0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views8 pages

ChatGPT Use Among 2nd Year Education Students

This study investigates the reliance on ChatGPT among second-year education students at the Philippine College of Science and Technology (PhilCST), focusing on usage frequency, perceived benefits and drawbacks, and impacts on academic performance. A survey will be conducted to gather quantitative and qualitative data, ensuring ethical considerations are met. The findings aim to inform educational practices and policy development regarding AI tools in academic settings.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views8 pages

ChatGPT Use Among 2nd Year Education Students

This study investigates the reliance on ChatGPT among second-year education students at the Philippine College of Science and Technology (PhilCST), focusing on usage frequency, perceived benefits and drawbacks, and impacts on academic performance. A survey will be conducted to gather quantitative and qualitative data, ensuring ethical considerations are met. The findings aim to inform educational practices and policy development regarding AI tools in academic settings.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Title: Exploring Academic Reliance on ChatGPT Among 2 nd Year Education

Students at PhilCST

A. CHAPTER 1: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational settings
has significantly transformed the landscape of learning and teaching.
Among the various AI applications. ChatGPT developed by OpenAI has
garnered attention for its ability to generate human-like text and assist
with a range of academic tasks. As educational institutions increasingly
adopt digital tools to enhance learning experiences, understanding the
extent and impact of academic reliance on AI technologies like ChatGPT
becomes crucial.

Philippine College of Science and Technology (PhilCST) is at the forefront of


this digital transformation, with students leveraging ChatGPT for various
academic purposes. From drafting essays to solving complex problems, the
use of ChatGPT has become increasingly prevalent among education
students. However, this reliance on AI raises important questions about its
effects on academic performance, learning outcomes, and the development
of critical thinking skills.

This study aims to explore the academic reliance on ChatGPT among


education students at PhilCST, especially the 2 nd Years as they are the target
respondents on this research. By examining the frequency and nature of
ChatGPT use, as well as the perceived benefits and potential disadvantages
or negative impacts, this research seeks to provide a comprehensive
understanding of how AI tools are shaping the academic experiences of
future educators.

Furthermore, the study will investigate the implications of this reliance for
educational practices and policy development within the institution. By
examining these aspects, the research will contribute to the broader
discourse on AI in education, offering insights that can inform the integration
of such technologies in a manner that enhances learning while mitigating
potential risks. This introduction sets the stage for a thorough investigation
into the evolving dynamics of AI-assisted learning and its impact on the
academic landscape at PhilCST.

1.3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK


1.4

1.3 RESEARCH PARADIGM

The research paradigm serves as the researchers’ set of ideas and


understanding in the study entitled, “Exploring Academic Reliance on
ChatGPT Among 2nd Year Education Students at PhilCST” Specifically, the
researchers aim to offer a pattern of understanding with the information
provided in the paradigm or figure below:

 In table –

Input:

1. Survey Creation: Making a survey questionnaire.

2. Participants: Second-year education students at the Philippine College of


Science and Technology (PhilCST).

3. Data Points: How often students use ChatGPT, how they use it for
schoolwork, their views on its benefits and drawbacks, and their
understanding of ethical issues.

Process:

1. Survey Distribution: Sending the survey to students via email and online
platforms.

2. Data Collection: Collecting survey responses from students.

3. Data Analysis:

- Quantitative Analysis: Using statistics to analyze how often and in what


ways students use ChatGPT, and its impact.
4. Ethical Considerations: Ensuring students agree to participate, keeping
responses anonymous, and protecting their data.

Output:

1. Results:

- Patterns in how students use ChatGPT.

- Effects of ChatGPT on students’ grades and learning.

- Students’ opinions on the pros and cons of ChatGPT.

- Awareness of ethical issues when using ChatGPT.

2. Recommendations:

- How to use ChatGPT effectively in school.

- Guidelines to address ethical concerns and ensure fair use.

3. Sharing Findings:

- Writing reports and giving presentations to share the results.

- Publishing the results in journals and presenting at conferences.

The study starts by creating a survey for second-year education students at


the Philippine College of Science and Technology (PhilCST) to learn how they
use ChatGPT. The survey will ask how often and how they use ChatGPT for
school, their thoughts on its benefits and drawbacks, and their
understanding of ethical issues. This survey will be sent out by email and
online platforms. Once we collect the responses, we will analyze the data to
find patterns and impacts on their academic performance. We will keep
everything ethical by ensuring students’ consent, anonymity, and data
protection. The results will show how students use ChatGPT, its effects on
their grades and learning, their opinions on its advantages and
disadvantages, and their awareness of ethical issues. Based on these results,
we will suggest ways to use ChatGPT effectively in school and provide
guidelines to handle ethical concerns. We will share our findings through
reports, presentations, and publications to help educators and policymakers.
1.5 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
1.6

The objective of this study is to investigate the degree and effects of


academic dependency on ChatGPT among second-year education students
at the Philippine College of Science and Technology (PhilCST). It specifically
aims to answer the following questions:

1. How frequently are second-year education students at PhilCST utilizing


ChatGPT for academic purposes such as assignments, research, and exam
preparation?

