CHAPTER 4
Chapter 4: Results and Discussion
This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of the data collected from
respondents through a distributed questionnaire. The results were subjected to statistical
analysis to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Part 1: Profile of Respondents
A total of thirty-five senior high school students from PAMMA Learning Center
participated in the study. The respondents' profiles included information on age, sex, grade
level and strand, GPA, and academic performance. These details were analyzed using
frequency counts and percentage distributions.
Table 1.a Profile of Respondent in terms of Age
Age Frequency Percentage
17 and below 19 54.3
18 11 31.5
19 1 2.9
20 2 5.7
21 and above 2 5.7
Total 35 100
The table presents the age of the respondents, the table 1.a shows that the age of 17 years
old and below has the highest frequency count which is 19 or 54.3% on the other hand, the age
of 20, 21 and above got the lowest frequency count of 2 or 5.7%.
This implies that most of our respondents are 17 years and above of age and the 20, 21
years above are the least of our respondents. It is obvious since the respondents are students.
“The man who does not read books has no advantage over the one who cannot read them.” —
Mark Twain
Table 1.b Profile of Respondent in terms of Sex
Sex Frequency Percentage
Male 33 94.3
Female 2 5.7
Total 35 100
Table 1.b shows the Profile of the respondents in terms of Sex. It can be gleaned from the
table above that males got the highest frequency count which is 33 or 94.3% while females got
the lowest frequency count which is 2 or 5.7%.
This implies that majority of the respondents are males. It is obvious because most of the
respondents are males.“Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those
who prepare for it today.” —Malcolm X
Table 1.c Profile of Respondents in terms of Grade level and strand
Grade Level and Strand Frequency Percentage
Grade 11(HUMMS) 5 14.3
Grade 11(STEM) 3 8.6
Grade 11(GAS) 2 5.7
Grade 11(TVL) 6 17.2
Grade 12(HUMMS) 6 17.2
Grade 12(GAS) 2 5.7
Grade 12(STEM) 4 11.5
Grade 12(TVL) 3 8.6
Grade 12(Pre-Bac) 4 11.5
Total 35 100
Table 1.c shows the Profile of Respondents according to their course. The most of the
respondents are the grade 11(TVL) and grade 12(HUMMS) with a frequency of 6 and a
percentage score of 17.2% while the grade 11,12(GAS) has the lowest frequency score of only 2
and a percentage score of 5.7%.
This implies that most of respondents are coming from the grade 11,12may be because
they are dedicated to studying. “Teachers can open the door, but you must enter it yourself.” —
Chinese proverb
Table 1.d Profile of Axcademic respondents
Weighted
Peers Descriptive Rating
Mean
1. How would you rate your overall academic 3.12 Very Good
performance?
2. How would you rate the effectiveness of your study 2.71 Very Good
habits in helping you achieve your academic goals?
3. How would you rate your self-learning skill? 2.77 Very Good
4. How would you rate your overall level of motivation 2.90 Very Good
and engagement in your academic studies?
5. How confident are you in your ability to apply the 2.97 Very Good
lessons you learned in your classes to real-world
situations?
6. How would you rate your ability to prioritize tasks 2.85 Very Good
effectively?
7. How would you rate your discipline when you create 2.91 Very Good
and follow a daily or weekly schedule to manage your
time?
8. How well do you handle unexpected disruptions or 2.57 Very Good
changes to your schedule?
9. How would you rate your skill in estimating the time 2.80 Very Good
required to complete tasks accurately?
10. management skills in balancing academic 2.97 Very Good
responsibilities with personal commitments?
11. How would you rate the overall workload of your 2.14 Good
academic activities?
12. On a scale of 1-5 how often do you feel overwhelmed 2.94 Very Good
by the amount of coursework you have to complete?
13. How well do you manage stress related to academic 2.68 Very Good
deadlines and workload pressure?
14. How would you rate the clarity of instructions and 2.80 Very Good
expectations provided for your assignments and
projects?
15. How would you rate your coping mechanism in having 2.82 Very Good
to work with the workload pressure?
2.8 Very Good
Average Weighted Mean