0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Understanding Freedom and Responsibility

The document discusses the concept of freedom, differentiating between various types such as physical, psychological, and moral freedom, and emphasizes the importance of responsibility and obligation in human actions. It explores intersubjectivity and the dynamics of human relationships, highlighting the significance of dialogue, empathy, and ethical care. Additionally, it touches on social contract theories by philosophers like Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Rawls, outlining their views on human nature and societal organization.

Uploaded by

aykiash91
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Understanding Freedom and Responsibility

The document discusses the concept of freedom, differentiating between various types such as physical, psychological, and moral freedom, and emphasizes the importance of responsibility and obligation in human actions. It explores intersubjectivity and the dynamics of human relationships, highlighting the significance of dialogue, empathy, and ethical care. Additionally, it touches on social contract theories by philosophers like Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Rawls, outlining their views on human nature and societal organization.

Uploaded by

aykiash91
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Freedom - Activities of man as animal

- Not deliberately done nor voluntary


- Being able to do whatever you want
without being controlled or limited.
- Strength of character to do what is
 Habits
good, true, noble, and right
- Performs repeatedly similar actions
-elements of freedom-  Ignorance
- Lack of knowledge
> voluntariness – ability of a person to act
 Fear
out his/her own free will
- Unpleasant emotion caused by
> responsibility – person being accountable anticipation/awareness of danger
for his/her actions and consequences  Passion
- Tendencies towards desirable objects
-kinds of freedom-
or tendencies away from undesirable
> physical freedom objects
 Violence
- absence of any physical restraint
- Force exerted on a person
> psychological freedom
- “freedom of choice”
Intersubjectivity
- person performs actions that is right and
- shared meanings constructed by
wise
people in their interactions with each
> moral freedom other
- Interaction between “self” and the
- “freedom in manner”
“other”
- upholds human dignity and goodness.
-dynamics of intersubjectivity-
1.) accepting me is accepting you
Responsibility
2.) accepting others is not to impose on
- Something you are expected to do them

Obligation/duty 3.) accepting others for what they are is


loving them
- Something you must do because of
legal requirement -characteristics in human relation-

Consequences 1.) dialogue – deeper and more genuine


interaction
- Unpleasant result of something that
has happened 2.) empathy – ability to share emotions
3.) availability – willingness of a person

Human acts 4.) ethics of care – ethical theory that


emphasizes moral dimension of relationship
- Human activity of man as man
and interaction
- Can be morally good or morally evil
- essential attributes-
> knowledge
Totalization
- performed consciously
> free will - One totalize the other
- performed freely - Claiming someone already know
> voluntariness who is that person before they can
- done willfully even speak to
Jean Paul Sartre

Acts of man
- Explained that by looking at a Paulo Freire
person, the act of objectification
- For him dialogue is also a sign of
allows you to capture that person’s
freedom, equality, and responsibility
freedom.
- "Without dialogue there is no
- Stereotyping based on appearance
communication and without
or certain actions
communication, there can be no true
education"
- "Pedagogy of the oppressed"
Edmund Husserl
- Believes that intersubjectivity is
capability to put oneself in the place Person With Disabilities (PWD’s)
where the other is. (Empathy)
- Persons who have long term
physical, psychological, intellectual,
or sensory impairments.
Rene Descartes
- Advocate of individualism
- "Doubt everything that can be Hellen Keller
doubted"
- American author and political
- Thinking is the only thing that can't
activist
be doubted.
- 1st deaf-blind person to earn
bachelor’s degree
- Anne Sullivan - her mentor who’s
Seeming
visually impaired as well
- Individuals present themselves in a - Published “the story of my life”
certain way when dealing with others

Nicholas James “Nick” Vujicic


Martin buber
- Australian evangelist and
- Stated that "I"/yourself can be motivational speaker
realized through recognition of - Born with phocomelia (person born
"others" with no arms and legs)
- Founder of life without limbs
Several ways of relating to others
1.) I-I relationship
Roselle Ambubuyog
People make themselves the center of their
world - 1st visually impaired Filipino to
graduate summa cum laude from
2.) I-It relationship
Ateneo De Manila University
People treat other people into the status of
an object
Underprivileged sectors of the society
3.) I-Thou relationship
- Group of people suffering from
Genuine sharing of one another takes place
social deprivation
Marginalized sector
Martin Heidegger
-Group of individuals experiencing
- Argued that human kind is a “marginalization” ( act of downgrading a
conversation. person to insignificant, secondary, or
- Conversation is more than just a powerless situations in the society)
simple talk but rather a dialogue.
LGBTQI++ community  Pre - industrial society
- characterized by a focus on
- Also victims of different types of
agriculture, low social division of
violence
labor, a strong emphasis on tradition
 Jennifer Laude
and family, and limited technology.
Hunting and gathering
The human person in society
- Earliest and simplest form of society
Society - Members are treated equally and -
decisions are based on consensus
- Organized group of people
- NOMADIC – they don’t have
- Members interact frequently and
permanent settlement
have common territory and culture
- Companionship or friendly Pastoral
association
- Domestication of animals for food
-
Horticultural
Social contract theory
- Small scale cultivation of plants
- Philosophers studied natural laws
that govern human societies during Agricultural
age of enlightenment
- Large scale cultivation of crops
Thomas Hobbes:
Feudal
- People in natural states are governed
- Hierarchy system
by desires and often leads to conflict
with their fellowmen
- Individuals who established social
 Industrial society
contract agreement sacrifice amount
- Widespread use of technology and
of freedom and submit to higher
machinery to enable mass production
authority
- “leviathan”
John Locke  Post industrial society
- Increased the rate of innovation and
- People in natural states are more
invention of new technologies and
cooperative and reasonable
explored their applications
- Society is formed through consent of
individuals who organized it
- People have the right to throw failed
government
Jean Jacques Rousseau
- Advocate of “general will”
- The government is expected to do
what is most beneficial for society by
people
John Rawls
- Imagined humans having “veil of
ignorance” (humans seek for a just
and fair society to look for own
interest)
- Humans approach social cooperation
in rational manner to meet their
individual self-interest

