THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

PART ONE

TOPIC COMMENT
NAME OF TOPMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY NIG LTD
COMPANY
SITE LOCATION FINIMA, BONNY ISLAND RIVERS STATE. NIGERIA
NUMBER OF 45
WORKERS
TMCC is a well-known company in the construction industry,
recognized for its work in building hospitals, schools,
marketplaces, churches, hotels, and residential areas. With 12
years of operation, TMCC is committed to strong work ethics
and clients satisfaction enabling the successful delivery of
GENERAL
various projects within their deadlines, the company has a work
DESCRIPTION
OF THE force of 45 permanent staffs, all professional in their respective
ORGANISATION
fields who collaborate as a team to complete tasks accurately.
The major activities carried out at the construction site includes
excavation, ironwork, grinding, carpentry, electrical works,
plumbing, concrete pouring block wall formation, lifting and
operations, roofing and finishing processes.
The working hours are structured as follows: the work day
begins at 7:30 am with a 1-hour safety toolbox talk, followed by
the assigning of duties for 30 minutes then work officially
commences at 9:00 am, with a lunch break from 12:00 pm to
1:00 pm. The work day ends by 5:00 pm. There are six (6)
working days in the week, with tasks progressing steadily each
day.

Who is The safety officer who reports directly to the safety manager has
responsible for
sole responsibility of health and safety at the site.
health and safety
Description of The risk assessment is carried out covering the activities of the
area included in
construction of two storey, 73 Rooms Building Project at
the risk
assessment Finima, Bonny island.
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

Outline how the risk assessment Various methods were used in the ongoing
was carried out, this should building project to identify hazards which
include: include consultation of manuals from the
 Sources of information International Labour Organization (ILO),
consulted Occupational Safety and Health Administration
 Who you spoke to (OSHA), and Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
 How you identified: regarding construction safety.
 the hazards Discussions were held with site managers,
 What is already being done; supervisors, safety officer on site and workers to
and gather firsthand insights into potential hazards.
 Any additional While some Hazards were identified through
controls/actions that may direct observation of the site activities and
be required reviewing safety logbooks for records of
previous accidents and near-misses.

Currently, safety measures such as the use of

personal protective equipment’s (PPE) and safety
signage are in place,

Additional control required include

implementing enhanced PPE usage protocols,
installing machine guards and dust extraction
system, establishing regular maintenance
schedules for equipment, and providing
comprehensive training programs on hazard
awareness and machine safety. The risk
assessment also involves consulting with
workforce to ensure the practicality and
effectiveness of these controls, aiming for a safe
work environment.
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

Name of organisation: Topman Construction Company Nigeria Limited

Date of assessment: July 29, 2024
Scope of risk assessment: Construction Activities and Finishing works by Topman
Construction Company Nigeria Limited

Hazard Who Might What Are What Further Timescale Responsible

Category Be Harmed You Doing Control/Action Are For Persons Job
And Hazard And How Already Required? Further Tittle
Actions To
Be
Completed
Noise: All workers Provision of 1. Conduct a noise 1 months Safety
on the site, ear protection assessment on work officer
High level of particularly (earplug) areas with high level of (action
noise from those with limited noise 1,3,5)
static operating or enforcement
concrete working near 2. Schedule regular Monthly Workshop
mixer, the noisy maintenance of manager
circular saw, machine. machinery to minimize (Action 2,3,)
and concrete Long term noise.
cutting exposure to
machines loud noise 3. Install noise barriers 2 months
can cause or enclosures around
hearing loss noisy machinery.

