100% found this document useful (1 vote)
257 views4 pages

Understanding Psychosophy Logic Types

The document categorizes individuals based on four primary functions: logic, emotion, physics, and will, each with distinct characteristics across four levels. It describes how people with different types of logic approach knowledge and debate, while those with varying emotional types interact with their feelings and relationships. Additionally, it outlines how individuals relate to the material world and their assertiveness in social contexts, emphasizing the complexity of human behavior and thought processes.

Uploaded by

Janine Genvo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
257 views4 pages

Understanding Psychosophy Logic Types

The document categorizes individuals based on four primary functions: logic, emotion, physics, and will, each with distinct characteristics across four levels. It describes how people with different types of logic approach knowledge and debate, while those with varying emotional types interact with their feelings and relationships. Additionally, it outlines how individuals relate to the material world and their assertiveness in social contexts, emphasizing the complexity of human behavior and thought processes.

Uploaded by

Janine Genvo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Logic : L

1st logic (LFVE, LFEV, LEFV, LEVF, LVFE, LVEF) :


People with first logic at first are mainly guided by their desire for knowledge and understanding
of truth. They have a desire for precision and intellectual rigor. They want to discover abstract,
formal rules that influence the world (Einstein: LVEF, Heraclitus LVFE). Those people tend to
like spending their time alone thinking and reasoning in their head and solving intellectual
problems that stimulate their mind. They can be prone to rigidity and disdain against people who
lack intellectual rigor. Their reasoning often take the form of intern monologue or axioms
accumulation (Spinoza: LVFE, Pascal LEVF), even Plato (LFVE) who tried to use socratic
dialogue end up to create monologue where his Socrates opponents have a role of simple student
that have to agree with the master. They are prone to be bookish. They are extremely common in
philosophy, mathematics and other scientific fields. They tend to have firm and absolute opinions
despite basing their work on a methodological skepticism.

2nd logic (ELFV, ELVF, VLEF, VLFE, FLVE, FLEV)


People with 2nd logic are driven by a natural curiosity and a desire for controversy. Unlike 1st
logic they prefer to openly philosophize and argue with others in debate rather than having an
inner personal research of truth (Socrate : VLEF or Epicurius FLEV both share 2nd logic). They
are quick thinkers and sharp critics who like to play the devil advocate. They are interested in
abstract ideas and like to play with them. Unlike 1st logic they don’t mind arguing about all and
nothing no matter the lack of scientific value of a subject or their lack of expertise on a subject.
They are often gifted at vulgarization and in rhetoric. They have a wide range of knowledge and
interpretation that they like to expose with talkativeness and pride (Stalin: FLVE, Lenin:VLFE
were both boastful about their Marxist knowledge). They share their opinion with confidence but
always with a request of debate on it.​

3rd logic (EFLV, EVLF, FVLE, FELV, VELF, VFLE) ​


3rd logic are seeking accuracy and justification, but unlike for 1st logic this desire is not a
consequence of their natural desire of intellectual rigor but mainly because they are suspicious
about what seem simplistic conclusions. 3rd logic is representative of a love-hate relation (like
all 3rd functions). Those people distrust their mind and fear harsh judgment. This fear can be
healthy skepticism but at a pathological level it can turn into a desire of ignoring the truth that
may hurt them (combined with 1st will those types are prone to censorship due to their
intellectual insecurities like Adolf Hitler: VELF or Napoleon VFLE). Those people even when
extremely intelligent (which is not a rare thing) tend to fear being in an intellectual competition
with opponents too rough intellectually for them. 4 th logic (FVEL, FEVL, EFVL, EVFL,
VEFL, VFEL)

4th logic, like the 2nd logic, is very good at the accumulation of diverse sources, some may be
gifted in academic fields but unlike 2nd logic they tend to think that intellectual discussion is
just talking and disconnected from their life. They rarely burn for intellectualism and are more
thinking that it's “it’s just the thing that I study” but nothing more. ​


