0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views4 pages

Understanding Interview Types and Techniques

An interview is a structured conversation where one participant asks questions and the other provides answers, often used in various contexts such as employment, psychology, marketing, and journalism. Interviews can be face-to-face or conducted remotely, and they can be unstructured or highly structured, depending on the purpose. Interviewer bias can affect the quality of information gathered, and techniques like blind interviews can help mitigate this bias.

Uploaded by

Polly Nuñez
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views4 pages

Understanding Interview Types and Techniques

An interview is a structured conversation where one participant asks questions and the other provides answers, often used in various contexts such as employment, psychology, marketing, and journalism. Interviews can be face-to-face or conducted remotely, and they can be unstructured or highly structured, depending on the purpose. Interviewer bias can affect the quality of information gathered, and techniques like blind interviews can help mitigate this bias.

Uploaded by

Polly Nuñez
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Interview

An interview is a structured conversation where one participant asks questions, and the other
provides answers.[1] In common parlance, the word "interview" refers to a one-on-one conversation
between an interviewer and an interviewee. The interviewer asks questions to which the interviewee
responds, usually providing information. That information may be used or provided to other
audiences immediately or later. This feature is common to many types of interviews – a job
interview or interview with a witness to an event may have no other audience present at the time,
but the answers will be later provided to others in the employment or investigative process. An
interview may also transfer information in both directions.

A musician interviewed in a radio


studio

A woman interviewing for a job

Athletes interviewed after a race


Street interview with a member of the
public

Interviews usually take place face-to-face, in person, but the parties may instead be separated
geographically, as in videoconferencing or telephone interviews. Interviews almost always involve a
spoken conversation between two or more parties, but can also happen between two persons who
type their questions and answers.

Interviews can be unstructured, free-wheeling, and open-ended conversations without a


predetermined plan or prearranged questions.[2] One form of unstructured interview is a focused
interview in which the interviewer consciously and consistently guides the conversation so that the
interviewee's responses do not stray from the main research topic or idea.[3] Interviews can also be
highly structured conversations in which specific questions occur in a specified order.[4] They can
follow diverse formats; for example, in a ladder interview, a respondent's answers typically guide
subsequent interviews, with the object being to explore a respondent's subconscious motives.[5][6]
Typically the interviewer has some way of recording the information that is gleaned from the
interviewee, often by keeping notes with a pencil and paper, or with a video or audio recorder.

The traditionally two-person interview format, sometimes called a one-on-one interview, permits
direct questions and follow-ups, which enables an interviewer to better gauge the accuracy and
relevance of responses. It is a flexible arrangement in the sense that subsequent questions can be
tailored to clarify earlier answers. Further, it eliminates possible distortion due to other parties being
present. Interviews have taken on an even more significant role, offering opportunities to showcase
not just expertise, but adaptability and strategic thinking.
Contexts

A radio interview

Interviews can happen in a wide variety of contexts:

Employment. A job interview is a formal consultation for evaluating the qualifications of the
interviewee for a specific position.[7][8] One type of job interview is a case interview in which the
applicant is presented with a question or task or challenge, and asked to resolve the situation.[9]
Candidates may be treated to a mock interview as a training exercise to prepare the respondent to
handle questions in the subsequent 'real' interview. A series of interviews may be arranged, with
the first interview sometimes being a short screening interview, followed by more in-depth
interviews, usually by company personnel who can ultimately hire the applicant. Technology has
enabled new possibilities for interviewing; for example, video telephony has enabled interviewing
applicants from afar which is becoming increasingly popular.

Psychology. Psychologists use a variety of interviewing methods and techniques to try to


understand and help their patients. In a psychiatric interview, a psychiatrist or psychologist or
nurse asks a battery of questions to complete what is called a psychiatric assessment.
Sometimes two people are interviewed by an interviewer, with one format being called couple
interviews.[10] Criminologists and detectives sometimes use cognitive interviews on eyewitnesses
and victims to try to ascertain what can be recalled specifically from a crime scene, hopefully
before the specific memories begin to fade in the mind.[11][12]

Marketing and Academic. In marketing research and academic research, interviews are used in a
wide variety of ways as a method to do extensive personality tests. Interviews are the most used
form of data collection in qualitative research.[3] Interviews are used in marketing research as a
tool that a firm may utilize to gain an understanding of how consumers think, or as a tool in the
form of cognitive interviewing (or cognitive pretesting) for improving questionnaire design.[13][14]
Consumer research firms sometimes use computer-assisted telephone interviewing to randomly
dial phone numbers to conduct highly structured telephone interviews, with scripted questions
and responses entered directly into the computer.[15]
Journalism and other media. Typically, reporters covering a story in journalism conduct interviews
over the phone and in person to gain information for subsequent publication. Reporters also
interview government officials and political candidates for broadcast.[16] In a talk show, a radio or
television host interviews one or more people, with the topic usually chosen by the host,
sometimes for entertainment, sometimes for informational purposes. Such interviews are often
recorded.

