0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

Two-Stage Amplifier Design and Analysis

The assignment involves designing a two-stage amplifier using a 180nm CMOS process with specific performance specifications, including a DC Gain of 60 dB and a unity gain bandwidth of 1 GHz. It requires deriving the transfer function, estimating compensation capacitors, and verifying results through simulation. Additionally, a closed loop amplifier design is to be created, with similar analysis and simulation verification required for its performance metrics.

Uploaded by

itzabhay
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

Two-Stage Amplifier Design and Analysis

The assignment involves designing a two-stage amplifier using a 180nm CMOS process with specific performance specifications, including a DC Gain of 60 dB and a unity gain bandwidth of 1 GHz. It requires deriving the transfer function, estimating compensation capacitors, and verifying results through simulation. Additionally, a closed loop amplifier design is to be created, with similar analysis and simulation verification required for its performance metrics.

Uploaded by

itzabhay
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Assignment: #5

PROBLEM 1. Two-Stage Amplifier and Compensation

Using the database generated in Assignment #2 for 180nm CMOS process, design a two-stage
amplifier with the following specifications: DC Gain = 60 dB, open loop unity gain bandwidth
= 1 GHz, CL = 5 pF, and Phase margin ≥ 70◦ . Schematic diagram of the amplifier with Miller
and Ahuja compensations are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. Bias MOSFETs with
overdrive voltage (∆) for optimum speed and power gain i.e., for maximum gm/Id × fT .

(a) Derive the transfer function υ out (s)/υ in (s) and evaluate DC Gain, poles, and zeroes using
dominant parasitic capacitors for MOSFETs.

(b) Estimate minimum capacitor required for both Miller and Ahuja compensation schemes
to achieve the desired performance.

(c) Verify the results in simulation. Plot the input-to-output AC response and clearly indicate
the DC Gain, unity gain bandwidth and phase margin.

(d) Sweep DC input across bias voltage and plot DC output voltage. Check for DC gain across
the input voltage.

EE5320: Analog Integrated Circuit Design 1 May-Aug. 2022


PROBLEM 2. Closed loop analysis
Make use of the amplifier in Figure 2 to design the closed loop amplifier as shown in Figure
3. You can either use a VCVS in the feedback loop to enforce negative feedback or a differential
input with single ended output if required. Use appropriate common mode bias voltages. Cin is
the parasitic capacitance due to input MOSFET. Use CL = 5pF, CS = 1pF, CF = 1pF. Ignore
the CL in Figure 2.

(a) Derive the closed loop transfer function υ out(s)/υ in (s) and evaluate DC Gain, poles, and
zeroes using dominant parasitic capacitors for MOSFETs.

(b) Verify the results in simulation. Plot the AC response of the closed loop amplifier and
clearly indicate the DC Gain and -3dB bandwidth.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The main challenges in designing a two-stage amplifier with a DC Gain of 60 dB and a bandwidth of 1 GHz using a 180nm CMOS process include achieving the high gain and bandwidth while maintaining stability and power efficiency. Miller compensation can address these issues by adding a feedback capacitor to control the dominant pole and enhance phase margin, which helps stabilize the system. Ahuja compensation, on the other hand, modifies the transconductance stage to shift the position of poles and zeros, providing an alternative stability pathway that can offer better power efficiency .

For Miller compensation, the minimum capacitor can be estimated using the unity-gain frequency and phase margin formula. Calculating the feedback factor and ensuring the dominant pole is sufficiently lowered helps maintain stability. Conversely, Ahuja compensation requires calculating the parasitic capacitances and ensuring zero-pole cancellation for improved bandwidth without sacrificing stability. These methods ensure the desired performance by accurately tuning the compensation network .

Deriving the closed-loop transfer function involves accounting for parasitic capacitances, which affect poles and zeros, and thus the frequency response. Calculating the feedback factor accurately is crucial since it determines how parasitic elements introduce phase shifts or gain variations. Adjusting these factors impacts stability, bandwidth, and phase margin of the overall system response, ensuring desired behavior under closed-loop operation .

To assess the impact, the DC input is swept across a range of bias voltages, and the resulting DC output voltage is plotted. This analysis shows how the DC Gain changes over different input levels, which is important for understanding the linearity and signal handling capability of the amplifier. Maintaining a consistent DC Gain across variations ensures reliable operation and minimizes distortion .

The closed-loop amplifier should be set up with appropriate input signal and feedback path in a simulation environment. Performing an AC analysis with a frequency sweep allows for plotting of gain versus frequency. Verifying the DC Gain ensures the amplifier operates at the correct/constant gain level, essential for input-output linearity. The -3dB bandwidth shows the range under which the gain is maintained with minimal distortion, critical for determining the frequency response width without significant loss .

Ignoring capacitances like CL can simplify the analysis by reducing complexity, making initial design stages more tractable. However, this can lead to inaccuracies in predicting the frequency response and stability, as these capacitances influence the poles and zeros significantly. It may result in a lack of precision in actual performance during simulations, causing potential discrepancies between anticipated and real-world performance .

Simulation steps include setting up the amplifier circuit in a simulation tool, applying AC analysis, and sweeping frequency to evaluate the frequency response. Key parameters to verify include DC Gain, which should be 60 dB, the unity gain bandwidth, expected to be 1 GHz, and the phase margin, which should be at least 70°. Plotting an input-output AC response curve allows visualization of these metrics and assessment of the amplifier's stability and bandwidth .

Using a VCVS in the feedback loop enforces strong negative feedback, which improves linearity and reduces the effect of component variations on performance. It helps maintain a stable DC Gain and enhances bandwidth. Alternatively, a differential input with a single-ended output can improve common-mode rejection and reduce noise interference. This configuration helps achieve a balanced design with high precision in signal processing .

To derive the transfer function υout(s)/υin(s), we need to consider the small signal model of the amplifier. The factors involved include the transconductance (gm), output conductance (go), and parasitic capacitances. The DC Gain is given by the product of the transconductance and output resistance of each stage. Poles and zeroes are determined based on the parasitic capacitances at each stage, affecting the frequency response and stability .

Common mode bias voltages affect the operating point of MOSFETs in an amplifier, influencing parameters like gain linearity, power consumption, and signal range. They must be optimized to maximize linearity while maintaining low power dissipation and sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. Adjusting these voltages ensures devices operate in the ideal region, stabilizing the amplification characteristics over process and temperature variations .

You might also like