Flood Routing Methods in Reservoirs
Flood Routing Methods in Reservoirs
FLOOD ROUTING
9.1 RESERVOIR ROUTING
Flood routing is the process of determining the reservoir stage, storage volume of the outflow
hydrograph corresponding to a known hydrograph of inflow into the reservoir; this is called
reservoir routing. For this, the capacity curve of the reservoir, i.e., ‘storage vs pool elevation’,
and ‘outflow rate vs. pool elevation’, curves are required. Storage volumes for different pool
elevations are determined by planimetering the contour map of the reservoir site. For exam-
ple, the volume of water stored (V) between two successive contours having areas A1 and A2
(planimetered) and the contour interval d, is given by
d
Cone formula, V= (A1 + A2 + A1 A2 ) ...(9.1)
3
d
Prismoidal formula, V= (A + A2 + 4Am) ...(9.2)
6 1
A1 + A2
where Am = , i.e., area midway between the two successive contours. The prismoidal
2
formula is more accurate. The outflow rates are determined by computing the discharge through
the sluices and the spillway discharge for different water surface elevations of the reservoir.
(i.e., pool elevations):
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
262
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 263
O = outflow rate
∆S = incremental storage, at any instant.
Taking a small interval of time, t (called the routing period and designating the initial
and final conditions by subscripts 1 and 2 between the interval, Eq. (9.5) may be written as
+ I2
t −
FG I
O1 + O2
1 IJ
t = S2 – S1
FG IJ...(9.6)
2 H 2 K H K
The routing period, t selected should be sufficiently short such that the hydrograph
I1 + I2
during the interval 1-2 can be assumed as a straight line, i.e., Imean = .
2
Eq. (9.6) can be rearranged as
+ I2
t + S1 –
FG I
O1t 1
= S2 +
O2 t IJ ...(9.7)
2 2H 2 K
After selecting a routing period t, curves of O vs. S, and O vs. S ± Ot/2 on either side of
O-S curve are drawn. At the beginning of the routing period all the terms on the left side of Eq.
(9.7) are known and the value of the right side terms is found out. Corresponding to this O2
and (S-Ot/2) are read from the graph, which become the initial values for the next routing
period and so on.
This method of flood routing was developed by LG Puls of the US Army Corps of Engi-
neers and is called the ISD (Inflow-storage-discharge) method. Here it is assumed that the
outflow (i.e., discharge) from the reservoir is a function of the pool elevation provided that the
spillway and the sluices have no gates (i.e., uncontrolled reservoirs) or with constant gate
openings, if provided with control gates for which poor elevation vs. discharge curves are drawn.
Eq. (9.6) may be rearranged as
FG 2S 1 IJ 2S2
(I1 + I2) + − O1 = + O2 ...(9.8)
H t K t
2S 2S
– 2O = – O, a curve of ‘ – O vs. O’ can also be drawn.
t t
At the beginning of the routing period all terms on the left of Eq. (9.8) are known. This
method is called modified puls or Storage Indication Method.
Example 9.1 For a reservoir with constant gate openings for the sluices and spillway, pool
elevation vs storage and discharge (outflow) curves are shown in Fig. 9.1. The inflow hydrograph
into the reservoir is given below:
Time (hr) 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42
Inflow (cumec) 50 70 160 300 460 540 510 440
Time (hr) 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90
Inflow (cumec) 330 250 190 150 120 90 80 70
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
264 HYDROLOGY
Route the flood through the reservoir by (a) ISD method, and (b) modified Puls method,
and compute the outflow hydrograph, the maximum pool elevation reached, the reduction in
the flood peak and the reservoir lag.
