0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views27 pages

EIA Methods for Environmental Impact Assessment

The document outlines various methods for identifying environmental impacts, including ad hoc methods, checklists, matrices, networks, and overlays, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages. It emphasizes the importance of systematic approaches in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) that can effectively gather, organize, and quantify data. Additionally, it discusses the significance of cost-benefit analysis in evaluating project impacts.

Uploaded by

Anamika Singh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views27 pages

EIA Methods for Environmental Impact Assessment

The document outlines various methods for identifying environmental impacts, including ad hoc methods, checklists, matrices, networks, and overlays, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages. It emphasizes the importance of systematic approaches in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) that can effectively gather, organize, and quantify data. Additionally, it discusses the significance of cost-benefit analysis in evaluating project impacts.

Uploaded by

Anamika Singh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

METHODS OF ENVRONMENT IMPACT

IDENTIFICATION

❖ Ad hoc method
❖ Checklists
❖ Matrices
❖ Overlays
❖ Networks
Cost benefit analysis
EIA Methodology: selection
Criteria
Each technique and method used for EIA should have the following features
• It should be systematic in approach and should be able to gather and
organize and summarize large amount of data coming from different
sources
• It should have good and reliable predictive ability and should be able to
quantify the impact
• It should be simple so that even with limited manpower available, with
can be adopted without much difficulty
• It should identify specific parameters which are likely to have significant
impact and should be comprehensive enough to contain all possible
options and alternatives for proper decision making
Types of Impact
• Impacts on environment due to the project are
broadly classified as:
• 1. Positive impact
• 2. Negative impact
• Further these impacts are classified as
• 1. Short term impact
• 2. Long term impact
• 3. Reversible impact
• 4. Irreversible impact
• 5. Local impact
1. Ad hoc Method
❖ Simple method based on subjective environment impacts on broad
aspects.

❖ Ad hoc method is useful when time constraints and lack of


information require that the EIA must rely exclusively on expert
opinion.

❖ A good example of an ad hoc method is a team of experts


assembled for a short time to conduct an EIA. Each expert's
conclusions are based on a unique combination of experience,
training and intuition.
[Link] hoc Method
❖ It provides minimal guidance for total impact assessment while
suggesting the broad areas of possible impacts and the general
nature of these possible impacts.

❖ Eg. Impact on plant and animal life may be stated as minimal but
adverse,
whereas, socio-economic impact may be stated as significant but
extremely beneficial.

❖ The criteria used to evaluate impacts are not comparable, the


relative weights of various impacts cannot be compared;

❖ When more scientific methods are available, it is not


recommended.
Ad hoc method:-
ADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE

❖ Specialists on a particular ❖ It require expert, difficult


area will provide guidance. to get the panel of experts
for each assessment.
❖ Short/long term impact
are merely examined on
guess basis.
❖ Identification , prediction
and interpretation of
impacts are quite poor
[Link] Method
❖ Checklist means a listing of potential Environmental Impacts.

❖ Checklists are standard lists of the types of impacts associated with a


particular type of project.

❖ They are more formalized version of ad hoc approaches ---


specific areas of impact are listed i.e. environmental, social and economic
and instructions are supplied for impact identification and evaluation.

❖ Checklists methods are primarily for organizing information or ensuring


that no potential impact is overlooked.

❖ This method is done to assess the nature of the impacts i.e. its type such
as adverse /beneficial , short term or long term , no effect or significant
impact , reversible or irreversible etc
Types of Checklists Method:-

❖Simple Lists.

❖Descriptive Checklists.

❖Scaling Checklists.

❖Scaling Weighting Checklist.


Types of Checklists Method
❖ Simple Checklist: a list of environmental parameters
with no guidelines on how they are to be measured
and interpreted.
❖ Descriptive Checklist: includes an identification of
environmental parameters and guidelines on how to
measure data on particular parameters.
❖ Scaling Checklist: similar to a descriptive checklist, but
with additional information on subjective scaling of
the parameters.
❖ Scaling Weighting Checklist: similar to a scaling
checklist, with additional information for the
subjective evaluation of each parameter with respect
to all the other parameters.
Page-9
Checklists

ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
❖Simple to ❖Do not distinguish
understand and use. between direct and
❖Good for site indirect impacts.
selection and ❖Sometime it is a
priority setting. cumbersome task.
3. Matrices
❖Matrix and its variants provide us a
framework of interaction of different actions
/activities of a project with potential
Environmental Impacts caused by them.
❖They incorporate a list of project activities
with a checklist of environmental components
that might be affected by these activities
3. Matrices
❖It was pioneer by Leopold et al(1971).
❖It lists about 100 project actions and about 88
environmental characteristic and condition.
❖Each activity and its potential for impact is
noted where interaction is anticipated its
magnitude(M) and importance(I) are also
indicated.
Matrix Method
Impact identification matrix
(example)
Matrices Method :-
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
❖Link action to impact❖Difficult to
distinguish direct
❖Good method for and indirect impacts
displaying EIA results
❖ focus on first order
impact i.e. impact
from proposed
action on particular
env. component
❖Qualitative
❖No cause-effect
relationship
4. Network method
❖Shown in the form of tree called as
Relevance/Impact tree/Sequence diagram.
❖Identification of direct ,indirect /short and
long term environment impact is a crucial and
intact basic step of making Impact tree.
❖Used to identify cause-effect linkages
❖Visual description of linkages
Network Method
Gcw, i _
r:acJHo ,an
[Link]:'JU 5i
I . -·

-- : _ i- ------,-. P°'11ut·--' -...

[Hll111l llil9

..
. . -·

I er&csiion

f :iJ:gilJu,e.3-· ·:: N etl, ·or of pulp, [Link] in1pacts (source: Lohruu [Link] ]irn 198 ·. _
Networks Method
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
❖Link action to ❖Can become overly
impact complex if used
❖Useful in simplified beyond simplified
form in checking version
for second order ❖Qualitative
impacts
❖Handles direct and
indirect impacts
5. Overlays
❖ Rely on a set of maps of a project
area’s environmental
characteristics covering physical ,
social, ecological, aesthetic
aspects.
❖ By overlaying these maps, area
possessing a preferred
combination of these variables
can be identified within the
project area boundaries, the
impacted areas and their relative
geographical location.
Overlay Method
Overlay Method
❖Older Technique: environmental features are
mapped on transparent plastic in different
colors.
❖Newer Technique: Geographic Information
Systems (GIS).
Overlay Method
Overlays Method:-

ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGE
❖Easy to understand ❖Address only direct
and use impacts
❖Good display ❖Do not address
method impact duration or
❖Good for site probability
selection setting
Cost Benefits Analysis
• Cost effectiveness involves selecting an option
that achieves a goal at the least cost.
• A cost-benefit analysis consists of several
stages such as project definition, identification
and enumeration of costs and benefits,
evaluation of costs and benefits, discounting
and presentation of results, etc.

You might also like