EXPLORING THE PERSPECTIVE OF TEACHERS IN ADRESSING THE
THEORY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES IN DESIGNING
INSTRUCTIONS
Collo, Eliza M.
Garcia, Precious Kyla E.
Layosa, Shiela Mae M.
Mercado, Lorence T.
Sapanza, Laurence P.
Villanueva, Kim Lee M.
Senior High School Department, Tagkawayan National High School
Practical Research 1: Qualitative Research
(STEM, 11 – MCS)
Johnlerey T. Erandio
APRIL 2025
Chapter 1
The Problem and its Setting
Introduction
For centuries, understanding of intelligence has been evolving. Come to
realize that it is not just about being book-smart or having a high Intelligence Quotient
(IQ) score. Intelligence is complex, multifaceted, and affected by a variety of things.
There are many theories that may explain the different aspects of intelligence and one
of the most prominent is the Theory of Multiple Intelligences, which is proposed by
Howard Gardner (1983).
This theory is also very prominent in schools as many students and teachers
alike, tends to exhibit one or more of these intelligences and it helps them to find their
own strengths and weaknesses to further improve themselves. An article published on
the Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning states
that an assertion made by Gardner himself says that educators should not follow one
specific theory or educational innovation when designing instruction but instead
employ customized goals and values appropriate to teaching, subject-matter, and
student learning needs. (NIUC, 2020)
However, there is a stigma with this theory as it often causes some teachers to
look down on their students when they only possess one type of intelligence.
According to an article published on Edutopia (2009), it shows that while Gardner's
theory changed how the education system thinks about intelligences and its students,
it has started a lot of misconceptions and gave rise to some stigma of how each
student only possesses and nourishes one type of intelligence thus hindering their
capacity to study about the different learning areas.
This research was conducted for broadening the knowledge from the
perspective of their teachers of the students regarding multiple intelligences and how
they create and design instructions based on the needs and abilities of their students.
Statement of the Problem
This study explores the perspectives of teachers in addressing multiple
intelligences in designing instructions.
Specifically, the study aims to answer the following questions:
1. How does the subject determine the type of intelligence of the students?
2. What are the ways of the subject in addressing the needs of the students?
3. How does the subject design an instruction that matches the capacity of students?
Theoretical Framework
Exploring the perspective of teachers in addressing theory of multiple
intelligences in designing instructions
Sternberg's Triarchic
Spearman's Two-factor Howard Gardner's
Theory of Multiple
Theory theory
Intelligences
This theoretical framework for understanding intelligence explores how we
think, learn, and solve problems. Multiple intelligences distinguish each person
capabilities, on how students acquire information and how will learn specific studies.
Intelligence is often seen as more than just one ability, but a range of cognitive skills
like reasoning, problem-solving, and adapting to new situations. Several key theories
explain the multiple intelligences:
The Spearman's Two-Factor Theory, according to Charles Spearman that the
intelligence is made up of a general factor (G) that influences all cognitive abilities,
and specific factors (S) that relate to particular tasks. The G factor was linked to the
general ability of a person, on the contrary S factor are related to specific abilities.
Spearman's Theory clarifies that there is a factor between cognitive abilities of a
person depending on what intelligence they are included. However, the theory named
"Two-Factor" does not intentionally mean that there are only two factors, due to this
factor has a different sub-factors which depends to the numbers of abilities given in
each test.
The second theory was Gardner's Theory of multiple intelligences, on the
authority of Howard Gardner he argued that intelligence is not one thing, but a variety
of types, such as linguistic-verbal, logical-mathematical, musical, visual-spatial,
bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic intelligence. The
concept behind this theory is that the people learn in a variety of different ways.
The last theory that included on this research is the Sternberg's Triarchic
Theory. Robert Sternberg who proposed that intelligence is made up of three
components: analytical intelligence (problem-solving), creative intelligence (ability to
think outside the box), and practical intelligence (street smarts). The theory is
comprised of three sub-theories: contextual, experiential, and componential. Each
sub-theory corresponds to one of the three proposed types of intelligence.
These theories highlight different ways to view intelligence, recognizing that it
is not just about how well we perform on tests, but involves a wide range of skills that
help us navigate the world. Exploring these theories will help the students to identify
specifically where multiple intelligences they are belong. All of those theories are
made by unrelated theorist who has a perspective way different to another.
Conceptual Framework
Exploring the Perspective of Teachers in Addressing the
Theory of Multiple Intelligences in Designing Instructions
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
Respondent’s data Data Gathering Exploring the
Interview Protocol Perspective of Teachers
Selected theories Interviewing the teachers of in Addressing the Theory
Related Literature and Grade 11- STEM of Multiple Intelligences
Studies Analyzation of data in Designing Instructions
Input- The researchers will prepare the questionnaires that will be used in
the interview and the respondents that will be reviewed. They will also review the
theories, literatures, and studies that are related to the research that is being
conducted.