Emotion : E
1st emotion (ELVF, ELFV, EFVL, EFLV, EVFL, EVLF)
1st emotion are deeply in touch with their inner passion, and value their emotional reaction with
authenticity. They are often gifted eccentric artists who like making exaltation of their emotion.
The 1st function is the function where people are the most confident but can also be called the
narcissistic function, it’s even more visible in the 1st function. The 1st Emotion subordinates all
to its feeling (Rousseau ELFV was the rock star of the philosopher!). They easily hypnotized
people by their enthusiasm or on the contrary by their aura of tragic soul. They openly show
their indignation about a subject or someone. They show their artistic gift with pride. They are
the most common type among poets and singers. They are confident and capricious lovers.

2nd emotion (VELF, VEFL, LEFV, LEVF, FEVL, FELV)


while 1st emotion bend their surrounding to their emotion 2nd emotion adapt their emotion to
their surrounding. They are gifted to make deep emotional connections with others. They are
gifted to include others into emotion. They often have sympathy for outsiders. They like sharing
emotion with people rather than having a solipsistic emotion. They make others feel even more
than they feel. They are gifted in communication and can be charming and often charismatic
(combined with 1st will it can bring in the world the most influential leader like Martin Luther
King VELF or the prophet Mohamed VEFL). They are reassuring lovers.

3rd emotion (VLEF, VFEL, FLEV, FVEL, LFEV, LVEF)


People with 3rd emotion appear as insensitive and cold based on the fact that they tend to distrust
emotion, but it is quite the opposite. People with 3rd emotion distrust feeling not because they
don’t feel but because they are terrible at dealing with their own feelings. Those people are
haunted by their feelings but are terrible at expressing it. They are insecure about their ability to
connect on an informal level with others (especially in romance) and express weirdly or in an
overly formal way when doing it. They are the type the most prone to alcoholism. They often
have artistic tendencies unexpected of them who help them to express emotion that they are
unable to express directly. They are insecure lovers.

4th emotion (VLFE, VFLE, LVFE, LFVE, FVLE, FLVE)


People with 4th emotion are emotionally stable, often skilled and quite confident about their
relationship but rarely put it as a first. They tend to be interested in art as a detached and critical
spectator but rarely make a career in art themselves. They rarely resist the emotion of others (the
powerful Napoleon himself (VLFE) was unable to resist the caprice of his wife). They are
compliant lover.

Physics : F
1st physics (FLEV, FELV, FLVE, FEVL, FVLE, FVEL)
1st physics is deeply involved in the material world but this materialism can express itself in
many forms. Some 1st physics materialism will become a seeking of basic sensory pleasure (can
be food, sex, violence or drugs), it can also become an obsession about material possession and
economic interest or a deep attention towards its own physical state (it can be beauty like
Marilyn Monroe or strength like Arnold Schwarzenegger). 1st physics have a strong sense of
cost-efficient thinking, they are the type least likely to be interested in something that will not
bring results. This type is the one who differs the most depending on the gender and the sexuality
of the person. Women of this type are common among cooks, models or prostitutes (respectable
jobs by the way) while Men of this type are common among bodybuilders, soldiers or
entrepreneurs.

2nd physics 2nd function is by far the most positive function on a social level, 2nd physics does
not make an exception. 2nd physics, unlike the 1st, is not based on an inner rapport towards the
physical world, it is about taking care of others' physical needs and taking care of the material
needs of the group. But that does not always mean that those people are particularly
compassionate, this caring is based on a strong pragmatism (Otto Von Bismark (VFLE)’s social
security system was based on pragmatic political goals rather than generosity). Those people
tend to encourage sport and value physical beauty a lot (Plato (LFVE) in the republic encouraged
physical training of students and assimilated beauty and goodness).

