raakoain
jolarpretation two
cases.
D
sovereign of
North to
these also the
the
paramount
Ganges in
the
also river the title
to i t in
"He
was from the referring to
countryghich extended
South
But, "This title would
in the remarks :
GGodavari Indravarman L he extending from
the
rirer
TH-Kaliágdhipat of country
whole
the
ruled
ruled over the in the South."
Godavari
"that he the river puts these
Dorth to why he
make it clear
sUggest
the
Lake in not explanation
Chilka
Prof. SSubba Rao
does
term. But
the
same
i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s on
the Ýailodbhavas makes
iferent Kongoda by the his suzerainty
occupation of extend
The could ever
Indravarman I
obvions. constrained
is that Rao wns
# mHkely hence Prof.
the Chilka Lake, and
restricted sense. But this
bgond case in a
Tri-Kaliága in this aoceptance of the
ofake against the
give warning references to
should fact, the
very fact
the term. As a matter of Eastern Calukya
uAUal meaning of records of the
Tri-Kalinga in the leave no doubt
KaliDga and later, would
which are quoted a few pages and much lesy
kings, distinct from,
meant a region,
that Tri-KaliDga
presumably a wild region covered
was
important than, KaliDga, and support the hypothesis of
records
with hills and forests. These
Tri-Kalinga denotes the highland to
Mr. G. Ramdas that hills of Ganjam from the
the west of the Mahendra
Mabânadi to about the 8ource of the
upper course of the Bafer to take
Lähguliys river: Perhaps it would be
foz the hilly tracts, lying
Tri-KaliDga as a general name foz
the Central
to the west of Kaliñga, and separating it from
borderlands
Provinces. Thisregion evidently shared the fate of all
Haibayas,
ADd passed at different times into the hands of the
I. J. A, H, R,S., Vol. VI, p. 203.
2. Ibid, p. 73
3. J. B. 0. R. S., Vol. XIV., Pp. 599 f. ; Vol, XV, pp. 635 f.