4. Implement rotating Construction

shifts to limit exposure Weekly manager
time. (action; 4,)

5. Implement the use

1 month
of PPE and Provide
training on noise
hazards.
Vibration: All workers Basic 1. Provide anti- 3 months Safety
using instruction on vibration devices then officer(actio
Hand-arm vibrating the safe use do routine maintenance n; 1,3)
vibration hand tools. of vibrating to them to ensure their
from hand Prolonged instruments proper operation
held power vibration is given to
drilling exposure can employees. 2. Adjust tools and
machine, cause workstations to Monthly
jackhammer damage to improve ergonomics Construction
and cutting the nerves, and reduce fatigue. manager(act
machines cardiovascul ion; 2,4,5,6)
ar issues, 3. Providing employees
and with anti-vibration
syndrome of gloves. 2 months
vibration in
the hands 4. Put into effect
and arms
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

(HAVS). frequent breaks to Daily

reduce prolonged
exposure

5. Monitor workers for

early signs of HAVS Monthly
through health
surveillance.

6. Establish emergency
procedure to deal with 2 months
symptoms of HAV,
such as immediate
medical attention.

Hazardous All workers Provision of 1. Install a local 3 months Safety

substance: on site, PPE such as exhaust ventilation personnel(ac
especially dust masks, system to remove dust tion;
Elevated dust those conducting particles directly from 1,2,3,4,5,6,)
levels from operating or periodic site the source.
circular saw working near cleaning to
and concrete the cutting reduce dust 2. Provide a specific 3 months
cutting machine. accumulation high-efficiency air
machines Long term filters for vacuums.
exposure to
high level of 3. Make full face 1 month
dust can respirators available.
result to
respiratory 4. Implement health 6 months
issues, skin surveillance to keep an
irritation and eye on employees'
eye damage. well-being.
1 week
5. Teach employees
about dust hazards and
how to use PPE
properly.
Procurement
6. Make sure any new Annually (action; 6)
equipment you buy has
incorporated dust
control capabilities.

Hazardous Workers Provision of 1. Provide training on 3 days Safety

substance: involved in PPE such as the use of solignum personnel
the hand gloves (action;
The use of application and gas mask 2. Ensure the use of Weekly 1,2,3,4,5,6)
Solignum for process. to avoid PPE, such as
wood Potential inhalation respiratory google and
preservation harms and operation protective cloths for all
includes skin is done in a workers applying
irritation, well solignum to woods.
respiratory ventilated
issues, and areas. 3. Conduct regular
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

eye irritation health surveillance for monthly

from fumes workers using solignum
and contact to detect early signs.
to the
chemical 4. Develop and
implement safe system 2 Weeks
of work (SSOW) for
the application of
solignum

5. Provide emergency
wash system and first
aid kits near application 1 month
areas

6. Regularly review and

update safety data sheet
(SDS) of solignum 6 months

Falling All workers, Implement 1. Use debris net and 3 months Safety
objects; especially basic work catch platform to officer(actio
those protocols like prevent falling n:
Hand tools, working wearing hard materials. 1,2,3,4,5,6)
debris, or below hats,
other elevated barricade 2. Install warning signs 1 month
materials areas. work areas where height working
falling from Serious below ongoing.
height injuries can elevated
occur work and 3. Carry out a training 1 week
including conduct on material
fracture, proper clean management at height.
wound and up to remove
head trauma debris. 4. Make sure all
as a result of workers makes use of Daily
falling fall protection systems.
objects and
debris from 5. Establish a strict
height housekeeping policy to
keep work area tidy. Daily

6. Ensure to carry out

safety audit to improve
on control measures.
6 months

Electricity: All workers, Providing 1. Ensure to avoid the 1 months Safety

especially basic PPE for use of electricity on wet officer
Exposure to electricians all workers; areas. (action:
live wire, and those such as 1,2,3,5,6,7)
using working insulated 2. Conduct training on 1 month
electrical with gloves and electrical safety and its
equipment in electrical boots. And dangers when
the work equipment's. making sure mismanaged.
place and the May suffer maintenance Electrician
general Burns, and checks 3. Implement a strict Monthly (1,3,4,6,)
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

electrical electrocution on electrical Lockout/Tagout/Tryout

installation at and electric equipment procedure to DE-
the work site. shock as are carried energized live wires
potential out regularly. before work.
injuries
4. Use grounding 2 months
system to protect from
electrical shock.

