0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 4 views7 pagesEff
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
EFFICIENCY RATIOS
Receivables Turnover Ratio (RTR)
The receivables turnover ratio measures how
effectively a company collects its accounts
receivable or manages the credit it extends to
its customers
Benchmark
© Industry benchmarks vary significantly
* Higher RTR indicates a quicker collection of
receivables, which is always favourable
—>
Formula
Net Credit Sales
Receivables Turnover Ratio = asr352 accounts Receivable
Results: Interpretation
Strength: A high RTR suggests effective credit
management and timely collection of receivables
© Weakness: A low RTR
practicesEFFICIENCY RATIOS
Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio measures how
effectively and efficiently the inventory is
managed and how quickly it is sold and replaced
over a specific period
Benchmark
© Industry benchmarks vary significantly
© High ITRs are better, indicating faster
inventory turnover
* Benchmarks can range from 4 to 10 or
higher, depending on the industry
Formula
Cost of Goods Sold
Inventory Turnover Ratio = oo Tavantory
Results: Interpretation
‘* Strength: High ITR suggests effective inventory
management, reduced holding costs and better
cash flow
© Weakness: Low ITR indicates overstocking,
slow-moving inventory or inefficient purchasing
practicesEFFICIENCY RATIOS
Payables Turnover Ratio (PTR)
The payables turnover ratio measures how Formula
efficiently a company pays its suppliers and
manages its accounts payable. It shows how ——?
many times a company pays off its accounts Payables Turnover Ratio = -
payable during a particular period
Benchmark Results: Interpretation
« Industry benchmarks vary significantly « Strength: High PTR suggests effective management
* Higher PTR indicates faster payment to suppliers, of trade Cred ord Wotan Cotacal
which can improve relationships and potentially * Weakness: Low PTR indicates liquidity issues or
leverage discounts strained supplier relationshipsEFFICIENCY RATIOS
Average Receivables Collection Period (DSO)
The average receivables collection period,
Formula
also called days of sales outstanding (DSO),
represents how long it takes, on average, for Ged a ae
a company to collect the money owed by
Sales per Day
customers after making a sale © Here,
© Sales per day = Sales revenue / 360
Benchmark Results: Interpretat
n
© Benchmarks vary by industry, but typically, © Strength: Lower DSO suggests efficient credit policies
30 to 45 days is considered good and effective accounts receivable management
* Lower DSO indicates a quicker collection of ‘* Weakness: Higher DSO indicates credit issues,
receivables, which is favourable ‘customer payment delays or inefficient collection
processesEFFICIENCY RATIOS
Average Inventory Processing Period (AIPP)
The average inventory processing period Formula
measures the average number of days it takes ~——>
for a company to sell and replace its inventory Average Inventory _ ___A\ :
Processing Period Cost of Goods Sold per Day
Where,
Cost of goods sold
© Cost of Goods Sold Per Day:
360
Benchmark Results: Interpretation
' Industry benchmarks can vary widely, but typically, '* Strength: Lower AIPP suggests efficient inventory
a lower AIPP indicates faster inventory turnover management and reduced inventory carrying costs
and better liquidity * Weakness: Higher AIPP indicates excess inventory,
slow sales or inefficient productionEFFICIENCY RATIOS
Average Payable Days (Payment Period)
Average payable days measures the average
number of days it takes for a company to pay
its suppliers. It indicates how quickly the
company settles its bills after receiving goods
or services
Benchmark
« Longer payment period indicates better cash flow
management but should be balanced with maintaining
good supplier relationships
* Benchmarks vary by industry practices and
‘supplier terms.
Formula
‘Average Accounts Payable
Average Payable Days = ==
Be Payanle DAYS * Cost of Goods Sold per Day
© Where,
Cost of goods sold
© Cost of Goods Sold Per Day = =
360
Results: Interpretation
« Strength: Longer payment period can improve cash
flow and working capital management
Weakness: Longer payment period may strain supy
relationships or lead to missed discountsEFFICIENCY RATIOS
Cash Collection Cycle (CCC)
The cash collection cycle measures the time
it takes for cash to flow back into the
company after the outlay for inventory
Benchmark
‘© Benchmarks can vary by industry and company size
* Shorter cycle is preferred, as it implies quicker cash
flow and better liquidity management
Formula
* Cash collection cycle = Average receivables collection
period (DSO) + Average inventory processing period
(AIPP) ~ Average payable days (payment period)
Results: Interpretation
« Strength: Shorter cash collection cycle indicates more
efficient management of working capital and faster
conversion of inventory and receivables into cash
‘* Weakness: Longer cash collection cycle indicates
problems with collecting payments, managing
inventory or paying suppliers on time, which might
lead to cash flow issues