Impact of work groups or teams on effective and efficient performance
SYSTEMATIC METHOD OF ANALYSING TEAMS
i) Differentiate a group and a team
ii) Team working
iii) Theories of teams
iv) Managing team effectiveness
DIFFERENTIATE GROUPS AND TEAMS
The terms ‘team’ and ‘group’ are often used interchangeably.
However, these are the following differences.
Groups
•A group is a collection of individuals who share common characteristics.
Individuals will be members of numerous groups, both socially and professionally, and
each will have their own hierarchical form and leadership.
A group can also be defined as two or more individuals interacting and interdepending on each
other. Groups defined membership and have a sense of belonging Groups can be formal or
informal.
Differentiate formal and informal groups
Formal –they are included in the organisation chart to deliver certain tasks with defined roles
and responsibility
Informal-They come to be automatically e.g. through shared activity or specialism, they can be
cross functional
How to recognise a group (social networks)
Spatial factors-close geographical proximity- People working in the same department
Informal communication and interaction grapevines
Shared technology –dependency on ICT system
Organisation climate /culture encouraging collectivism, task culture
Diversity
People with same Perceptions and believes-ideology
People protecting power –political groupings /cliques
People desiring to be recognised
People desiring companion and support
Existence of an informal leader
Hidden operating structure – informal process and procedure of working short cuts
Specialism
Teams
A team is a group of people who will work together to achieve a common purpose.
A team, having been bought together to achieve a particular purpose, is likely to be smaller
than a group, made up of between four and six individual members.
They have complementary skills and committed to common purpose, work approach and goals
How to recognise a team
A small group of carefully selected and approved by management
Defined objectives and goals
Formal way of working-tasks allocation
Shared responsibility in carrying out tasks
Focus of performance –targets
Desire for accountability to management through established channels
Shared leadership roles
Major differences between groups and teams
i) The way each is defined
ii) Membership groups are large
iii) Teams are bound shared purpose and performance goals
iv) Team members share cohesive characteristics
v) Groups are formed less formally
Weiss states that membership to groups or teams offer individuals social provisions or
opportunities to:
Guidance
Reassurance of worth –recognition
Reliable alliance –get assistance
Social interaction
Emotional attachment
Conclusion: Therefore all teams are groups but not all groups are necessary teams
TEAMS IN PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY
i)Cross functional multi-skilled
ii)Hybrid teams-
Clan: Centre Led Action Network. CLAN as a procurement strategy and organizational
structure for large organizations– the Centre Led Action Network.
It is a structure design approach for procurement based on a small procurement centre, setting
strategy and gathering information from the centre of the organisation.
But the main procurement operations are to be carried out in a devolved fashion around the
network of business units. Procurement staff report locally, but with a dotted line to a CPO.
Lead category management responsibility would be allocated out around the procurement staff
in the network, but with some guidance and lose control from the headquarters.
Scan: Strategically Controlled Action SCAN looks at a structure with geographically
devolved loose networks of procurement professionals – but with those people reporting
to the CPO at home. More direct control could then be exerted over key activities
Business partnering procurement professional is seconded to a major project to manage
expenditure
Consortium – when organisations with the same needs collaborate for their
mutual benefit
Interconnected groups-subcontracted workers who work from home
iii)VIRTUAL TEAMS (OR REMOTE WORKING GROUPS)
A Virtual Team – also known as a Geographically Dispersed Team (GDT) – is a group
of individuals who work across time, space, and organizational boundaries with links
strengthened by webs of communication technology.
This has increased as advances in technology, such as the cloud, e-sharing,
asynchronous messaging or synchronous online meetings have transformed the
workplace where the team members are
• Are able to work closely together on task objectives despite being separated by
geography and time zones.
• Are able to share expert knowledge, specialist skills and capability from across the
organization by using virtual systems.
• achieve greater levels of ‘satisfaction, idea generation and customer service’.
The above Enables organisations to utilise their worldwide workforce to operate around
the clock, creating a capacity to respond to customers wherever they are.