5. Ensure to develop a 2 month

safe working procedure
for electrical works.

6. Conduct regular site

inspection to identify Daily
and address all eletrical
related hazards.

7. Provide emergency
response procedure for
electrical related Monthly
accidents

Fire: All workers, All 1. Ensure flammable Safety

visitors, and flammable liquids are stored in a 6 months officer
No safe residents liquids are designated areas with (action:
storage of nearby. kept in the appropriate fire 1,2,3,4,5)
flammable They can be main tools extinguisher.
liquid harmed store without
(gasoline and through fire specifically 2. Ensure storage areas 6 months Construction
fuel oil) and outbreaks, separating are well ventilated. manager
combustible explosions, them from (action: 2,)
materials burns and other 3. Install fire warning
damage to materials signs in areas where 1 months
properties flammable liquids are
stored.

4. Train workers on the

risk associated with 5 days
flammable liquids and
and implement proper
labels .

5. Train workers on
emergency procedure 6 months
and conduct regular
audit and inspection on
flammable liquid.

Working at All workers Workers are 1. Implement a 1 week Safety

height: using ladder provided mandatory use of officer
and with training harness belt (action
The risk of scaffolding, on the safe 1,2,3,4,5,6)
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

falling from particularly use of ladder 2. Regular inspection

ladders and those and and maintenance of Monthly
scaffolding masons and scaffolding. ladders and scaffolding
used for electricians. Workers are before use.
block laying They might provided
and electrical get fractures, with PPE to 3. Implement strict
works brain work on protocol for the set up 2 months
traumas, and scaffolding and the use of ladder
other severe such as and scaffolding,
injuries as a harness-belt, including the weight
result of falls limit.
Scaffolding
is inspected 4. Ensure supervision 2 months
before use for total compliance
with safety guard lines.

5. Establish an
emergency response 3 months
procedure for fall
accidents

6. Review the
effectiveness of fall Yearly
prevention measure
through the safety
regulation

Machines All workers Training on 1. Install guards and 1 month Workshop

with sharp operating the uses of shield on machines manager
edge: these circular saw with sharp edge and
machines, and concrete blades to avoid direct
Cut and They may cutting contact.
amputation suffer from machine.
from severe cuts 2. Provide a 1 month Safety
exposed due to Workers are comprehensive training officer
blades and contact with provided on the operation of (action:
sharp edges exposed with basic circular saw 2,3,4)
of circular blades and PPE such as
saw. sharp edges. gloves and 3. Ensure the provision
safety of advance PPE such as 2 months
Google, and cut-resistance gloves
respiratory and aprons.
masks
4. Implement
emergency procedure
such as first aid to 1 month
handle all cuts and
amputation cases.

Manual All workers Workers are 1. Provide a training 1 month Safety

handling involved in provided on manual handling and officer(actio
manual with proper lifting n: 1,3,4,5,)
Lifting and handling wheelbarrow procedure.
carrying of tasks, as a s only
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

blocks, bag result of 2. Ensure to provide 3 months Managing

of cement their hard mechanical aids such as director
and other lift, they forklift and trolleys, (action: 2 )
heavy may hoists and Crane to
materials to experience help workers minimize
work strained prolong manual
location muscles, handling tasks
back pain
and other 3. Conduct an 1 months
musculoskel ergonomic assessments
etal on workers to identify
conditions. and control risks
associated with manual
handling tasks in the
site.

4. Provide PPE such as

back support belts to 1 month
workers who engaged
in heavy lifting tasks.

5. Implement a
monitoring system to 6 months
identify any health
issues related to manual
handling and provide
emergency response
procedures.

