0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views1 page

Character Arcs in Film Analysis

The document outlines character analyses of protagonists from various films, focusing on their beliefs and character arcs. Daniel Plainview from 'There Will Be Blood' and Nader from 'A Separation' experience negative change arcs, while Louis Bloom from 'Nightcrawler' shows signs of corruption without a clear arc. Juror 8 from '12 Angry Men' and Jaggu from 'PK' maintain flat arcs, reinforcing their beliefs throughout the narratives.

Uploaded by

imama.rec
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views1 page

Character Arcs in Film Analysis

The document outlines character analyses of protagonists from various films, focusing on their beliefs and character arcs. Daniel Plainview from 'There Will Be Blood' and Nader from 'A Separation' experience negative change arcs, while Louis Bloom from 'Nightcrawler' shows signs of corruption without a clear arc. Juror 8 from '12 Angry Men' and Jaggu from 'PK' maintain flat arcs, reinforcing their beliefs throughout the narratives.

Uploaded by

imama.rec
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Name: Imama Aamir

Course: Storytelling and character Analysis (5th semester)

There will be blood


Protagonist: Daniel Plainview​
Belief: Money and success are the only important things. Attachments, relationships and
empathy will only create obstacles for him​
Character arc: Negative change arc (subtype: disillusionment arc)
Explanation: Daniel is ambitious and throughout the story keeps getting more and more morally
corrupt.

Nightcrawler
Protagonist: Louis Bloom​
Belief: believe that work is above all else, even ignores basic morals just for the sake of
capturing the latest news.​
Character arc: Unknown
Explanation: Louis Bloom keeps getting more and more corrupt as the story progresses.
Perhaps his character follows the corruption arc’/anti hero arc

A Separation
Protagonist: Nader​
Belief: sees himself as a responsible man, thinks he fair and truthful​
Character arc: Negative change arc (subtype: disillusionment arc)
Explanation: nader believes he is always morally correct however, as the truth unfolds he begins
to doubt his own morals. He doesn't completely change by the end of the film but becomes
doubtful in what he once believed in.

12 Angry men​
Protagonist: juror 8​
Belief: the defendant is not guilty​
Character arc: flat arc.
Explaination: Character believes the accused is innocent, the rest of the jury thinks otherwise.
Juror 8 proves the truth, eventually convincing the other jurors too.

PK​
Protagonist: Jaggu​
Belief: no one is inherently bad, and deserve love regardless of their religion​
Character arc: flat arc

Common questions

Powered by AI

Success in Daniel Plainview's arc is portrayed as a singular pursuit, leading him to dismiss empathy and relationships, resulting in a progressive moral corruption . For Louis Bloom, success is tied to professional achievement, leading him to disregard basic morals to capture news, resulting in an anti-hero transformation . Both characters see success as paramount, but while Plainview becomes isolated in his corruption, Bloom's success-driven immorality places him within darker societal critique.

Jaggu's belief that no one is inherently bad and everyone deserves love forms the basis of her flat arc, meaning her inherent beliefs remain unchallenged and unchanged throughout the story . In contrast, Daniel Plainview's belief in money and success leads to a negative change arc, characterized by increasing moral corruption and detachment from others . This juxtaposition highlights varying impacts of personal beliefs on character transformation.

Juror 8's steadfast belief in the defendant's innocence is crucial to '12 Angry Men's' resolution. His unwavering stance in the face of unanimous opposition sets the foundation for critical examination of the evidence, provoking doubt and discussion among other jurors . This steadfastness implies that firm belief, when paired with reason and patience, can lead to truth and justice, influencing others to reconsider and eventually align with his perspective.

Nader's self-perception as a responsible man who is fair and truthful is central to his negative change arc . His journey through 'A Separation' reveals the conflict between perceived morality and lived actions. As the story unfolds, Nader's certainty is challenged, leading to self-doubt about his moral convictions. This reveals how self-perception can falter when confronted with complex realities, highlighting the nuanced relationship between self-image and moral integrity.

Moral ambiguity is central to both Daniel Plainview's and Nader's narratives, though it manifests differently. Daniel's arc in 'There Will Be Blood' reflects increasing moral corruption, driven by his belief that only money and success matter, resulting in a disillusionment arc where his ruthless pursuit blurs moral lines . Conversely, Nader's arc in 'A Separation' involves an internal struggle with his moral beliefs as his certainty is challenged, leading to self-doubt but not complete transformation . Both arcs highlight how rigid initial beliefs can lead to morally ambiguous outcomes.

Jaggu's flat arc in 'PK', where her inherent belief in the goodness and love deserving nature of all individuals remains robust, emphasizes the power of steadfast positive beliefs in storytelling . In contrast, Louis Bloom's corruption arc in 'Nightcrawler' shows how inherent beliefs centered on ambition can lead to moral decay . This contrast highlights the diverse narrative potential of inherent beliefs, illustrating how they can drive characters toward either ethical conviction or moral erosion.

In 'There Will Be Blood', Daniel Plainview's arc shows little awareness of moral decline as he prioritizes success, resulting in deepening corruption without self-reflection . Meanwhile, in 'A Separation', Nader's arc involves growing awareness of his moral ambiguity and self-doubt, highlighting a nuanced journey towards ethical realization . These arcs signify that while not all characters gain insight into their ethical transformation, those with self-awareness can undergo profound internal conflict and recognition of their moral state, even without complete transformation.

Daniel Plainview's belief that money and success are the only important things contribute to his negative change arc, specifically a disillusionment arc . As the story progresses, his ambition leads to increased moral corruption. His transformation is characterized by a growing disconnect from empathy and relationships, reinforcing his belief that such attachments are obstacles to success.

Louis Bloom in 'Nightcrawler' and Nader in 'A Separation' both experience negative change arcs, but with differing implications. Louis Bloom's belief that work and ambition justify ignoring morals leads him to corruption and the deepening of his antihero persona . Nader, on the other hand, starts with a belief in his moral correctness, but as events unfold, he enters a disillusionment arc where his certainty is challenged, leading to self-doubt rather than corruption .

A flat character arc involves a protagonist who remains largely unchanged throughout the story, maintaining their beliefs despite external pressures . In '12 Angry Men', Juror 8's arc is flat because he consistently believes in the defendant's innocence and does not waver from this belief, despite the initial opposition from other jurors. He ultimately remains steadfast, resulting in the jury's unanimous decision aligning with his original stance .

You might also like