Drawbacks of remote working can lead to the following.
• Poor performance management
• Information exchange insecurity
• Timeliness issues caused by operating across time zones.
Interpersonal issues such as group mistrust, miscommunication, lack of cohesiveness and
detachment from team goals.
iv)SELF-MANAGED TEAMS
This consist of individuals who are in depend and want freedom, with the following
characteristics
Skills and knowledge
Interdependence
Consensus building
Shared responsibility and accountability
Shared leadership roles
Benefits of self-managed teams
Utilise technical knowledge and skills
Appreciate the role of everybody as leaders
Speed in information flow
HOW TO APPLY VIRTUAL TEAM WORKING
Utilise ICT to communicate
Appreciate of diversity knowledge and skills
Appreciate other culture
Encourage trust, task dependency and social attraction
EFFECTIVE TEAM WORKING
BASIC ISSUES RELATED TO TEAM WORKING
Team work
Values norms and Social behaviour
Productivity
i) Team working
How to identify Team working
There is Right composition of team members
The teams have norms
Holist view of impact of tasks
Sharing roles/tasks
Absence of conflicts and disputes
Assessment of what is done
Positive outcomes or results
Sharing of leadership roles
Self-managing
Benefits of team working
Avoidance of conflict
Team cohesion
Efficiency and effectiveness in performance
Innovativeness and creativity
Rewards from the management
ii)TEAM VALUES AND BEHAVIOR NORMS
Definition
Values are general guidelines, while norms are specific guidelines. Values are general
standards, which decide what is good and what is bad. As defined by the code.
Norms are rules and expectations that specify how people should and should not behave in
various social situations. Example,
Respect for each other,
Helping others
Avoiding discrimination and promoting Equity
Transparency
Loyalty
Characteristics of group norms
Guides group behaviour
Easily acceptable by the group
Important to every body
Promotes tolerance
Facilitate the group
PURPOSE OF GROUP NORMS
Define the nature of the group – by expressing the central values of the group,
group norms provide members with clarity about the nature of the group they are
part of.
• Make behaviour predictable – group norms simplify expectations in respect to the
behaviour of group members and therefore improve group functioning.
• Avoid embarrassing situations – by outlining rules of engagement, individual
members can avoid embarrassment by avoiding particular situations that could
upset other members of the group.
• Ensure group survival – the acceptance of agreed group rewards for compliance or
punishment for non-compliance, results in threats to group existence being
resolved and tolerance of deviant behaviour that is non-threatening.
They Influence social behaviour .e.g
Expressly state required behvaiors-puntuality, personal conduct
Emergency behaviour-changing with emerging situations
Ensure conformity to norms
Compliance
Personal commitment and acceptance
iii)Measure Productivity-
Quantative factors
Qualitative factors
THEORIES OF TEAMS WORKING
Team Development
Tuckman and Jensen theory-stages in team development
Katzenbach and Smith curve – development - performance and effectiveness
Champoux 2006 theory-concept of group socialisation
Team Performance
Belbin team roles -9 different team roles
Maccan team management wheel -8 team roles
TUCKMAN AND JENSEN
Analyse stages of team development
Team development does not occur within a vacuum, and managers should be aware
of external influences, such as organisational change, that can disrupt the progress of
team development or affect the team’s performance. Tuckman and Jensen model recognises that
in contemporary organisations, teams and groups evolve in
their interaction and behaviours over a period of time.
Management’s aim is to get the team to the ‘performing’ stage as quickly as possible
Tuckman and Jensen developed the model of team development in 1977.
Identifies five key phases of group development
• Forming – members develop a structure and roles. Individuals are on their best
behaviour.
• Storming – period of potential conflict as a result of individual members testing
boundaries and determining preferred ways of working.
• Norming – codes of conduct and norms of accepted group behaviour have been
established and the team starts working together as a group.
• Performing – group members begin to work together effectively in purposeful
endeavour, with a focus on performance outcomes and goal achievement.