UV All workers Workers are [Link] workers with 2 months HRM

Radiation working advised to long-sleeve cloths (action; 1)
outdoors. take regular made with breathable
Prolong breaks in fabric to protect against
exposure to Due to shaded areas UV rays
sunlight prolonged to minimize
while exposure to prolong 2. Ensure the
working sunshine, exposure to provision on sunscreen 2 weeks Safety
outdoor at they may UV radiation. with high SPF on site officer
the experience an encourage frequent (action; 2, 4)
construction sunburn, Workers are application
site. cataracts, also advised
skin cancer, to always put 3. Provide shaded
dehydration, on their hard areas for workers to
heat hats. take a rest 4 months Construction
exhaustion, Manager
and heat [Link] a (action; 3)
stroke. monitoring system and
emergency response
procedure to handle 6 months
workers with illness
due to prolong
exposure to UV
radiation
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

Repetitive All workers, Daily work 1. Conduct a 1 month Safety

strain hazard: both skilled rotation is comprehensive training officer
and implemented on workers for the ( action; 1,
carrying out unskilled to enable proper use of vibrating 2, 3, 4,6,7,8)
repetitive workers. workers tools and ergonomic
tasks with reduce practices.
vibrating Due to duration of
tools and extended exposure to 2. Ensure to provide 1 month
equipment exposure to repetitive anti-vibration gloves to
while vibrations tasks. enable workers who
continuously and repeated uses vibrating tools for
completing motions, task.
the same they may
move experience 3. Provide anti- 3 months
musculoskel vibration devices then
etal disorder, do routine maintenance
hand-arm to them to ensure their
vibration proper operation
syndrome
(HAVS), 4. Monitor workers for
and early signs of HAVS 6 months
repetitive and RSI through health
strain surveillance.
injuries
(RSI). 5. Modify workstations
and tools to improve 6 months Construction
ergonomics and reduce manager(act
strain. ion; 5)

6. Increase supervision
to ensure workers are
using the tools correctly Daily
and taking necessary
breaks.

7. Establish emergency
procedures for dealing
with symptoms of 6 months
HAVS and RSI,
including immediate
medical attention.

8. Review and update

safety protocols
regularly based on
feedback and new Yearly
information.

Airborne All workers Basic 1. Implement a Daily Site

pathogens and visitors, housekeeping comprehensive supervisor(a
may suffer is being housekeeping to be ction: 1)
Exposure to respiratory carried out in done before, during and
concentrated issues, skin the work site after every tasks.
dust, and irritation and and workers
more by and visitors 2. Ensure proper waste 1 month Safety
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

inhaling or are provided management system in officer

viruses due direct with basic the site to minimize (action:
to poor contact with PPE such as accumulation of debris 1,2,3,4,5,6,7
housekeepin dust and nose mask. )
g viruses. 3. Introduce HEPA
filter vacuum cleaner in
areas with high level of 2 months
airborne dust.

4. Carry out regular

inspection to address
poor housekeeping. Daily

5. Conduct a
comprehensive training
on the importance of 1 month
cleanliness and hygiene
in preventing health
hazards.

6. Establish protocols
for immediate clean-up
of spills and debris
2 month
7. Monitor and evaluate
the effectiveness of
housekeeping practices
through regular audits. Monthly

Micro- All workers Basic 1. Implement a 1 month Site

organisms and visitors, cleaning thorough and regular supervisor
Because of protocols are cleaning schedule to (action: 1,
Fungal and their in place and remove organic debris 3,5)
bacterial exposure to workers are and moisture.
infections bacteria and provided
due to fungi, they with PPE 2. Ensure proper 2 month Construction
inadequate may such as ventilation in all work manager
housekeepin experience gloves and areas to reduce (action: 1,2)
g leading to allergic masks. moisture accumulation.
accumulation reactions,
of organic skin 3. Use antifungal and
debris and infections, antibacterial cleaning 1 month Safety office
moisture respiratory agents to sanitize (action:
problems, affected areas. 3,4,6)
and other
health 4. Train workers on the
issues. importance of 1 month
maintaining cleanliness
and the risks associated
with fungal and
bacterial infections.

5. Introduce waste
THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

management protocols
to ensure organic debris 1 month
is promptly disposed
of.

