0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views2 pages

Engineering Mathematics III Exam 2021

This document outlines the end-term examination details for the Engineering Mathematics III course at the National Institute of Technology Hamirpur for the academic year 2020-2021. It includes instructions for submission, question formats, and specific mathematical problems to be solved. The exam covers various topics including numerical methods, series expansions, and residue calculations.

Uploaded by

rudesh kumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views2 pages

Engineering Mathematics III Exam 2021

This document outlines the end-term examination details for the Engineering Mathematics III course at the National Institute of Technology Hamirpur for the academic year 2020-2021. It includes instructions for submission, question formats, and specific mathematical problems to be solved. The exam covers various topics including numerical methods, series expansions, and residue calculations.

Uploaded by

rudesh kumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

National Institute of Technology Hamirpur

Department of Mathematics & Scientific Computing


MA 203: Engineering Mathematics III
End-Term Examination
Academic Year: 2020-2021

Time: 2:00 hrs Max. Marks: 50

Instructions:
• All questions are compulsory. The marks allotted to a question are indicated against it.
• Your single pdf file to be uploaded be named as RollNumberMA203.
• First page of the answer sheet shall have Full Name, Roll Number, Subject Name, Subject
Code, Programme, Semester, Name of the Department, Date of Exam and No. of Pages.
Second page and onwards shall have Roll Number on the top and signature at the bottom
along with page number. Pages without signature or pages with tempered signature will
not be evaluated.
• You will be given 15 Minutes extra for scanning and sending the pdf file of answer sheet.
Submission after the due time will attract penalty.
• Make sure that pages are visible and in correct order and orientation.

1. Write the most appropriate answer: [5×2=10]


(i) Consider the Runge-Kutta method of the form
yn+1 = yn + ak1 + bk1
where k1 = hf (xn , yn ) and k2 = hf (xn + αh, yn + βk1 ) to approximate the solution
of the initial value problem
y 0 (x) = f (x, y(x)), y(x0 ) = y0 .
Which of the following choice of a, b, α and β yields a second order method?

• a = 1/2, b = 1/2, α = 1, β = 1 • a = 1/4, b = 3/4, α = 2/3, β = 2/3


• a = 1, b = 1, α = 1/2, β = 1/2 • a = 1, b = 1, α = 1, β = 1

(ii) With reference to the finite difference operators, choose the most appropriate option:

• δ = E −1/2 ∆ • Both are true


• µ + 21 δ = E 1/2 • Both are false

(iii) Which of the following is NOT correct:


• The convergence of Gauss-Seidel method is more rapid than the Gauss-Jacobi
method
• The sufficient condition for convergence of the Gauss-Jacobi method is that the
system of equations is diagonally dominant
• The necessary and sufficient condition for convergence is that the spectral radius
of the iteration matrix H is less than one
• None of these
(iv) For the curve C : |z| = 1, which of the following is not correct:

1
H H
• c ez dz = 0 • c z̄dz = 0
H 1
• c z−2 dz = 0 • None of these

(v) Behold the following statements:


A: Annulus is a simply connected domain
B: Infinitely many terms in principal part of the Laurent series of a function gives
rise to a pole

• Only A is true • Both A and B are true


• Only B is true • None of these

2. (i) Perform two iterations of the Gauss-Jacobi iteration method for solving the system
of equations:     
1 4 3 x1 −4
 6 1 2   x2  =  6  .
2 1 8 x3 8
Take the initial approximation as x(0) = (1.3, −1.9, 0.8)T . [4]
(ii) Find the sum of the following series by using C + iS technique [4]

x2 x3
1 + x cos θ + cos 2θ + cos 3θ + ...
2! 3!

