Evidentiary Value of Registered Document
A Project submitted to
ARMY INSTITUTE OF LAW, MOHALI
In the Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Award of
Degree of [Link].
Submitted To: Submitted By:
Dr. Inderpreet Kaur Pratiksha
(2014)
PUNJABI UNIVERSITY, PATIALA, PUNJAB
Academic Year 2024 - 2025
Page |1
DECLARATION
IT IS CERTIFIED THAT THE PROJECT WORK PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT
ENTITLED “EVIDENTIARY VALUE OF REGISTERED DOCUMENT” EMBODIES
THE RESULTS OF ORIGINAL WORKS CARRIED OUT BY ME. ALL IDEAS AND
REFERENCES HAVE BEEN DULY ACKNOWLEDGED.
Pratiksha
(2014)
Page |2
Table of Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3
Meaning & Importance Of Registered Documents .............................................................. 3
Legal Provisions On Registered Document ........................................................................... 4
The Registration Act, 1908 ...................................................................................................... 4
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhinayam, 2023............................................................................. 6
Registered Document As Conclusive Proof ......................................................................... 11
Admissibility Of Unregistered Documents .......................................................................... 11
Fraud, Lack Of Jurisdiction, Or Defects Making A Document Unadmissible ................ 11
Presumption Of Validity Of A Registered Document ........................................................ 11
Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 11
Page |3
Introduction
In legal proceedings, documents serve as the backbone of establishing rights, obligations, and
factual claims. Among various forms of documentary evidence, registered documents hold
special significance due to their authentication by a competent public authority. Registration
provides legal recognition, ensures transparency, and prevents fraudulent claims over
immovable property and contractual agreements. It also plays a crucial role in securing
transactions by creating a public record that safeguards the interests of all parties involved.
The Registration Act, 1908, mandates the registration of certain documents to ensure their
legal enforceability, while the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872, define the evidentiary value of such documents in courts. A registered
document enjoys a presumption of validity, meaning it is assumed to be genuine unless
proven otherwise. However, this presumption is not absolute, as courts may scrutinize its
authenticity, execution, and legal compliance, particularly in cases involving fraud, coercion,
or undue influence.
One of the key distinctions in evidentiary value lies in the difference between admissibility
and probative value. While registration ensures that a document can be admitted as evidence,
the weight assigned to it in judicial proceedings depends on factors such as execution,
compliance with formalities, and challenges raised by the opposing party. Courts may
refuse to admit a registered document if it is found to be forged, improperly executed, or lacking
necessary legal requirements.
Furthermore, the concept of admission under Section 15 of the Bharatiya Sakshya
Adhiniyam, 2023, adds another layer of significance to registered documents. Once a
document is duly registered, it may serve as an admission of facts contained within it, thereby
influencing the burden of proof in legal disputes.
MEANING & IMPORTANCE OF REGISTERED DOCUMENTS
A registered document refers to any legal instrument or writing that has been formally recorded
in accordance with the statutory provisions of the Registration Act, 1908. Registration is a
process that confers authenticity, legal recognition, and evidentiary value upon a document by
ensuring its compliance with prescribed formalities.1
Key benefits of registration:
• Provides conclusive proof of execution.
• Establishes priority over unregistered documents.
• Reduces fraudulent claims and misrepresentation.
1
Sanjana Tripathy, Registration of documents the Registration Act, 1908 iPleaders, IPLEADERS (2018),
[Link] (last visited March 12, 2025).
Page |4
• Enables legal enforcement of rights.
• Enhances transparency in property transactions.
• Ensures that documents are legally recognized by courts.
Legal Provisions on Registered Document
The Registration Act, 1908
The Registration Act, 1908, governs the process of document registration in India. It provides
a framework that determines which documents require mandatory registration and the
consequences of non-registration.
Section 17: Documents That Require Mandatory Registration2
Certain documents must be compulsorily registered under this section, including:
• Sale deeds for immovable property valued above Rs. 100.
• Gift deeds for immovable property.
• Lease agreements exceeding 12 months.
• Partition deeds, mortgage deeds, and adoption deeds.
Failure to register such documents renders them inadmissible as evidence under Section 49.
Section 47. Time from which registered document operates3:
A registered document shall operate from the time which it would have commenced to operate
if no registration thereof had been required or made, and not from the time of its registration.
This provision establishes that the legal effect of a registered document is not dependent on the
date of its registration but on the date when it was originally intended to take effect. In terms
of evidentiary value, this ensures that once a document is registered, it is treated as valid from
the date it was executed, not from the date of registration. This principle is crucial in legal
disputes where the timing of rights and obligations under a registered document is contested.
