0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views5 pages

Understanding Connected Discourse Techniques

The document outlines various concepts related to connected discourse, coherence, cohesion, and techniques for selecting and organizing information in writing. It discusses the importance of transitional words, brainstorming methods, patterns of development, and critical reading strategies. Additionally, it provides guidance on forming evaluative statements and claims in a text, including the structure of an evaluative outline essay.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views5 pages

Understanding Connected Discourse Techniques

The document outlines various concepts related to connected discourse, coherence, cohesion, and techniques for selecting and organizing information in writing. It discusses the importance of transitional words, brainstorming methods, patterns of development, and critical reading strategies. Additionally, it provides guidance on forming evaluative statements and claims in a text, including the structure of an evaluative outline essay.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RWS – DAY 1 MIDTERMS 8.

to indicate logical relationship: because,


TEXT AS A CONNECTED DISCOURSE therefore, thus, for this reason, hence, if,
TEXT DISCOURSE otherwise, as a result, accordingly
- derived from - c from Latin
Latin word: word: discursus PARALLELISM
texere – to – conversation - shows equal grammatical structure or
weave speech pattern to clearly express ideas which are
- large unit of - utterance, talk, given in a series
written language speech,
- group of ideas conversation
1. Balanced use of words
put together to - expression and
a. Faulty Parallelism: My friend is
make a point or exchange of
one central idea ideas honest, sincere, and possesses
humility.
CONNECTED DISCOURSE – continuous b. Parallel/Revised: My friend is
sequence of sounds forming utterances or honest, sincere and humble.
conversations in spoken language 2. Balanced use of phrases
a. Faulty: Seeing a ghost is to believe
AUTHOR + READING + TEXT = MEANING in ghosts.
b. Revised: Seeing a ghost is believing
in ghosts.
COHERENCE 3. Balanced use of clauses
- unifying element in a text and discourse a. Faulty: The applicant was told that
- ideas in a sentence are arranged and he got the job and to start the next
connected so that the information or points day.
are properly understood b. Revised: The applicant was told that
- “clarity of expression” he got the job and that he could start
the next day.
COHESION
- focuses on the grammar and style of the TECHNIQUES IN SELECTING AND ORGANIZING
paper INFORMATION
- “to stick together” I. BRAINSTORMING
a. efforts are made to find a conclusion
TRANSITIONAL WORDS & PHRASES for a specific problem by gathering a
1. to give examples: for example, for list of ideas spontaneously
instance, in fact, indeed, to illustrate contributed by its members
2. to compare: also, likewise, similarly, in the b. synthesize ideas
same way, at the same time c. informal method of gathering ideas,
3. to contrast: although, and yet, at the same thoughts or information about a
time, but, despite, even though, despite of, specific topic and organizing it to
in spite of, nevertheless, in contrary, on the create a meaningful context
other hand, though, however, d. writing as many ideas as you can
notwithstanding regarding the topic is allowed
4. to show addition: and, also, again, in BRAINSTORM
addition, furthermore, moreover o Alex Osborn
5. to show place/duration: above, below, o 1953
beneath, beyond, farther, here o applied imagination
6. to summarize: in other words, in short, in
summary, to sum up, all in all
7. to show time: after, before, during, finally,
afterward, next, since, then, until, while,
immediately, later, as soon as
4 BRAINSTORMING TIPS BY MARK NICHOLS PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT IN WRITING
1. CUBING – topic/idea is examined in 6 - methods of organization that writers use to
viewpoints: describe, compare, associate, organize their ideas about a topic
analyze, apply, argue for & against
2. FREE WRITING – just keep on writing and COMMON PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT
not minding errors in spelling or grammar 1. NARRATION – to tell a story; explain how
3. LISTING – list down what comes in your something happened
mind; enumeration a. relate events in order which they
4. MAPPING (clustering & webbing) – graphic happened
form of listing; jotting down ideas in large b. topic sentence should identify the
writing surface situation/event
c. mostly written in first POV
II. GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS 2. DESCRIPTION – describe a person, thing,
a. uses visual symbols to express place or situation
knowledge, concepts, thoughts or a. use specific words/phrases that will
ideas and the relationships between allow readers to create clear image
them in their minds
b. appeal strongly to the sense
TYPES OF GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS 3. DEFINITION – explain your understanding
a. CONCEPT MAPS – graphically illustrate of a key term or concept
relationships between 2 or more concepts; a. do not just repeat the word’s
linked by words to describe their dictionary meaning
relationship b. express what the word means to you
b. WEBS – how different categories of through convincing examples
information relate to one another c. to convince readers that your
c. MIND MAPS – visual representations of definition is legitimate
information that include a central idea/image 4. EXEMPLIFICATION – use specific
surrounded by connected branches of instances or actual cases to convince an