6. Conduct regular
inspections to ensure
housekeeping standards Daily
are maintained and
address any issues
promptly.

Insects and All workers Workers are 1. Provide insect 1 week Site
other especially advised to repellent to all workers supervisor
arthropods: those wear and ensure it is used (action:
working protective regularly. 1,2,4)
Insect bites outdoors. As clothing.
and stings on a result of Basic first aid 2. Implement regular
workers insect bites is available pest control measures 2 weeks
causing and stings, on-site. to reduce insect
itching, they may populations at the
swelling and experience
work site.
hives. allergic
responses,
3. Educate workers 2 weeks
infections, Safety
itching, on recognizing and personnel
swelling, responding to insect
and hives. bites and stings,
including how to use
first aid.

4. Ensure first aid kits 1 week

are fully stocked with
supplies to treat
insect bites and
stings, including
antihistamines and
epinephrine auto-
injectors.

Moral, general Moral Argument

legal and
financial From the moral point of view, TMCC should prioritize employee welfare
arguments in order to ensure a safe working environment for all workers. Because
workers may experience stress, hearing loss, and reduced quality of life if
 THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

they are constantly exposed to workplace danger like loud noises, high
concentrated dust, and improper manual handling. Therefore providing a
safe workplace where workers may carry out their responsibilities
without endangering their health is a moral obligation. Prioritizing the
health and safety of employees demonstrate the company’s commitment
to valuing human life and dignity, promoting a healthy work
environment, and raises employee morale.

Legal Argument:

Construction companies are required to comply with occupational health

and safety regulations, in accordance to the International Labour
Organisation (ILO) Convention NO. 148 on working environment states
that employers must reduce exposure to hazards like (loud Noises, Dust
exposure, and risk associated with manual handling), by providing
mechanical aids and other protective measures to mitigate the hazards,
and if contravened, companies could face serious legal consequences
such as fines, shutdown, and lawsuits. The (ILO) Standard emphasized
the need for risk assessment and implementation of control measures to
help Organisations meet both national and international safety
regulations.

Financial Argument

From the financial point of view, investing in safety measures has

significant financial benefits, although initially it may be expensive in
reducing dust, improving manual handling techniques and managing
noise level, but not as compared to possibility of significant claims from
workers compensation, medical expenses, and lost of productivity due to
injuries and illnesses.

Therefore, safe workplace increase productivity, since healthy and

productive workers are less likely to miss work. Over time a reputation
for safety will attract better talent and more business opportunities.

Justification For Action 1

Action Control and reduce noise exposure, prevent hearing loss and promote
safe work environment for all workers (hazard category: Noise)
 THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

Specific legal arguments The noise hazard at Topman construction company Nigerian limited,
comes with a serious legal responsibilities under both international
and local laws. The international labour organization (ILO)
occupational health and safety convention 1981 (C-155) mandates
employers to maintain a safe and healthy place of work, which
includes managing noise levels to prevent all forms of hearing loss
that may be resulted from works. The Nigeria’s labour law also
enforce safety standards such as the use of PPE and regular noise
monitoring.
Failure to manage noise levels effectively can lead to severe legal
consequences, including fines and sanctions, as it constitutes a
violation of workers' rights to a safe working environment.
Implementing measures such as noise assessments, PPE enforcement,
and machinery maintenance aligns with these legal requirements,
ensuring compliance and protecting the company from potential legal
actions
Consideration of The likelihood of noise-related harm at TMCC is high, given the
likelihood and severity continuous use of equipment like static concrete mixers, circular
saws, and concrete cutting machines, Etc. Workers who are exposed
to high level of noise tend to face a significant risk of long-term
hearing loss.
The severity of this hazard is considerable, as hearing damage can be
permanent and debilitating, affecting workers' quality of life and
ability to work. By conducting a regular noise assessments,
maintaining machinery, and enforcing the use of PPE, the company
can reduce both the likelihood and severity of noise-related injuries,
aligning with ILO guidelines and ensuring a safer working
environment.

