1.

2. Abdullayeva, M., & Musayeva, Z. M. (2023). The impact of Chat GPT on

student's writing skills: An exploration of AI-assisted writing tools. In
International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (Vol. 1, No. 4,
pp. 61-66).
3. Agzamxanova, G., & Golovko, Y. (2025). How AI tools can support English
writing development. Educator Insights: Journal of Teaching Theory and
Practice, 1(3), 27-33.
4. Ahmed, M., Siddique, M., & Yasmin, T. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence-
based writing assistant on the academic writing skills of university faculty in
Pakistan. International Journal of Human and Society (IJHS), 4(1), 539-545.
5. Al Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of
King Saud university postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3),
123-130.
6. Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students' perceptions and
awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance
perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100203.
7. Aldosari, S. A. M. (2020). The future of higher education in the light of artificial
intelligence transformations. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3),
145-151.
8. Alharbi, K., & Khalil, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in ESL vocabulary
learning: An exploratory study on students and teachers’ perspectives. Migration
Letters, 20(S12), 1030-1045.
9. Alharbi, W. (2023). The Use and Abuse of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled
Machine Translation in the EFL Classroom: An Exploratory Study. Journal of
Education and e-learning Research, 10(4), 689-701.
10. Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Five building blocks for comprehension
strategy instruction. In Reading comprehension in educational settings (pp. 125-
144). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
11. Alotaibi, A. H. E. (2023). The impact of AI-powered Grammarly on enhancing
grammar proficiency among Saudi EFL students. Remittances Review, 8(4).
12. Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical
review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.
13. Amina, F. (2024). Exploring EFL Students ‘Perceptions on the use of Grammarly
as an AI Writing Tool to Enhance Academic Writing Proficiency The Case Study
of Master Two English Students at Mohammed Kheider University.
14. Araújo, S., Aguiar, M., & Monteiro, J. (2023). A BERT-powered writing assistant
for academic purposes in European Portuguese. In Perspectives and Trends in
Education and Technology: Selected Papers from ICITED 2022 (pp. 513-520).
Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
15. Bailey, S. (2015). The essentials of academic writing for international students
(4th ed.). Routledge.
16. Bailey, S. (2018). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (5th
ed.). Routledge.
17. Ballardini, R. M., He, K., & Roos, T. (2019). AI-generated content: authorship and
inventorship in the age of artificial intelligence. In Online Distribution of Content
in the EU (pp. 117-135). Edward Elgar Publishing.
18. Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to AI: Student and teacher
perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process.
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 59.
19. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and
potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745.
20. Barrot, J. S. (2024). Google Bard as an automated written corrective feedback
tool: Possibilities and drawbacks. TESOL Journal, 15(3), e805.
21. Bazerman, C., Applebee, A. N., Berninger, V. W., Jeffery, J. V., Matsuda, P. K.,
Murphy, S., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Rowe, D. W., Schleppegrell, M., & Wilcox,
K. C. (2020). The lifespan development of writing. National Council of Teachers
of English.
22. Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences.
Pearson.
23. Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.).
Pearson.
24. Bibi, Z., & Atta, A. (2024). The role of ChatGPT as AI English writing assistant:
A study of student’s perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction. Annals of Human
and Social Sciences, 5(1), 433-443.
25. Black, R. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2025). University students describe how they
adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course. Scientific Reports,
15(1), 8799.
26. Black, R. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2025). University students describe how they
adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course. Scientific Reports,
15(1), 8799.
27. Byrne, D. (1993). Teaching writing skills. Longman.
28. Campesato, O. (2020). Deep learning introduction. In Artificial intelligence,
machine learning, and deep learning (pp. 95–110). Mercury Learning and
Information.
29. Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023).
The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy
for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257-
295.
30. Chauhan, P. (2022). Fundamentals of academic writing: A literature review.
Journal of NELTA, 27(1-2), 161-180.
31. Chauke, T. A., Mkhize, T. R., Methi, L., & Dlamini, N. (2024). Postgraduate
students’ perceptions on the benefits associated with artificial intelligence tools on
academic success: In case of ChatGPT AI tool. Journal of Curriculum Studies
Research, 6(1), 44-59.
32. Chávez, Y., & Naranjo, C. (2024). Chat GPT in Spanish college classes: Is it
beneficial for listening, speaking, reading and writing skills?. language, 7(06).
33. Chen, C., & Gong, Y. (2025). The Role of AI-Assisted Learning in Academic
Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study on Chinese as a Second Language Students.
Education Sciences, 15(2), 141.
34. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A
review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278.