Process- The interview will be conducted by the researchers to figure out
the advantages and disadvantages of the students who possesses the different
intelligences in their class. They will analyze the data given by to them by the
respondents right after they collect the data needed in the study.
Output- Understanding the implications of the Multiple Intelligence
Theory inside the classroom; the advantages and disadvantages of each type of
intelligence, and how it affects the performance of each of the students on the eyes of
their teachers.
Significance of the Study
The study would be beneficial to the following:
For the Teachers - The study can help them understand students and their
intelligences better.
For the Students- It will help them to know what intelligences they excelled the
most, and know what learning field will they have the advantage of.
For the Researchers- The researchers can use the study of intelligences by Howard
Gardner to develop and improve on current educational theories, and to have
comprehensive understanding of how various students learn and exhibit their skills.
For the Future Researchers - This study will help the future researchers to
understand the ways that people learn and this enables the development of more
individualized and acknowledge the student’s unique strengths.
Scope and Delimitation
The Scope of this study centers in exploring the perspective of teachers in
addressing multiple intelligences while designing an instruction. It will be conducted
at Tagkawayan National High School, gathering information from the subjects who
are Grade 11 teachers. It discloses data like considerations, reasons, and strategies of
the subjects in addressing the topic.
Definition of Terms
The following terms were defined conceptually and operationally for
better understanding of the study:
Academic- Relating to schools, colleges, and universities or connected with studying
and thinking, not with practical skills. This study examines the academic skills of the
students in the perspective of their teachers.
Educator- A person who teaches people. In this study, it includes grade 11 educators
as their respondents.
Intelligence- The ability to learn, understand, and make judgments or
have opinions that are based on reason. This study explores the different types of
intelligence of the students and their teachers.
Knowledge- understanding of or information about a subject that you get
by experience or study, either known by one person or by people. Students’
knowledge in their teachers’ perspective, is one of the main things to measure in this
research study.
Student- A person who is learning at a college or university. This study examines the
student(s) intelligence ranges.
Theory- A formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or
of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or, more generally,
an opinion or explanation. The study assesses the theories connected to the multiple
intelligence, enhancing the future results of this study.
Chapter 2
Review of Related Literatures and Studies
Review of related literatures and studies let the researchers seek pieces of
information. It also leads to brainstorming of ideas about multiple intelligence in a
classroom setting. Lastly, it helps to gather valuable data and ideas that can help to
their own research topic.
Related Literature
Cornerstone University's (2018) article delves into Howard Gardner's Theory
of Multiple Intelligences, which proposes that people have distinct learning methods
and abilities. Gardner recognized eight separate intelligences: Visual-spatial,
Linguistic-verbal, Logical-mathematical, Body-kinesthetic, Musical, Interpersonal,
Intrapersonal, and Naturalistic. The paper contends that traditional education systems,
which favor linguistic and logical methods, are ineffective for all students. It promotes
multiple teaching methodologies and learning environments that cater to each
student's particular abilities, using multimedia, visuals, music, motion, realia, and
other methods to engage different intelligences. The article underlines the necessity of
identifying and addressing individual learning styles in the classroom to promote
effective learning and student engagement.
According to Wikipedia (n.d.), the theory of multiple intelligences (MI) is a
pseudoscientific theory that proposes the division of human intelligence into distinct
multiple intelligences, as opposed to the current theory of general intelligence, which
defines it as a single general ability. Despite its lack of widespread recognition in the
psychiatric profession, the idea has gained popularity among educators worldwide
since 1983. Psychologists sharply condemned the revolutionary psychological
concept for its lack of empirical proof, reliance on subjective judgment, and general
unscientific and speculative nature.
The essay "Multiple Intelligences Theory: Widely Used, Yet Misunderstood,"
published on Edutopia in 2018, investigates the abuse and misinterpretation of
Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences theory in educational settings. While
Gardner's theory challenged the traditional notion of a single, monolithic intelligence,
it has frequently been confused with learning styles, resulting in a reductionist
approach that labels students as "visual learners" or "auditory learners." The author
contends that this misapplication of the theory is harmful because it limits students'
opportunities to explore different ways of thinking and learning. Instead, the paper
calls for a more nuanced understanding of different intelligences, arguing that
teachers should prioritize giving kids with multiple methods to obtain knowledge,
personalizing their courses, and using the arts to promote diversified intellectual
growth. The article underlines that, while students may prefer how information is
presented, there is little evidence that tailoring materials to these preferences improves
learning. Finally, the article advocates for a move away from simplistic labels and
toward a more comprehensive approach to education that acknowledges the varied
character of human intelligence.
