PAPER PRESENTATION RATING RUBRIC (D.O. 16, s.

2017)

MAIN CRITERIA LOW ------------- Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions -------------- HIGH

Not all key elements/variables of the

research questions or focus of inquiry All key elements/ variables of the research questions or
TITLE
are reflected focus of inquiry are reflected in the title
(2 points) (5 points)
The nature, extent and
salience of the identified
The educational relevance
problem or issue are
and timeliness of the topic
comprehensively
RATIONALE (AR)/ Not It presents a general are shown. It explains the
discussed. Different
describe description of the topic or need to conduct to advance
aspects of the action
d (no focus of inquiry or validate knowledge,
research setting are
INTRODUCTION (BR) points) (5 points) improve a situation, address
elaborated showing in-
an issue/ problem
depth and critical analysis
(8 points)
of the situation.
(10 points)
For AR- It outlines when and where The rationale, extent &
Not It mentions the the intervention will be limitation of the
presente intervention, innovation or undertaken and who will be intervention are explained
INTERVENTION/ INNOVATION d strategy to be tried out involved and the activities to in detail. Plausibility is
(AR)/ (no (5 points) be undertaken. given support.
points) (8 points) (10 points)
It cites related theories
For BR- Viewpoints and issues underlying the topic are discussed
USE OF LITERATURE/CITATION and/or previous studies.
Not and synthesized. The study identifies the gap/s in current
(BR) Sources are properly
provided knowledge that it intends to address. Constructs are
acknowledged.
(no defined and presented. Citation consistent.
(5 points)
points) (10 points)
Research questions
Not Research questions specify logically proceed from the
Aim, objective or general
stated the variables or the focus of context of the study and
RESEARCH QUESTIONS research questions stated
(no inquiry clearly show the extent or
(5 points)
points) (8 points) scope of inquiry
(10 points)
PARTICIPANTS/ SOURCE OF Not It states the study’s target Details are provided about the target participants (ex.
DATA OR INFORMATION stated participants and/or other number, characteristics, sampling procedure, if any)
(no sources of data and and/or other sources of data and information. Clear
points) information (ex. Division, rationale for their inclusion in the study is given.
district, offices, schools, (10 points)
learners, teachers, parents,
docs, secondary data,
 others)
(5 points)
It explains why the data
gathering methods are
suited to the nature and
Details of data gathering
purpose of the study, and
methods are provided: the
how it is aligned with the
specific kinds of data, how
Not It presents a general research questions. Details
and when collected. It
describe description of the methods about research
describes the research
DATA GATHERING METHODS 10 d to be employed for instruments are presented
instrument, if any (ex. test,
(no gathering data such as sources or how
scale, survey questionnaire,
points) (5 points) these were developed and
checklist, interview guide) to
by whom, and their
be developed or adopted
appropriateness for
(8 points)
obtaining the desired kind
of data/ information
(10 points)
Details of the methods of
The selected methods of
data analysis are given.
data analysis are shown to
Techniques (ex.
Not It presents a general be appropriate to the
quantitative/statistical,
stated description of how the data nature of the
DATA ANALYSIS 10 qualitative, or both
(no gathered are analysed data/information gathered
methods), as well as tools
points) (5 points) and for addressing the
(ex. software) employed are
research questions.
specified.
(10 points)
(8 points)
Not Results are presented in Results are extensively discussed. Interrelatedness of the
explaine general terms and variables are explained. Implications of the results are
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS/ RECO d recommendations are provided.
(no broad Each recommendation is clearly stated, feasible and
points) (5 points) related to the information/topic (15 points)
Presentation is clear and easy to understand. Dressed
Some parts of the presentation are not
appropriately/ professionally. Presents the paper in logical
clear. Did not consistently provide
OVERALL PRESENTATION and coherent manner. Shows confidence and mastery of
adequate answers to the questions.
the topic. Speaks clearly and provides adequate answers
Shows lack of self-confidence.
to the questions. (10 points)