1
Storage S in cumec – day
4
0 400 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 4800 5600 6400
120
c
cume
118 s. O in 100
levn v
3 pool e
116 .m
Pool elevation (m)
M
10
114 in d)
.S u te
112 vs p
ev
n .S om
el vs (c
110 o l v n day
po e 1
el 4
108 o ol ec –
p m
cu
106 in
104
102
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Outflow O in 100 cumec, Storage S in 10 Mm3 (or 1000 ha-m)
Fig. 9.1 Pool elevation vs. storage and discharge (Example 9.1)
1
Solution (a) Flood routing by ISD method Take the routing period as 6 hr or 4
day. It is easier
1
to work the flow rates in cumec and the storage volumes in terms of cumec – day. Hence, the
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
4
1
storage in Mm3 is converted to cumec – 4
day by multiplying by 46.3, Table 9.1. Corresponding
to an initial pool elevation of 110 m, O = 124 cumec, S = 49.1 Mm3 = 49.1 × 46.3 = 2270 cumec
1
Ot O 124 1 1
Ot
– 4
day, = ×t cumec × day = 62 cumec – day, S + = 2270 + 62 = 2332 cumec
2 2 2 4 4 2
1
Ot 1
– 4
day, and S – = 2270 – 62 = 2208 cumec – day. First ‘O vs. S’ curve is drawn. For a
2 4
O
particular O on the S curve, abscissa units may be set off on either side of the S curve and
2
this is repeated for other values of O. The points obtained on either side of S curve plot
Ot Ot
S+ and S – curves as shown in Fig. 9.2.
2 2
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Ot 2S
Table 9.1 Tabulation for drawing (i ) S ± and (ii ) ± 0 curves for routing the flood through the reservoir (Example 9.1)
2 t
1
Ot Ot Ot 2S 2S 2S
(m) (cumec) (Mm 3) (cumec – 4
day*) S+ S– +O –O
2 t 2 t t t
(cumec – (cumec – (cumec – (cumec) (cumec) (cumec)
1 1 1
4
day) 4
day) 4
day)
*1 cumec – 1 day = 1 × 6 × 60 = 21600 m3. 1 million m3 (Mm3) = 106/21600 = 46.3 cumec – 1 day.
4 4
265
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
266 HYDROLOGY
1400
1300
1200
1100
2 )
1000
t
2 )
+ O
(S – Ot
Outflow O (cumec)
900
(S
sS
vs
800
Ov
O vs
O
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1400 1800 2200 2600 3000 3400 3800 4200 4600
1
Storage S, S + Ot and S – Ot cumec – day
2 2 4
For routing the flood by the I.S.D. method, Table 9.2, for the known outflow at the
Ot
commoncement of 124 cumec, S – is read from the curve as 2208 cumec– 41 day and to this
2
I1 + I2 50 + 70 1 1
t= cumec × 4
day = 60 cumec – 4
day is added to get the right hand side of Eq.
2 2
Ot
(9.7); i.e., S + = 2268 and corresponding to this O = 120 cumec is read from the graph which
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
2
is the outflow at the beginning of the next routing period. Corresponding to this O = 120
cumec, the pool elevation of 109.2 m is read from the ‘pool elevations vs. O’ curve. Correspond-
Ot I1 + I2 70 + 160
ing to this O = 120 cumec, S – = 2040 is read from the graph and t= t
2 2 2
1
Ot
= 115 cumec – 4
day is added to get S +
= 2155 for which O is read as 116 cumec and pool
2
elevation as 108.4 m. Thus the process is repeated till the flood is completely routed through
the reservoir and the outflow hydrograph is obtained as shown in Fig. 9.3.
(b) Flood routing by modified Puls method: Corresponding to the initial pool elevation of
1
1 2S 2 × 2270 cumec − 4 day
110 m, O = 124 cumec, S = 2270 cumec – 4
day, = 1 day = 4540 cumec,
t 4
2S 2S
+ O = 4540 + 124 = 4664 cumec and – O = 4540 – 124 = 4416 cumec. Thus, for other
t t
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 267
2S 2S 2S 2S
values of O, values of + O and – O are computed and ‘O vs. + O and – O’ curves
t t t t
are drawn as shown in Fig. 9.4.