• Adjourning – the period in which a group disbands, due to the completion of a
project task, group members leaving voluntarily, team restructures, or
redundancy.
KATZENBACH AND SMITH
Link stage and performance
Provides information which can guide on identification of a team stage
Working group has no common purpose but there is information-sharing
• Pseudo team – operates as a team even if it does not perform as a team
• Potential team – moving towards a common purpose, and performance levels rise
• Real team – a shared purpose begins to emerge and, in groups where individual
team members’ skills are complementary, accountability for team results begins to
be shared
• High-performance teams – work together to achieve the shared goal, individual
members demonstrate commitment towards building healthy social relationships
with other group members and developing their skills to complement the team.
The effectiveness of the team falls as the team moves from working group to
pseudo-team stage, but then increases as it moves through the other phases
CHAMPOUX 2006 THEORY
Phases of work group socialisation
1. Anticipation-opinions about work roles and relationships, anxiety on conformity to
norms
2. Encounter-process of acceptance or rejection, learning roles and tasks
3. Adjustment-successfully fit into each other
BELBIN TEAM ROLES
Identified direct from the case study
THE NINE BELBIN TEAM ROLES
Strengths/ how
Team Role Description Weaknesses
they operate
Uses their inquisitive nature to Might be over-
find ideas to bring back to the optimistic, and can lose
Outgoing, enthusiastic.
team Helps the team to gel, using interest once the initial
Resource Explores opportunities
their versatility to identify the enthusiasm has passed.
Investigator and develops contacts.
work required and complete it on
Nb:they might forget
behalf of the team.
to follow up
Can be indecisive in
crunch situations and
Helps the team to gel, using their Co-operative, tends to avoid
versatility to identify the work perceptive and confrontation.
Team worker
required and complete it on behalf diplomatic. Listens and
Nb:they might be
of the team. averts friction.
hesitant to make
unpopular decision
Co-ordinator Needed to focus on the team’s Mature, confident, Can be seen as
objectives, draw out team identifies talent. manipulative and might
members and delegate work offload their own share
THE NINE BELBIN TEAM ROLES
Strengths/ how
Team Role Description Weaknesses
they operate
of the work-
Nb:they might over
appropriately. Clarifies goals. delegate finding
themselves with little
to do
Might ignore
incidentals, and may be
Creative, imaginative, too preoccupied to
Tends to be highly creative and free-thinking, communicate
Plant good as solving problems in generates ideas and effectively.
unconventional ways. solves difficult
problems. Nb:they could be
forgetful and absent
minded
Monitor Provides a logical eye, making Sober, strategic and Sometimes lacks the
Evaluator impartial judgements where discerning. Sees all drive and ability to
required and weighs up the team’s options and judges inspire others and can
options in a dispassionate way. accurately. be overly critical.
THE NINE BELBIN TEAM ROLES
Strengths/ how
Team Role Description Weaknesses
they operate
Nb:They could be
slow to come to a
decision
Tends to contribute on
a narrow front and can
Single-minded, self- dwell on the
Brings in-depth knowledge of a starting and dedicated. technicalities.
Specialist
key area to the team. They provide specialist
knowledge and skills. Nb:they overload
themselves with
information
Can be prone to
Challenging, dynamic, provocation, and may
Provides the necessary drive to
thrives on pressure. sometimes offend
ensure that the team keeps moving
Shaper Has the drive and people’s feelings
and does not lose focus or
courage to overcome
momentum.
obstacles. Nb: they may be
overaggressive
Implementer Needed to plan a workable Practical, reliable, Can be a bit inflexible
THE NINE BELBIN TEAM ROLES
Strengths/ how
Team Role Description Weaknesses
they operate
and slow to respond to
efficient. Turns ideas new possibilities
strategy and carry it out as into actions and
efficiently as possible. organizes work that Nb: .can abandon place
needs to be done. in place of positive
changes.
