Non-Parametric Statistical Tests
Non-Parametric Statistical Tests
|
dkotribution. Dísad vartages o on- parametric
They don4 make any arumption tects
o
This ic unlike dhe tade we looked
previouly uohich
on gctimadinq or
were
eting
pcued
hypolhasid
ome
labourouc
thee der may be
for large vampler.
about one or more popu farlion
parameters DeN-TEST (Taet 40c randemne
Suppase , [Link] l an erdered
Advandaqet
tec
They allow
Non-parametric
ample
yoa
1rom
as
a conlinuous dalibution f
wlww w w w wlw w w lL and
Tat ue are
Hypothacic,
Ho, bla i randem.
H,Datq i n random. Ahen II,...nare Independent
bernoulli random variable with wouldimprove 1be appearance
parameer
hypolhasis
P4lm) and co tho null |mentlly challenged gd.1og"
i equivalent to stating celecded at ranom "re ceired
|Ahal p- Ya.
pecial iatructor in Pe ronal
Ihecores oblained are
heloo
4,5 s, 6, ,G/j0, 7, 06
The dast totistics qor
wich to knos 1 we can
gn 1et N the, median eor p
conclude that
etherdhe
Dr the ober ved no.
cbserved no 0
iqs| 4he populariDn neselh ith
(4)
e
The noure (-)
he 59n. |asrme hic sample to bave been
aHlernotive draun diterer K jrom 6
hypolhers deleimine ohich
|here {ect olidt ice is apprepriote
Aasumption;
|na Gven -ler .any the oll own | Dola i cortinuour gq
)
Hypotherkj
Ho iMm=5K
i ,, m t5
H, p
pl-) Test ctatistis;
Care;
A
The
coueu
Gjiciendly mal no.
a rejedion Ho.
) T+ or
Shaller
Sbecuion rule j
e
T whchever vrlcenty
)
rejecl
teld at rticr Ahe no
)signs
p(x) DD25
Distri buton
kle rejecd Ho
The est claliclis 0rll 4ollouw a
binormial bictibtion Concluion ;
The median ks no 5 Only
ue
DecÁsiDn Rule
nDrmal
We reied Ho th probdbilrty
observinq fPWer obsprvtion
. K or
|ernatively
We can uSe normal approx to istrueted
H was beneficial
Sin Aest paced d ata
hen dhe dala do be ana lyzed Zo:2 - (o 5 xI)
conotc obervations in n atched 051 ngnec
|
sign det may be employed to te rant
Silcoxon
.11 l6t Rejed Ho
the hypolhers hat the' median
derEnce
Hypolheric ;=
o. WILCOXON RANKED SIGN TEST
This is ured to Aest a null bypotha
Ho , m
o populorlion mean when nerher
plt:) plt *-) nor t z an appropriae dest
4 we hav e a cmall cample
Example a nc30 qom a po pulalion dhal u
A dendal rerearch team oiched kno wn to be
groly non -nof molly
to knoo
brucdo heir
deachi09 people hoo to | drbuted and cenral
totlh ould ha thearem í not app licable,
ld
|benericial. The fo lleuing dotachout ctatistier is rulbd out
oral hygne GCorR nvbjecte b7he etotkrtia ic n appropriate
recei ving oral hygqåne inglruclionc(x)|because be campled population
and t9 ubjeettafer receiving oral |dopr n4ficiently PProximmte
hyqine instructions (Y). A loo ceore a nor mal dctribuho,
|ypclhecie,
, mmy
|
ahe
4he
daa
more oppropr iale procedure t
wilcox on qned rank ted
|2)Ho, uo
614
13)Ho, u uo V 4 T+ 1-21
7-42
3
10
Tect
(chotícdiac 7.5
Procedure,
)Subdrad the hupot hesies
mean do69
G56
dix-o
from each 1he obrer vation xto 598 O43
'oain di - x-Ho.
