0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views3 pages

Inboard Braking System Design for ATVs

The document presents a project on the design and implementation of an inboard braking system for automobiles, specifically for all-terrain vehicles. It details the advantages of this system, including weight reduction and improved braking efficiency, while also discussing the design, manufacturing process, and calculations involved. The project concludes that the inboard braking system is cost-effective and enhances vehicle performance by reducing unsprung weight.

Uploaded by

imtiazshaikh211
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views3 pages

Inboard Braking System Design for ATVs

The document presents a project on the design and implementation of an inboard braking system for automobiles, specifically for all-terrain vehicles. It details the advantages of this system, including weight reduction and improved braking efficiency, while also discussing the design, manufacturing process, and calculations involved. The project concludes that the inboard braking system is cost-effective and enhances vehicle performance by reducing unsprung weight.

Uploaded by

imtiazshaikh211
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol.

6, Issue 02, 2018 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613

Inboard Braking System for Automobiles


Prof. K.B. Kshirsagar1 Mr. Shubham Ghatge2 Mr. Akhilesh Dhone3 Ms. Vaishnavi Thakare4
Ms Ashwini Jadhav5
1
Assistant Professor 2,3,4,5BE Student
1,2,3,4,5
Department of Mechanical Engineering
1,2,3,4,5
DIT, Pimpri, Pune, India
Abstract— As today’s passenger vehicles are implemented
D. Calliper Front
with 3 rotor braking system (i.e. inboard braking) in order to
increase the overall braking performance of the vehicle. The F = P*A = (9.642*3.14*322)/4 = 7750.63N
basic motive of this project is to design an inboard braking Fb = u*F = (0.4*7750.63) = 3100.25 N
for an All-Terrain Vehicle. This concept could be used to Torque = Fb* effective radius = 3100.25*0.068=210.817 Nm
provide direct locking to the gearbox output shaft. This E. Rear Calliper
concept has various advantages and several disadvantages
which are to be considered during the design of this braking F = P*A = (9.642*(3.14/4)*22 2*2 = 7326.7629N
Fb = u*F =7326.76*0.4 = 2930.70 N
system. Also the mounting positions of the braking
Torque = Fb* effective radius = 2930.70*0.068 = 199.28 N
components and various vehicles using such types of braking
system practically are showcased in this report. F. Static Weight Distribution
Key words: Inboard Braking, Weight Reduction FF * 52 =230 *9.81 *24.32 = FF = 1055.25 N
Objective: To increase the braking overall efficiency. Fr * 52 = 230*9.81*27.68 = Fr = 1201.04 N
 To maintain the overall weight of the complete vehicle FF = [1055.25/(230*9.81)]*100 = 46.76 %
to an optimal level, as weight is of prime importance for Fr = [1201.04/(230*9.81)]*100 = 53.23%
this vehicle to sustain in different terrain.
 To promote Reliable and sustainable braking. G. Dynamic Weight Disribution
 To Maintenance free and low overall operating cost FRONT WHEEL = FF = uwf =[uw(l2+hu)/L]
[0.8*230*9.81(24.32 + (0.8*19.12)/52] = 1375.1627 N
I. INTRODUCTION REAR WHEEL = Fr = uwr =[uw(l2-hu)/L]
[0.8*230*9.81(27.68 - (0.8*19.12)/52] = 429.877N
An inboard braking system is an automobile technology
FF + Fr = 230*9.81= Fr = 881.2 N
wherein the disc brakes are mounted on the chassis of the
FF = [1375.16/(230*9.81)]*100 = 60.94 %
vehicle, rather than directly on the wheel hubs. Inboard
Fr = [881.2/(230*9.81)]*100 = 39.05%
brakes are fitted to a driven axle of the car, as they require a
drive shaft to link the wheel to the brake. Most have thus been H. Stopping Distance
used for rear-wheel drive cars, although four-wheel drive and RA = ƍ/2 CD AF V2 = [1.2*0.44*0.96*11.112]/2 =Cae V2
some front-wheel drives have also used them. A rare few rear RA = 31.286
wheel drive racing cars (e.g., the Lotus 72) have also used Cae = 0.25344 V2
inboard front discs, accepting the need to provide a drive shaft S = [W/2gCae] ln (1 + ((Cae2)/µw+frwcosƟs ± Wsin Ɵ)]
to gain the unsprung weight and braking torque advantages. S=[230*9.81/2*9.81*0.25)
Inboard brakes for early racing cars have rarely used drum ln[1+((0.2534*11.112)/(0.8*230*9.81 + 0.12*230*9.81cos
brakes, although nearly all inboard brakes date from the disc Ɵ))
brake era. S= 6.787 m
STOPPPING TIME = t = d/v = 6.787/11.11 = 0.6108
II. CALCULATION STOPPPING TIME = t1 + reaction time
A. Required =.6108 + 1.5 =2.11 sec0
FRONT WHEEL = FF = uwf =[uw(l2+hu)/L] I. Thermal Calculation
[0.8*230*9.81(24.32 + (0.8*19.12)/52] = 1375.1627 N Maximum Speed: 60 km/hr = 16.66 km/sec
TORQUE=(FF/2)*r=[(1375.162*11*0.96*0.0252)/2 Kinetic Energy = ½ mv2 = ½ * 230* 16.662 = 31944.44 J
=184.42 Nm Total Kinetic Energy = Heat generated during breaking =
REAR WHEEL = Fr = uwr =[uw(l2-hu)/L] 31944.44J
[0.8*230*9.81(27.68 - (0.8*19.12)/52] = 429.877N Area of rubbing surface = π/4(Do2-Di2)
TORQUE = FR * r = 429.87 *11*0.96*0.0254 = 115.30 N = π/4 (0.1592 – 0.1122) = 9.998*10-3 m 2
B. Generated Heat Flux = (Heat Generated/second*rubbing area)
(31944/2.28*0.01999) = 709911.94 w/m2
TMC = 19.05mm
Weight transfer due to a brake on the front axle at a speed of
Pedal Ratio = 7:1
40- 0 km/h
Driver Force = 40*9.81 = 392.4
Wt = (av/g)*(hcg/wg) = (14.56)*(19.12/230)*11.11 = 13.44
Pedal Force = 2746.8 N
N
C. TMC Pressure VF Weight transfer front axle
P = F/A =9.642 N/mm2 Vf d = vf +w r = 1491.79 +13.44 = 1505.23 N