This article, published in Frontiers in Psychology in October 2021,
investigates the impact of teaching with multiple intelligences on corporate
employees' learning achievement and motivation. The study, conducted with 314
employees in the high-tech industry in Southern Taiwan Science Park, found that
teaching with multiple intelligences positively affected both learning motivation and
learning achievement. The authors argue that this approach allows employees to
leverage their strengths and develop their potential, leading to improved performance
and a more engaged workforce. The study highlights the importance of tailoring
teaching methods to individual learning styles and the potential benefits of
incorporating multiple intelligences into corporate training programs.
The article published on Oneatlas (2024) explores Howard Gardner's Multiple
Intelligences Theory and its application in education. Gardner's theory identifies eight
types of intelligence, emphasizing that students learn in different ways. By
recognizing these diverse intelligences, educators can tailor teaching methods to suit
individual strengths, such as using music for historical learning or drawing for math
concepts. While implementing this approach fosters a student-centered environment,
challenges include designing inclusive activities, especially in large or under-
resourced classrooms. Despite these hurdles, applying the theory can enhance student
engagement, improve learning outcomes, and create a more inclusive educational
experience.
Related Studies
The study conducted by Winarti [Link] (2018) revealed that Multiple
Intelligences strategy has an effect on and can be a significant predictor of the
development of students’ Multiple intelligences. This study showed an improvement
of the Science Process Skills (SPS) on the students, specifically in the questioning
ability. The results of this study will change the teaching strategy in the future, from
academic ability oriented to be multiple intelligences oriented and focus of each
student’s potential.
Ayesha and Khurshid’s (2013) study emphasize the significance of
recognizing and nurturing multiple intelligences and effective study skills to enhance
academic achievement. As suggested by the study, both teachers and parents play
crucial roles in supporting students' development and educational strategies should be
tailored to individual differences. The study also highlights the need for targeted
interventions in public sector universities to improve study habits and academic
outcomes.
In Dermentzis’ (2008) study entitled “Reconceptualizing Teaching in the
Twenty-First Century: Teacher Attitudes and Perspectives on the Role of Multiple
Intelligences Inside the Classroom”, she interviewed two elementary school teachers
from the Greater Toronto Area, and their responses highlighted three key areas: their
views on Multiple Intelligences, their teaching methods, and the challenges of
tailoring instruction to diverse learners. The study found that teachers should vary the
content, activities, resources, and assessments to actively guide students in
recognizing their own intelligences and use this knowledge to plan and deliver
lessons. The teachers suggested that differentiation– is crucial to help students
understand and utilize their unique strengths.
Heming’s (2008) study examined how two elementary school teachers
incorporated multiple intelligences into their classrooms. Both teachers, regardless of
their own learning styles, used a variety of teaching methods that addressed the
different ways their students learn. It's interesting that both teachers, even though
they are strong learners in other areas, adjusted their teaching to fit the needs of their
students, suggesting they were using multiple intelligences in their teaching, whether
they realized it or not. This research challenges the idea that only Logical-
Mathematical and Linguistic intelligences are important for school success, showing
that teachers are becoming more aware of the importance of teaching in ways that
work for all kinds of learners.
Li’s (2012) study investigated the effectiveness of incorporating Multiple
Intelligences (MI) theory into English reading instruction in a primary school. Two
parallel classes, one taught using MI theory and one with traditional methods, were
compared. The results showed that MI-based reading significantly increased students'
interest in English reading and improved their reading proficiency. This study
suggests that incorporating MI theory into English reading instruction can be an
effective way to engage students, enhance their reading skills, and foster a more
positive attitude towards English learning.
A study conducted by Wang (2017) states that colleges and universities should
actively help students develop a sense of achievement and self-belief. Gardner's
theory of multiple intelligences emphasizes that while some students excel in verbal
or mathematical skills, others may shine in areas like music, spatial reasoning, or
interpersonal skills. By creating supportive learning environments and evaluating
students in a way that encourages participation and celebrates diverse talents,
institutions can foster a culture where students feel empowered to explore their
strengths and contribute their unique gifts. This approach should be a cornerstone of
higher education, as it allows students to flourish and reach their full potential.
Chapter 3
Methodology
This chapter presented the methodologies employed in the study. This includes
the research design, research environment, subjects of the study, research instruments,
and data gathering procedure.
Research Design
The researchers used a qualitative research method where the study focused on
exploring the theory of multiple intelligences among Grade 11 senior high school
students of Tagkawayan National High School (TNHS). This study used a
Phenomenological approach gaining concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about
the study which explores perspectives of Grade 11 teachers in addressing multiple
intelligences while designing instruction.