Table 9.2 Reservoir routing—ISD method [Eq. 9.7] (Example 9.1)
I1 + I 2 Ot Ot
Time Inflow t Outflow O S– S+ Pool
2 2 2
(hr) I (cumec- (cumec) (cumec- (cumec- elevation
(cumec) 1 day) 1 day) 1 day) (m)
4 4 4
0 50 124 110.0
60 + 2208 2268
6 70 120 109.2
115 + 2040 2155
12 160 116 108.4
230 + 1960 2190
18 300 119 109.1
380 2020 2400
24 460 122 109.6
500 2080 2580
30 540 130 110.8
525 2380 2905
36 510 195 112.5
475 2730 3205
42 440 395 113.4
385 2820 3205
48 330 395 113.4
290 2920 3110
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
268 HYDROLOGY
600
14.5 hr = Reservoir lag
550
12 hr
500 75
cumec 132 cumec = Reduction
450 in flood peak
Inflow or outflow (cumec)
400
300 To
storage Outflow hydrograph
250 (ISD method)
1200
1100
O
1000
t +O
O vs. 2S –
t
s. 2S
900
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
800
Outflow O (cumec)
O v
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
2S + O and 2S – O cumec
t t
Fig. 9.4 Reservoir routing by modified Puls method (Example 9.1)
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 269
For routing the flood by the modified Puls method, Table 9.3, corresponding to the initial
2S 2S
pool elevation of 110 m, O = 124 cumec, + O = 4664 cumec and – O = 4416 cumec are
t t
2S
read off. For this – O = 4416 cumec, I1 + I2 = 50 + 70 = 120 cumec is added to get the right
t
2S 2S
hand side of Eq. (9.8), i.e., + O = 4416 + 120 = 4536 cumec. For this value of + O, O = 123
t t
2S
cumec, and – O = 4290 cumec are read off from the curves. For O = 123 cumec, the pool
t
elevation of 109.8 m is read off from the ‘O vs pool elevation curve’. These values become the
2S
initial values for the next routing period. Again, for – O = 4290 cumec, I1 + I2 = 70 + 160 =
t
2S
230 cumec is added to get the right hand side of Eq. (9.8), i.e., + O = 4290 + 230 = 4520
t
2S
cumec for which O and – O values are read off and pool elevation obtained, which become
t
the initial values for the next routing period. Thus the process is repeated till the flood is
completely routed through the reservoir and the outflow hydrograph is obtained as shown in
Fig. 9.3 by dashed line.
Table 9.3 Reservoir routing–modified Puls method [Eq. 9.8]. (Example 9.1)
2S 2S
Time (hr) Inflow O – O* +O Outflow O Pool elevation
t t
(cumec) (cumec) (cumec) (cumec) (m)
Results.
Modified
ISD method Puls method
stora
ge
Strea
m be
d prism
stora
ge
In the case of stream-flow routing, the solution of the storage equation is more compli-
cated, than in the case of reservoir routing, since the wedge storage is involved. While the
storage in a reach depends on both the inflow and outflow, prism storage depends on the
outflow alone and the wedge storage depends on the difference (I – O). A common method of
stream flow routing is the Muskingum method (McCarthy, 1938) where the storage is ex-
pressed as a function of both inflow and outflow in the reach as
S = K [xI + (1 – x) O] ...(9.9)
where K and x are called the Muskingum coefficients (since the Eq. (9.9) was first developed by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in connection with the flood control schemes in the
Muskingum River Basin, Ohio), K is a storage constant having the dimension of time and x is
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 271
a dimensionless constant for the reach of the river. In natural riverchannels x ranges from 0.1
to 0.3. The Eq. (9.9) in most flood flows approaches a straight line. Trial values of x are as-
sumed and plots of ‘S vs. [xI + (1 – x) O]’ are in the form of storage loops; for a particular value
of x, the plot is a straight line and the slope of the line gives K. If S is in cumec-day and I, O are
in cumec, K is in day.
After determining the values of K and x, the outflow O from the reach may be obtained
by combining and simplifying the two equations.
