0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views3 pages

Coastal Waters Navigation Risk Assessment

The document outlines a risk assessment for navigation in coastal waters for the vessel Front Ocelot, conducted on October 29, 2022. It categorizes risks from negligible to extreme, detailing actions required at various management levels based on risk values. Specific hazards and mitigating actions are identified to ensure safe navigation, particularly under adverse conditions and with inexperienced personnel.

Uploaded by

mailaadarsh151
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views3 pages

Coastal Waters Navigation Risk Assessment

The document outlines a risk assessment for navigation in coastal waters for the vessel Front Ocelot, conducted on October 29, 2022. It categorizes risks from negligible to extreme, detailing actions required at various management levels based on risk values. Specific hazards and mitigating actions are identified to ensure safe navigation, particularly under adverse conditions and with inexperienced personnel.

Uploaded by

mailaadarsh151
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RA-2239381 NAVIGATION IN COASTAL WATERS

Vessel: Front Ocelot Risk assessment group List of participants (one on each row):
Date: 2022-10-29 Bridge (incl. navigation, mooring) choff
Approved by:
2off
Master
3off
Jr off / dcdt

The highest level in the risk assessment is highlighted in below table


Description of task RISK CATEGORY RISK VALUE ACTION
NAVIGATION IN COASTAL WATERS
Negligible 1-2 Evaluation at Operational level Onboard.

Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment


Minor 3-4 Evaluation at Senior Operational level Onboard.
Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment
Moderate 5 - 10 Evaluation at Senior Operational level Ashore (Vessel Manager –Marine
Superintendent/Manager).
Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment
Major 12 - 16 Evaluation at Management level Ashore (Fleet Director- Fleet Manager –DPA -
HSEQ Manager)

Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment

Extreme Risk 20 - 25 Evaluation at Top Management level Ashore (Managing Director - CEO)
Not Acceptable Risk. Work Cannot Proceed.

HAZARD CONSEQUENCE 1ST ASSESSMENT MITIGATING ACTIONS 2ND ASSESSMENT

Page 1 of 3
1 Navigation in BAD WEATHER - COLLISION - INADEQUATE WATCH / LOOK- 12 Severity 4 Bridge Team Meeting carried out and to keep all involved 3 Severity 3
coastal Waters OUTS - HUMAN ERROR-POOR SITUATIONAL AWARENESS - Likelihood 3 appraised of weather with reduced visibility. Follow Traffic Likelihood 1
UNFAMILIARITY, COMPLACANCY, INEXPERIENCE lanes and reporting's as marked on ENC.
Maintaining lane discipline in TSS and using the correct TSS
(REFER to Ship Routing & Sailing Directions).
Bridge / Engine room watch levels.
Critical phases Master on bridge under command.
Watch keeping Arrangement
Engines to be on Standby through out the transit.
Monitoring of vessels behaviour by considering draft.
Additional Look Out on the foc'sle in case of poor visibility.
Anchorages in direct contact with Wheel house on Walkie
Talkie.
Appropriate reporting’s to VTIS and ports as required by
Local regulations (REFER to ALRS).
As a guidance make use of publication ' Guide to port entry
,ALRS
Have a good appraisal of anticipated tide at Sounds for safe
passage.
Ensure sufficient bunkers on board to conclude the passage
safely
2 TAKING OVER UNTRAINED / INEXPERIENCED HANDS ENGAGED IN OPERATION - 12 Severity 4 Follow STP 005 Poster and Comply BDC 012. 3 Severity 3
WATCH / HANDING INADEQUATE WATCH / LOOK-OUTS - LACK OF RESOURCES - Likelihood 3 Taking over officer to be properly Rested. Likelihood 1
OVER WATCH MALFUNCTION OF NAVIGATIONAL EQUIPMENT Watch levels to be in line with watch level matrix.
UKC to be monitored continuously & reduce speed if
required.
Confirm sea bed is clear of obstruction if to drop anchor in
emergency
Make use of parallel indexing to the fullest which enhances
the standard of navigation through straits thereby not
affecting failure of any bridge nav. equipment’s
Anchors to be kept for emergency use in case of steering
failure or ME failure.
Monitor the UKC through the transit and maintain maximum
speed as per UKC calculation only.
Position fixing to be maximized by use of visual means,
RADAR, GPS. Position to be cross checked
Anticipate currents, Tide and wind during the passage.
3 NAVIGATION IN Collision, Grounding 12 Severity 4 In areas of high density traffic, additional look-out to be 3 Severity 3
PROXIMITY OF Likelihood 3 posted and bridge Likelihood 1
NUMEROUS watch level heightened as per Bridge watch level matrix.
TARGETS Obtain traffic information from VTIS
use contingency anchorage in emergency

Page 2 of 3
RA-2239381 NAVIGATION IN COASTAL WATERS approved by Master

____________________________________________
Signature

Page 3 of 3

Common questions

Powered by AI

Continuous position fixing using multiple methods such as visual checks, RADAR, and GPS is crucial in coastal navigation to ensure accurate positioning and situational awareness. This redundancy minimizes the risk of navigational errors by cross-verifying the vessel's position, thereby reducing reliance on any single system that might be erroneous or compromised. It helps detect discrepancies early and enables corrective measures to avoid collisions and grounding in high-density or environmentally sensitive areas .