All rights reserved by [Link] 1433


Inboard Braking System for Automobiles
(IJSRD/Vol. 6/Issue 02/2018/390)

Vf d =(1505.23/9.81) = 153.43 kg

III. DESIGN PHASE


 The braking system design consists of a master cylinder
hydraulic lines and 3 calliper setup.
 The hydraulic oil is the working medium in this system.
 The conventional 4 rotor and calliper system is modified
to use 3 rotor and calliper system. The braking of the
drive shaft automatically brakes the driven wheels.
 The design phase included designing of the braking rotor
and the the flange on which the rotor will be mounted. Fig. 1.3: Flange structural ansys result (for deformation)
The rotor of outer diameter 160 mm and a pcd of 60 mm
was designed considering the packaging space as well as
the other related calculations. This rotor was given
elongated circular slots for the purpose of weight
reduction and effective heat distribution.
 The material of AISI 410 was selected for the rotor and
aluminium 7 series was used for manufacturing the
flange.
 The flange was given a through hole of 30 mm in
diameter from its centre for mounting the flange on the
third shaft of the gearbox. The flange too has a pcd of Fig. 1.4: Rotor structural ansys result(for deformation)
60mm so that the rotor can be mounted on it by bolting.
 The flange and the third shaft are having spline meshing
arrange with a circlip for the locking purpose. The flange
has 18 internal spline which mesh with the external
spline on the third shaft.
 A factor of safety of more than 1 was the minimum
requirement for the fail proof operation of the system.

Fig. 1.5: Flange structural ansys result (for stress)

Fig. 1.1: (Inboard flange)

Fig. 1.6: Rotor structural ansys result (for stress)

Fig. 1.2: (Rotor) Fig. 1.6: Rotor thermal ansys result

All rights reserved by [Link] 1434


Inboard Braking System for Automobiles
(IJSRD/Vol. 6/Issue 02/2018/390)

IV. MANUFACTURING PHASE


 The manufacturing ease was also accounted for and
hence the design was kept as simple as possible.
 Manufacturing phase consisted of manufacturing the
rotor and flange.
 The rotor material of ss410 was in the form of a 5 mm
thick plate.
 He plate was laser cut to get the required shape of the
rotor.
 After the rotor was laser cut, induction hardening was
performed on it to harden the material so that the rotor
does not fail under strong brake calliper bite.
 The plate was then surface finished by 0.5 mm on both
the sides.
 This ensured a flat and smooth surface of the brake rotor.
 The flange was in the form of a block of 15 mm thickness
and dimensions (80*80)
 The flange was manufactured by the vertical machining
centre machine.
 After the vmc process the flange was given internal
splines (18) by the slotting machine.
 This flange was later reduced to a thickness of 13 mm by
surface finishing.

