0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views3 pages

Behavioral Pricing and Consumer WTP Insights

Uploaded by

dsssssss
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views3 pages

Behavioral Pricing and Consumer WTP Insights

Uploaded by

dsssssss
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Overview:

-​ Small changes in price can have an enormous impact on income


-​ Before changing the price, a firm must understand and predict a
consumer’s response to this change
-​ Many firms are not well-informed about consumer’s WTP and their response
to price changes
Purpose of this article:
-​ To highlight the impact of some behavioural variables on a consumer’s WTP
-​ WTP is influenced by “psychological” or “behavioural” variables that are often
not considered

Value Price and the Economic Perspective


The traditional economic approach is the “thermometer“

-​ Objective value
Measurement of the benefit delivered to customers, regardless of whether
customers recognize benefits
-​ Perceived value (PV)
-​ The value that consumers understand the products to deliver
-​ Topline for pricing
-​ Influenced by objective value, substitutes, and marketing efforts
-​ Price
-​ PV-P= consumer’s incentive to purchase
-​ P-COGS= firm’s incentive to sell
-​ COGS
-​ Bottom line for pricing
In value pricing terminology the firm creates values by offering a product that
the customers value at a price > COGS. In turn, by pricing between PV and
COGS, the firm has captured some value for itself and allowed consumers to
capture the remainder

The economic perspective: consumers buy when PV > P


-​ People’s prices differ due to different expectations they have
(pay $2.5 for a bottle of beer at a fancy hotel seems reasonable but it is
impossible in a grocery store)
-​ WTP is not only driven by the “economic utility” of the transaction but
also by “psychological utility” - “fairness”
-​ Economy utility = PV - P (类似consumer surplus)

Behavioural updates to the economic perspective - Fairness of Transaction


1.​ relative vs absolute value of money
-​ Relative incentive to enter the transaction = (PV-P)/P
= Economy utility/ actual price
(consumer surplus在商品总价中的占比,如果占比大,消费者更容易决定
购买)
-​ “psychological utility” of a fixed amount of money is relative

2.​ The impact of a salient reference price 显著的参考价格


-​ WTP is impacted by Salient Reference Price
-​ In determining consumer’s WTP, they are considering “economic
utility” and consistency between the actual price and a salience
reference price
-​ Salience reference price= actual price - reference price
-​ Reference price (“fair price”): previous price paid for a product

3.​ The impact of a firm’s COGS


-​ Consumers will think a price increase is unfair when the price change
is coupled with little or no change in COGS
-​ Consumers don’t want themselves to be taken advantage of by
retailers
-​ WTP is impacted by COGS:
In determining consumer’s WTP, they are considering “economic
utility” from the transaction and firm’ “economic utility” (actual
price - COGS)

4.​ The nature of the Product Being Sold


-​ In determining a consumer’s WTP, the degree to which a consumer will
reply upon their “economic utility” will vary across product
category (discretionary vs necessity; luxury vs utilitarian)
-​ The playoff game is viewed as a discretionary expense (因为是不是必
需品,所以被视为正当的提价), but the purchase of a snow shovel after
a large snowstorm is vired as a necessary expense (因为是必需品,所
以被视为恶意抬价,剥削)

Consumer’s WTP= Economic utility of the transaction + fairness of the transaction (3


个公式)

-​ In reality, consumers 包含 psychological (or behaviour) factors into their


decision-making.
-​ Factors - tend to reduce WTP compared with a purely economic perspective
-​ The relative size of incentive to purchase
-​ Consistency between the actual price and expected price
-​ Firm’s COGS

How can a firm manage the perception of transaction fairness and anticipate
customers’ WTP? (2 strategies)
➔​ Strategy 1: Actively manage price expectations
-​ Establish credible reference prices 参考价
(为产品设立一个benchmark price)
-​ Manage product price trends
(基于高一些的reference price——之前的价格,降价比抬价更加容易)
-​ Encourage favourable comparisons
(鼓励消费者比较替代品的价格,对比突出产品的优势)
-​ Avoid unfavourable comparison through product differentiation
(避免不好的对比)

➔​ Strategy 2: Actively manage perceptions of COGS


-​ Focus attention on fully-loaded COGS
(communicate the high cost of the development and support to customers)
-​ Bundle products to obscure 掩藏 COGS
-​ Focus the attention on consumer value
(focus on customer’s incentive to purchase)

You might also like