0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views3 pages

Mechanical Systems Dynamics Homework 3

The document outlines a homework assignment for ME 240, focusing on dynamics and control of mechanical systems. It includes various problems related to rigid body motion, Lagrangian mechanics, and equations of motion for different mechanical systems. Additionally, there are ungraded problems exploring manipulator dynamics and a disk connected to a hinge.

Uploaded by

HR Kalita
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views3 pages

Mechanical Systems Dynamics Homework 3

The document outlines a homework assignment for ME 240, focusing on dynamics and control of mechanical systems. It includes various problems related to rigid body motion, Lagrangian mechanics, and equations of motion for different mechanical systems. Additionally, there are ungraded problems exploring manipulator dynamics and a disk connected to a hinge.

Uploaded by

HR Kalita
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ME 240 Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

Homework 3

(1) Consider a rigid body rotating about a fixed point O. Show, from first principles, that the
1
kinetic energy is 2 𝜔𝑇 𝐼𝜔 , where I and 𝜔 are represented in some body fixed coordinates
with its origin at O.

(2) A uniform bar of mass 𝑚 1 and length L is connected to the ground at one end and the
central axis of a circular disk at the other end via revolute joints.
The disk has a radius R and a mass 𝑚 2 . Torques 𝜏1 and 𝜏2 can be
applied at the two joints of the system. The whole system moves
in the vertical plane.
(a) What is the number of degrees of freedom for this system?
Pick a set of generalized coordinates to capture the system
configuration.
(b) Write down the Lagrangian for the system.
(c) Derive the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion.

(3) Two wheels, each of mass m and radius R are


connected by a rigid massless rod. They are rolling
down an incline without slipping under the action of y
gravity. The incline is tilted at an angle α to the m, R
horizontal. The wheels experience torques τ1 and τ2
as shown in the figure. Choose the position y along τ2
the incline as the generalized coordinate.
(a) Write down the Lagrangian for the system
τ1
(b) Obtain the expression for generalized force
L
α
(c) Use Euler-Lagrange equation to obtain the
equation of motion.

(4) A bead of mass ‘m’ can slide smoothly along a wire bent into the shape of the parabola
𝑧 = 4𝑥 2 . The Z-axis of the parabola is vertical. The wire is spun
about the Z-axis at a rate ω.
(a) Taking x as the only generalized coordinate, write down the
Lagrangian for the bead.
(b) Derive the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion for the bead.
(c) Consider the case ω=0. For this case determine the
constraint force (hint: assume x and z are both generalized
coordinates and use Lagrange multipliers).
(5) A uniform slender rod of mass m and length ℓ is hinged at ℓ/2 ℓ/2
the point O and swings in the vertical plane. A spring of
stiffness k and damper of coefficient b are connected to it’s O
centre-of-mass G as shown in the figure. The forces generated ℓ/2
by both the spring and the damper act along their length. The
b
k
rod also experiences a horizontal force F at the end. The
spring is unstretched when θ=0. Choose the angular G
orientation θ as the generalize coordinate. ℓ/2
(a) Write down the Lagrangian for the system. θ
(b) Obtain the generalized forces acting on the system.
(c) Use Euler-Lagrange equations to obtain the equations of F
motion.

(6) Consider the problem of the self-balancing monorail. Assume that the monorail’s centre
of mass is at a height hm above the ground and the centre of mass of the constrained gyros
L is at a height hg above that of the monorail. The gyro
employs a spinning disk of axial moment of inertia I0 and
Gyros
spinning at a speed Ω. Two identical gyros have been placed
hg symmetrically with the gap between them being L. The
gyro’s structure is identical to that discussed in class.
Monorail
Chassis (a) Write down the Lagrangian of the system
hm
(b) Obtain the equations of motion of the system

(7) For a vehicle of your choice (which moves either in air/water or land), define generalized
coordinates, write down the Lagrangian, obtain the generalized forces and derive the
equations of motion using Euler-Lagrange equations.