FG I 1 + I2 IJ t − FG O
1 + O2 IJ t = S – S1 ...(9.10)
H 2 K H 2 K 2
same as (9.6)
and S2 – S1 = K [x (I2 – I1) + (1 – x) (O2 – O1)] ...(9.11)
(Eq. 9.11 is the same as Eq. (9.9)); for a discrete time interval the following equation may be
obtained
O2 = C0I2 + C1I1 + C2O1 ...(9.12)
Kx − 0.5t
where C0 = – ...(9.12 a)
K − Kx + 0.5t
Kx + 0.5t
C1 = ....(9.12 b)
K − Kx + 0.5t
K − Kx − 0.5t
C2 = ...(9.12 c)
K − Kx + 0.5t
Combining Eq. (9.12 a, b, c) gives
C0 + C1 + C2 = 1 ...(9.12 d)
where t is the routing period. The routing period should be less than the time of travel for the
flood wave through the reach, otherwise it is possible that the wave crest may pass completely
through the reach during the routing period. Usually the routing period is taken as about 1/3
to 1/4 of the flood wave travel time through the reach (obtained from the inflow-hydrograph).
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
If there is a local inflow due to a tributary entering the mainstream, it should be added
to I or O accordingly as it enters the reach at the upstream or downstream end, or the local
inflow may be divided, a portion added to I and another portion added to O.
A number of methods have been developed for flood routing. The numerical method of
solution of the routing equations is tedious but has the advantage of easy checking and filling.
The Sorensen’s graphical method of reservoir routing has the advantage that variable time
periods can be used. Cheng’s graphical method is used for stream flow routing. Quite a number
of mechanical instruments, flood routing slide rules and electronic computers, etc. have been
used to facilitate computations.
Example 9.2 The inflow and outflow hydrographs for a reach of a river are given below. Deter-
mine the value of the Muskingum coefficients K and x for the reach.
Time (hr) 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216
Inflow (cumec) 35 125 575 740 456 245 144 95 67 50
Outflow (cumec) 39 52 287 624 638 394 235 142 93 60
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
272 HYDROLOGY
Solution From the daily readings of the inflow and outflow hydrographs, a routing period t =
24 hr = 1 day is taken. The mean storage is determined from Eq. (9.10) and then the cumula-
tive storage S is tabulated. For trial values of x = 0.2, 0.25 and 0.3, the values of [xI + (1 – x) O]
are computed in Table 9.4. Storage loops for the reach, i.e., curves of S vs. [xI + (1 – x) O] for
each trial value of x are plotted as shown in Fig. 9.6. By inspection, the middle value of x = 0.25
approximates a straight line and hence this value of x is chosen. K is determined by measuring
the slope of the median straight line which is found to be 0.7 day. Hence, for the given reach of
the river, the values of the Muskingum coefficients are
x = 0.25, K = 0.7 day
Example 9.3 The inflow hydrograph readings for a stream reach are given below for which the
Muskingum coefficients of K = 36 hr and x = 0.15 apply. Route the flood through the reach and
determine the outflow hydrograph. Also determine the reduction in peak and the time of peak of
outflow.
cum storage S (cumec-day)
500 500
S (cumec-day)
100 100
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
xI + (1 – x) O (cumec) xI + (1 – x) O (cumec)
500 m=k
x = 0.25
400
Dy
S (cumec-day)
300 c.d
K= =
300 Dx 430 c
= 0.7 day Dy = 300 cumec-day
approx.
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fig. 9.6 Storage loops for the reach of the river (Example 9.2)
Outflow at the beginning of the flood may be taken as the same as inflow.