Can be inclined to
Most effectively used at the end worry unduly, and
Painstaking,
of tasks to polish and scrutinise
Completer conscientious, anxious. reluctant to delegate.
the work for errors, subjecting it
Finisher Searches out errors.
to the highest standards of quality Nb:can be accused of
Polishes and perfects.
control. taking performance to
extremes
MACCAN TEAM MANAGEMENT WHEEL
The Team Management Wheel describes the eight different roles that people like to adopt when
working in a team, the eight work functions teams must perform in order to be successful and the
Linking Skills required to coordinate and lead a team.
1. Report Adviser: Gathering, uses and reporting information-behaviour- controls
2. Creator Innovator- generates and Creates and experiments with ideas-behaviour-researches.
3. Explorer/ promoter -Exploring and presenting opportunities –behaviour researches
4. Assessor Developer -Assessing and testing the applicability of new approaches- behaviour
researches
5. Thruster –Organiser-Establishing and implementing ways of making things work-planning
and organising
6. Concluder Producer-Concluding and delivering outputs-production
7. Inspector controller -Controlling and auditing the working of systems-advisory
8. Upholder Maintaining-Upholding and safeguarding standards and processes-eye on details
MANGING TEAMS EFFECTIVENES
Type of questions
Explain the characteristics of effective teams
Or
Explain how the manager can improve effectiveness of the teams
Or
Evaluate the effectiveness of the team
QUESTION :EXPLAIN THE CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE TEAMS
This question can be answered in two ways depending on how it is asked
General Characteristics of effective teams
Look for general feature or quantative and qualitative factors
I) GENERAL FEATURES
A group of individuals will not naturally develop into an effective team without planning
and intervention from leadership. The characteristics of effective teams include the following.
• Relatively small size to enable cohesion
• Complementary roles that enable team members to share common objectives
• A common purpose that provides the team with the focus needed to achieve the
end goal
• Interdependency
• Collective responsibility
• Collective accountability
• A sense of membership and responsibility
• Accountability
• Effective conflict resolution
ii) QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE FACTORS
QUANTATIVE
High output
Low labour turnover
Low error rates and wastages
Achievement of specific targets
Infrequent disruptions
QUALITATIVE FACTORS
Clear understanding of goals
Clear understanding of work roles
Involvement in decision making
Willingness to take on challenges
High level of trust among members
EXPLAIN HOW A MANAGER CAN IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TEAMS
From the information given identify symptoms of problems (signs of poor functioning teams)
Poor group norms
Conflicts within the group
Unhealthy competition
Low motivation
Lateness
High turnover
High error rates
Lack of commitment
Low output
How to improve Team effectiveness
Solving these problems and satisfaction of the team members
Define goals clearly
Agree on roles and responsibility
Enhance open communication
Create a cooperative atmosphere based on trust
Create opportunities for learning and improving
Manage conflicts
Reward praise recognise
Use leadership style suitable to situations-
EXPLAIN HOW TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CAN BE IMPROVE THROUGH
INTERPERSONAL SKILLS
From the information given identify symptoms of problems (signs of poor functioning teams)
Poor group norms
Conflicts within the group
Unhealthy competition
Low motivation
Lateness
High turnover
High error rates
Lack of commitment
Low output
PROPOSE USE OF KEY INTERPERSONAL SKILLS TO IMPROVE TEAM
EFFECTIVENESS
Build good relations within the team to ensure collaboration and cooperation
Improve communication to ensure information is shared
Encourage use of negotiation through reasoned arguments to develop alternatives
Encourage use of analyses and evaluation when solving problems
Ensure factual decisions are made where team members collaborate in data collection and
critical thinking
EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVE TEAMS OF TEAMS IN A PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY
FUNCTION
ASSESS CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE TEAMS
a) Identify signs of problems
b) Identify signs of effective teams (quantative and qualitative factors)
c) Answer to A above..Propose an approach to improve the team effectiveness
Hackman and Morris inputs-processes-outcomes/output framework
The input–process–output (IPO) model of teams provides a framework for conceptualizing teams
that suggests that many factors influence a team's productivity and cohesiveness.