(8) Pick any real-world mechanical system of your choice (You can also make one up yourself,
but it should be substantially different from those provided here or those made by your team
members).
(a) Identify its degrees of freedom and generalized coordinates
(b) Write down the Lagrangian, identify the generalized forces
(c) Use Euler-Lagrange equations to obtain the equations of motion.
These problems will not be graded
(1) Consider a 2R manipulator which is moving in the vertical plane. The rigid links of the
manipulator are uniform bars of mass m1 and m2 and lengths l1 and l2. Let the joint torque
at the first revolute joint be τ1 and the second revolute joint be τ2 and the angle of the first
link with respect to the vertical be θ1 and the second link with respect to the first link be θ2.
Use the Lagrangian formalism and determine
(a) the Lagrangian
(b) the equations of motion

(2) A disk of radius R and mass m is connected to a hinge ZA


by a rigid massless rod of length ℓ. The assembly can
swing freely in the vertical plane (ZA being the vertical Hinge
direction). The disk is spinning about its axis (ZB1) at a rate XA
ωS relative to the rod.
θ ℓ
(a) Obtain the expression for the net angular velocity 𝐵1𝝎
ZB1 ωS XB1
of the disk and the translational velocity 𝐵1𝒗𝑮 of the
centre-of-mass of the disk R
G
(b) Choose θ to be the generalized coordinate and write
down the Lagrangian for the system. Disk

Common questions

Powered by AI

Assuming a massless rod implies it contributes no kinetic or potential energy to the system, simplifying the Lagrangian calculations. This focuses analysis on the wheels' dynamics and torques. However, this assumption must be validated against real-world scenarios where rod mass could influence stability or motion dynamics. Neglecting the rod's mass is valid if its contribution is substantially smaller than other forces, ensuring analytical tractability without significant loss of model accuracy .

Choosing generalized coordinates, like the angle \( \theta \) for a swinging rod-disk system, impacts the mathematical form of kinetic and potential energy expressions. The linear and angular velocities are expressed in terms of \( \theta \), simplifying the Lagrangian \( L = T - V \). Incorrect choices might complicate derivation by involving additional or irrelevant constraints, affecting computational and conceptual clarity in deriving motion equations .

Define the system's generalized coordinates based on its configuration, such as position and orientation angles. The Lagrangian \( L = T - V \) is derived from kinetic energy \( T \) of the motion and potential energy \( V \). Using Euler-Lagrange equations \( \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \), where \( q \) are the generalized coordinates, determines forces and dynamics. Calculations involve translating physical constraints into mathematically manageable expressions for solving motion equations .

First, determine kinetic and potential energies, considering the gyro's axial inertia \( I_0 \) and speed \( \Omega \). The Lagrangian \( L \) is the difference between these energies. Apply the Euler-Lagrange equation to obtain the motion equations. The system's symmetry simplifies calculations by using generalized coordinates related to both the monorail and gyros' configurations, reflecting constraints and movements accurately .

Damping forces, usually non-conservative, aren't directly part of the Lagrangian \( L = T - V \) but influence the equations of motion as generalized forces. These are incorporated by modifying the Euler-Lagrange formulation, typically requiring external force terms representing damping because they depend on velocity, not position. Correctly incorporating these forces ensures the damping effect is accurately reflected in the motion analysis .

The system has two degrees of freedom since it involves two independent rotational movements at the revolute joints. Appropriate generalized coordinates can be the angular displacements of these two components, for instance, \( \theta_1 \) for the angle of the bar and \( \theta_2 \) for the angle of the disk .

To derive the Lagrangian, identify kinetic and potential energy components. For a bead on a parabolic wire \( z = 4x^2 \) rotating about the Z-axis at a rate \( \omega \), the kinetic energy \( T \) includes translational and rotational parts. Potential energy \( V \) depends on gravitational height. The Lagrangian is \( L = T - V \). Applying the Euler-Lagrange equation \( \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0 \) yields the equations of motion. When \( \omega = 0 \), using Lagrange multipliers helps determine constraint forces considering both \( x \) and \( z \) as coordinates .

The kinetic energy of a rigid body rotating about a fixed point can be expressed as \( \frac{1}{2} \omega^T I \omega \), where \( \omega \) is the angular velocity vector represented in body-fixed coordinates, and \( I \) is the inertia tensor, also represented in these coordinates. The expression is derived from the principles of rotational dynamics, considering the rotational inertia of the body .

Realistic models include broader effects like friction or air resistance, whi...

You might also like