In analyzing the severity, I made use of 4 categories:

1. Minimal: Incidents with no injuries or damage. Unlikely, it is
minimal in this case.
2. Minor: Limited injuries, like temporary discomfort or mild hearing
issues. Likelihood: Moderate
3. Major: Incidents leading to hospitalization, such as significant
hearing loss requiring medical intervention. Likelihood: High
4. Fatal: Severe injuries resulting in death or complete damage of
equipment.

Therefore, the rating for this hazard is considered to be major,

because it will require a medical intervention.
How effective the action is The actions taken to control the noise risk at TMCC are expected to
likely to be in be highly effective. By conducting noise assessments, maintaining
controlling the risk. This machinery, and enforcing the use of ear protection, wherefore
should include: reducing the impact cause by prolong exposure to noise, and
 the intended impact of preventing hearing loss among workers. And the timescale is
the action; indicated to be one(1) month period, as it ensures timely
 justification for the implementation and continues maintenance. This proactive approach
timescale that you allows for early detection and resolution of issues, ensuring
indicated in your risk continuous protection. While these actions will greatly mitigate the
 THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

assessment; And risk, they may not fully eliminate it. Continuous monitoring and
 Whether you think the adherence to safety protocols are necessary to maintain a safe noise
action will fully level on the construction site.
control the risk.

Justification for action 2

Action The use of local exhaust ventilation system to remove dust particles
directly from the source. (hazard category: hazardous substance)
Specific legal Dust exposure at TMCC poses significant health risks under ILO
arguments conventions and Nigeria's Factories Act. According to the ILOs
Occupational Safety and Health Convention (C155), employers must
ensure the health and safety of workers, which includes controlling
hazardous substances like dust. Failure to comply can lead to legal
actions, fines, and sanctions. The Factories Act also mandates that all
practicable measures must be taken to prevent the inhalation of dust
and fumes. Legal compliance requires implementing effective dust
control measures, such as installing local exhaust ventilation,
providing appropriate PPE, and ensuring regular health surveillance.
These actions not only protect workers but also fulfill the company's
legal obligations to maintain a safe and healthy working
environment.
Consideration of The likelihood of dust exposure at TMCC is high, especially for
likelihood and severity workers using concrete cutting machines. Long-term exposure can
lead to severe respiratory issues, skin irritation, and eye damage.
Given the frequency and intensity of dust-producing activities,
without effective controls, the risk remains significant. The severity
of potential health effects, including chronic respiratory conditions,
By putting in place proper control measures, the health risk can be
greatly decreased and a safe work place can be assured.

In analyzing the likelihood and severity using 4 stages

1. Minimal: Incidents with no injuries or damage.
2. Minor: Limited injuries, like temporary discomfort,
3. Major: Incidents leading to hospitalization or absence from work
due to illness
4. Fatal: Severe injuries resulting in death or complete incapacitation

The rating for this hazard is likely high because workers who are
expose to high concentrated dust may develop respiratory disease,
eye damage, and illness requiring medical intervention.
How effective the The planned actions to control the risk associated with dust are likely
action is likely to be in to be very effective. by Installing local exhaust ventilation systems
controlling the risk. will directly reduce dust levels at the source, improving air quality,
This should include: Providing high-efficiency air filters and full-face respirators will
 the intended further protect workers from inhaling dust. Regular health
 THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

impact of the surveillance will help in early detection of any dust-related health
action; issues, allowing timely intervention. The timescales indicated, such
 justification for the as 3 months for ventilation systems and 1 week for training, is
timescale that you practical to ensure timely implementation. These measures, if
indicated in your consistently applied, will significantly reduce dust exposure,
risk assessment; ensuring a safer work environment. While these actions will greatly
And mitigate the risk, continuous monitoring and maintenance are
 Whether you think necessary to fully control the risk and adapt to any changes in work
the action will fully conditions.
control the risk.