It "provides a way to understand how teams perform, and how to maximize their performance"
This can by comparing team present circumstances, the process they are using and the results
a) Team inputs – how the present team looks like in terms of
Team size,
Skills
Knowledge,
Team composition,
Availability of resources.
Physical working condition
Personality traits,
Relationships
b)Team processes – the different ways that the team operates in order to achieve its
outcomes.
Planning
Procedures
Controls
Enhancing commitment
Communication
Conflict management
Information sharing
c) Team outcomes or output identify how the team is presently performing
Measured by achievement of
Quantity
Quality
Targets
Team satisfaction
NB:
Managing team conflict
ANALYSE NATURE OF ROLE OF RELATIONSHIPS IN WORK GROUPS AND TEAMS
The context in which relationships aspects in team and individual is explained in this learning
outcome is in three ways
ROLE
STAKEHOLDER
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
ROLE CONGRUENCE
EXPLAIN THE CONCEPTS OF ROLE INCONGRUENCE FOR INDIVIDUALS AND
TEAMS
The aim of this section is to analyse conflicts arising when teams work together and how it can
be managed .one of the key management approaches is to develop and maintain cooperative
working ,
What is a work role?
This is the part one plays by the virtual of occupying a particular position
What is role congruence?
The word congruence means two things are similar or fit together well or are compatibility. In
organisations this can be explained in three ways
Role congruence is the perception of the individual ’s roles and responsibilities as
compared with the position held within an organisation
Role congruence is the perception of Team roles and responsibilities compared to their
expectations from the organisation
Role congruence is comparison between the Position of a manager and the expectations
of different stakeholders regarding that position.
What is a role relationship?
Role relationships
This is explained in terms of relations within groups carrying out certain tasks together. Or the
relationships among functions working together .This is determined by management when
assigning roles
What are social relationships?
Social relationships: These exist informally among individuals working together as a group.
They impact each other positively by defining what is acceptable and not acceptable .This
automatically comes into existence when individuals work together.
What is the influence of work and role relationships?
The self-concept and roles
This is defined as ideas we have about who we are—physically, emotionally, socially, it is the
totality of individual’s thoughts and feelings having reference to [Link] consist of
our beliefs our personality traits, physical characteristics, abilities, values, goals, and roles. It
enables Individuals understand their roles and if they match with their totality of thoughts or
perceptions. Self-concept can be explained in three ways
Ideal self or how you wish you could be in ideal state
Self-image or how you see yourself.
Self-esteem or how much you value yourself
Nb: if there is inconsistency between individual self-image and ideal self then then self-esteem is
affected .This affects the way individuals do their roles and relate with each other.
If there is a mismatch then there is a situation of role incongruence.
HOW A MANAGER ISSUES ARISING FROM ROLE INCONGRUENCE FOR
INDIVIDUALS AND TEAMS
a) Find out the cause of role incongruence by focusing on
i) Individuals factors
Focus on specific individuals –roles are not matched properly by the manager
is it due to poor individual poor self-concept
ii) Teams team factors
Imbalance between responsivity and authority
Inability of individual to comply with defined team norms
Lack of communication of the expectations
Low expectations in terms of reward
Is It role overload
iii) The Manager and stakeholders factors
The inability of the manager to understand different stakeholders needs
Inability of the manager to manage perceptions and expectations of different stakeholders
Inability of the manager to understand the nature of their authority in a given situation-
line direct flow authority, staff specialised authority
Proposal suitable intervention by the manager
i) Apply Belbin /MCcan roles theory –refer previous notes
ii) Apply implicit self-theory
ii) Creating suitable group environment
Application of implicit self-theory
Implicit or self-theories categorises individuals based on
STABILITY AND CHANGEABILITY of personal attributes.
