Pediatric Central Venous Catheter Malfunctions
Pediatric Central Venous Catheter Malfunctions
DOI 10.1007/s00247-007-0610-2
REVIEW
Received: 22 July 2007 / Accepted: 29 July 2007 / Published online: 12 October 2007
# Springer-Verlag 2007
Abstract Central venous access is increasingly becoming emergence of image-guided vascular access techniques has
the domain of the radiologist, both in terms of the insertion brought central venous access increasingly into the domain
of central venous catheters (CVCs) and in the subsequent of interventional radiology (IR), with perceived advantages
management of these lines. This article seeks to provide an of shorter operating times, an increased likelihood of achiev-
overview of the CVC types available for paediatric patients ing access in difficult cases, fewer procedural complications,
and a more detailed explanation of the spectrum of com- lower operating costs, and a probable improvement in long-
plications that may lead to catheter malfunction. A standard term venous patency rates [1–10]. This shift from general
catheter contrast study or ‘linogram’ technique is described. surgery to radiology has, however, brought with it an
The normal appearances of such a study and a detailed increased demand on radiology departments to maintain
pictorial review of abnormal catheter studies are provided, and manage indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs). In
together with a brief overview of how information from children, meticulous attention to catheter position is vital to
catheter investigations can guide the management of cath- ensure that CVCs are kept functioning for as long as pos-
eter complications. sible in order to minimize the number of catheter replace-
ments a child may have to undergo. In some practices,
Keywords Central venous catheter . Complications . malfunctioning catheters are removed and replaced without
Children investigation; in other centres, including our institution, it
is recognized that there are a number of interventions
available to salvage blocked or displaced catheters, allow-
Introduction ing alternative access sites to be preserved for future use.
Plain radiographs and fluoroscopic contrast examinations
Central venous access forms a vital part of the management are central to the radiological investigation of malfunction-
of many paediatric conditions. For many years, tunnelled ing catheters [11, 12]. Many radiologists, however, may be
central venous catheters were largely reserved for patients perplexed by the increasingly wide variety of venous access
on chemotherapy regimens or long-term total parenteral devices available and unaware of some of the potential
nutrition (TPN), but more recently, reliable central venous CVC-related complications that develop in children or the
access has proved central to the management of an extensive catheter-salvage techniques available.
range of conditions such as those requiring long-term This article gives a brief overview of the central venous
antibiotic therapy, chemotherapy or haemodialysis. The access devices available and the potential causes of catheter
malfunction. A standard catheter contrast study or ‘linogram’
technique is described. The normal appearances of such a
A. Barnacle : O. J. Arthurs : D. Roebuck : M. P. Hiorns (*) study and a detailed pictorial review of abnormal catheter
Radiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital,
Great Ormond Street,
studies are provided, together with a brief overview of how
London WC1N 3JH, UK information from catheter investigations can guide the
e-mail: hiornm@[Link] management of catheter complications.
364 Pediatr Radiol (2008) 38:363–378
Catheter types
policy of removing all malfunctioning catheters without complication seems to occur most commonly in chubby
investigating the cause of the malfunction is maintained. In infants with redundant tissue in the neck (Fig. 11). Despite
most institutions, however, protocols are available for at- accurate initial placement, catheter tips can flick into an
tempted thrombolysis of blocked catheters and in some
units revision of displaced or incorrectly positioned lines is
attempted. In our opinion, an attempt should always be
made to diagnose the cause of a malfunctioning catheter,
with the aim of possible catheter salvage and, therefore,
a potential reduction in the number of both repeated an-
aesthesia and venous access attempts that a patient may
have to undergo. An institutional policy regarding the man-
agement of malfunctioning CVCs is helpful and should be
made with the facilities of that institution in mind. In
particular, contrast studies involving radiation exposure
should only be undertaken if the results of the study would
alter the subsequent management of the line. In general, an
IR department is more likely to be able to offer salvage pro-
cedures than a surgically managed service, due to differences
in both the imaging and interventional techniques available
within each speciality [3, 10, 31].
lying problem and obviate the need for access of the second
lumen. Water-soluble nonionic contrast medium should be
used and the operator should aim to minimize the dose of
contrast medium that the child receives.
