0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views1 page

Civil Defamation Principles Explained

The document contains a series of answers to legal questions, indicating principles of civil defamation, liability, and duty of care. It discusses various legal concepts such as absolute liability, foreseeability of injury, and the distinction between invitation to offer and acceptance. Each answer references specific legal principles and cases relevant to the questions posed.

Uploaded by

amayasharma.3105
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views1 page

Civil Defamation Principles Explained

The document contains a series of answers to legal questions, indicating principles of civil defamation, liability, and duty of care. It discusses various legal concepts such as absolute liability, foreseeability of injury, and the distinction between invitation to offer and acceptance. Each answer references specific legal principles and cases relevant to the questions posed.

Uploaded by

amayasharma.3105
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

4

60. (a)

61. (d)

62. (b)

63. (b)

64. (d)

65. (c)

66. (a)

67. (d)

68. (a)

69. (c)

70. (a)

71. (a) The principle is of civil defamation and as such does not require intention,
therefore publication is sufficient to constitute defamation.

72. (b) As per the principle of absolute Liability, UCIL is liable to the entire extent.

73. (d) In the facts it is given the partnership ends. After that the transactions are
independent and in personal capacity.

74. (a) (As per author the answer is incorrect as the pregnant woman’s injury was not
foreseeable, however stick to official key.)

75. (d) Toleration would amount to invitation. Since he is aware that there are people
using the premises as a thoroughfare, he should have taken more care.

76. (c) The moment M boarded the bus he became a passenger and the driver owes duty of
care to all passengers.

77. (a) As per the principle legislation is a prerogative of the legislature and not the court.

78. (b) Here the case is of invitation to offer as he just tells the price he is willing to sell at,
not that he agrees to sell.

You might also like