V. CONCLUSION
 This project concludes that for the braking in an off road
buggy use of hydraulic oil o dot 3 has been used.
 The project concludes that the hydraulic pressure is equal
in all directions and obeys the Pascal law.
 This project concludes that by using inboard braking
significant amount of weight reduction is achieved in the
unsprung masses of the vehicle and that enhances the
performance of the vehicle.
 The project also concludes that by using inboard braking
the cost effective braking system is achieved as only 3
callipers are used instead of the conventional 4 calliper
setup.

REFERENCE
[1] [Link]
_pp2322-[Link]
[2] [Link]
[3] [Link]
rear-brakes
[4] [Link]
[5] [Link]

All rights reserved by [Link] 1435

Common questions

Powered by AI

Static weight distribution in inboard braking systems refers to the proportional allocation of vehicle weight on each axle when the vehicle is stationary, typically dictated by the vehicle's center of gravity and design attributes. In contrast, dynamic weight distribution changes with vehicle movement, influenced by acceleration, braking, road conditions, and cornering forces. Inboard braking systems can affect these distributions by altering torque and force transmission dynamics. Factors including vehicle speed, axle load, and suspension characteristics also contribute to these variations .

An inboard braking system can be more cost-effective compared to traditional systems as it employs fewer components, such as utilizing a 3-rotor and caliper setup instead of a conventional 4-caliper system. This reduction in parts not only decreases initial material costs but also simplifies the maintenance process, potentially extending component life and reducing operational expenses. However, the specialized design and manufacturing requirements may complicate initial production, necessitating a careful cost-benefit analysis to determine economic viability on a case-by-case basis .

Thermal management is crucial for inboard braking systems as it affects braking efficiency and component longevity. In this design, thermal management is addressed through the use of materials like AISI 410 for the brake rotor and aluminum for the flange, which offer good thermal conductivity characteristics. The design includes elongated circular slots on the rotor for effective heat distribution, which helps manage the temperatures generated during brake application, thereby preventing overheating and ensuring consistent performance .

The design of an inboard braking system contributes to improved weight distribution by reducing unsprung mass, moving weight more centrally within the vehicle. This leads to better handling and stability due to an optimal balance between the vehicle's sprung and unsprung mass. By keeping the braking system on the chassis rather than the wheel hubs, the vehicle benefits from more evenly distributed forces, enhancing both performance and efficiency .

Implementing an inboard braking system in a front-wheel drive vehicle presents challenges such as accommodating additional components required for drive shaft connections, which complicates the drivetrain setup. Ensuring effective heat dissipation from the brakes while managing torsional stresses on drive shafts and integrating them with existing transmission systems are critical issues. Additionally, design modifications might be required to maintain the vehicle's balance due to changes in the weight distribution caused by centralizing more mass .

The key materials used in the construction of the brake rotor in an inboard braking system are AISI 410 for its durability and resistance to temperature-induced wear, and the flange is made from aluminum 7 series, chosen for its lightweight properties and strength. These materials balance the need for a durable braking surface with the requirement to reduce overall vehicle weight, contributing to enhanced performance and handling .

During the design phase of an inboard braking system, considerations include the optimal placement of components to ensure effective weight distribution, material selection to balance durability with lightness, and the integration with existing drivetrain components like the gearbox output shaft. Design must also account for heat dissipation through effective thermal management of the brake rotors, as well as the manufacturing feasibility of complex component shapes and configurations. This phase should also ensure that the system maintains a factor of safety exceeding one for reliable performance under stress .

Inboard braking systems potentially reduce vehicle maintenance requirements by minimizing the exposure of braking components to harsh conditions near the wheel hubs, thus reducing wear and tear. Their integration into the vehicle's frame can lead to improved operational longevity due to fewer components being subject to intense handling and environmental stress. Maintenance might be more streamlined since the system has fewer interfaces with wheel hubs, leading to lower long-term repair costs and enhancing the vehicle’s overall reliability .

In the context of inboard braking systems, unsprung weight reduction is achieved by mounting the brake discs on the vehicle frame instead of the wheel hubs, lowering the unsprung component of the vehicle mass. This reduction in unsprung weight enhances the vehicle's suspension effectiveness, allowing quicker response to road irregularities and improving cornering grip and overall handling dynamics. The implications on vehicle performance include smoother ride quality, increased traction and braking efficiency, and reduced tire wear, facilitating better control and safety during operation, especially in challenging terrains .

The primary advantages of an inboard braking system include enhanced braking performance due to reduced unsprung weight and potentially improved braking torque . This system keeps the brakes closer to the vehicle's center, improving weight distribution and handling. However, challenges include complexity in design and maintenance due to the requirement of a drive shaft linking the wheel to the brake. Additionally, it may not be suitable for all types of vehicles and requires careful consideration of component mounting .

You might also like