35. Choudhuri, R., Liu, D., Steinmacher, I., Gerosa, M., & Sarma, A. (2024, April).
How far are we? the triumphs and trials of generative ai in learning software
engineering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th international conference on
software engineering (pp. 1-13).
36. Choudhuri, R., Liu, D., Steinmacher, I., Gerosa, M., & Sarma, A. (2023,
December). How far are we? The triumphs and trials of generative AI in learning
software engineering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software
Engineering (pp. 1–13).
37. Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023). Writing with AI: University students’ use of
ChatGPT. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4 (36)), 128-138.
38. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and
evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. pearson.
39. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks,
CA.
40. Dale, R., & Viethen, J. (2021). The automated writing assistance landscape in
2021. Natural Language Engineering, 27(4), 511-518.
41. Đặng, V. E., Nguyễn, Đ. L. P., & Nguyễn, T. H. (2024). Thực trạng ứng dụng
ChatGPT trong việc học tập, nghiên cứu của sinh viên Đại học Quốc gia Thành
phố Hồ Chí Minh. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 36-41.
42. Day, T. (2023). A preliminary investigation of fake peer-reviewed citations and
references generated by Chatgpt. The Professional Geographer, 75(6), 1024–
1027.
43. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative
research. sage.
44. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative
research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
45. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative,
qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
46. Duong, H.L., Tran, M.T. (2023). Analyzing the Impact of Chat-GPT Usage by
University Students in Vietnam. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics
Culture, 35, 1001-1015.
47. El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Ozfidan, B., & Ibrahim, N. G. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions
of digital language learning strategies: The case of a private Egyptian university.
International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 13(1), 1–18.
48. Ersöz, A. R., & Engin, M. (2024). Exploring Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of
Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Perspectives of Researchers. Journal
of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 37(3), 1190-1208.
49. Fang, X., Che, S., Mao, M., Zhang, H., Zhao, M., & Zhao, X. (2024). Bias of AI-
generated content: an examination of news produced by large language models.
Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5224.
50. Fayez, O., Ozfidan, B., & Ismail, H. (2023). The praxis of user experience (UX) in
the design of undergraduate online classes: Framing the perceptions of engineering
and social sciences students. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 3300.
51. Fitria, T. N. (2023, March). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI
ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essays. In ELT
Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 44-58).
52. Fitria, T. N. (2023, March). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI
ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essays. In ELT
Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 44-58).
53. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College
Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
54. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College
Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
55. French, A. (2020). Academic writing as identity-work in higher education:
Forming a ‘professional writing in higher education habitus’. Studies in Higher
Education, 45(8), 1605-1617.
56. Gabi, C. (2022). Academic Writing. Altralogue.
57. Gasaymeh, A. M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. A. (2024). University
Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools.
Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062.
58. Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an
AI-based writing Assistant's impact on English language learners. Computers and
Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055.
59. Ghufron, M. A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The role of Grammarly in assessing
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 395-403.
60. Gillham, B. (2001). The research interview. Continuum.
61. Ginting, P., Batubara, H. M., & Hasnah, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence powered
writing tools as adaptable aids for academic writing: Insight from EFL college
learners in writing final project. International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research and Analysis, 6(10), 4640-4650.
62. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On
the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California management
review, 61(4), 5-14.
63. Han, Y., Zhao, S., & Ng, L. L. (2021). How technology tools impact writing
performance, lexical complexity, and perceived self-regulated learning strategies
in EFL academic writing: A comparative study. Frontiers in psychology, 12,
752793.
64. Higgs, J. M., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2024). Being human in the age of generative AI:
Young people's ethical concerns about writing and living with machines. Reading
Research Quarterly, 59(4), 632-650.
65. Hoang, T. H., Trinh, T. T., & To, V. C. (2024). Perceptions of fourth-year English
majors at Hanoi University on the use of AI tools in academic writing
[Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Hanoi University.
66. Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2024). Using AI to write
scholarly publications. Accountability in research, 31(7), 715-723.
67. Hsu, H. Y., & Wang, S. K. (2017). Using Google Forms to collect and analyze
data. Science Scope, 40(8), 64–67.
68. Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication:
writing better scientific review articles. American journal of cancer research,
13(4), 1148.
69. Huete-García, Á., & Tarp, S. (2024). Training an AI-based writing assistant for
Spanish learners: the usefulness of chatbots and the indispensability of human-
assisted intelligence. Lexikos, 34(1), 21-40.
70. Hutson, J. (2025). Human-AI Collaboration in Writing: A Multidimensional
Framework for Creative and Intellectual Authorship. International Journal of
Changes in Education.
71. Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal?
English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40–51.
72. Johnson, A. (2016). Academic writing: Process and product. Rowman &
Littlefield
73. Jong, Y. O., & Jung, C. K. (2015). The Development of Interview Techniques in
Language Studies: Facilitating the Researchers' Views on Interactive Encounters.
English Language Teaching, 8(7), 30-39.
74. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer,
F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges
of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103,
102274.
75. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic
writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and
Programs in Biomedicine Update, 100145.
76. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic
writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and
Programs in Biomedicine Update, 100145.
77. Kim, H., & Han, S. (2021). College students’ perceptions of AI-based writing
learning tools: With a focus on Google Translate, Naver Papago, and Grammarly.
Modern English Education () , 22(4), 90-100.
78. Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on
Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information
Technologies, 30(1), 1265-1300.
79. Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of
ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614.
80. Koos, S., & Wachsmann, S. (2023). Navigating the Impact of ChatGPT/GPT4 on
Legal Academic Examinations: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations.
Media Iuris, 6(2).
81. Koos, S., & Wachsmann, S. (2023). Navigating the Impact of ChatGPT/GPT4 on
Legal Academic Examinations: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations.
Media Iuris, 6(2).
82. Kuphanga, D. (2024). Questionnaires in research: Their role, advantages, and main
aspects. Preprint. [Link] org/10.13140/RG, 2(15334.64325).
83. Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of
Quillbot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English
Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437-451.
84. Kvale, S. (1994). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.
Sage Publications, Inc.
85. Kvale, S. (1994). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.
Sage Publications, Inc.
86. Langan, J. (2006). College writing process (11th ed.). The McGraw-Hill
Companies.
87. Laredj, H., & Mebarek, F. N. E. (2024). Investigating the dynamic interaction
between human language and artificial intelligence tools: AI writing assistants as
a case study (Doctoral dissertation, ibn khaldoun university-Tiaret).
88. Le, T.T., Hua, H.H., Pham, T.T. (2023). Exploring the impacts of ChatGPT in
EFL writing: Student perceptions of opportunities and challenges in Vietnamese
higher education. Kognisi: Jurnal Ilmu Keguruan, 1(2), 107-124.
89. Lee, I. (2025). AI-powered writing assistance: Korean language students' and
teachers' views and experiences. In Innovative Methods in Korean Language
Teaching (pp. 13-27). Routledge.
90. Levine, S., Beck, S. W., Mah, C., Phalen, L., & PIttman, J. (2025). How do
students use ChatGPT as a writing support?. Journal of Adolescent & Adult
Literacy, 68(5), 445-457.
91. Liao, P. W., & Hsieh, J. Y. (2017). Does internet-based survey have more stable
and unbiased results than paper-and-pencil survey? Open Journal of Social
Sciences, 5(1), 69–87.
92. Lin-Siegler, X. (2018). The master of clarity and precision. In P. Lemaire (Ed.),
Cognitive development from a strategy perspective: A festschrift for Robert
Siegler (pp. 207–215). Routledge.
93. Lowe, D., & Willey, K. (2018, January 1). Conceptualising academic rigour in
engineering degree programs [Paper presentation]. AAEE (Australasian
Association for Engineering Education) Conference 2018, Hamilton, New
Zealand.
94. Ma’amor, H., Achim, N., Ahmad, N. L., Roszaman, N. S., Kamarul Anuar, N. N.,
Khairul Azwa, N. C. A., … Aqilah Hamjah, N. A. (2024). The effect of artificial
intelligence (AI) on students' learning. Information Management and Business
Review.
95. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing
skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1),
9.
96. Mahmud, F.A. (2023). Investigating EFL Students' Writing Skills Through
Artificial Intelligence: Wordtune Application as a Tool. Journal of Language
Teaching & Research, 14(5).
97. Mali, Y. C. G., & Salsbury, T. L. (2021). Technology Integration in an Indonesian
EFL Writing Classroom. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching &
Learning of English, 32(2).
98. Mali, Y. C. G., & Salsbury, T. L. (2021). Technology Integration in an Indonesian
EFL Writing Classroom. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching &
Learning of English, 32(2).
99. Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis,
A. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: higher education
student's perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5,
100296.
100. Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The
impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing:
EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469.
101. Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The
impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing:
EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469.
102. Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Mahmud, M. M. (2025). Exploring learners’
experiences and perceptions of ChatGPT as a learning tool in higher education.
Education and information technologies, 30(1), 917-939.
