Supreme Court Advance List 08-05-2025
Supreme Court Advance List 08-05-2025
7 SMW(Crl) No. 4/2021 IN RE POLICY STRATEGY FOR GRANT OF BAIL BY COURTS MOTION
PIL-W
Versus
VISHAKHA[IMPL], VANSHAJA
SHUKLA[IMPL], V. K.
BIJU[IMPL], SWATI
GHILDIYAL [IMPL],
SINDOORA VNL[IMPL],
SHUVODEEP ROY[IMPL],
SHREEKANT NEELAPPA
TERDAL[IMPL], SHOVAN
MISHRA[IMPL], SHIBASHISH
MISRA[IMPL], SARAD KUMAR
SINGHANIA[IMPL], SANJAI
KUMAR PATHAK[IMPL],
SAMIR ALI KHAN[IMPL],
SAMEER
ABHYANKAR[IMPL], SAHIL
TAGOTRA[IMPL], RASHMI
NANDAKUMAR[IMPL],
RAMESHWAR PRASAD
GOYAL[IMPL],
PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH
KUMAR[IMPL], PRASHANT
SINGH[IMPL],
PRASHANT SHRIKANT
KENJALE[IMPL], PARTHA
SIL[IMPL], PAI AMIT[IMPL],
P. I. JOSE[IMPL], NIDHI
MITTAL[IMPL], MUKESH
KUMAR MARORIA[IMPL],
MUKESH K.
GIRI[IMPL], MILIND
KUMAR[IMPL],
MADHUSMITA BORA[IMPL],
KUMAR MIHIR[IMPL], KEDAR
NATH TRIPATHY[IMPL],
KARAN SHARMA[IMPL],
KANHAIYA SINGHAL[IMPL],
K.
ENATOLI SEMA[IMPL],
HARSHAD V. HAMEED[IMPL],
GURMEET SINGH
MAKKER[IMPL], GUNTUR
PRAMOD KUMAR[IMPL],
GOPAL JHA[IMPL], ENAKSHI
MUKHOPADHYAY
SIDDHANTA[IMPL],
DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[IMPL],
DEVINA SEHGAL[IMPL],
DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[IMPL],
CHANCHAL KUMAR
GANGULI[IMPL], AVIJIT
MANI TRIPATHI[IMPL],
ASMITA SINGH[IMPL],
ASHWARYA SINHA[IMPL],
ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND
CO[IMPL], ARJUN
GARG[IMPL], ARAVINDH
S.[IMPL], APOORV
SHUKLA[IMPL], AMIT
SHARMA[IMPL],
AKSHAY GIRISH
RINGE[IMPL], AKSHAY
AMRITANSHU [IMPL],
ABHIMANYU TEWARI[IMPL],
AADITYA ANIRUDDHA
PANDE[IMPL], KSN &
CO.[IMPL]
SHIVANSH BHARATKUMAR
PANDYA [INT], MRIGANK
PRABHAKAR[INT]
IA No. 28005/2024 - APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No. 203408/2022 - APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No. 132106/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 63329/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 164210/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 203407/2022 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 269110/2024 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 27999/2024 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
10 C.A. No. 2105/2024 M/S COLMAR BEACH RESORT DCOSTA IVO MANUEL
XVII SIMON
Versus
GOA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ROHIT GUPTA[R-1], SRISHTI
AND ANR. AGNIHOTRI[R-2]
IA No. 36061/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 102552/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
IA No. 101624/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
IA No. 37424/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
IA No. 36060/2024 - STAY APPLICATION
11 SLP(C) No. 21353/2024 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
IV-C
Versus
JYOTSNA DOHALIA AND ANR. ROHIT AMIT
STHALEKAR[CAVEAT]
IA No. 272405/2024 - APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No. 249160/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 262252/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE
APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION
IA No. 262046/2024 - VACATING STAY
16 W.P.(C) No. 859/2013 JAFFAR ULLAH AND ANR. SATYA MITRA[P-1], JYOTI
PIL-W MENDIRATTA[P-2]
Versus
U.O.I AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1],
GURMEET SINGH
MAKKER[R-1], SANJAY
KUMAR VISEN[R-4]
SHUVODEEP ROY[IMPL]
IA No. 69132/2021 - APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No. 123931/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 69134/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
AFFIDAVIT
IA No. 2/2016 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 118501/2018 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 1/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ANNEXURES
16.1 Connected MOHAMMAD SALIMULLAH AND ANR. PRASHANT BHUSHAN
W.P.(C) No. 793/2017
X
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUVIDUTT M.S.[INT],
SOMIRAN SHARMA[IMPL],
PRANAV SACHDEVA[IMPL],
LAKSHMI RAMAN
SINGH[IMPL], KETAN
PAUL[R-2]
RAJEEV MAHESHWARANAND
ROY[IMPL],
APPLICANT-IN-
PERSON[IMPL],
ABHISHEK[IMPL]
SUBHASISH
BHOWMICK[INT], RESMITHA
R. CHANDRAN[INT],
PASHUPATHI NATH
RAZDAN[INT], MANOJ K.