(iii) If f (z) is analytic function of z, show that [4]


 2  2
∂ ∂
|f (z)| + |f (z)| = |f 0 (z)|2 .
∂x ∂y

3. Find the correct value of (30)−1/5 , accurate upto four decimal places by Newton-Raphson
method. For initial approximation, use the first iteration of bisection method in the
interval (0.1, 1). [7]
1
4. Find the all possible Taylor and Laurent series expansions of the function f (z) = (z+1)(z+2)2
about the point z = 1 in the region 2 < |z − 1| < 3. [7]

5. Using fourth order Adam predictor-corrector method, find y(1.4) for the initial value
problem,
y 0 = x2 (1 + y 2 ), y(1) = 1,
taking h = 0.1. Use Euler’s method to calculate starting values. [7]
1
6. Find the residues at all the singular points of f (z) = z 3 +z 5
. Also evaluate the integral of
f (z) in C : |z − i| = 3/2, using the residue theorem. [7]

∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ The End ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗

Common questions

Powered by AI

The choice of parameters (a = 1/2, b = 1/2, α = 1, β = 1) in the Runge-Kutta method ensures a second order approximation because these values are derived from the requirement that the method must match the Taylor series expansion of the true solution up to second order terms . The second order accuracy condition involves the consistency with the first two terms of the solution's Taylor expansion, thus ensuring that the local truncation error is minimized to be O(h^3).

The C + iS technique involves representing trigonometric series in terms of complex exponential functions. By expressing cos(nθ) as the real part of the complex exponential e^(inθ), the series can be transformed into a geometric series of the form ∑ (x^n / n!) e^(inθ), enabling summation using exponential function properties. This simplification leverages both Euler's formula and properties of geometric series to facilitate evaluation .

The mathematical principles underlying the evaluation of the integral of f(z) over a curve using the residue theorem involve identifying the singular points of f(z) within the curve's interior, calculating the residues at these points, and then applying the theorem which states that the integral equals 2πi times the sum of these residues. The residues are determined by evaluating the coefficients of the (1/(z - z0)) term in the function's Laurent series expansion around each singularity .

Applying Taylor and Laurent series to represent complex functions involves expanding the function into series forms, where the Taylor series is valid for regions where the function is analytic, and the Laurent series allows representation over annular regions containing singularities. In the case of f(z) = 1/((z+1)(z+2)^2), these expansions around singularities highlight the function's behavior near poles and illustrate how singularities affect function regularity and integrability, with Laurent series capturing essential behavior near singular points .

Challenges in using the fourth order Adams predictor-corrector method include the need for accurate initial conditions to prevent error propagation. As a multistep method, it relies on previous corrector stages to refine each predictor stage, meaning that any error in initial values can exponentially affect subsequent iterations. Inaccurate initial conditions compromise stability and accuracy, thereby requiring care in their computation, typically using methods like Euler's for preliminary values .

Infinitely many terms in the principal part of a Laurent series indicate the presence of an essential singularity, rather than a pole or a removable singularity. Unlike poles, which have a finite number of principal terms, essential singularities lead to complex behavior characterized by the great Picard theorem, where the function takes every complex value, with one possible exception, infinitely often in any neighborhood of the singularity .

The residue theorem simplifies the evaluation of complex integrals by reducing it to the calculation of residues at singularities within the contour of integration. Specifically, for a function f(z) analytic inside and on some simple closed contour C except for isolated singularities, the integral of f over C is 2πi times the sum of residues at these singularities. This approach efficiently handles integrals by focusing on the behavior of f near singularities without evaluating the full contour integral .

Applying the Newton-Raphson method after the bisection method enhances root-finding accuracy by combining the robustness of the bisection method in narrowing down the interval where the root lies with the rapid convergence of Newton-Raphson, which fine-tunes the root approximation. The bisection method reduces the interval size, ensuring Newton-Raphson begins with a good initial guess, and hence accelerates convergence to the actual root beyond linear rates typical in bisection alone .

The Gauss-Seidel method generally converges more rapidly than the Gauss-Jacobi method because it uses the latest updated values within each iteration step. In contrast, the Gauss-Jacobi method updates all variables simultaneously without using intermediate updated values, which can slow convergence. The convergence of these iterative methods often requires the system to be diagonally dominant, and the Gauss-Seidel method takes advantage of this property more effectively .

For an analytic function f(z), the condition (∂/∂x |f(z)|)^2 + (∂/∂y |f(z)|)^2 = |f'(z)|^2 emerges from the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which imply that f is both differentiable and its partial derivatives satisfy certain harmonic properties. The relationship indicates the preservation of harmonic gradients due to the analytic nature of f, meaning the modulus of the derivative encapsulates the combined variation of real and imaginary components .

You might also like