103. Nabilla, C., Apriani, E., & Gusmuliana, P. (2024). Promoting Students’
Writing Critical Thinking By Using Paragraph Writing Ai Technology (Doctoral
dissertation, Institut agama islam negeri curup).
104. Nguyen, P. H., & Dieu, N. B. (2024). An investigation into third-year Elt
students’ perceptions of using Chatgpt as an Ai writing-assistant tool: a case study
in Vietnam. International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Studies,
9(5).
105. Nguyen, T. X. (2024). English majors’ perceptions of AI tool application in
English language learning at tertiary level in Vietnam. Journal of Knowledge
Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online), 3(1), 179-193.
106. Nguyen, T.T. (2023). A systematic review on flipped classrooms in
English language teaching in Vietnam. Van Hien University Journal of Science,
9(3), 49-62.
107. Ningrum, S. (2023). ChatGPT’s impact: The AI revolution in EFL writing.
Borneo Engineering & Advanced Multidisciplinary International Journal,
2(Special Issue (TECHON 2023)), 32-37.
108. Ozfidan, B., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2024). Students’ perceptions of online
learning in non-L1 environments. International journal of multilingualism, 21(4),
2150-2164.
109. Ozfidan, B., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Alsalim, L. A. (2024). The Use of AI
Tools in English Academic Writing by Saudi Undergraduates. Contemporary
Educational Technology, 16(4).
110. Passonneau, R. J., McNamara, D., Muresan, S., & Perin, D. (2017).
Preface: special issue on multidisciplinary approaches to AI and education for
reading and writing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,
27, 665-670.
111. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large
Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of
University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), 1-24.
112. Phạm, D. (2024). Lỗi ngữ pháp trong kỹ năng viết tiếng Hàn của sinh viên
năm nhất khoa ngôn ngữ và văn hóa Hàn Quốc, Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại
 học Huế: Thực trạng và biện pháp khắc phục. Tạp Chí Khoa học Trường Đại học
Quốc tế Hồng Bàng, 165-174.
113. Pham, T. T., Nguyen, L. A. D., Dang, H. M., & Le, T. T. P. (2023).
Exploring tertiary Vietnamese EFL students’ engagement in vocabulary learning
through the use of an AI tool. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International
Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 129-149).
114. Pham, X. G., & Nguyen, T. P. T. (2020). Accuracy of a concept in
quantitative research. Journal of Science and Technology - IUH, 46(4).
115. Phan, N. T. T., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Vietnamese students’perception of
the use of Google Translation tool. Journal of Science and Technology-IUH,
48(6).
116. Phan, T.N.L. (2023, November). Students' perceptions of the AI
technology application in English writing classes. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL
International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 45-62).
117. Phuong, W. T. N. (2021). Difficulties in studying writing of English-
majored sophomores at a university in Vietnam. European Journal of Education
Studies, 8(10), 313–330.
118. Punar Özçelik, N., & Yangın Ekşi, G. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: the
role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning
Environments, 11(1), 10.
119. Putra, M. (2023). AI writing correction tools: Teachers and students’
perception. Jurnal Tatsqif, 21(1), 35-66.
120. Rabbianty, E. N., Azizah, S., & Virdyna, N. K. (2023). AI in academic
writing: Assessing current usage and future implications.
121. Rahmayani, S. O. (2018). Student’s Difficulties in Paraphrasing English
Texts (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
122. Rashid, H. (2022, October 31). Main aspects of questionnaire. Library &
Information Management.
123. Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background,
applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of
Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121-154.
124. Riadil, I. G. (2023). Investigating learners'difficulties and strategies in
academic writing skills: a qualitative study. ELP (Journal of English Language
Pedagogy), 8(1), 66-76.
125. Rousi, R., Alanen, H. K., & Wilson, A. S. (2024). Data Privacy, Ethics and
Education in the Era of AI–A University Student Perspective. In Proceedings of
the Conference on Technology Ethics 2024 (Tethics 2024). RWTH Aachen.
126. Rowland, D. R. (2023). Two frameworks to guide discussions around levels
of acceptable use of generative AI in student academic research and writing.
Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T31-T69.
127. Rowland, D. R. (2023). Two frameworks to guide discussions around levels
of acceptable use of generative AI in student academic research and writing.
Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T31-T69.
128. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: a modern
approach. pearson.
129. Safitri, M., & Fithriani, R. (2024). Exploring Higher Education EFL
Students’ Perception of AI Writing Tools in the 5.0 Era. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu
Pendidikan, 7(1), 267-276.