Lf an y Xi K
O that di =o,
equal todhe hegn - ag
eliminale that di 5-89
ftom dhe calculai
onxs and reduce
n 2
5-14 o34
3)Rankaccordingly
the ucable di 5-17
from the
Smallect to he largett
a Ke
rRgord toAhe ign
2) Asciqn each rak {he iqn
withoul
(ldl) od m wich do know
the bas
we can conclude
thir dot a 4hal the
d ihel pbpulalion
i dyferP ron
wieldecl hal rank.
meon 5
+)find T+ 4he Cun he rankr urh
Hypotheris)
HoW=5-05
and T the cunm the H, t5 05
rank wHh -Ve ign. |2. Ted laic
When we have 2-sided altern ative 3.
beotion Rulei
hypotheis eidher
Sicient4, cmall pject to
Ho
eject
The Tluo,^
dact clotkeic s T, or whicheve T<25
I-
Smaller. T-34
is
hen Ho; o, we expet our TET-34
cample toyielada larqe value 4 Stotitical decioon ,
, when
4 drve 4 VHicienl
T+ Dll Cae arejpcion
he
mall valuo
Ho and
aHernative hypothesis
5.
34 >Q5
We fail
Concluri on,
to reject Ho.
T
0
Decicion
T,
Rule.
Tn j
Tn,d.
From example 4)
,
Example 5.
Weail to reert Ho and concl ude Leveld meral head corer jr
that the pop-mean is not di from hiqhssch b oy9Yen ar
g o5.
|ban: 35196,27,a, 27,36, 23, 25
Rural: 29,50, 49, 2R A2, 41, 431
MEDIN TEST
Ndest) 60 1, 45,k i3326 46) 5
|hu is non- parametric pro cedure 3 &t, Gl,25, 35. 4
hat will be ued to tee the null
belermine ir{he mediqn the
hypothei that a inde pendent samplecrural menlal heaHh rore and urban
have been drawn
Trom populationc mental healh sore are eq ual.
pith the came median
Median
Urhqn
3. Ho, Mx M BCD
,, Mx > My Rs(1a1)-xe)]°
Ho, Mx My 19x9x4 +.
as(s4-14)
33510
&&X4900
The tect etatitias will be a ehi-cquore 33516
0 e5 -3SI +
becii on Rule + 094 3-814
rejecd to
oboervoton ollhn obove and belbuo The median tel dogc mat make qull
he common reqon and Cum marisp the |0SP all {he inormation Prerenl in
ort heir
dor at all they
i
medans
continuou .|
a
we
Ho;
are
Mx Mc H,
Aeting
valuo
M« > My
T
Ha
HM
o cample
[Link]
15
5
obrer vations-from he 2
value 156
pepulorlion 163
The choice u hich Uampler we 153 b5
label Xis arbitrary 1Ç.7
13 7
Decision Rule 153 16.
moder
d etri bution a, brh m and n |cu mul ot ve dherlribution
large
can be,
>s),dhe Ho a qreot erent hen funhon
wel
PProx by q normal distri bution
(
hyptheris is rejeted.
The diere nce betoeen
and fs k) s
he null
(x)
me as ured bythe
F
s, -n,(n tha1l) |Hitics b ohich the
9reates- verica dican ce hn
ts Ca) and F()
Aatumpianc
from exom ple , 3 Sample was randomly
2) Dlg is condinuous
selected
ypolheci
Ho Fe (x)= Al) 7
145-J95
N325
&C
o.3&89o-5
0.4723 |0-33 .370|0lc
|3 0.63g9
|
308 5lo-b6o4
|.138
ror
ep
orervations
which it tied.
Q, the ranks assigned
in eadh be k
32co 1922 |:1 056501547qTp
B4a2slo-7718 o7486 D.02 42
ave dded cFparortely give
Ri-CK rankcum)
S4I3| cgu
32o. 88691- 17
Aep 8; Ahe test statistics is
Ahen qiven q¢
1110228
n(n+1)
? - d(nt) ,
tlo bata is normally distibuted
H. Data k not normally distiburled where K" no. campler
Reject Ho4
no o b«ervation in
the ihsaMple
n- np, ober vatiorn i
all camples
dum rank in the
h sauple.
becision Rule:
D0.(541 hen
or
here
4ewer
are 3Lample and 5
obcer vations in each sampl,
O1547 40.a2)
|he gnyicance the computed )
We qail to rejec te dete r mined by
|s
kruskal Walls
bato is nor mall disributed. hable and we rp jed He if
H Reied
KRuC RAL-ALLS KWn,ans, K
TEST.