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Table 9.4 Determination of the Muskingum coefficients K and x for a reach of the river. (Example 9.2)
day) day)
48 575 287 288 180 212 115 229.6 344.6 143.75 215 358.75 172.5 200.9 373.4
72 740 624 116 202 414 148 499.2 647.2 185.0 468 653.0 222.0 436.8 658.8
96 456 638 –182 –33 381 91.2 510.4 601.6 114.0 478 592.0 136.8 446.6 583.4
120 245 394 –149 –165 216 49 315.2 364.2 61.25 295.5 356.75 73.5 275.8 349.3
144 144 235 –91 –120 96 28.8 188.0 216.8 36.0 176.3 212.3 43.2 164.5 207.7
168 95 142 –47 –69 27 19.0 113.6 132.6 23.75 101.64 125.39 28.5 99.4 127.9
192 67 93 –26 –37 –10 13.4 74.4 87.8 16.75 69.7 86.45 20.1 65.1 85.2
216 50 60 –10 –18 –28 10 48.0 58.0 12.5 45.0 57.5 15.0 42.0 57.0
273
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
274 HYDROLOGY
0 42 — — — 42*
12 45 0.90 13.0 28.2 42.1
24 88 1.76 14.0 28.3 44.0
36 272 5.44 27.3 29.5 62.2
48 342 6.84 84.3 41.7 132.8
60 288 5.76 106.0 89.0 200.7
72 240 4.80 89.2 139.0 233.0
84 198 3.96 74.4 156.0 234.0
96 162 3.24 61.4 157.0 221.6
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 275
400 Lag
36 hr
Inflow hydrograph
350
Inflow or outflow Q (cumec)
300
108 cumec = Reduction in peak
250 To Peak out-flow after 84 hr
stor-
age Outflow hydrograph
200
1
k = 36 hr = 1 day
150 2
Equal Fro x = 0.15
areas m
100 sto
rag
e
50 84 hr
12 hr routing period
0
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240
Time t (hr)
QUIZ IX
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
276 HYDROLOGY
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 277
QUESTIONS
1 (a) Define ‘flood routing’. What are the usual assumptions made in routing a flood in a reservoir?
(b) Explain clearly the I.S.D. curves method of reservoir flood routing. What are the factors to be
considered in choosing the routing period?
2 (a) Take any two flood routing methods you know of and show that they are only solutions of the
dS
continuity equation I – 0 = .
dt
(b) A retarding basin has storage and discharge characteristics as given below. The dam has an
ungated sluice 1.5 m dia with its centre at elevation 157.5 m and a spillway at crest elevation
226.5 m. Discharge given below for pool elevations above 226.5 m include both sluice and
spillway discharge. The inflow hydrograph is also given below.
Route the flood through the reservoir
(i) by ISD method
(ii) by the modified Puls method
Determine the maximum pool elevation reached, the reduction in flood peak and the reservoir
lag. Pool elevation at commencement = 157.8 m (for which the discharge = 5.95 cumec).
(i) ‘Pool Elevation vs. Storage’ and Discharge data:
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
278 HYDROLOGY
0 15 36 141
6 57 42 93
12 159 48 60
18 258 54 33
24 246 60 18
30 198
Ot 1
(ii) Discharge (outflow) in comec vs. S ± in cumec – 4
day, for ISD method of routing.
2
2S
(iii) Discharge (outflow) in cumec vs. ± O in cumec, for modified Puls method of routing.
t
3 (a) How does ‘stream flow routing’ differ from reservoir flood routing?
(b) The inflow hydrograph readings for a stream reach are given below for which the Muskingum
coefficients of K = 30 hr and x = 0.2 apply. Route the flood through the reach and determine
the reduction in peak and the time of peak of outflow. Outflow at the beginning of the flood
may be taken as the same as inflow.
0 15 132 32
12 16 144 28
24 31 156 24
36 96 168 22
48 121 180 20
60 102 192 19
72 85 204 18
84 70 216 17
96 57 228 16
108 47 240 15
120 39
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.
FLOODS ROUTING 279
4 (a) Show that storage in a stream reach can be expressed in terms of inflow and outflow in the
form:
S = K [xI + (1 – x) 0]
(b) The inflow and outflow hydrographs for a reach of a river are given below. Determine the
best values of the Muskingum coefficients K and x for the reach.
0 20 20
12 191 30
24 249 120
36 164 176
48 110 164
60 82 135
72 62 116
84 48 90
96 32 68
108 28 52
Copyright © 2006. New Age International Ltd. All rights reserved.
Raghunath, H.M.. Hydrology : Principle Analysis Design, New Age International Ltd, 2006. ProQuest Ebook Central, [Link]
Created from kenyatta-ebooks on 2021-11-04 10:52:54.