associated topics/ideas audience that particular point is true
d. FLOW DIAGRAM/SEQUENCE CHART – a. examples should connect clearly to
series of steps or events in the order in main point
which they take place 5. COMPARISON & CONTRAST – make a
e. VENN DIAGRAM – identify similarities and point by showing how people, things, etc.
differences between two or more concepts are similar and/or different
f. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART – shows the a. determine your purpose; determine if
structure of an organization you want to focus on the difference
g. PIE CHART – type of circular graph, divided b. use graphic organizer (i.e., venn
into slices to illustrate a numerical diagram)
proportion c. things compared should belong to
h. GRAPH – collection of all points whose the same class
coordinates satisfy a given relation d. 2 methods:
i. TABLE – systematic arrangement of data i. POINT-BY-POINT – look at 1
usually in rows and columns for ready aspect of your comparison at
reference a time and relate it to the 2
subjects
III. OUTLINE ii. BLOCK METHOD – deal
a. general plan of what you intend to with all the points focusing on
write 1 item or subject at a time
b. classify each information and its 6. CAUSE AND EFFECT – support purpose
connection to the topic or subject by using examples that explain the causes
c. 2 basic formats: NUMBER-LETTER and/or effects of a particular event
& DECIMAL OUTLINE
7. PERSUASION – persuade the readers to
accept your POV or even have the chance TYPES OF PUNCTUATION
to change their POV - COMMA
a. take a clear position then present - PERIOD
evidence to support your position - DASH
b. success of this pattern depends - ELLIPSIS
greatly on identifying your audience - APOSTROPHE
8. PROBLEM-SOLVING – provide possible - COLON
solutions to a problem presented - HYPHEN
a. present the problem clearly - SEMI-COLON
- QUOTATION MARKS
PROPERTIES OF A WELL-WRITTEN TEXT
1. ORGANIZATION – ensures that the writer CRITICAL READING AS LOOKING FOR WAYS
is able to effectively communicate through OF THINKING
clear and logical pattern what ideas he or
she wants to impart in his or her readers CRITICAL READING – engaging yourself in a text
a. 3 prevailing patterns: or any material that you are reading
i. CHRONOLOGICAL
PATTERN – arranges ideas CRITICAL THINKING – ability to think clearly and
according to time, either rationally; to understand the relation of ideas
backward or forward (i.e., presented
first, second, next, later,
finally, etc.) CRITICAL THINKER CHARACTERISTICS
ii. SPATIAL ORDER – arranges
1. Understands the relation of one idea to
information according to how
another
things fit in physical space
2. Determines the importance and relevance of
(use of transitional words like
ideas and arguments
above, beneath, in front,
3. Recognizes, builds and appraises arguments
nearby, to the right,
4. Identifies inconsistencies and errors in
underneath, etc.)
reasoning
iii. TOPICAL ORDER – the
5. Approaches problems in a consistent and
writer present several ideas
systematic way
that are interrelated (first,
6. Reflects on the justification of his own
second… also, another…
assumptions, beliefs and values
are)
CRITICAL READING STRATEGIES
2. COHERENCE & COHESION
COHERENCE COHESION 7. Evaluating an argument
sentences in a sentence sticks to 8. Reflecting on challenges to your beliefs and
paragraph are another sentence, a values
focused on the paragraph sticks to 9. Looking for patterns of organization
central thought the next 10. Judging the writer’s credibility
11. Exploring the figurative language
3. LANGUAGE USE 12. Recognizing emotional manipulation
a. good writing includes good choice of
diction 1. Annotating
b. DICTION – way in which words are 2. Contextual Reading
used in speech or writing 3. Outlining
4. Summarizing
4. MECHANICS – apply S-V agreement, 5. Paraphrasing
capitalization, punctuations, spelling, writing 6. Comparing and Contrasting
numbers, etc.
SQ3R
- commonly used strategy CRITICAL READING AS REASONING
- introduced by Francis Pleasant Robinson FORMING EVALUATIVE STATEMENTS
(in his book, Effective Study (1946)
- S – Survey; Q – Question; 3Rs – Read, EVALUATIVE STATEMENT
Recite, Review - presents a value judgment based on a set
of criteria
*terms usually used in critical reading are explicit, - way of giving better explanation to show the
implicit and inferences strengths and the weaknesses of something
through writing
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT INFORMATION
1. EXPLICIT – fully revealed or expressed that HOW TO FORM EVALUATIVE STATEMENT
there is no room for any confusion on the 1. Begin with the positive before you point out
writer the negatives
2. IMPLICIT – idea is not openly stated and is a. FEEDBACK SANDWICH – positive
just suggested or implied feedback-constructive feedback-
3. INFERENCE – conclusion or opinion positive feedback
formed based on both information (explicit & 2. Suggest a solution on how to improve the
implicit) or evidence and reasoning written material
3. Keep your feedback concise and precise
CLAIMS IN A TEXT
- CLAIM – assertion, declaration or OTHER METHOD OF FORMULATING
affirmation EVALUATIVE STATEMENT
o arguable statement that defines the STEP 1. Formulate assertions about the
goal of the text content and the properties of a text you
o central statement where writer tries have read
to prove his/her points by providing a. ASSERTIONS – statement used to
details and evidences make a declaration/to express
- FACT – true piece of information, something strong belief on a particular topic
that truly exists or happens STEP 2. Formulating a meaningful
- OPINION – belief, viewpoint or a way of counterclaim in response to a claim made
thinking about something in the text read

CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD CLAIM THREE PARTS IN FORMING EVALUATIVE


1. A claim should be argumentative and STATEMENT
debatable 1. The judgment or the overall opinion
2. A claim should be specific and focused 2. The criteria or reasons for the opinion
3. A claim should be engaging and logical 3. The evidence to support it

TYPES OF CLAIMS MAIN COMPONENTS IN FORMING EVALUATIVE


1. CLAIM OF FACT – asserts that a condition STATEMENT
existed, exists or will exist based on facts 1. INTRODUCTION – the writer gives his or
2. CLAIM OF POLICY – argue that something her overall opinion or judgment
needs to be done; may it be making a law or 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION – gives
calling for action the readers an idea of what the writer is
a. usually has modals should, must & talking about; brief summary of the text
ought to 3. CRITERIA – reasons for making a judgment
3. CLAIM OF VALUE – based in preference or decision
such as likes or dislikes, good or bad 4. CONCLUSION – summarizes the points
a. compares 2 ideas against one made in the body of essay
another
EVALUATIVE OUTLINE ESSAY
PARA. 1: INTRODUCTION
- use an opening sentence
- quotation, question, statement, statistic, etc.
- describe the topic
- list the criterion (at least 3) for evaluating
your topic
- give your opinion; this is the thesis
statement

PARA. 2: DESCRIPTION OF CRITERION 1, 2 & 3


- restate criterion 1, 2 & 3
- give opinion on how your topic meets the
criteria; use strong adjectives
- provide supporting evidence to back up your
opinion
- give a statement that defends against
counterarguments

PARA. 3: CONCLUSION
- use a metaphor or simile that will make your
reader understand your opinion
- restate opinion

Common questions

Powered by AI

Evaluative statements enhance critical reading by allowing readers to judge the strengths and weaknesses of a text based on specific criteria . To formulate an evaluative statement, begin by forming an assertion about the content and properties of the text read . Then, create a meaningful counterclaim in response to a claim made in the text . The process involves three parts: stating the overall judgment, mentioning the criteria behind this judgment, and providing the evidence that supports it . An evaluative outline essay starts with an introduction presenting the opinion, follows with the description of criteria, and concludes by summarizing the evaluative points, reinforcing understanding and critique of the text .

