femoral artery from large (12 French or greater) sheath +34713 Included Open repair infrarenal aortic aneurysm endo repair; tube prosthesis 34830**
Endo repair of iliac art bifurc using endoprosthesis into external/internal iliac artery; unil 0254T Open repair infrarenal aortic aneurysm endo repair; aorto-bi-iliac prosthesis 34831**
Open repair infrarenal aortic aneurysm endo repair; aorto-bifem prosthesis 34832**
TA ENDOPROTHESIS DEPLOYMENT CPT S&I
TA endo repair w/ coverage of subclavian origin 33880** 75956 BYPASS CPT
TA endo repair w/o coverage of subclavian origin 33881** 75957 Bypass graft, with vein; femoral-popliteal 35556***
Open subcl. to carotid transpositio in conj w/ TA endo repair, neck incision 33889*** N/A Bypass graft, with other than vein; femoral-popliteal 35656***
Graft other than vein, transcervical retropharyngeal carotid-carotid with TA 33891*** N/A
THROMBOENDARTERECTOMY CPT
TA EXTENSIONS/CUFFS DEPLOYMENT CPT S&I Thromboendarterectomy, incl. patch graft; iliofemoral 35355***
Placement of proximal extension prosthesis; initial extension 33883** 75958 Thromboendarterectomy, incl. patch graft; common femoral 35371***
Placement of proximal extension prosthesis; each add'l proximal extension +33884** X_ 75958 Thromboendarterectomy, incl. patch graft; deep femoral (profunda) 35372***
Placement of distal extension prosthesis delayed after desc TA endo repair 33886** 75959
EMBOLECTOMY THROMBECTOMY CPT
Embolectomy/thrombectomy, w/ w/o catheter; fem-pop, aortoiliac artery, leg incision 34201***
TRANSLUMINAL BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY CPT S&I Embolectomy/thrombectomy, w/ w/o catheter; pop-tibio-peroneal artery, leg incision 34203***
PTA, initial artery 37246 Included
PTA, each additional artery +37247 Included ARTERIAL REPAIR CPT
PTA, initial vein 37248 Included Repair blood vessel, direct; lower extremity 35226***
PTA, each additional vein +37249 Included Repair blood vessel with vein graft; lower extremity 35256***
Repair blood vessel with graft other than vein; lower extremity 35286***
INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND CPT S&I
Intravascular ultrasound; initial (non coronary) vessel +37252 N/A
Intravascular ultrasound; each add'l (non coronary) vessel +37253 N/A Inpatient Only Procedures
+ = Add-on code
Patient Radiologist
Date Technologist
Referring Physician Moderate Sedation Time
Diagnosis Provided By Same Phy
Provided By Others
BREAST CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY CPT S&I
Stereotactic guidance, 1st lesion 19081 Included
Stereotactic guidance, each additional lesion +19082 X_ Included
Ultrasound guidance, 1st lesion 19083 Included
Ultrasound guidance, each additional lesion +19084 X_ Included
Magnetic resonance guidance, 1st lesion 19085 Included
Magnetic resonance guidance, each additional lesion +19086 X_ Included
Tomosynthesis guidance without stereotactic 19499
Breast Biopsy includes imaging, localization device, and imaging of biopsy specimen, when performed
+ = Add-on code
CPT Only Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2019 Society of Interventional Radiology. All Rights Reserved