ver, when there are more than
Ho u e
Ths is red uohen {he Gumpons
|5Dbrervatianc ln one or more
underlyi pg q one- way ANova lcRb) Hhp camples or more tban 3 qrps
o0
|ae not metie Ahe populionc 4rm Hhen Ho ol| be ejeted iY
which he camplar have begn draon
are not notmally distriburled wrth
equal oriancec
|The on ead ion
|Ascumptians n Kruckal dallae tecl Hime o a cert ain timulus was ,2dng
Sampla are candomly celected. |ftudier in 3 uamplef
erperimental
bata is continuous
|animale omple ce Ved ar cortrol 3
8 bala ic Meqsurpd on atl east an |»hile the nimole in oMple 1 uere
ordinal scal e
tr eated wrlh drug A and hae in
3 (n) aa
nlnt) 3
3+ a-
Reject Ho
H> KNaAitit b 25 56
3
>56923.
B
3
123 Te-6x13) 5
-o--
9-8t6. Ho;,=da=ts
., A, +ta?ta
4- 846 >5-69a3
- he
We rejec
4hree compler der
to
0iven 4or e
LHupthecis.
RCBb.
. [Link]>6.22
e reied
:. The models
H.
are not preerre
equally
Va,,itj
SPEARMÄN RAN CORRE LATIon K
Decision Rule
) The sgmple bave been
randomly celected.
Rejet to ifi 12) Variable interert ic
Cominuour
|3)Dorta ir m arured en atloas
Exe mple 4 erdi nal scale
|o
electricdl cdimulplore mulually
physieal 1hergplts
were acked o yince pendent
rank the ctimulators ordor in H, xand qre not
firc preference .e
wich toknow | 8.) Ho; xand m u{ually are
we conclude ha the mod e ls are independent So
Py
H, There is a endane
preferedequally
|> ho qe valuer *and
0)Ho; arge valuer bepalred 4 15
543 169
Qndy Qre mutually
53 I7 53 a 15
,There
ovaluec b
is dendancy dor lqrgd
d0 be Paired
55
68 14
8 67
UHh Gmall valuer y G5 1
R348
Tac ctalhciac
Rseceduce
1) Rankthe valuer xTom
Hi Payo.
4 to n.
|0)Rank the Valuer (4 rom n (n)
.'yx
1 to n.
Reed Ho
|4) Compute d or each pai Payl> Pn,a.
obrervations by subdracting > Pao,o-o5
fank
1om >0-316
di Rt-R)tank
t) Square each di and com pute a342
20(20-i)
5) Compute the cogfficlem :-O-7Goq
Py -- @d
n(n-)
O.7Goq> 8189 o
Decision Rule.
We reject Ho.
:. EEG output is in
verely
correlated orh age.
CoNCORDENCE
KENDÀLL TEST OF
Fxample 10, hs used uhen we bich to
tudy 1he relclionchip |Aesl the hypolheir that a
between atk and £EG,dalo oere potlern indicaling adendancy
collected on 20 ubjeck
iuon the | 3or more 3roup4 to 0gree
|aper a0 and e0. The inverlqrtur |re c\gnicand.
|Licher to knpb ean be 42e. Cog Eordancetorl
Concluded lha hic regorming pthete,
par ticular |a 0i9ncance
)
level
EEG orp ic inveksely Correlaledwe cay 4hal a pattern
wth dye
indicating tendoncy {or people
Age(x) EEG d Ao 0greeebi.
dqgeoment9nficant
1515-13 |1evel ettenelontt
q5 11
G9
he hypherir ic 9iven au42
Ho, The 5els rank do
nol indi
19 icatfe93can
651 level Ceacante.
H, 7he so ran k exhibrt
o ignii(anl level of
338 0 2 Dg reememt
359 85 1G
|Tect rlatia
744
68 10 Kn (nt)
4a 19
ohere:
44 1S1 13 R=Sum ran ks arsigned
an teM
n No. tens ranked.