Section 48. Registered documents relating to property when to take effect against oral
agreements4:
All non-testamentary documents duly registered under this Act, and relating to any property,
whether movable or immovable, shall take effect against any oral agreement or declaration
relating to such property, unless where the agreement or declaration has been accompanied or
2
The Registration Act, 1908 (Act 16 of 1908), § 17.
3
The Registration Act, 1908 (Act 16 of 1908), § 47.
4
The Registration Act, 1908 (Act 16 of 1908), § 48.
Page |5
followed by delivery of possession and the same constitutes a valid transfer under any law for
the time being in force:
Provided that a mortgage as defined in section 58 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of
1882), shall take effect against any mortgage-deed subsequently executed and registered which
relates to the same property.
This provision highlights the superiority of registered documents over oral agreements in
property transactions. A registered document serves as conclusive proof of ownership or
transfer, making it more reliable as evidence in court. However, an oral agreement supported
by possession of property may still be recognized if it constitutes a valid transfer under the law.
The provision further ensures that a registered mortgage takes precedence over a later-
registered mortgage-deed concerning the same property, reinforcing the importance of
registration in securing legal rights.
Section 49. Effect of non-registration of documents required to be registered5.—
No document required by section 17 or by any provision of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
(4 of 1882), to be registered shall—
(a) affect any immovable property comprised therein, or
(b) confer any power to adopt, or
(c) be received as evidence of any transaction affecting such property or conferring such power,
unless it has been registered:
Provided that an unregistered document affecting immovable property and required by this Act
or the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), to be registered may be received as evidence
of a contract in a suit for specific performance under Chapter II of the Specific Relief Act, 1877
(3 of 1877), or as evidence of any collateral transaction not required to be effected by registered
instrument.
This provision reinforces the importance of registration by prohibiting the use of unregistered
documents as evidence in property disputes. If a document that is required to be registered is
not registered, it has no legal standing in court regarding ownership or transfer of immovable
property. However, an unregistered document may still be admissible as evidence in limited
cases, such as proving a contract in a suit for specific performance or for collateral transactions.
This underscores the strong evidentiary value of registered documents in property matters.
Section 50. Certain registered documents relating to land to take effect against
unregistered documents6:
5
The Registration Act, 1908 (Act 16 of 1908), § 49.
6
The Registration Act, 1908 (Act 16 of 1908), § 50.
Page |6
(1) Every document of the kinds mentioned in clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) of section 17, sub
section (1), and clauses (a) and (b) of section 18, shall, if duly registered, take effect as regards
the property comprised therein, against every unregistered document relating to the same
property, and not being a decree or order, whether such unregistered document be of the same
nature as the registered document or not.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) applies to leases exempted under the proviso to sub-section (1)
of section 17 or to any document mentioned in sub-section (2) of the same section, or to any
registered document which had not priority under the law in force at the commencement of this
Act.
Explanation.—In cases where Act No. 16 of 1864 or the Indian Registration Act, 1866 (200 of
1866), was in force in the place and at the time in and at which such unregistered document
was executed, “unregistered” means not registered according to such Act, and, where the
document is executed after the first day of July, 1871, not registered under the Indian
Registration Act, 1871 (8 of 1871), or the Indian Registration Act, 1877 (3 of 1877), or this
Act.
This provision establishes the precedence of registered documents over unregistered ones in
matters relating to land. A duly registered document has a stronger legal standing and is given
priority in disputes over ownership or transfer of property. This principle reinforces the
evidentiary value of registered documents, ensuring that legal recognition is granted to
officially recorded transactions rather than informal or unregistered agreements. By making
registered documents legally superior, this section safeguards the rights of parties who comply
with the registration process, preventing fraudulent or conflicting claims based on unregistered
documents.
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhinayam, 2023
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, introduces provisions that reinforce the
evidentiary value of registered documents in legal proceedings.
Section 15. Admission of Registered Documents7 [Section 17 of IEA, 1872]
An admission is a statement, oral or documentary or contained in electronic form, which
suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact, and which is made by any of the
persons, and under the circumstances, hereinafter mentioned.
Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, an admission includes statements that imply
an inference about a fact in issue. A registered document qualifies as a documentary admission
since its execution and registration indicate acknowledgment of its contents.
7
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 15.
Page |7
Registered documents carry a presumption of validity, making them strong evidence in court.
If a party has executed such a document, it serves as an admission of the transaction, and they
cannot later deny it unless fraud or coercion is proved. Thus, admissions under Section 15
reinforce the evidentiary value of registered documents.
Section 57. Primary evidence8: [Section 62 of IEA, 1872]
Primary evidence means the document itself produced for the inspection of the Court.
Explanation 1: Where a document is executed in several parts, each part is primary evidence
of the document.