2. What benefits and disadvantages do these students perceive in their use


of ChatGPT?

3. In what ways does ChatGPT usage impact the academic performance and
learning experiences of second-year education students at PhilCST?

4. What ethical issues do students identify when using ChatGPT, and how do
they manage potential challenges related to academic integrity?

1.5 HYPOTHESIS/HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

The second-year education students at the Philippine College of Science and


Technology (PhilCST) who often use ChatGPT for their schoolwork will see
both big advantages and some disadvantages. This use will affect their
academic performance and learning in different ways, and they will be aware
of the ethical issues related to using ChatGPT.

1.7 SCOPE AND DELIMITATION ✓


1.8 This study aims to investigate the utilization of ChatGPT among 2 nd
year education students at PhilCST. Specifically, it will explore the
frequency and contexts in which students rely on ChatGPT for academic
support, assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in assisting with their
educational needs, and examine the perceptions of students regarding
the impact of ChatGPT on their learning experiences. The study will be
conducted over a specified time frame, focusing on a particular academic
year or semester
The study will focus on a specific group within PhilCST, namely 2 nd-year
education students, thus limiting the scope to this particular academic
cohort. The time frame of the study will be confined to a specific academic
year or semester, ensuring a clear temporal boundary for data collection and
analysis. Furthermore, the study will concentrate specifically on students
enrolled in the education department at PhilCST, providing a focused
exploration within this academic domain. To maintain rigor, potential biases
or limitations associated with the use of ChatGPT will be acknowledged and
thoroughly addressed within the study, ensuring a comprehensive
examination of the topic.

1.7 ASSUMPTIONS OF THE STUDY

1. Students have regular access to technology and the internet.

2. Participants have some level of familiarity with ChatGPT or similar AI tools.

3. Participation in the study is voluntary and honest.

4. Students will accurately report their usage and experiences with ChatGPT.

5. The selected sample represents the broader student population at PhilCST.

6. Ethical guidelines regarding consent, confidentiality, and privacy are


adhered to.

7. The use of ChatGPT may have varied effects on academic performance


and study habits, which the study aims to explore comprehensively.

1.9 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY


1.10

The present study was significant to the 2year Education Student at PhilCST.
School administrators, Students and future Researchers.
School administrators: This study may enlighten them on using ChatGPT on
academic nowadays. They may use this research in order to establish
interventions programs to bridge the learning gaps of their studies on using
ChatGPT.

Student: They were the end-beneficiary of this research. The improvement


that the school will implement based on the findings of the study will greatly
affect them

Future Researchers: They may use this study as a source of both conceptual
and research literature when they conduct their own studies related to the
topic of the present study. They can extend the scope of the present
investigation to formulate a more generalize condition.

1.9 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

B. CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

3.1 RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN ✓

We used a quantitative research design to collect and analyze data


systematically. A survey questionnaire will serve as the primary data
collection tool, specifically targeting second-year education students at
PhilCST. This method allows for the quantification of various aspects, such as
the frequency, types, and perceived effects of ChatGPT usage on academic
activities. The use of closed-ended questions will facilitate the collection of
measurable data, enabling statistical analysis to uncover patterns and
correlations. This approach ensures objectivity and provides a detailed
understanding of how students depend on ChatGPT for their academic
endeavors.
3.2 POPULATION AND SAMPLES OF THE STUDY ✓

This study will be conducted at Philippine College of Science and Technology


specifically the Second (2nd) year Students of College of Education. The
population was selected through the use of criterion sampling. Criterion
sampling is a purposive sampling technique where participants are chosen
based on specific predetermined criteria essential to the research. For the
study "Exploring Academic Reliance on ChatGPT Among 2 nd Year Education
Students at PhilCST.”, the criteria would be: (1) students must be in their
second year of education studies, (2) students must be enrolled at PhilCST,
and (3) students must have used ChatGPT for academic purposes.

3.3 DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS ✓

To collect data for the study “Exploring Academic Reliance on ChatGPT


Among 2nd Year Education Students at PhilCST,” we designed and distributed
a survey questionnaire to the target group. This questionnaire sought to
obtain detailed information about the students’ demographics, their
frequency and methods of using ChatGPT, the perceived effects on their
academic performance, and any ethical considerations. It included both
closed-ended questions for quantitative data and open-ended questions for
qualitative insights. This approach ensures a thorough understanding of how
second-year education students at PhilCST are integrating ChatGPT into their
academic work, revealing their dependence on this AI tool and its impact on
their educational experience.