3rd physics
3rd physics are focus on the material world but unlike the 1st physics or the 2nd this focus cause
mainly trouble for them. They can be over-worried about their body (often hypochondriac or
feeling ugly), fear economical trouble, disgust about their own physical desire. This love-hate
relationship towards physic is even more visible about sexual example, some people of this type
is at the same time obsessed by sex and ashamed by it (Rousseau’s work is extremely puritan
despite being a sexual masochist himself, Mohamed's disgust toward the material world
especially sensory pleasure is also a good example) . On the other hand this rapport towards the
material world makes them very sensitive towards the physical pain of others (Lenin was
disgusted by the material condition of the working class). They often are compassionately
socialist and anti-bourgeois (like Rousseau or Lenin).

4th physics
4th physics are oblivious of their material surroundings and rarely care about their material
possession. They appear to others as completely disconnected from everyday life. They are often
disconnected from their body’s sensation. They have a very low effort-results thinking which
means that they are more likely to fight for a lost cause than everyone else (Socrate’s trial shows
it). They often have an interpretation of the world somewhat disconnected from material reality
(Hegel’s reason in history, Charles Maurras’s ideal of an eternal France, or Hitler’s total lack of
connection with germany’s military power)

Will: V

1st will:
1st will is guided by affirmation of willpower in a given society. People with 1st will want to
have an impact on the external world and crave for social eternity and personal pride. They don’t
fear affirm themselves by going against the social norm. Those types can affirm their willpower
in two different ways, oppose themselves to the establishment as a rebel lone wolf who will
inspire others(like Socrate, Marx or Wagner) or become the leader of the pack (like Robespierre,
Napoleon or Lenin). They don’t fear confrontation and enjoy it. They often have a confident and
slightly arrogant attitude when asserting their views. They often have an authoritarian but
paternalist worldview.
2nd will:
2nd will unlike 1st will is a democratic function based on collective deliberation and healthy
negotiation to accomplish a common goal, those types are able to confront others if necessary but
will try to find a compromise rather than trying to crush other’s willpower. The notion of fairness
and impartiality in the distribution of tasks is the core motive of this type. They always express
their opinion with humility and respect for others. They advocate freedom of expression more
than any type ( even more if white logic leads like Kant: LFEV or Spinoza LFVE). They are
likely to play the role of the peace-maker in a confrontation. 2nd will take leadership by duty
rather than childish power seeking.

3rd will
3rd will is always the most painful and problematic function , but the 3rd will is without doubt
one of the functions most linked with pathological behavior. People with 3rd function want to be
assertive and forceful but rarely can be because they feel pushed by the external world who crush
their potential. 3rd will turn this feeling of injustice in a different manner depending on their 1st
function.1st Emotion with 3rd will are likely to have martyr syndrome. 1st logic will become
embittered and haughty intellectual paranoid about the crowd's savageness ( Plato’s
Authoritarian Republic is an answer to this fear as well as Pascal's desire to mask the artificiality
of law by fear of political disorder) . 1st physics will answer to this feeling of powerlessness by
impulsive outburst of violence or/and sadism (like Sade and Stalin). Unlike 1st will who are at
their ease in an open conflict, 3rd will answer to their opponents by different form of back
stabbing (Leibniz was not honorable at all, he met Spinoza in person and did not openly disagree
with his philosophical thought in person, but after made a whole book of metaphysics written
against the ethic of Spinoza based on it and answered that he was not inspired at all by it and that
he despised this work, despite the fact that his monade theory is greatly inspired from Spinoza's
monism.) .

4th will
4th will don’t have any aspiration for power or leadership and are unlikely to want to assert
themselves more than necessary. They prefer either to be dutiful follower or passive observer of
events. They are likely to follow Cartesian morality. They are unlikely to go against social norms
but often because they don’t want to be bothered rather than because they agree with it.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Individuals with fourth physics often exhibit detachment from the material world, appearing disinterested in their physical surroundings and everyday life tasks. Their low effort-results thinking makes them more likely to engage in pursuits perceived as losing battles, disconnected from practical outcomes. This perspective can result in a philosophical or idealistic outlook, as seen in historical figures who pursued abstract ideals at odds with material realities. Such detachment can influence personal motivation, leading to a focus on intellectual or idealistic endeavors rather than tangible, material goals .