130. Santos, J. S., Coelho, G., Melo, S., Atila, O., & Zeltzer, C. (2024, March).
FazGame: A Game Based Platform that Uses Artificial Intelligence to Help
Students to Improve Brazilian Portuguese Writing Skills. In Proceedings of the
16th International Conference on Computational Processing of Portuguese-Vol. 2
(pp. 174-177).
131. Sarkar, S., & Ghosh, A. (2024). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to
Enhance Media Literacy and Combat Misinformation. JNRID, ISSN, 2984-8687.
132. Schmohl. T., Watanabe. A., Fröhlich. N., Herzberg. D. (2020). How can
Artificial Intelligence Improve the Academic Writing of Students?
133. Sedaghat, S. (2024). Plagiarism and wrong content as potential challenges
of using chatbots like ChatGPT in medical research. Journal of Academic Ethics,
1-4.
134. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental
data in psychology. Basic Books.
135. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and
motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for
EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843.
136. Sterling, L., Ye, C., Ying, H., & Chen, Z. (2025). Finding Your Voice:
Using Generative AI to Help International Students Improve Their Writing.
Information, 16(4), 289.
137. Sulistyaningrum, S. D. (2021). Employing online paraphrasing tools to
overcome students’ difficulties in paraphrasing. Stairs: English Language
Education Journal, 2(1), 52-59.
138. Syahnaz, M., & Fithriani, R. (2023). Utilizing artificial intelligence-based
paraphrasing tool in EFL writing class: a focus on Indonesian university students’
perceptions. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210-218.
139. Taecharungroj, V. (2023). “What can ChatGPT do?” Analyzing early
reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive
Computing, 7(1), 35.
140. Tang, A., Li, K. K., Kwok, K. O., Cao, L., Luong, S., & Tam, W. (2024).
The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial
intelligence (AI) in academic writing. Journal of nursing scholarship, 56(2), 314-
318.
141. University of Leeds. (2019). What is academic writing? University of
Leeds.
142. Utami, S. P. T., & Winarni, R. (2023). Utilization of Artificial Intelligence
Technology in an Academic Writing Class: How do Indonesian Students
Perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4).
143. Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of
artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian
students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450.
144. Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the
bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045.
145. Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the
bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045.
146. Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing
processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English
speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-22.
147. Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing
processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English
speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-22.
148. Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing
processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English
speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-22.
149. Williams-Ceci, S., Jakesch, M., Bhat, A., Kadoma, K., Zalmanson, L., &
Naaman, M. (2025). Biased AI Writing Assistants Shift Users’ Attitudes on
Societal Issues.
150. Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and genre-based models
for academic writing instruction: A'literacy’journey. Journal of English for
academic purposes, 11(1), 26-37.
151. Wu, Y. (2024). Study on the impact of utilizing ChatGPT and other AI
tools for feedback in EAP writing classrooms on the discursive writing
performance of English major students. Transactions on Social Science,
Education and Humanities Research, 4, 143-150.
152. Wu, Y. (2024). Study on the impact of utilizing ChatGPT and other AI
tools for feedback in EAP writing classrooms on the discursive writing
 performance of English major students. Transactions on Social Science,
Education and Humanities Research, 4, 143–150.
153. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on
AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart
Learning Environments, 11(1), 28.
154. Zhao, X. (2023). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for
English writing: Introducing wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL
writers. RELC Journal, 54(3), 890-894.
155. Zhao, X., Xu, J., & Cox, A. (2024). Incorporating artificial intelligence into
student academic writing in higher education: The use of Wordtune by Chinese
international students.
156. Zou, X., Su, P., Li, L., & Fu, P. (2024). AI-generated content tools and
students’ critical thinking: Insights from a Chinese university. IFLA Journal,
50(2), 228–241.
157. Zulfa, S., Dewi, R. S., Hidayat, D. N., Hamid, F., & Defianty, M. (2023,
August). The use of AI and technology tools in developing students’ English
academic writing skills. In Proceeding International Conference on Education
(pp. 47-63).
158. Zyoud, D. M. M., Bsharat, D. T. R., & Dweikat, D. K. A. (2024).
Quantitative Research Methods: Maximizing Benefits, Addressing Limitations,
and Advancing Methodological Frontiers. ISRG Journal of Multidisciplinary
Studies (ISRGJMS), II (IV), 11-14.
159. Zyoud, D. M. M., Bsharat, D. T. R., & Dweikat, D. K. A. (2024).
Quantitative Research Methods: Maximizing Benefits, Addressing Limitations,
and Advancing Methodological Frontiers. ISRG Journal of Multidisciplinary
Studies (ISRGJMS), II (IV), 11-14.