Scribd
Upload
4 views7 pages

Go's Divergence from OOP Principles

Go is not considered an object-oriented programming language because it lacks classes and traditional inheritance, using structs and composition instead. It employs interfaces for polymorphism without a rigid class hierarchy, and visibility is determined by identifier capitalization rather than access modifiers. Go's design emphasizes simplicity and minimalism, diverging from classic OOP principles while still supporting some object-oriented concepts.

Uploaded by

vitea vitea
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views7 pages

Go's Divergence from OOP Principles

Go is not considered an object-oriented programming language because it lacks classes and traditional inheritance, using structs and composition instead. It employs interfaces for polymorphism without a rigid class hierarchy, and visibility is determined by identifier capitalization rather than access modifiers. Go's design emphasizes simplicity and minimalism, diverging from classic OOP principles while still supporting some object-oriented concepts.

Uploaded by

vitea vitea
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Why isn't Go considered an

object-oriented progamming
language ?

Rihab Sakhri
01

1. No Classes : In Go, there are no classes. Instead, Go uses structs to

define types, and methods can be associated with these structs.

Example :

ds cannot belong to a

c t , not a cla ss . M et ho
Here , Pe rs on is a stru
iat ed w ith th e stru ct.
class bu t ca n b e as soc

Rihab Sakhri
03

2. No Inheritance : Go does not support inheritance in the traditional

sense where one class can inherit properties and methods from

another class. Instead, it uses composition, where a struct can include

other structs.

Example :

n, but this is not inheritance

, Address is embedded in Perso


In this cas e
it's composition.

Rihab Sakhri
03

3. Interface Instead of Class Hierarchies : Go uses interfaces to

achieve polymorphism but does not have a rigid class hierarchy.

Any type that implements an interface’s methods implicitly satisfies

that interface.

Example :

a n b e p a ssed to the SayHello

ype th at h as a G re e t m et ho d c
Here, an y t a h iera rch y.


n , p ro m oting flex ibility w it hou t
funct io

Rihab Sakhri
04

4. No Access Modifiers : Go does not have traditional access

modifiers (public, private, protected). Instead, visibility is determined

by the first letter of the identifier: uppercase for public and lowercase

for private.

Example :

nnot be accessed outside of its

example, members of person ca


In this
package.



Rihab Sakhri
05

5. Simplicity and Minimalism : Go was designed with simplicity in

mind, preferring fewer abstractions and a more straightforward

approach to programming. This contrasts with many OOP languages

that embrace more complex features.



Rihab Sakhri
06

Conclusion :

While Go supports some object-oriented concepts like encapsulation

through structs and polymorphism through interfaces, it does so in

a way that diverges from traditional OOP principles. Go's focus on

simplicity, composition over inheritance, and the absence

of classes distinguishes it from classic OOP languages.



Rihab Sakhri

You might also like