It is divided into two:
Entity theory-states that individuals believe there intelligence is fixed and
unchangeable .individual with this type of theory believe that assigned roles are difficult
and beyond their control. The manager can guided and control through instructions
Incremental theory –individual believe there level of intelligence can changed and
improved. Such people are changeable .The manager can encourage them to recognise
their strengths by exposing them to challenges. They should also be encouraged to rotate
roles with other team members
Conclusion
Rogers states as follows in regard to role congruence and self-theory
• Individuals are motivated to self-actualise and will seek out personal development
and growth opportunities to achieve their potential if conditions are right.
• If the organisation or group environment is destructive, negative or constraining
then individuals will experience a poor self-concept and feel devalued, leading to a
state of incongruence.
• Self-actualisation occurs when an individual is in a state of congruence.
• If there is an inconsistency between an individual’s self-image and their ideal self,
then their self-esteem will be affected
• However, if there is consistency between the self and role experience, then an
individual will be in a state of congruence.
Creating suitable group environment
Factors that determine group environment
The group environment can be improved as follows:
Encourage openness and self-disclosure with the group –GENUINESS
Encourage team member to accept each other-ACCEPTANCE
Encourage team members to understand and listen to each other-EMPATHY
STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT
Stakeholders-anyone or any group that has an interest in the operations of the organisation or the
outcome of its activity. They can have a significant impact on the performance and sustainability
of the strategic plans of the procurement and supply function.
The development of the procurement and supply function will be shaped by the level of
understanding that a manager has regarding key stakeholders.
Managers of the procurement and supply function need to build collaborative
relationships in order to enhance stakeholder engagement, and this requires an
integrated and proactive approach to ensure that stakeholder support is gained and
sustained
Factors contributing to the importance of stakeholder management in procurement and supply
Procurement staff have power to through position, specialist knowledge and skills
Increasing focus on procurement and organisation customers
Some stakeholders have strategic resources
Projects such as product development, process design, are implemented by teams
Laws and regulations keep on changing
Supply chain integrations with very long supply chains
Some stakeholders have the ability to influence quality, value addition, cost and pricing
The need to align procurement function with organisation objectives
Procurement managers have role culture with the structure with the ability to provide leadership
in the supply chain and influence colleagues
How to answer a question on stakeholder management
Identify a procurement and supply chain operation,plan,project,strategy
Identify particular groups of stakeholder-four directions
Identify stakeholder interests and influence –depending on who they are ,what they do
and their contributions to the procurement function operation,plan,project and strategy
Use stakeholder management tools to engage them (Lewis +(Mendelow JSW)
Identify Procurement or organisation operation
Designing an e-procurement system, outsourcing
Identify different procurement stake holder Groups
Participating staff and groups
Users of purchased inputs
Suppliers and contractors
Supply chain partners
The top management
Heads of other department
Factors considered in Stakeholder influence and interest:
With the information provided try to find out the following:
Who is affected directly and indirectly by the organisation’s actions?
• Who has power to influence the organisation’s decisions?
• Who would be concerned if the project or organisation succeeded or failed?
• Who has a personal interest in the project or organisation?
• Who will benefit through success of the project or organisation?
• Who could help solve problems?
• Who sets the regulations that must be adhered to?
• Who carries out related actions?
Propose a method of engaging stake holders
Lewis 2011 stakeholder roles
Mendelow stakeholder mapping
Johnson and scholes –relationship strategies
LEWIS 2011 STAKEHOLDER ROLES
The success of procurement activity will be influenced by procurement manager’s level of
understanding of the interdependency of procurement and other function in the delivery of
procurement projects .To this extent Lewis identifies four key stakeholder roles
Connectors-providing support- tangible resources, knowledge and skills –suppliers and team
members
Opinion leader-influencing others-strategic groups such as technical manager, finance manager
Journalists-gathering information and reporting-project manager who report on project
progression
Counsellors-providing psychological support-where there i
MENDELOW STAKEHOLDER MAPPING
Minimum effort: in the context the information provided those levels of resistance to
procurement plans, and strategies low power low interest groups
Keep informed: in the context of the information provided those look forward to the success of
procurement plans or strategies for their own survivor although they can influence anything
unless they form coalitions to put a case for their interests
Keep satisfied: not active in day to day procurement activities but a key influencers because their
control of resources and decision making
Manage closely: They oppose or enforce changes e.g. the technical managerial and specialists
JOHNSON AND SCHOLES STAKEHOLDER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT
STRATEGIES
Johnson and Scholes adapted Mendelow matrix and tried to explain types of relationships to
engage with different stakeholders
Keep satisfied-high power high interest –keep updating on the project and reassure them, can
provide project reports regularly
Manage closely-hold regular meetings and ensure the project objectives are met on time
Keep informed –keep them close, show consideration when decisions are being made
Minimum effort: spend little effort and time
EXPLAIN AN APPROACH TO MANAGING CONFLICTS AMONG TEAMS
Identify types of conflict behaviour from the information provided
Categorise conflict behaviour into intra and inter
Propose conflict management approach
What are group conflicts?