Explanation 2: Where a document is executed in counterpart, each counterpart being executed
by one or some of the parties only, each counterpart is primary evidence as against the parties
executing it.
Explanation 3: Where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process, as in the
case of printing, lithography or photography, each is primary evidence of the contents of the
rest; but, where they are all copies of a common original, they are not primary evidence of the
contents of the original.
Explanation 4: Where an electronic or digital record is created or stored, and such storage
occurs simultaneously or sequentially in multiple files, each such file is primary evidence.
Explanation 5: Where an electronic or digital record is produced from proper custody, such
electronic and digital record is primary evidence unless it is disputed.
Explanation 6: Where a video recording is simultaneously stored in electronic form and
transmitted or broadcast or transferred to another, each of the stored recordings is primary
evidence.
Explanation 7: Where an electronic or digital record is stored in multiple storage spaces in a
computer resource, each such automated storage, including temporary files, is primary
evidence.
This provision defines primary evidence as the document itself, including its various forms
such as counterparts, uniform reproductions, and electronic records. In the context of the
evidentiary value of a registered document, primary evidence holds great importance. A
registered document, when produced in its original form before the court, serves as the
strongest proof of its contents.
Since a registered document is legally recognized and stored in public records, it often qualifies
as primary evidence under this section. If challenged, certified copies may also be admissible
under secondary evidence, but the original document carries greater weight in proving
transactions. Additionally, electronic storage of registered documents further enhances their
evidentiary value, ensuring their authenticity and admissibility in legal proceedings.
In the case of Kale & Others v. Deputy Director Of Consolidation9, Supreme court held that
8
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 57.
9
AIR 1976 SUPREME COURT 807.
Page |8
the registered family settlement deeds have a strong evidentiary value and it must be given due
weightage in deciding the property dispute.
58. Secondary evidence10: [Section 63 of IEA, 1872]
Secondary evidence includes—
(i) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained;
(ii) copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves ensure the
accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies;
(iii) copies made from or compared with the original;
(iv) counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them;
(v) oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it;
(vi) oral admissions;
(vii) written admissions;
(viii) evidence of a person who has examined a document, the original of which consists of
numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court, and
who is skilled in the examination of such documents.
This provision defines secondary evidence as any form of evidence that is not the original
document but serves to prove its contents. In the context of the evidentiary value of a registered
document, secondary evidence becomes relevant when the original registered document is
unavailable.
Certified copies of registered documents, which are issued by the registering authority, are
considered strong secondary evidence and are admissible in court. Additionally, oral or written
admissions related to a registered document can support its authenticity. However, secondary
evidence is generally less conclusive than primary evidence, and courts prefer the original
document unless its absence is justified. The reliability of secondary evidence depends on the
circumstances, making registered documents crucial in legal proceedings as they serve as both
primary and secondary evidence when necessary.
Section 74. Public and private documents11: [Section 74 & 75 of IEA, 1872]
(1) The following documents are public documents:
(a) documents forming the acts, or records of the acts—
(i) of the sovereign authority;
(ii) of official bodies and tribunals; and
(iii) of public officers, legislative, judicial, and executive of India or of a foreign country; (b)
public records kept in any State or Union territory of private documents.
(2) All other documents except the documents referred to in sub-section (1) are private.
10
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 58.
11
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 74.
Page |9
This provision distinguishes between public and private documents. Public documents are
those created by government authorities in the exercise of their official functions, while all
other documents are considered private. In the context of the evidentiary value of a registered
document, registered deeds maintained by the government (such as property records) fall under
public documents. This classification ensures their authenticity and makes them more reliable
in legal proceedings, as courts accept them with a presumption of correctness.
Section 75. Certified copies of public documents.12— [Section 76 of IEA, 1872]
Every public officer having the custody of a public document, which any person has a right to
inspect, shall give that person on demand a copy of it on payment of the legal fees therefor,
together with a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such document
or part thereof, as the case may be, and such certificate shall be dated and subscribed by such
officer with his name and his official title, and shall be sealed, whenever such officer is
authorised by law to make use of a seal; and such copies so certified shall be called certified
copies.
Explanation: Any officer who, by the ordinary course of official duty, is authorised to deliver
such copies, shall be deemed to have the custody of such documents within the meaning of this
section.
This section establishes the procedure for obtaining certified copies of public documents. In
the context of the evidentiary value of a registered document, it ensures that individuals can
legally obtain certified copies of registered deeds from the relevant public offices. Since a
registered document serves as strong legal evidence, its certified copy is equally admissible in
court, provided it is duly authenticated. This provision safeguards the accessibility and
reliability of registered documents for legal proceedings.
Section 76. Proof of documents by production of certified copies 13: [Section 77 of IEA,
1872]
Such certified copies may be produced in proof of the contents of the public documents or parts
of the public documents of which they purport to be copies.
