0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views7 pages

Single Plate Shear Connection Design

AISC Verification Example-Single Plate Shear

Uploaded by

waneco1268
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views7 pages

Single Plate Shear Connection Design

AISC Verification Example-Single Plate Shear

Uploaded by

waneco1268
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Verification example Single plate shear

Type of connection: Single plate shear connection

Unit system: Metric

Designed acc. to: AISC 360-10

Investigated: Bolts, Shear plate, Welds

Materials: Steel A36, Bolts A490M

Profile:
Geometry:
HEB 500

Profile:

HEB 200

Shear plate
thickness:

tp = 10 mm

Bolts:

M20 – A490M

Spacing of bolts
80mm
Applied forces:

V = 68 kN

N = 0 kN

M = 3.8 kNm (this moment is caused by eccentricity of center of gravity of bolt group M = 68 kN x
0,055m; The shear force V must be set in the center of gravity of bolt group but such configuration
doesn’t give a correct moment at column wall; Therefore additional moment must be added.)

Procedure:

Instantaneous center of rotation method is used for computing the bolt coefficient C – Crawford and
Kulak algorithm is used. The AISC Steel construction manual (2006 printing) - table 8-4 gives values
for weld verification.

IDEA StatiCa Connection – results

Von Mieses stress


Plastic strain ratio + Direction of resultants in bolts

The shear force in one bolt is Fv = 58 kN

The ultimate shear strength of M20 – A490M is Fnv = 108 kN acc. Table J3-2 and Eq. J3-1

The unit check: 58/108 = 0.54 = 54%


AISC 360-10 and Steel construction manual – results

1) Bolt check without check of bearing strength at holes


Simple shear plate connection Plate and beam steel: A36

bp = 100
fin plate thickness d = 10 mm
number of bolts n = 2 pieces Plates: fy = 250 MPa
gv bolt spacing p1 = 80 mm fu = 400 MPa
e21b
j e1 e1 = 30 mm Φb = 0,9
2 p1
j hp = 140 e 2 = e 2b = 45 mm Φ= 0,75
2
h= 200 gv = 30 mm
2
gh = 10 mm
2
cross-section height h = 200 mm
he web thickness tw = 9 mm
e2 e2b gh plate width bP = 100 mm Utilization as whole:0,54 OK
z
plate height hP = 140 mm
plate 0 e 1b = 60 mm
tw
no additional reinforcing he = 30 mm
z= 55,0 mm

Design load
+Nd Tension force N d = 0,0 kN
Shear force V zd = 68,0 kN
+Vzd

R d = 68,0 kN b = 90,0 °
Bolt design - resistance check dB0= 24 mm (db+2mm)
C - coefficient of eccentrically loaded bolts M 20 Class A490M Fnt = 245 kN tension force per 1 bolt
Shear plane in thread? Yes fy= 780 Fnv = 144 kN shear force per 1 bolt and
shear plane in thread

Bolt coefficient C= 1,176 (computed using VBA algorithm based on ICR method - Craw ford, Kulak)

Shear strength:
ΦFnv = 108 kN

ΦRb= C x min ΦFnv = 127 kN > 68 kN 0,54 OK

The resulting shear force in one bolt is: Fv = V / C = 68 kN / 1,176 = 58 kN

The unit check: 54%


2) Check of bearing strength at holes
Simple shear plate connection Plate and beam steel: A36

bp = 100
fin plate thickness d = 10 mm
number of bolts n = 2 pieces Plates: fy = 250 MPa
gv bolt spacing p1 = 80 mm fu = 400 MPa
e21b
j e1 e1 = 30 mm Φb = 0,9
2 p1
j hp = 140 e 2 = e 2b = 45 mm Φ= 0,75
2
h= 200 gv = 30 mm
2
gh = 10 mm
2
cross-section height h = 200 mm
he web thickness tw = 9 mm
e2 e2b gh plate width bP = 100 mm Utilization: 0,99 OK
z
plate height hP = 140 mm
plate 0 e 1b = 60 mm
tw
no additional reinforcing he = 30 mm
z= 55,0 mm

Design load
+Nd Tension force N d = 0,0 kN
Shear force V zd = 68,0 kN
+Vzd

R d = 68,0 kN b = 90,0 °
Bolt design - resistance check dB0= 24 mm (db+2mm)
C - coefficient of eccentrically loaded bolts M 20 Class A490M Fnt = 245 kN tension force per 1 bolt
Shear plane in thread? Yes fy= 780 Fnv = 144 kN shear force per 1 bolt and
shear plane in thread

Bolt coefficient C= 1,176 (computed using VBA algorithm based on ICR method - Craw ford, Kulak)

Shear strength: Clear distance Lc to edge of plate:


ΦFnv = 108 kN Lc = 18 mm

Φrbrg,1= Φ 1,2 Lc d Fu = 58 kN thickness is taken as minimum of beam w eb or fin plate


Φrbrg,max = Φ 2,4 db d Fu = 130 kN
Φrbrg= min rbrg = 58 kN

ΦRb= C x min (Φrbrg;ΦFnv )= 69 kN > 68 kN 0,99 OK


Plate check Ubs = 1,0 Case 1 Case 2
For V - direction of force:
Case 1
2
Agv = 1400 mm ΦRn=0,90 x 0,6Fy Agv = 189 kN
2
Anv = 920 mm ΦRn=0,75 x 0,6FuAnv = 166 kN
Unit check: 0,41 OK
Case 2
2
Agv = 1100 mm Rn=0,6FuAnv + Ubs FuAnt = 310 kN > Rn=0,6Fy Agv + Ubs FuAnt = 297 kN
2
Anv = 740 mm Rn= 297 kN
2
Agt = 450 mm ΦRn= 223 kN
2
Ant = 330 mm
Unit check: 0,31 OK
Weld design – IDEA StatiCa

Item c-bfl shows the results of weld of shear plate, thickness 5.0mm is the throat of weld. Unit
check is 46%.
Weld design – AISC – Steel construction manual

Eccentrically loaded weld group - AISC Steel construction manual - table 8-4
Electrode E70XX
ϴ weld size w = 7 mm = 0,275771644662754
Weld:
in.
e Pu Length l= 140 mm = 5,46 in. C1= 1,000
eccentricity e= 55 mm = 2,145 in. Φ= 0,75
angle ϴ= 0 ° w
Reduction at
Plate thickness t= 10 mm elevated
l= 140 mm a= 0,393 temperature: 1,00
D= 4,41 (no reduction)
C= 2,691
Design load Pu Results: 0,31 O.K.
Load Pu = 68,0 kN
Design of weld
weld size w Rn= CC1Dl = 64,8 kips = 288,3 kN
Φ Rn= 48,6 kips = 216,2 kN

Comparison:

The results of both IDEA StatiCa design and manual computation according to AISC 360-10 gives
comparable values:

Bolt check: Both results give exactly the same values.

Plate check: Bearing strength at bolt holes determines the plate check. The same result is given by the
FEM computation. However, according the IDEA StatiCa, there is still a reserve in plastic strain limit.

Weld: IDEA StatiCa can design the welds using 3 possible methods. The least conservative values
were taken into account – average stress in welds. This method gives a unit ratio of 46%. The design
according to AISC Steel construction manual – table 8-4 – Eccentrically loaded weld group is less
conservative (31%) than IDEA StatiCa, but both results are reasonable and gives good values.

You might also like