The initial contrast medium injection should be per-
formed slowly while the entire catheter is screened so that
complications anywhere along the length of the line are
readily identified (Fig. 13). The operator should look for
signs of pooling of contrast medium in the soft tissues
surrounding the catheter. Extravasation and pooling of con-
trast medium in the neck are usually painful; a slow gentle
injection will minimize both the patient’s discomfort and
the risk of loss of the child’s confidence in the operator.
When examining a malfunctioning portacath device, tan-
gential and en face views of the port reservoir should be
obtained, to ensure that it fills uniformly and does not
from the long axis of the catheter (Fig. 24). Thrombus may
extend into the vessel itself, which will cause irregular
filling of the vessel beyond the catheter tip (Fig. 25).
Catheter-induced venous thrombosis is influenced by
catheter dwell time, the size of the catheter relative to the
vessel, the access vein used, infusate type, and the presence
of any prior venous interventions or systemic comorbidities
in the patient [34–38]. It is likely to be a relatively common
occurrence [39], although evidence for this in the literature
is skewed by variations in the diagnostic techniques and
the affected vessel via a peripheral cannula rather than the the services of a proactive IR department. Most institutions
catheter at this stage, to assess drainage of the extremity at least have a ward-based thrombolysis protocol for occluded
(Fig. 26). Some operators may prefer to perform a venogram CVCs and these techniques play a significant role in
immediately prior to placement of a new catheter, to allow extending the life of a malfunctioning catheter [10, 40–45].
time for possible recanalization of the vessel or formation of Catheters that are found to be too long can be shortened
substantial collaterals in the interim period (Fig. 27). by a variety of techniques. The simplest involves with-
drawal of the intravascular portion of the catheter at the
venous access site while the tunnelled portion is left in situ.
Implications for catheter salvage techniques The catheter is then re-measured and shortened, prior to re-
puncture of the venous access site and replacement of the
Diagnostic catheter studies are central to the management intravascular portion of the catheter [46, 47]. If there is
of malfunctioning catheters. A detailed discussion of cath- sufficient excess length, the catheter can be cut when it is
eter salvage techniques is beyond the remit of this review; a partially withdrawn, and the tip wired to maintain access,
number of the techniques outlined below are dependent on avoiding the need for re-puncture.
Kinks in the subcutaneous tunnel of a CVC can often be alternative technique involves venous access via a femoral
straightened by accessing either the venous access site or approach, allowing the displaced catheter to be snared and
the skin exit site of the catheter. Intervention at the venous pulled back into the appropriate vessel [10, 49–51].
access site may result in an increase in the intravascular Catheter tip thrombus can be dislodged by inserting a tip
length of the catheter, a result that is beneficial in catheters deflecting guidewire through the catheter and rotating the
that have migrated back into the tunnel or the neck. wire once it is just beyond the tip of the catheter [9, 10].
Catheter tips that have flicked out of position can occa- Such techniques, although effective, are rarely long lasting.
sionally be repositioned using one of several techniques. Fibrin sheath stripping techniques can be attempted in
Often a forceful injection of saline through the displaced patients in whom replacement of a malfunctioning catheter
catheter will encourage the tip to return to its original is undesirable, such as those with a high risk for general
position, in the direction of flowing blood [10]. Obstinate anaesthesia or limited alternative access sites. Again, fem-
catheters may respond to placement of a guidewire through oral venous access is obtained and the catheter is ensnared
the catheter lumen, which stiffens the catheter sufficiently using a standard vascular snare device (Fig. 28). Gentle
to encourage repositioning of the catheter [10, 48]. An manipulation of the snare along the length of the catheter is
Pediatr Radiol (2008) 38:363–378 375
Conclusion
and on contrast investigations. Accurate diagnosis of CVC 19. Nowlen TT, Rosenthal GL, Johnson GL et al (2002) Pericardial
malfunction can significantly alter outcome for patients in effusion and tamponade in infants with central catheters. Pediatrics
110:137–142
whom repeated venous access procedures can often become a 20. Beardsall K, White DK, Pinto EM et al (2003) Pericardial effusion
source of greater morbidity than their primary condition. and cardiac tamponade as complications of neonatal long lines:
are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:
F292–F295
21. Cadman A, Lawrence JA, Fitzsimmons L et al (2004) To clot or
not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin
References Radiol 59:349–355
22. Schutz JC, Patel AA, Clark TW et al (2004) Relationship between
1. Trerotola SO, Johnson MS, Harris VJ et al (1997) Outcome of chest port catheter tip position and port malfunction after interven-
tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular tional radiologic placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:581–587
vein by interventional radiologists. Radiology 203:489–495 23. Cohn DE, Mutch DG, Rader JS et al (2001) Factors predicting
2. Mauro MA, Jaques PF (1997) Radiologic placement of long-term subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the rela-
central venous catheters: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:127–137 tionship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients
3. Rush J, Baskin KM, Cahill AM et al (2005) Central venous access with gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 83:533–536
by different service providers: does it matter who puts in the port? 24. Petersen J, Delaney JH, Brakstad MT et al (1999) Silicone venous
(abstract). Pediatr Radiol 35 [Suppl 1]:S76 access devices positioned with their tips high in the superior vena
4. Roebuck DJ, Kleidon TM, McLaren CA et al (2005) Internal jugular cava are more likely to malfunction. Am J Surg 178:38–41
vein (IJV) patency after central venous (CV) access (abstract). Pediatr 25. Lucas H, Attard-Montalto SP, Saha V et al (1996) Central venous
Radiol 35 [Suppl 1]:S75 catheter tip position and malfunction in a paediatric oncology unit.