K N, rple assigning G 5 3
ranks 5
Ditribution: a Kendal|Concardante
Peryorm
tert
reject Ho
>-pn. >1,o.05
avple
Cuppose G people
|Varieier
ranked & dit
wine As rhoun bel ow:
X -3n[kn1
Knln)
R
3
5 atLs3) - 3x6(Bxa)
3x 8 X9
We reject
Kn(nti)
H f
| uay
which doec not conform to
e <Cale
Chunt dota
he
|afumpion mae tertr te
> .0G This leaves us wrlh the
optin
Chi Sguare tet
-
Esouple a
|hreeexecuive 0CoMpany rankel becid ion rule
|4he perofmance_ rondom sample We re,jec Ho g
8 manqgers. lheir fanks are
|
9Yen as; M
|4dhquareect
3 )
Tedners
|) Chi-suore
Chi-square Hest
leu for independened
homegene
The dietribtion ís binomial
Geodeescpded Ho
qoodnecr
example. whether or nol a cample
observed yaluec ome OG 79|
V=0-1-9
D
rondomvarioble is compatible H
oth the hypctheis hat H war D.1S43 4 we
draonrom poPularion valuer
thal normall
is ditributed. INe rejec Ho iyi 9:n:
The proce dure for reachin9 a X>v,r
No Ne
rejed
parom
valuer in each Coleqory.
0.1544 59l vadio
eter
estimate
iAVentory planning and
Ocacionallu a cylin der wil be Cotrolpurpose, Crap hemico eompu
He
ngnficonce
|1he no
ao ha
the
o
(PA
war to tert at 5% level op oco)
hol
bin om ial
boxey
diribution
o
|a4
34-a5S
2s s-87
|31 -38 S
doy
131lnd
le
212
|No
in boxe oberved 4 46
39 035Y 49 584
0.1135 21, 15
12 20 2
3 4100552 42
4 0.23 22iai7451
5
0.0op36
P ao00
(o-eE
O0107 ExampleS
Aet sahca
qu
Gurvey wau
done
do doterm ine
ction
on htel
A second
wil| return.
|whelher Ahey
all rapondet
|2ution was ark ed were
|ho 1hal hey
indcoted
fo reurn These
n likely
aked do indi ce
1quert wpre
Hhe Prtmor feDn forheir
|eponsereorm a hypelherh
|l 5% level gnyiconce
Holel
Golden Palm Palo
Feedloack Palm RoyalePincesd lo
Price 7 37 6
Locaticr 60
Room 5 31
I3 8
Olhes
Total 33
(o-e)?
Chquare Jeloriocepelenc
Concider a coigene talble consitird
e rejet b
a variables lax2 toble) >c,ocs
variable has R col egorees X là.592
e while oathe e cond vGriable har
Ccategories
|e wchtoeel lbe bypolhecf
abl hp associadion hese f0-E)°/
Huoo variobler. 2331529 2307 4
1f
|This hypolbess can be claled as 823 5
810.2353
-CR3t
|e feect. Ho
|27,10
50595 L5.991
al40 7 12. 590.
Ne redt Ho.
We fail to
fropor ionr
reje ct He
workesr rated
The hole! and
feedback have
an aSpciio satisfa dory are equal
hsgdatye
Sometimes We hoogasaidy
iteresled Tn
re
hypalheiang dhe equalkly
two ropordionc bwn
variabler which are
he categorised.
ptocedure remain same a
tast for
|independente excepl hypehec alement
Example E
Consider
peformance workers
based on level
educaion 3jven
as follous,
Educational level.
Ao hghHgh shomplek
<SchoolN conmpl high schTO
Rding Satyaty
Not cai
Q5
Total 80
A 5Y level o iqni
conce
determine 1here is homcqenerty
in Aerms o [Link]
acrasS
|levels educ ation
Ho, Proporti ons Df workers roted
Sat nsfa ctory ore eaqual acracr
H. , digerent
PrepDrti
fatioory
educotion
ons
worke2 rated
are not equl
lereks
(o- E)
v:(r-0cc-)
e rect Ho ,
e-E)cl
G3 O.75
G5 7 0 3511
O8333
6D545
X5 D595