1

I. Sentence Breakdown and Meaning Contribution

1. The cat is inside the house.

• Constituent Parts:

* The cat: Noun phrase (determiner + noun)

* is: Verb (auxiliary)

* inside the house: Prepositional phrase (preposition + determiner +

noun)

• Meaning Contribution:

* "The cat": Refers to a specific, definite cat (referential reference).

* "is": Indicates a state of being (copula) and links the subject to the
location.

* "inside the house": Specifies the location of the cat. "Inside" indicates
containment, "the house" refers to a specific dwelling.

* Overall meaning: The sentence asserts that a particular cat is currently

located within a specific house. The meaning is built compositionally; the
individual meanings of words combine according to syntactic structure to
create the overall sentence meaning.

2. John gave Mary a book.

• Constituent Parts:

* John: Noun phrase (proper noun)

* gave: Verb (transitive)

* Mary: Noun phrase (proper noun)

* a book: Noun phrase (determiner + noun)

2

• Meaning Contribution:

* "John": Refers to a specific person (the agent).

* "gave": Denotes the action of transferring possession.

* "Mary": Refers to a specific person (the recipient).

* "a book": Refers to an unspecified book (the theme/patient).

* Overall meaning: John performed the action of giving a book to Mary.

John caused Mary to possess a book. This follows Fillmore's case grammar
where verbs dictate which noun phrases play specific roles.

3. The black cat jumped over the lazy dog.

• Constituent Parts:

* The black cat: Noun phrase (determiner + adjective + noun)

* jumped: Verb (intransitive)

* over the lazy dog: Prepositional phrase (preposition + determiner +

adjective + noun)

• Meaning Contribution:

* "The black cat": Refers to a specific cat, described as black (modifiers

specify the referent).

* "jumped": Denotes the action of leaping.

* "over the lazy dog": Specifies the path of the jump and the object that
was jumped over. "Lazy" describes a specific dog.

* Overall meaning: A particular black cat performed the action of jumping,

moving over a specific dog described as lazy.

II. Truth Conditions

3

1. The sun is shining today.

• Truth Conditions: The sentence is true if and only if, on the current day,
the sun is emitting light and is not obscured by clouds or other atmospheric
conditions. If the sun is hidden, or it's nighttime, the statement is false.

2. Some birds can run.

• Truth Conditions: The sentence is true if and only if there exists at least
one type or instance of bird that possesses the ability to run. It doesn't need
to be all birds, just some. (Examples: ostriches, rheas). If no species of bird
can run, the sentence is false.

3. Some students passed the exam.

• Truth Conditions: The sentence is true if and only if at least one student
successfully achieved a passing grade on the exam. If no student passed, the
sentence is false.

III. Ambiguity and Compositional Semantics

1. I saw the man with a new telephone.

• Ambiguity: Structural (syntactic) ambiguity. It's unclear whether "with a

new telephone" modifies "the man" (I saw the man who had a new
telephone) or "saw" (I used a new telephone to see the man).

• Compositional Semantics:

* CS can assign different syntactic structures and corresponding semantic

interpretations:

* [I saw [the man [with a new telephone]]] - "with a new telephone"

modifies "the man." This reading entails the ma

ading entails the man possesses or is closely associated with a new

telephone.
4

* [I [saw [the man] [with a new telephone]]] - "with a new

telephone" modifies "saw." This reading implies I used a new telephone to
see the man, potentially a phone with a camera.

* The selection of the correct parse depends on the context.

2. **She loves her children more than her husband.**

*Ambiguity:** Scope ambiguity. It's unclear whether:

* She loves her children more than she loves her husband (Her love for
children > her love for her husband).

* She loves her children more than her husband loves her children
(Her love for children > her husband's love for her children).

* **Compositional Semantics:**

* CS can use quantifier scope analysis to represent the two readings:

* loves(she, children) > loves(she, husband): Her level of love for

her children is greater than her love for her husband.

* loves(she, children) > loves(husband, children): Her level of love

for her children is greater than the level of love that her husband has for
their children.

3. **Food is ready to eat.**

**Ambiguity:** Thematic role ambiguity.

* "Food" could mean food is ready as in is ready to consume.

* Even knowing "Food" is the subject of the scentence , "ready to eat"

could mean ready to consume food (the agent of eating) or Food is ready to
be consumed (the patient/theme).

* **Compositional Semantics:**
5

* CS could assign different thematic roles based on the context and

the verb "eat":

* Food is the agent: ready_to_eat(Food) - Foot has the property of

being prepared and willing to eat.

* Food is the patient: ready_to_be_eaten(Food) - Foot has the

property of being prepared to be consumed.

* World knowledge and context are crucial to determine the correct

meaning.

**IV. Meaning Composition of Phrases**

1. **Red apple:**

* **Composition:** "Red" modifies "apple," restricting the set of apples to

those that are red. The meaning of "red apple" is the intersection of the set
of things that are red and the set of things that are apples.

* **Compositional Rule:** Adjective + Noun results in a modified noun.

2. **Running water:**

**Composition:** "Running" modifies "water," indicating water that is in

motion. The meaning of "running water" is water that possesses the attribute
of running.

* **Compositional Rule:** Verb (present participle) + Noun results in a

modified noun.

3. **Three tall buildings:**

Composition: "Three" quantifies the number of buildings, and "tall"

modifies the characteristics of those buildings. "Tall" restricts the set of
buildings to those which are tall and there are three members of this set.
6

Compositional Rule:** Number + Adjective + Noun results in a quantified

and modified noun.

V. Semantic Roles

1. **The chef cooked the meal.**

* **The chef:** Agent (the entity performing the action)

* **cooked:** Verb (the action)

* **the meal:** Patient/Theme (the entity undergoing the action or being

acted upon)

2. **The dog chased the ball.**

**The dog:** Agent (the entity performing the action)

* **chased:** Verb (the action)

* **the ball:** Patient/Theme (the entity being acted upon)

3. **The teacher gave the students a homework assignment.**

* **The teacher:** Agent (the entity performing the action)

* **gave:** Verb (the action)

**the students: Recipient/Beneficiary (the entity receiving something)

*a homework assignment:** Theme/Patient (the entity being transferred)

VI. "Kick the Bucket": Literal vs. Figurative**

• Literal Use:** Imagine someone standing on a bucket to reach something

high, and then kicking the bucket away (intentionally or accidentally).

Meaning:* Performing the physical act of kicking a bucket.

7

*Example:** "He needed to change the lightbulb, so he kicked the

bucket out from under his feet." (Implies he intentionally moved the bucket.)

• **Figurative Use:** "To die." * **Meaning:** To cease to live; to pass

away.

* **Example:** "After a long illness, he finally kicked the bucket."

(Implies that he died.)

**Origin:** The origin is debated, but likely relates to methods of suicide

where someone would stand on a bucket with a noose around their neck and
kick the bucket away.

• **Analysis:**

Literal:* The meaning is compositional. Each word ("kick," "the," "bucket")

contributes its literal meaning, and the sentence describes a physical action.

**Figurative:** The meaning is *not* compositional. The phrase as a

whole has a meaning that is different from the sum of its individual word
meanings. This is an idiom. The entire phrase acts as a single semantic unit.