3.4 DATA GATHERING PROCEDURES

To gather data for this study, we will give a survey questionnaire to second-
year education students at the Philippine College of Science and Technology
(PhilCST). First, we will create a survey with both multiple-choice and open-
ended questions to collect information on how often and how much students
use ChatGPT, as well as their thoughts on its benefits, drawbacks, and
ethical concerns. The survey will be sent out electronically using school email
lists and learning platforms to reach as many students as possible easily.
Before they take the survey, students will be informed about the study’s
purpose, assured that their answers will be anonymous, and asked for their
consent. The survey will be available for a set time, with reminders sent to
encourage more students to participate. After the survey closes, we will
compile and analyze the responses to find trends and key insights related to
the study’s goals.

3.5 DATA ANALYSIS/STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA

Common questions

Powered by AI

The research paradigm outlines the conceptual framework guiding the study, focusing on understanding the frequency and nature of ChatGPT use, its perceived benefits and drawbacks, and ethical issues . This structured approach ensures a comprehensive analysis of AI reliance, offering insights that shape educational strategies and inform the integration of digital tools in academic settings. The paradigm's input-process-output model facilitates systematic inquiry and data-driven conclusions .

The study's insights can inform the development of educational practices by highlighting the need for balanced AI integration that encourages both technological proficiency and critical thinking skills . Policymakers may use these findings to implement intervention programs that promote ethical use of AI, address learning gaps, and ensure that reliance on AI doesn't impede the development of essential academic skills. This could result in policies that support AI literacy and the responsible use of technology in learning environments .

The advantages of using ChatGPT in academic settings among second-year education students at PhilCST include increased efficiency in tasks such as essay drafting and problem-solving, as well as the accessibility of information that might aid learning . On the downside, excessive reliance on ChatGPT may lead to a decline in critical thinking skills and an overdependence on AI for academic work, which can impact the development of independent learning strategies . Ethical concerns also arise, as students must be aware of the potential for academic dishonesty and the lack of transparency in AI-generated content .

The findings offer a detailed examination of how AI technologies like ChatGPT are being integrated into educational practices, highlighting both advantages and potential pitfalls . These insights can guide educational policies and curriculum development to enhance learning while addressing the ethical and pedagogical challenges of AI reliance. The study contributes to ongoing discussions by providing empirical data that illustrates the real-world implications of AI-assisted learning within academic contexts .

The reliance on AI tools like ChatGPT is assessed through the frequency and context of its use among students, alongside perceived benefits and disadvantages. Surveys focusing on usage patterns, impacts on grades, and user opinions are analyzed quantitatively to identify correlations between ChatGPT usage and academic performance . Analyzing this data provides insights into how these technologies are influencing learning outcomes and the academic knowledge base .

The study assumes students have regular access to technology, familiarity with AI tools, and represent a broader student population. These assumptions, such as students reporting their use honestly and ethically, affect the study's conclusions by framing data interpretation within these parameters . If these assumptions hold true, the study's findings accurately reflect ChatGPT's impact across similar populations, while any deviation could necessitate adjustments in interpretation or broader applicability .

Data was collected using a survey questionnaire designed for second-year education students at PhilCST. This included both closed-ended questions for quantitative data and open-ended questions for qualitative insights. The data collected was then subjected to statistical analysis to uncover usage patterns and impacts on academic performance, providing an objective and detailed understanding of student dependency on ChatGPT for academic tasks .

The study acknowledges limitations in its scope, focusing solely on second-year education students, which may not capture broader trends across other cohorts or disciplines . Potential biases include the reliance on self-reported data, which can be subject to inaccuracies, and the specific sampling criteria that might not represent diverse student experiences. Addressing these biases necessitates cautious interpretation of results and consideration of broader study designs to generalize findings .

The study recommends establishing clear guidelines for ChatGPT's use, emphasizing educational strategies that enhance learning while fostering ethical standards . Implementation can include AI literacy programs, curriculum revisions to integrate critical thinking with AI tools, and the development of policies that address both the benefits and ethical challenges of AI use. Educators can use these strategies to ensure students are well-equipped to navigate AI-enhanced learning environments effectively .

Education students might face ethical issues such as academic dishonesty, privacy concerns, and a potential lack of accountability when using ChatGPT . To manage these challenges, the study recommends clear guidelines for ethical use, including transparency in AI-assisted work, ensuring that AI tools augment rather than substitute personal effort, and maintaining data protection standards. Ethical awareness training for students can also help in managing these issues effectively .

You might also like