Other situations. Sometimes college representatives or alumni conduct college interviews with
prospective students as a way of assessing a student's suitability while offering the student a
chance to learn more about a college.[17] Some services specialize in coaching people for
interviews.[17] Embassy officials may conduct interviews with applicants for student visas before
approving their visa applications. Interviewing in legal contexts is often called interrogation.
Debriefing is another kind of interview.

Interviewer bias

The relationship between the interviewer and interviewee in research settings can have both
positive and negative consequences.[18] Their relationship can bring deeper understanding of the
information being collected, however this creates a risk that the interviewer will be unable to be
unbiased in their collection and interpretation of information.[18] Bias or discrimination can be
created from the interviewer's perception of the interviewee, or the interviewee's perception of the
interviewer.[18] Additionally, a researcher can bring biases to the table based on the researcher's
mental state, their preparedness for conducting the research, and the researcher conducting
inappropriate interviews.[19] Interviewers can use various practices known in qualitative research to
mitigate interviewer bias. These practices include subjectivity, objectivity, and reflexivity. Each of
these practices allows the interviewer, or researcher, the opportunity to use their bias to enhance
their work by gaining a deeper understanding of the problem they are studying.[20]

Blind interview

In a blind interview the identity of the interviewee is concealed to reduce interviewer bias. Blind
interviews are sometimes used in the software industry and are standard in blind auditions. Blind
interviews have been shown in some cases to increase the hiring of minorities and women.[21]

See also

Repertory grid interview

Common questions

Powered by AI

Mock interviews serve as a preparatory exercise to help individuals practice response delivery, refine their interviewing skills, and increase confidence in handling real interview questions. They provide an opportunity to receive feedback and make improvements, thus enhancing performance in actual job interviews by reducing anxiety and improving communication skills .

Cognitive interviews are employed in criminology to help witnesses and victims recall details of crime scenes with improved accuracy. This technique encourages mental visualization and context reinstatement, allowing individuals to provide detailed memories before they fade or become distorted. The process includes open-ended questions to minimize leading and suggestive questioning, which could contaminate the witness’s accounts .

Bias in research interviews can stem from an interviewer's interpretation of participant responses and from participants' perceptions of the interviewer. To minimize such biases, employing blind interview techniques can conceal identities, subduing preconceived notions. Additionally, training interviewers in cultural competence and neutral questioning can further prevent bias by striving to create an unbiased discussion environment .

The ladder interview technique allows the interviewer's questions to be guided by the respondent's previous answers, delving deeper into underlying motivations by continually exploring the 'why' behind each response. This method is particularly effective at uncovering subconscious motives because it prompts participants to sequentially reflect on their behavior and thoughts, leading to a revelation of personal insights that might not emerge in more direct questioning .

Couple interviews involve two subjects being interviewed simultaneously, unlike solo interviews. This format is beneficial in psychological contexts as it can reveal interpersonal dynamics and mutual perceptions that might not arise when individuals are interviewed separately. Such interviews offer richer contextual insights into relational patterns and behaviors, which can be critical in therapeutic assessments and interventions .

Interviews can deepen understanding in qualitative research by providing rich, detailed data. However, they pose risks of bias if the researcher allows personal feelings to influence interpretation. To mitigate bias, practices like reflexivity, wherein researchers critically examine their own influence on the research process, and using a blind interview setup can help maintain objectivity and reduce preconceived notions from affecting outcomes .

In marketing research, interviews are instrumental in gaining consumer insights which guide the design of effective questionnaires. Cognitive interviewing, for instance, allows researchers to test and refine survey questions based on respondents’ thought processes and interpretation. This pre-validation ensures that final questionnaires are clear and relevant, ultimately facilitating accurate data collection and better understanding of consumer preferences and behaviors .

Technology, such as video telephony, has transformed interview processes, allowing for remote interviews and broader candidate pools. Advantages include increased accessibility and convenience for both parties. However, potential drawbacks entail potential technical issues and challenges in establishing rapport that might be naturally found in face-to-face settings, alongside concerns about ensuring consistent evaluation standards across different platforms .

Structured interviews involve predetermined questions asked in a specific order, making them more suited for contexts requiring consistency and comparability of responses, such as job interviews or academic research. Unstructured interviews, by contrast, have no set questions, allowing for free-flowing conversations that can be more effective in exploratory phases of research or in therapeutic settings where understanding nuanced personal insights is crucial .

Interviews can deter subjectivity by applying structured or standardized questioning, promoting uniformity in responses. Reflexivity further supports this by encouraging researchers to be aware of and account for their biases, fostering greater objectivity and enhancing the credibility of the research. By reflecting on their potential influence on data collection, researchers can adjust their approaches to better capture authentic insights .

You might also like