Research Location
This research study will be conducted in Tagkawayan National High School
(TNHS), Barangay Munting Parang Tagkawayan, Quezon. Is the exact location of the
study where the respondents are located, furthermore the location chosen is where the
researchers currently studying thus it is more suitable to conduct the study due to
familiarity of the people and also the students
Subject of the Study
The respondents of this study are Grade 11 Teachers from Tagkawayan
National High School. A total of six (6) teachers were chosen to be part of the study.
These teachers were selected because they have the ability to answer the research
questions and provide valuable insights about the topic. The teachers will be able to
answer the questions based on their perspectives and interactions with the students.
Population and Sampling
The researcher chooses a sample of (6) respondents to participate in the study.
The subjects are identified through a purposive sampling strategy which lies with the
set of criteria. The subjects are Grade 11 teachers teaching different strands HUMSS,
STEM, and ABM.
Research Instrument
In this study, the researchers will use an interview protocol (IP), as well as the
related literatures and studies as the research instruments. It will be used in gathering
data from the respondents collecting their perspectives, insights, and strategies
regarding the questions presented and to use as a reference for the answers of the
respondents.
Data Gathering Procedure
The researchers will ask for permission from their adviser, Mr. Johnlerey T.
Erandio to conduct the study, then they will make a letter for the Principal to give
them permission to do the research/interview as the first step in data gathering. After
that, the researchers will prepare the questions for the interview of the subjects. They
will ask for the permission of the subjects to conduct the interview and if given
permission, will proceed with the interview. The researchers will promise the
confidentiality and privacy of the subjects as their informed consent is obtained. As
for the last step, the researchers will analyze the data to identify the difference of the
different kinds of intelligence of their students. The researchers also used devices such
as cellphone or audio recorder in conducting the interview to clearly understand the
answer of the respondents.
References
Atlas. (2024, May 12). Using the Multiple Intelligences Theory in a Classroom -
Atlas. Atlas. [Link]
a-classroom?
fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0wqRZAKAPUYPEmzpVJls7FqWX2ZHXfFt
KY4PrmKbBGolG7v31URihsm8I_aem_yVjH9gxNcHCEj3GnzKxjJg
Ayesha, B., & Khurshid, F. (2013). The Relationship of Multiple Intelligence and
Effective Study Skills with Academic Achievement among University Students.
Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 13(1).
[Link]
[Link]
Cornerstone University. (2025, February 10). What are multiple intelligences and how
do they affect learning? | Cornerstone University. [Link]
post/what-are-multiple-intelligences-and-how-do-they-affect-learning/?
fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3t6R5VabC2n7xRrbC72JwCC5JJJ867P_vWz0
BytRRzMpIQ04ZOj8u_m3U_aem_aCGdaMAdLzkS15AIFiy_tw
Dermentzis, M. (2017). Reconceptualizing Teaching in the Twenty-First Century:
Teacher Attitudes and Perspectives on the Role of Multiple Intelligences Inside the
Classroom. University of Toronto.
[Link]
MT_MTRP.pdf
Heming, A. L. (2008). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Western Kentucky
University. [Link]
article=1143&context=stu_hon_theses
Huang, Z., & Li, H. (2024). The impact of the application of multiple intelligence
theory on classroom communication. Region - Educational Research and Reviews,
5(8), 25. [Link]
Lei, D., Cheng, J., Chen, C., Huang, K., & Chou, C. J. (2021). Discussion of teaching
with multiple intelligences to corporate employees’ learning achievement and learning
motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. [Link]
Li, J., Ma, S., & Ma, L. (2012). The Study on the Effect of Educational Games for the
Development of Students’ Logic-Mathematics of Multiple Intelligence. Physics
Procedia, 33, 1749–1752. [Link]
Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2020).
Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. In Instructional guide for
university faculty and teaching assistants. Retrieved
from [Link]
Seider, S. (2009). An Educator’s Journey Toward Multiple Intelligences. Edutopia.
[Link]
Terada, Y. (2018, October 15). Multiple Intelligences Theory: Widely used, yet
misunderstood. Edutopia. [Link]
theory-widely-used-yet-misunderstood/?
fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3O_76obLnLWqRpDFeQdkXfN82IDbcsEVB6
NJObWcfe7K_NRAjeunENN18_aem_EFuX143uq4YAWOdn-hcGKQ
Wikipedia contributors. (2025, February 24). Theory of multiple intelligences.
Wikipedia. [Link]
fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1D9epvgck1nm5SfhPlCE_ByqSBBYtoOa4-
ypvQoe4t_MEqAv5uSzw-xF4_aem_FgC8igjn9S5vZybUuEWDAw
Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences
based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and science process
skills of junior High School students. Journal of Technology and Science Education,
9(2), 122. [Link]