Conflict can be defined as antagonistic interactions in which one party tries to block the actions
or decisions of another party. Team conflict may arise from work related activities or from
relationships among the team members
What is conflict behaviour?
These are observable symptoms of conflict with a team .Conflict behaviour must be identified
from the information provided in two ways:
General symptoms
Robbin specific sources of conflict
Pinkely conflict frames
GENERAL SYMPTOMS
Interpersonal issues such as Rivalry, jealousy personality clashes,
Inflexible attitude by some group members towards change towards adopting new ways
Hostility and unhealthy competition for scarce resources
Lack of hygiene factors
Disagreement over of goals
Misunderstandings due to poor communication
Disagreement Trade union representatives and management
Status and prestige some managers are more important than others –procurement and
finance
Formal and informal conflicts-employees want to use short cuts management want forma
channels to be followed.
Political conflict some departmental heads exercise power to influence things
ROBBIN SPECIFIC SOURCES OF CONFLICT
1. Structure of the team-size, the team may be too large and conflicts may happen because
of ambiguity of responsibilities and accountabilities
2. Personal factors-incompatibility of personality types, values and believes
3. Poor communication-information overload, under load and use of poor channels
CLASSIFICATION OF CONFLICT
Intra
Inter
INTRA –GROUP CONFLICT (WRITTEN IN RED)
Intragroup conflict (or infighting) refers to conflict between two or more members of the same
group or team.
INTERGROUP CONFLICTS (WRITTEN IN BLUE)
Intergroup conflict refers to disagreements that occur between two or more different groups.
OUTCOME OF CONFLICTS (NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE)
Negative
Positive
Pinkly dimensions
Negative
This means that conflicts are destructive and non-value adding negative conflicts lead to the
following outcomes
Stress and anxiety
Decreased productivity
Decreased morale
Mistrusts
Reduced cooperation
Work disruptions
Positive
This means conflicts part of social relationships and may lead to better performance when they
occur. Manager can encourage positive conflicts in order increase self-evaluation and creativity
and avoidance of too much harmony leading to complacency .Positive conflicts will lead to the
following outcomes
Better decisions because of ideas generated through arguments
Creativity of new ideas and new solutions
Transparency of information given by individual
Team learning
Avoidance of assumptions
PINKELY THREE DIMENSIONS
There three ways which can be used to examine conflict situations?
1. Conflict and its effect on relationships and output
2. Conflicts as express through behavior of people e.g. anger
3. Conflict benefiting a situation
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT APPROACHES
Thomas Kilman five styles of conflict management
Stein theory of internal cohesion
THOMAS KILMAN FIVE STYLES OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
Competition-use of power, authority or threat
Collaboration –encourage joint problem solving
Avoidance-withdraw or suppress a situation, take a break for some time before visiting the issues
to cool off
Compromise-parties together find a way out
Accommodation: self-sacrificing
STEIN THEORY OF INTERNAL COHESION
Improving team cohesion can be done by creating awareness to the team members regarding the
following;
If conflicts arise they affect everybody
That the team leader can use authority reduce conflicts
That team cohesion will enable the team achieve its goals