This provision allows certified copies of public documents to be used as proof in legal
proceedings. In the context of the evidentiary value of a registered document, this section is
crucial because it permits the submission of certified copies instead of originals when proving
legal transactions. Since registered documents like sale deeds, wills, and agreements are part
of public records, their certified copies are treated as valid secondary evidence in court. This
ensures the preservation and legal validity of registered documents, even if the original is lost
or unavailable.
12
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 75.
13
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 76.
P a g e | 10
Section 119. Court may presume existence of certain facts14: [Section 114 of IEA, 1872]
(1) The Court may presume the existence of any fact which it thinks likely to have happened,
regard being had to the common course of natural events, human conduct and public and private
business, in their relation to the facts of the particular case.
This provision courts the discretion to presume certain facts based on natural events, human
behavior, and business practices. In the context of the evidentiary value of a registered
document, this section is significant because courts may presume the authenticity and validity
of a duly registered document.
Since registration involves verification by a public authority, courts often presume that the
document was properly executed and its contents are genuine unless proven otherwise. This
presumption strengthens the evidentiary value of registered documents, making them more
reliable in legal proceedings. However, this presumption is rebuttable, meaning a party
challenging the document can provide contrary evidence, such as proof of forgery, fraud, or
coercion.
In Prem Singh and others v. Birbal Singh and others15, There is a presumption that a
registered document is validly executed. A registered document, therefore, prima facie would
be valid in law. The onus of proof, thus, would be on a person who leads evidence to rebut the
presumption. In this case, the appellant, Prem Singh, claimed ownership based on a registered
sale deed, while the respondent, Birbal, challenged its validity, alleging that the deed was
executed fraudulently. The trial court ruled in favour of Prem Singh, holding that a registered
document carries a presumption of genuineness and, therefore, the sale deed was valid.
However, on appeal, the High Court reversed the decision, stating that mere registration does
not automatically establish a document’s authenticity if its execution is challenged. The
Supreme Court upheld this view, emphasizing that while a registered document enjoys a
presumption of validity, this presumption is rebuttable. If fraud, misrepresentation, or undue
influence is proved, the document cannot be used as admissible evidence to confer ownership.
Hence, registration alone does not grant absolute legitimacy to a document if its execution is
successfully contested.
In the case of Anil Rishi vs. Gurbaksh Singh16, the Supreme Court of India clarified the burden
of proof concerning the genuineness of a registered document. Generally, under the Indian
Evidence Act, a registered document carries a presumption of genuineness, and the burden of
disproving it lies on the person challenging its validity. However, this case carved out an
important exception where the relationship between the parties involves elements of undue
influence or fiduciary obligations.
The Court recognized that when a party to the transaction holds a dominant position—such as
in fiduciary relationships or cases involving undue influence—the onus shifts. In such cases,
14
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (Act 47 of 2023), § 119.
15
(2006) 5 SCC 353.
16
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 1971.
P a g e | 11
the burden of proving the document's genuineness rests upon the party who is in a position of
power or influence, rather than on the party who challenges the document.
REGISTERED DOCUMENT AS CONCLUSIVE PROOF
A registered document is strong evidence of its contents and execution. As per Section 48 of
the Registration Act, 1908, it takes effect over oral agreements unless possession follows the
oral deal and creates a valid transfer. Section 50 of the same Act gives priority to registered
land documents over unregistered ones, ensuring their reliability in court.
ADMISSIBILITY OF UNREGISTERED DOCUMENTS
Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, states that an unregistered document, when
registration is required, cannot affect property rights or be used as evidence. However, it can
be admitted in cases like specific performance suits or proving collateral transactions, but not
for ownership or transfer.
FRAUD, LACK OF JURISDICTION, OR DEFECTS MAKING A DOCUMENT
UNADMISSIBLE
A registered document can be challenged if obtained by fraud, coercion, or if the registering
officer had no authority. Section 119 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, allows courts
to presume facts but also to reject documents if proven invalid.
PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY OF A REGISTERED DOCUMENT
Under Section 57 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, primary evidence means the
document itself, making a registered document the best proof of its contents. Additionally,
Section 74 classifies registered documents maintained by public authorities as public
documents, further strengthening their evidentiary value. Unless proven otherwise, courts
presume the validity of registered documents.
Conclusion
A registered document holds greater legal weight compared to an unregistered one. Courts rely
more on registered documents as they serve as solid proof of transactions and agreements.
Registration ensures authenticity, reduces fraud, and protects the rights of parties involved. As
seen in various judgments, thus, a registered document carries higher evidentiary value, making
it more reliable in legal disputes. Therefore, registration is crucial for establishing the validity
and enforceability of important documents.