0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views18 pages

Utility Functions in Investment Analysis

Chapter 2 discusses Rational Choice Theory focusing on utility functions and their mathematical representation of investor characteristics such as non-satiation, risk aversion, and risk neutrality. It explains how risk-averse investors value potential gains and losses differently and introduces concepts like certainty equivalent and absolute/relative risk aversion. The chapter concludes with examples of utility functions and their properties related to risk attitudes.

Uploaded by

sulianahsaddisin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views18 pages

Utility Functions in Investment Analysis

Chapter 2 discusses Rational Choice Theory focusing on utility functions and their mathematical representation of investor characteristics such as non-satiation, risk aversion, and risk neutrality. It explains how risk-averse investors value potential gains and losses differently and introduces concepts like certainty equivalent and absolute/relative risk aversion. The chapter concludes with examples of utility functions and their properties related to risk attitudes.

Uploaded by

sulianahsaddisin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PORTFOLIO AND INVESTMENT NURIN HANIAH ASMUNI

ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 2: RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY

TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTIONS


TOPIC 2 : INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES UNDER UTILITY FUNCTIONS
OBJECTIVE OF THIS CHAPTER: TOPIC 1
Explain how the following economic characteristics of investors can be
expressed mathematically in a utility function:
• Non-satiation
• Risk aversion, risk neutrality and risk seeking
• Declining or increasing absolute and relative risk aversion

Discuss the economic properties of commonly used utility functions


TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-4
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION
2. Risk aversion
• Attitudes to risk can now be expressed in terms of the properties of utility functions.
• The form of utility function can model individual’s preferences whether he likes,
dislikes or indifferent to risk.

Risk-aversion investor
• A risk-averse investor values an incremental increase in wealth less highly than an
incremental decrease and will reject a fair gamble.
 Fair gamble: the expected wealth of the individual unchanged. Also define as
gamble that has an overall expected value of zero
 E.g.: toss unbiased coin once. If head; receive RM1. If tail; lose RM1.
the expected value: 0.5x(+1) + 0.5(-1) = 0 the gamble is fair
• Risk-averse investors utility on prospect of possible gain < (less) than prospect of
lose (with same probability of occurrence)
• However, they willing to accept additional risk from an investment if associated with
higher level of expected return  feature of risk-return trade off
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-
Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-5
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-6
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-7
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Exercise 2.2.1

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-8
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION Certainty equivalent: guaranteed
return that an investor will accept
now than taking a chance of a
higher but uncertain return in the
future

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-9
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-10
TERMS
U(cw) = E[U(w+x)] : expected utility for certain equivalent of the combines
portfolio

cw = w+x : certainty equivalent of the combined portfolio of initial wealth plus


gamble

cx = cw – w : certainty equivalent of gamble only

W- wealth
X – gamble

U – expected utility
Cw, cx – wealth/amount
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

E(x)=0.5(1)+0.5(-1) = 0

U(cw)=E[U(w+x)] – expected
utility of certainty equivalent of
combined portfolio

Possible outcomes / probability:


+RM1 head : 0.5
-RM1 tail : 0.5

P1=0.5, Cw1= w+x = 10+1


P2=0.5, Cw2=w-x = 10 -1

Cx is negative. We would have to pay investor to accept the gamble.


Equivalently the investor would be prepared to pay 0.0251 to avoid
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-
Wesley. All rights reserved.
the gamble 1-12
W = 100
Y +10%, -10%
W*y=110, 90
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION W=1000
Y +10%, -10%
W*y=1100, 900

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-13
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION Absolute risk aversion: a
measure of investor reaction to
uncertainty relating to amount
change in their wealth

Cw increase, cx increase
Cw decrease, cx decrease

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-14
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION Relative risk aversion: a
measure of investor reaction to
gamble that proportional to
wealth

Example 3:
We shall see below that the log utility function U(w) = ln(w) exhibits:
• decreasing absolute risk aversion
• constant relative risk aversion.

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-15
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-16
TOPIC 1: UTILITY FUNCTION

Absolute risk aversion Relative risk aversion

Increasing A’(w)>0 R’(w)>0


Constant A’(w)=0 R’(w)=0
Decreasing A’(w)<0 R’(w)<0

Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-


Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-17
THE END…THANK YOU

You might also like