MISHRA[INT],
ANJANA
CHANDRASHEKAR[INT]
IA No. 60248/2018 - APPLICATION FOR
IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 44982/2021 - APPLICATION FOR
PERMISSION
IA No. 44249/2021 - APPROPRIATE
ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
IA No. 14970/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 120367/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 44984/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
AFFIDAVIT
IA No. 87282/2017 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 97090/2017 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 132156/2017 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 130783/2017 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 112813/2019 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 90627/2017 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 107402/2017 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION
IA No. 88305/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 94489/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 93270/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 44245/2021 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 93032/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 89100/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 107396/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 120322/2018 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 89024/2017 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 46251/2021 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 97091/2017 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR
AND ARGUE IN PERSON
IA No. 60250/2018 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR
AND ARGUE IN PERSON
IA No. 100563/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
16.1 Connected AMTALA NAGARIK ADHIKAR RAKSHA SAMITY AND BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH
1 W.P.(C) No. 442/2018 ANR.
PIL-W
Versus
UNION OF INDIA
FOR
FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA
66802/2018
IA No. 66802/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
17 C.A. No. 877-878/2025 BADRI NARAIN SINGH AND ORS. SOMESH CHANDRA JHA
III-A
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SHASHANK SHEKHAR
SINGH[R-1], [R-2], GP. CAPT.
KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-3]
IA No. 19263/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 19262/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
21 SLP(C) No. 4702/2024 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS. MAHFOOZ AHSAN NAZKI,
XII-A GUNTUR PRAMOD
KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],
[P-4], [P-5]
Versus
P. GUNAVATHI AND ORS. S. THANANJAYAN[CAVEAT],
[R-1], ANNAM
VENKATESH[R-1]
FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.24641/2024-
EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE
IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
23 SLP(C) No. 10977/2024 SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LIMITED AND ORS. UPENDRA PRATAP SINGH
IV-C
Versus
KANHAIYALAL YADAV AMOL B. KARANDE[R-1],
[R-1]
IA No. 113494/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 113496/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 15402/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
24 SLP(C) No. 21357/2024 SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED AND ORS. PARIJAT KISHORE
IV-C
Versus
PREM KUMAR TIWARI SHASHWAT TRIPATHI [R-1]
IA No. 178633/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 178632/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 195323/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
30 Diary No. 166-2025 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RAJ BAHADUR YADAV, [P-1]
III
Versus
VARMORA GRANITO PVT. LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]
IN SLP(C) No. - 6512/2019,
IA No. 82844/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN
FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION
IA No. 443/2025 - RESTORATION
31.2 Connected BIOMASS ENERGY DEVELOERS ASSOCIATION SONALI JAIN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],
C.A. No. ANDOR AND ORS. [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8],
7860-7861/2013 [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12],
XVII [P-14], [P-15], [P-16], [P-17],
[P-18], [P-19],
[P-20], [P-21], [P-22], [P-23],
[P-24], [P-25], [P-26], [P-27]
Versus
ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY PRAMOD DAYAL[CAVEAT], G.