5. Blum AS (1999) The role of the interventional radiologist in Pediatr Surg Int 11:159–163
central venous access. J Intraven Nurs 22 [Suppl 6]:S32–S39 26. Jimenez M, Baskin KM, Cahill AM et al (2005) The elusive
6. McBride KD, Fisher R, Warnock N et al (1997) A comparative cavoatrial junction: anatomic and biometric study of the superior
analysis of radiological and surgical placement of central venous vena cava (abstract). Pediatr Radiol 35 [Suppl 1]:S59
catheters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:17–22 27. Yoon SZ, Shin JH, Hahn S (2005) Usefulness of the carina as a
7. Lamaris JS, Post PJ, Zonderland HM et al (1990) Percutaneous radiographic landmark for central venous catheter placement in
placement of Hickman catheters: comparison of sonographically paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 95:514–517
guided and blind techniques. AJR 155:1097–1099 28. Nazarian GK, Bjarnason H, Dietz CA et al (1997) Changes in
8. Lund GB, Trerotola SO, Scheel PF et al (1996) Outcome of tunneled catheter tip position when a patient is upright. J Vasc
tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists. Radiology Intervent Radiol 8:437–441
198:467–472 29. Kowalski CM, Kaufman JA, Rivitz SM et al (1997) Migration of
9. Namyslowski J, Trerotola SO (2000) Interventional radiologic central venous catheters: implications for initial catheter tip
placement and management of infusion catheters. In: Savada SJ, positioning. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 8:443–447
Trerotola SO (eds) Venous interventional radiology with clinical 30. Chang TC, Funaki B, Szymski GX (1998) Are routine chest
perspectives. Thieme, New York, pp 325–346 radiographs necessary after image-guided placement of internal
10. Kidney DD, Nguyen DT, Deutsch LS (1988) Radiologic evalu- jugular central venous access devices? AJR 170:335–337
ation and management of malfunctioning long-term central vein 31. Garofalo RS, Zaleski GX, Lorenz JM et al (1999) Exchange of
catheters. AJR 171:1251–1257 poorly functioning tunneled permanent hemodialysis catheters.
11. Kim FM, Burrows PE, Hoffer FA et al (1996) Interpreting the AJR 173:155–158
results of pediatric central venous catheter studies. Radiographics 32. Weschler RJ, Spirn PW Conant EF et al (1993) Thrombosis and
16:747–754 infection caused by thoracic venous catheters: pathogenesis and
12. Boardman P, Hughes JP (1998) Radiological evaluation and imaging findings. AJR 160:467–471
management of malfunctioning central venous catheters. Clin 33. Hoshal VL, Ause RG, Hoskins PA (1971) Fibrin sleeve formation
Radiol 53:10–16 on indwelling subclavian central venous catheters. Arch Surg
13. Garg M, Chang CC, Merritt RJ (1989) An unusual case 102:353–358
presentation: pericardial tamponade complicating central venous 34. Namyslowski J (2002) Management of catheter-induced throm-
catheter. J Perinatol 9:456–457 bosis. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:85–88
14. Rogers BB, Berns SD, Maynard EC et al (1990) Pericardial 35. Allen AW, Megargell JL, Brown DB et al (2000) Venous
tamponade secondary to central venous catheterisation and thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted
hyperalimentation in a very low birthweight infant. Pediatr Pathol central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1309–1314
10:819–823 36. Gonsalves GF, Eschelman DJ, Sullivan KL et al (2003)
15. Sasidharan P, Billman D, Heimler R et al (1996) Cardiac arrest in an Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper
extremely low birth weight infant: complication of percutaneous extremity PICC and port placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
central venous catheter hyperalimentation. J Perinatol 16:123–126 26:123–127
16. Makwana N, Lander A, Buick R et al (2003) Unusual complica- 37. Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS et al (2000) Tunneled
tion of a central venous catheter in a neonate. Arch Dis Child infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous
Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F440 thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular access.