Justification for action 3

Action Introduction of mechanical aids such as forklift, trolleys, hoists and Crane to
help workers to minimize prolong manual handling tasks. (Hazard category:
manual handling)
Specific legal Manual handling hazards at TMCC need strict control due to legal
arguments obligations under ILO standards and Nigerian regulations. The ILO
Manual Handling of Loads Convention (C-127) emphasizes that
employers must prevent injuries caused by manual handling. Nigerian
Labour Act and Factories Act also mandate employers to ensure safe
work practices, which include minimizing manual handling risks. Failure
to address these hazards can lead to legal consequences such as fines,
penalties.
Therefore, introducing proper trainings, the using mechanical aids, and
redesigning tasks to reduce manual handling are some legal requirements.
These measures not only comply with legal standards but also protect
workers from musculoskeletal injuries, ensuring a healthier workforce
and avoiding potential legal liabilities.
Consideration of Manual handling tasks are frequent at TMCC, making the likelihood of
likelihood and related injuries high. The severity of these injuries can range from minor
severity strains to severe musculoskeletal disorders, potentially leading to chronic
pain and long-term disability. Given the regularity and physical nature of
these tasks, the risk is significant. Without effective controls, workers are
at high risk of injuries that can impact their health and productivity.
Therefore, implementing proper manual handling procedures and aids is
crucial to reduce the likelihood and severity of such injuries.

1. Minimal: Incidents with no injuries or damage.

2. Minor: Limited injuries, like temporary discomfort,
3. Major: Incidents leading to hospitalization, absence from work due to
illness.
4. Fatal: Severe injuries resulting in death or damage of properties.
 THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

The rating for this hazard is ranging from minimal to major, because
workers who engage in continues lifting operations has high chance of
developing mosculoskeletal disoder, chronic pain and long-term
disability.
How effective the The planned actions for controlling manual handling risks will be very
action is likely to be effective. Training workers on safe manual handling techniques will
in reduce improper lifting and carrying methods, minimizing the risk of
controlling the risk. injury. Using mechanical aids like trolleys, forklift and other lifting
This should include: devices will lessen the physical strain on workers. Redesigning tasks to
 the intended limit manual handling will further reduce exposure to these hazards. The
impact of the timescales, such as 1 month for training and 3 months for acquiring
action; mechanical aids, are practical and allow for a swift reduction in risk.
 justification for These measures, if consistently applied, will significantly reduce manual
the timescale handling injuries, ensuring a safer work environment. While these actions
that you will greatly mitigate the risk, continuous monitoring and periodic
indicated in refresher training will be necessary to fully control the risk and adapt to
your risk any changes in work processes.
assessment;
And
 Whether you
think the action
will fully
control the risk.

Part 4: Review, communicate and check

Planned review The risk assessment was carried out on July 29, 2024. The next
date/period with appropriate date for review should be July 29, 2025.
reasoning
Annual evaluations ensure the risk assessment is up to date and
relevant, taking into consideration all modifications to the work
process, equipment purchase, or change of work procedures. To
maintain the safety standards and legal compliance, a periodic reviews
will be of help.
How the risk The risk assessment findings will be communicated through a site-wide
assessment meeting but first, I will arrange a meeting with the safety officer on site
findings will be to detailed it and report to the safety manager off site in a written report.
communicated then all workers, supervisors, and managers will be informed through a
AND who you general safety meeting.
need to tell Special emphasis will be given to the safety officer, construction
manager, and department heads. Also notices will be posted on the
site’s bulletin board.
This will enable everyone to be aware of the identified hazards and the
actions required to mitigate them.
How you will To ensure actions are carried out, regular follow-up inspections will be
follow up on the scheduled. The safety officer will be responsible for monitoring
risk progress and compliance.
 THOMPSON PEREMOBOWEI NEBOSH IG2 RISK ASSESSMENT

assessment to Monthly visitations with department heads will be conducted to talk

check that the about the implementation of the control measures. then during the
actions safety meeting, the progress report will be reviewed.
have been carried Finally, random site visits will be conducted to ensure commitment to
out safety protocols.
All issues concerning delays will be addressed duly to ensure that all
actions are effectively implemented.