COMMISSION.. AND ORS. N. REDDY, EJAZ
MAQBOOL[CAVEAT], TARUN
GUPTA[R-3], [R-5], [R-6],
ANNAM VENKATESH[R-9],
SRAVAN KUMAR
KARANAM[R-24]
FOR ON IA 74243/2013
FOR ON IA 3/2015
31.5 Connected M/[Link] INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSO. AND ORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO,
C.A. No. 11340/2013 [CAVEAT]
XVII
Versus
ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTR. REG. COMMSN. . AND AG VERITAS LAW[R-1],
ORS. TARUN GUPTA[R-2],
NISHANT[R-2], [R-4], [R-6],
MAHFOOZ AHSAN
NAZKI[R-7]
31.7 Connected BIOMASS ENERGY DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATIONS AND SONALI JAIN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],
C.A. No. 11333/2013 ORS. [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8],
XVII [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12],
[P-14], [P-15], [P-16], [P-17],
[P-18], [P-19],
[P-20], [P-21], [P-22], [P-23],
[P-24], [P-25], [P-26], [P-27]
Versus
A.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMM. AND ORS. AG VERITAS LAW[R-1],
TARUN GUPTA[R-3], [R-5],
[R-6]
FOR ON IA 74287/2013
FOR ON IA 2/2015
31.8 Connected THE SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASS. AND ORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO
C.A. No. 11337/2013
XVII
Versus
A.P ELECTRICITY REG. COMM. AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL[CAVEAT],
AG VERITAS LAW[R-1],
ANNAM VENKATESH[R-3],
[R-5], TARUN GUPTA[R-2],
[R-4], [R-6], [R-6], MAHFOOZ
AHSAN NAZKI[R-7],
HITENDRA NATH
RATH[R-8]
31.9 Connected TRANSMISSION CORP. OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD. NISHANT[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]
C.A. No. 10448/2014 AND ORS.
XVII
Versus
M/S SLS POWER LTD AND ORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO, TATINI
BASU, , PRAMOD DAYAL,
ABHIJIT SENGUPTA, SONALI
JAIN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],
[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],
[R-10], [R-11],
[R-12], [R-13], [R-15], [R-16],
[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20],
[R-21], [R-22], [R-23], [R-24],
[R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],
[R-54], [R-55],
[R-56], [R-57], [R-61]
FOR [Impleadment] ON IA 2/2014
IA No. 2/2014 - Impleadment
31.1 Connected BIOMASS ENERGY DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION AND SONALI JAIN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],
1 C.A. No. 13832/2015 ORS. [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8],
XVII [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12],
[P-13], [P-14], [P-15], [P-16],
[P-17], [P-18],
[P-19], [P-20], [P-21]
Versus
ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY AG VERITAS LAW[R-1],
COMMISSION AND ORS. NISHANT[R-2], TARUN
GUPTA[R-3], [R-5], SRAVAN
KUMAR KARANAM[R-4],
SOMANADRI GOUD
KATAM[R-8]
NEW DELHI
24-04-2025 12:13:19
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
The prevalence of diverse IA applications reveals a complex procedural landscape where parties seek various legal remedies, such as permissions, exemptions, and directions. It highlights both the adaptability required in litigation strategies and the court’s role in responding to these varied procedural requests .
The procedural challenges observed include multiple applications for exemptions from filing certain documents and applications for permissions to file various documents. For instance, there are numerous applications for exemptions from filing copies of impugned judgments, indicating challenges in meeting document filing requirements .
The frequency of exemption applications suggests challenges in complying with procedural requirements or difficulties in gathering necessary documentation. It implies a need for flexibility in legal processes or potential systemic inefficiencies that necessitate routine exemptions .
Connected cases shape legal discourse by facilitating comprehensive examinations of related legal issues within a unified framework. This allows the court to address cases with similar legal questions together, promoting consistency and coherence in legal reasoning .
The list reflects the diversity by encompassing a range of legal domains, including criminal and civil appeals, public interest litigations, and constitutional matters. This includes cases involving state governments, policy strategies for bail, and electricity regulatory commissions, highlighting the broad scope of legal issues addressed by the court .
Stay orders are significant as they temporarily halt judicial proceedings or the enforcement of judgments, preventing potential irreversible actions until a full evaluation can be conducted. Many cases listed involve stay applications, demonstrating their importance in maintaining the status quo pending further court consideration .
The intervention or impleadment process allows additional parties or agents to enter the legal proceedings, which can potentially introduce new evidence or perspectives, thus impacting the direction and complexity of the cases. For example, there are multiple intervention/impleadment applications across various cases, indicating that third-party interests or new information are being considered by the court .
Legal representation plays a crucial role in navigating complex legal frameworks, as evidenced by the involvement of numerous advocates for petitioners and respondents. This highlights the adversarial nature of the proceedings and the necessity of expert legal guidance to advocate for clients’ interests .
Scheduling cases for admission allows for the efficient allocation of court time and resources by determining which cases are ready for a full hearing. This impacts the timeline as only cases deemed suitable proceed, while others may require further documentation or procedural clarifications .
The inclusion of PILs indicates the court’s role in addressing societal and policy issues beyond individual legal disputes. It prioritizes cases impacting broader public welfare, reflecting the court’s function in promoting justice and accountability at a systemic level .