17. Leipala JA, Petaja J, Fellman V (2001) Perforation complications Radiology 217:89–93
of percutaneous central venous catheters in very low birth weight 38. Oguzkurt L, Tercan F, Torun D et al (2004) Impact of short-term
infants. J Paediatr Child Health 37:168–171 hemodialysis catheters on the central veins: a catheter venographic
18. Liossis G, Bardin C, Papageorgiou A (2003) Comparison of risks study. Eur J Radiol 52:293–299
from percutaneous central venous catheters and peripheral lines in 39. Chait P, Verbeeteb K, Amaral J et al (2005) Central venous
infants of extremely low birth weight: a cohort controlled study of catheter (CVC) related thrombosis in haematology-oncology
infants <1000 g. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13:171–174 pediatric population (abstract). Pediatr Radiol 35 [Suppl 1]:S79
378 Pediatr Radiol (2008) 38:363–378
40. Chesler L, Feusner JH (2002) Use of tissue plasminogen activator 49. Thalhammer A, Jacobi V, Balzer J et al (2002) Repositioning of
(rt-PA) in young children with cancer and dysfunctional central malpositioned or flipped central venous catheters. Eur Radiol
venous catheters. J Pediatr Hematol 24:653–656 12:698–700
41. Whigham CJ, Lindsey JI, Goodman CJ et al (2002) Venous port 50. Hartnell GG, Gates J, Suojanen JN et al (1996) Transfemoral re-
salvage utilizing low dose tPA. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol positioning of malpositioned central venous catheters. Cardiovasc
25:513–516 Interv Radiol 19:329–331
42. Santilli J (2002) Fibrin sheaths and central venous catheter occlusions: 51. Bessoud B, de Baere T, Kuoch Y et al (2003) Experience at a
diagnosis and management. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:89–94 single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical
43. Savader SJ, Ehrman KO, Porter DJ et al (2001) Treatment of complications caused by implanted central venous access devices
hemodialysis catheter-associated fibrin sheaths by rt-PA infusion: in pediatric and adult patients. AJR 180:527–532
critical analysis of 124 procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:711–715 52. Angle JF, Shilling AT, Schenk WG et al (2002) Utility of
44. Semba CP, Deitcher SR, Li X et al (2002) Treatment of occluded percutaneous intervention in the management of tunnelled
central venous catheters with alteplase: results in 1,064 patients. J hemodialysis catheters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:9–18
Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1199–1205 53. Janne d’Othee B, Tham JC, Sheiman RG (2006) Restoration of
45. Liu CY, Jain V, Shields AF et al (2004) Efficacy and safety of patency in failing tunnelled haemodialysis catheters: a comparison
reteplase for central venous catheter occlusion in patients with of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of
cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:39–44 the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping. J Vasc Interv Radiol
46. Kaufman JA, Fan CM, Geller SC et al (1997) Percutaneous 17:1011–1015
revision of excess length from an implanted long-term central 54. Grey RJ, Levitin A, Buck D et al (2000) Percutaneous sheath
venous access device. AJR 169:1732–1734 stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion for malfunc-
47. Murthy R, Arbabzadeh M, Richard H et al (2004) Endovascular tioning well-positioned tunneled central venous dialysis catheters:
technique for revision of excess catheter length in subcutaneous a prospective, randomized trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1121–
implanted venous access devices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1129
27:259–261 55. Crain MR, Mewissen MW, Ostrowski GJ et al (1996) Fibrin
48. Lois JF, Gomes AS, Pusey E (1987) Non-surgical repositioning of sleeve stripping for salvage of failing hemodialysis catheters:
central venous catheters. Radiology 156:329–333 technique and initial results. Radiology 198:41–44