Common questions

Powered by AI

Martin Buber's 'I-Thou' relationship expands our understanding by highlighting the depth and genuineness of human interactions where individuals engage with each other as whole beings rather than objects . Similarly, Martin Heidegger's concept of dialogue suggests that human relationships are fundamentally conversational, implying that authentic connections go beyond mere exchanges of words to embody deeper, reciprocal dialogues . Both concepts emphasize the importance of viewing others as equals and engaging in sincere, empathetic interactions.

Hunting and gathering societies are characterized by egalitarianism, with members treated equally and decisions made by consensus in a nomadic lifestyle without permanent settlements . In contrast, industrial societies are defined by the widespread use of technology and machinery enabling mass production, creating structured hierarchies, and emphasizing roles dictated by specialized labor. This transition introduces complexities like social stratification and greater individual roles in economic systems.

Thomas Hobbes views humans in their natural state as governed by desires that often lead to conflict, necessitating a strong authority to maintain order, thus supporting a governance structure based on control . In contrast, Jean Jacques Rousseau envisions humans as possessing a ‘general will’ that guides societal benefit, advocating for a government that serves the collective good rather than individual power. Rousseau's perspective focuses on cooperation and shared interests as foundational to governance, contrasting with Hobbes' emphasis on constraint and hierarchy.

A 'post-industrial society' is marked by a significant increase in technological innovation and the exploration of new technology applications . This society prioritizes information and services over manual labor, fostering an environment where continual innovation is crucial for economic and societal growth. Such characteristics can lead to accelerated technological advancements and a dynamic application landscape, influencing how societies adapt to and integrate these changes into daily life.

John Locke's view of society plays a crucial role in the formation of social contracts by advocating that society is created through the consent of individuals who are naturally cooperative and reasonable, contrasting with Hobbes' perspective where individuals are driven by desires that lead to conflicts . Locke posits that rational individuals establish society to safeguard their rights and have the authority to dismantle ineffective government, whereas Hobbes sees the need for submission to a higher authority to maintain order within a conflicting natural state.

According to Edmund Husserl, intersubjectivity and empathy contribute to understanding others by enabling individuals to place themselves in the position of others, fostering empathy . Intersubjectivity allows for shared meanings to be constructed through interactions, enhancing the capacity to understand and relate to others' experiences and perspectives. This emphasizes that human connection is crucial for grasping the complexity of others' lives.

The concept of 'freedom' in the document integrates voluntariness and responsibility by emphasizing that true freedom allows a person to act according to their own free will, which is the essence of voluntariness, while simultaneously holding them accountable for their actions and consequences, reflecting responsibility . This integration suggests that an individual's moral actions are guided not only by personal autonomy but also by a sense of accountability to what is good, true, noble, and right, thereby extending freedom beyond mere independence to a more principled exercise of choice.

The concept of 'totalization,' where one person claims to fully know or understand another person before they have communicated, directly relates to stereotyping and objectification by reducing individuals to predefined categories based on appearance or actions . This impedes genuine intersubjective relationships by preventing authentic engagement and understanding, thus denying individuals the freedom to express their true selves and leading to misguided perceptions based on superficial judgments.

The portrayal of Descartes' ideology of doubt emphasizes the importance of questioning all that can be doubted, except for the act of thinking itself, highlighting individual freedom in defining identity independently of external validation . Sartre's perspective on objectification illustrates how societal perceptions can impinge on personal freedom by reducing individuals to mere objects, shaping identity through external lenses. Together, these ideologies underscore a tension between self-perception and external definitions, illustrating the complex interplay between individual autonomy and societal influences on identity.

Paulo Freire emphasizes dialogue as a fundamental aspect of freedom and equality by asserting that without dialogue, there can be no genuine communication, and consequently, no true education . This perspective underscores dialogue as a dynamic practice that liberates individuals from oppression and facilitates mutual learning and sharing, which are essential for achieving equality and enabling individuals to exercise their freedom responsibly and collaboratively.

You might also like