The document advises that during adverse weather conditions, conducting a bridge team meeting is essential to keep all involved parties informed about weather conditions with reduced visibility. It also recommends following traffic lanes marked on Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC), maintaining lane discipline in Traffic Separation Schemes (TSS), and ensuring bridge and engine room watch levels are adequate. Additionally, having the master on the bridge during critical phases, keeping engines on standby, and ensuring communication with the wheelhouse through walkie-talkies are advised. These measures help mitigate risks by ensuring heightened situational awareness and preparedness for human error under challenging conditions .

Compliance with local port regulations and utilizing publications like the 'Guide to Port Entry' are crucial for ensuring safe and legal navigation. These resources provide important information on local traffic lanes, reporting requirements, and safety protocols specific to different ports, aiding in the prevention of accidents and ensuring smooth passage through heavily regulated zones. This adherence is part of the vessel's safety management system, which aims to minimize navigational risks and legal liabilities associated with non-compliance and to maintain operational efficiency .

Parallel indexing and continuous monitoring of UKC are vital navigational techniques that enhance precision and safety. Parallel indexing allows navigators to maintain the vessel's position relative to a navigational reference line, providing a straightforward method to detect drift or deviations, particularly in narrow straits or confined waters. Continuous monitoring of UKC ensures that the vessel maintains a safe distance above the seabed, preventing grounding incidents. Together, these techniques compensate for potential failures in bridge navigational equipment by providing robust, independent checks and enhancing situational awareness .

Proper rest and resource allocation for officers taking over a watch are critical for maintaining effective watchkeeping standards and minimizing human error. The document specifies that officers must be properly rested and that watch levels align with the established watch level matrix. This ensures that officers are mentally and physically prepared to assume their duties, promoting vigilance and the capacity to respond to any situational changes swiftly and accurately. This approach highlights the importance of human factors in navigation safety and the need for adequate resource allocation to support operational demands .

Maintaining engines on standby during coastal navigation is crucial because it allows for immediate response to navigational emergencies such as steering or engine failures, thus reducing the risk of collision or grounding. Similarly, posting additional lookouts enhances visual monitoring capabilities, particularly under conditions of poor visibility or high traffic density. These practices help in promptly detecting and responding to nearby hazards, thereby minimizing the impact of human error and ensuring safe transit through challenging environments .

The document suggests that in areas of high traffic density, the bridge watch level should be heightened according to the bridge watch level matrix, and an additional look-out should be posted. Furthermore, obtaining traffic information from Vessel Traffic Information Services (VTIS) is recommended, and a contingency anchorage should be available for emergencies. These measures together help mitigate collision risks by enhancing situational awareness and response capability .

VTIS (Vessel Traffic Information Services) and adherence to local regulations play a crucial role in enhancing navigational safety by providing vessels with real-time traffic updates, navigational warnings, and routing advice specific to the area. By ensuring that vessels follow established local protocols and reporting, VTIS minimizes the risk of collisions and navigational errors in busy or constrained waters. This cooperation between ships and regulatory services ensures that all maritime activities are synchronized for safety and efficiency .

Monitoring tides and currents is essential for safe navigation as these environmental factors directly influence a vessel's movement and stability. Understanding tidal cycles and currents allows navigators to calculate the optimal sailing windows, ensuring adequate under-keel clearance and reducing the risk of grounding. It also aids in fuel efficiency and timing of navigational maneuvers, thereby enhancing overall voyage safety and operational effectiveness in coastal regions .

The document outlines several risk categories: Negligible (1-2), Minor (3-4), Moderate (5-10), Major (12-16), and Extreme Risk (20-25). Each risk category requires different actions: for negligible and minor risks, the actions are evaluated and deemed acceptable to proceed with the work onboard as per the mitigation plan. For moderate risks, the evaluation occurs at the senior operational level ashore. Major risks entail evaluation at the management level ashore. Extreme risks require evaluation at the top management level and are not acceptable to proceed, indicating that work cannot proceed. Differentiating these categories is crucial as it ensures the appropriate level of scrutiny and resources are allocated to mitigate potential hazards, ensuring navigational safety and compliance with safety management systems .

You might also like