Individuals with first emotion are deeply connected with their inner feelings, expressing them confidently and often using them to captivate others. This often results in a magnetic personality that draws others in through artistic expression and the embrace of drama. Conversely, individuals with third emotion tend to distrust and struggle with their emotions. Despite feeling deeply, they often have difficulty expressing these feelings and may appear cold or detached, using art as a substitute outlet for emotional expression .

Individuals with first physics are deeply immersed in the material world, pursuing sensory pleasures, material possessions, and physical fitness enthusiastically. Their focus on material success is driven by a pragmatic approach to cost-efficiency. On the other hand, individuals with third physics have a conflicted relationship with material concerns, often feeling anxious about their physical desires or economic stability. This ambivalence can lead to hypersensitivity to others' physical pain and a tendency towards socialism or anti-materialist views .

Skepticism for individuals with third logic arises from a distrust of simplistic conclusions. They seek accuracy and justification not purely out of a love for intellectual rigor but from a cautiousness borne out of fear of harsh judgment. This skepticism can manifest in a healthy wariness but also may lead to denial of uncomfortable truths due to intellectual insecurities .

Individuals with first will are driven by a strong desire to assert their willpower. They thrive in confronting societal norms, either as rebellious figures inspiring change or as leaders with authoritative, paternalistic tendencies. In contrast, individuals with second will favor cooperation and democratic processes. Their leadership is grounded in fairness and negotiation, aiming to achieve common goals through collective effort rather than domination. This reflects a willingness to lead as a duty rather than an assertion of power .

Individuals with first logic are driven by a deep desire for knowledge and truth, focusing on precision and intellectual rigor. They prefer solitary reasoning and are often involved in creating formal rules and concepts. In contrast, those with second logic are more extroverted in their approach, preferring debate and interaction over solitary reflection. They are less concerned with scientific validity and more with the breadth of ideas and discussion. This difference underscores a core divergence in how each group prioritizes intellectual engagement .

Individuals with third will often struggle with asserting themselves, feeling constrained by external pressures that inhibit their potential. This struggle frequently culminates in frustration and indirect confrontation, where they might engage in subtle power plays rather than open conflict. In contrast, first will individuals confidently assert their power, either challenging or leading with little regard for opposition. Their approach to power dynamics is direct and often confrontational, embodying confidence and a desire for influence .

Individuals with fourth emotion tend to maintain emotional stability and confidence in relationships but often do not prioritize them. Their artistic engagement is usually as detached consumers, rather than passionate creators. This detachment can challenge their ability to form deep emotional connections or pursue a career in the arts. Their stable yet reserved emotional presence results in reliable, albeit less emotionally intense or expressive, interactions in personal and artistic domains .

First logic individuals engage in philosophical discourse through rigorous internal monologue, often leading to absolute opinions despite skepticism. They focus on formalized, structured thinking, which can be seen in the monological style of philosophers like Spinoza. Meanwhile, second logic individuals thrive in philosophical debates, enjoying the playfulness of abstract ideas without the constraints of depth or expertise. This difference results in a more dynamic, open-ended discourse for second logic types, as opposed to the structured, albeit rigid, debates favored by first logic individuals .

First emotions drive artistic expression through an authentic and confident display of personal feelings, often resulting in captivating and magnetic artistic outputs that draw societal attention and admiration. These individuals often use their art to communicate personal truths powerfully. Second emotions, however, focus on connecting with others, integrating societal feedback into their artistic expression. This results in art that resonates deeply with audiences, fostering a communal experience and societal influence through shared emotions and charismatic engagement .

You might also like