Brainstorming contributes to effective writing by generating a plethora of ideas that can be synthesized into a coherent context for writing . Techniques involved include cubing, which examines a topic from six viewpoints such as describe, compare, and analyze ; free writing, which encourages uninterrupted writing to explore thoughts without focus on errors ; listing, where ideas are enumerated as they come to mind; and mapping, which visually jots down ideas on a large writing surface . These techniques facilitate the exploration of ideas and the organization necessary for effective writing.

Transitional words and phrases improve text cohesion by linking sentences and paragraphs logically, thereby guiding the reader through the argument or narrative . For giving examples, phrases like 'for example' and 'for instance' can be used. To show comparison, words like 'likewise' and 'similarly' are employed. For contrast, connectors like 'however' and 'on the other hand' articulate differences . Addition is signaled by 'furthermore' and 'moreover', while logical relationships are indicated by 'therefore' and 'as a result' . These transitions ensure fluidity, helping each part of the text to 'stick together' in coherence.

The SQ3R method includes Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review, and facilitates deeper comprehension by structuring the reading process into stages. Surveying involves skimming the text to get a general idea, questioning turns this overview into inquiry to give focus, and reading involves looking for answers to these questions within the text . Reciting involves summarizing or paraphrasing this information to reinforce retention, while reviewing consolidates understanding by reflecting on the material's significance and connections . This method encourages active engagement with the text, promoting thorough comprehension and retention.

Main patterns of development in writing include narration, description, definition, exemplification, comparison and contrast, cause and effect, persuasion, and problem-solving . Each pattern supports text organization by providing a structured approach to present ideas. Narration tells a story of events in logical sequence; description employs vivid language to create mental images; definition offers deeper understanding of terms; exemplification uses examples to substantiate a point . Comparison and contrast evaluate similarities and differences; cause and effect explore relationships between events; persuasion argues for a specific viewpoint; and problem-solving provides solutions . These patterns ensure effective progression and clarity within a text.

Parallelism enhances clarity and readability in writing by ensuring that similar parts of a sentence are grammatically alike. This demonstrates balance and symmetry, making the text more comprehensible . Faulty parallelism can obscure the meaning or make a sentence awkward. It can be corrected by ensuring that each element in a series uses the same grammatical structure. For example, correcting 'My friend is honest, sincere, and possesses humility' with 'My friend is honest, sincere, and humble' maintains parallel structure . Employing parallelism improves the flow and effectiveness of communication.

Coherence and cohesion both contribute to the effectiveness of a text by ensuring that it is easily understandable and logically organized. Coherence refers to the logical connections that make a text comprehensible; it involves organizing ideas around a central theme or main point to create 'clarity of expression' . Cohesion, on the other hand, refers to the grammatical and lexical linking within a text that hold it together, such as the use of transitional words and phrases to connect sentences and paragraphs . While coherence focuses on the unity of ideas, cohesion focuses on the linguistic means to achieve fluidity and consistency.

Graphic organizers use visual symbols to express knowledge and relationships between concepts. Concept maps graphically illustrate relationships between concepts using linking words . Webs show how different categories of information relate, while mind maps display information with a central idea surrounded by related topics . Flow diagrams or sequence charts depict steps or events in order. Venn diagrams draw out similarities and differences between concepts . Organizational charts show structures, pie charts illustrate numerical proportions, and tables arrange data systematically for easy reference . Each type helps visualize data in a manner best suited to the user's needs, aiding in comprehension and retention.

Critical reading strategies, such as evaluating an argument, judging the writer's credibility, and recognizing emotional manipulation, can help readers discern the credibility of a writer . These strategies involve scrutinizing the logic and evidence presented, which aids in determining whether the arguments are based on sound reasoning or evidence. Identifying patterns of organization can reveal whether the information is presented logically. Reflecting on challenges to one's beliefs and values can indicate the potential biases in a text, thus helping to appraise the writer's objectivity and authenticity . These techniques ensure that readers critically engage with texts, which is crucial for assessing credibility.

A good claim in writing is argumentative, debatable, specific, focused, engaging, and logical . Different types of claims diversify text argumentation by assuming various forms: a claim of fact asserts existence based on evidence, a claim of policy argues for specific actions, and a claim of value deals with preferences and evaluations, comparing ideas against each other . These claims provide a foundation for constructing detailed and convincing arguments, enriching the argumentative landscape and engaging readers through diverse viewpoints and evidence-based reasoning.

You might also like