0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views4 pages

Thailand's Agrarian Transformation Insights

Jonathan Rigg's book, 'More Than Rural: Textures of Thailand’s Agrarian Transformation,' provides a comprehensive examination of Thailand's rural changes over 35 years, challenging the neoliberal narrative of economic development. The author explores the complexities of rural identity, agrarian practices, and social structures, arguing that rural Thailand is more than just a traditional countryside. Through detailed chapters, Rigg highlights the interplay between rural and urban dynamics, the impact of policies on human flourishing, and the evolving nature of livelihoods in the context of Thailand's economic transformation.

Uploaded by

hafizatria21
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views4 pages

Thailand's Agrarian Transformation Insights

Jonathan Rigg's book, 'More Than Rural: Textures of Thailand’s Agrarian Transformation,' provides a comprehensive examination of Thailand's rural changes over 35 years, challenging the neoliberal narrative of economic development. The author explores the complexities of rural identity, agrarian practices, and social structures, arguing that rural Thailand is more than just a traditional countryside. Through detailed chapters, Rigg highlights the interplay between rural and urban dynamics, the impact of policies on human flourishing, and the evolving nature of livelihoods in the context of Thailand's economic transformation.

Uploaded by

hafizatria21
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/348959096

JONATHAN RIGG, MORE THAN RURAL: TEXTURES OF


THAILAND’S AGRARIAN TRANSFORMATION

Article in Asian Ethnology · February 2021

CITATIONS READS

0 590

1 author:

Benjamin Huffman
University of Maryland, College Park
5 PUBLICATIONS 20 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Benjamin Huffman on 02 February 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


410 | Asian Ethnology 79/2 • 2020

Southeast Asia
Jonathan Rigg, More Than Rural: Textures of Thailand’s Agrarian
Transformation
Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2019. 324 pages. Hardcover, $68.00. ISBN:
9780824876593.

This work offers a longitudinal perspective of the agrarian transformation in Thailand.


The author’s exploration of the Thai countryside spans three and a half decades. It
commenced at a time when the country was being referred to as the next Asian Tiger.
Contrary to the neoliberal philosophy sweeping much of the world during Thailand’s
aggressive economic development in the late 1980s, rural Thailand has followed a dif-
ferent path. Rigg presents an illuminating slant on agrarian change by leading readers
through a thought-provoking investigation of rural Thailand.
The book is divided into ten detailed chapters. The author starts the first chapter,
which is also the introduction, by addressing what he sees as a paradox between the
continued importance of the countryside with its “progressive diminution,” a con-
traction in and of itself. To support his argument, “the rural” is delineated into three
nomenclatures. The first is the classic definition that one might expect to associate
with the countryside; the second accommodates the social norms and values inherent
to the individual regardless of physical location; while the third lays the foundation for
the book, building up the rural as something more. The third, rural, while trying to
maintain linkages to the first and second, does so only loosely. The author steers away
from the more abstract distinctions of the rural by building on the critical discourses
that he presents over the next eight chapters.
Chapter 2, “Inheritances,” the first of the eight core chapters, sets the stage for the
author’s main argument by providing a brief history of the agrarian transformation in
rural Thailand while appraising some of the earliest rural village studies. The research
methodology used in early village studies was rather obtuse. This led the author to
argue that the normative understanding of the countryside, what he refers to as the
primordial village community, is distinctly different from the more modern village set-
tlement. The context in which early studies defined and demarcated, in spatial terms,
the rural, makes it difficult for scholars to contrast it with the modern village set-
tlement. This issue of interpretation and the developmental transformation in rural
Thailand are discussed further in the next chapter.
Chapter 3, “Spaces,” continues to advance the author’s position that rural Thailand
is more than rural. It is effectively accomplished through an in-depth discussion of the
urban/rural dichotomy and supported with innovative tools for conceptualizing the
contemporary countryside. Before transforming into the more modern rural settle-
ments we know today, the livelihood of villagers in the countryside centered on rice
farming: “to be a villager was to be a rice farmer” (49). The author turns to Nobel
laureate Amartya Sen to further his discussion on what constitutes a life worth living.
In the case of villagers, this means farming. This intrinsic feeling of community within
the village settlement is a measurement of subjective well-being. From this point,
the reader accelerates through Thailand’s high-paced economic development where it
went from a low-income to upper-middle-income country in just over three decades.
During this period, the dichotomy between rural and urban identities became blurred.
reviews | 411

The author illustrates this development through the lens of two rural villages—pro-
viding evidence of urbanization in the countryside contrasted with rural migration to
the urban centers, by which “the urban mentally shapes the rural and vice versa” (64).
Chapter 4, “Flourishing,” explores how ideologies and policies have shaped the
country’s development and investigates whether this has had a positive impact on
human flourishings in the countryside. The transition between chapters is frail but
necessary to support the author’s contention regarding “the limitations of taking a
money-metric, poverty-based approach to progress” (88), specifically, with regards to
development policy. This perspective was correctly supported by identifying the shift
from a basic needs approach to policy development to the more widely discussed suf-
ficiency economy (SE) approach that Thailand is known for. The author also identi-
fies many of the SE approach’s shortcomings, predominantly with regards to human
development—leading to a discussion on human flourishings or in Greek eudaimonia,
which Aristotle equates to happiness, the goal for both life and political policy. This
notion of flourishing brings the author back to the work of Amartya Sen; unfortu-
nately, he stops short of introducing Sen’s seminal work on the capability approach.
Sen’s approach could address some of the author’s criticisms regarding SE, particularly
his reproach as to why SE has found such limited traction over much of rural Thailand.
The chapter concludes by rightly reiterating the need to focus on well-being but leaves
the reader less than satisfied.
Chapter 5, “Society,” reengages the reader by providing an interesting statistic.
Thailand has remained mostly rural, despite its rapid economic development (90).
Moreover, the author presents a modernized family structure that is more spatially
divided due to migration and more difficult to define due to social coherence. To il-
lustrate this, readers are invited into the life of Mr. and Mrs. Weerakul, a smallholder
couple with a daughter working in Bangkok and whose children are being raised by
their father’s grandparents living Ban Nam (101). This family dynamic is not entirely
unusual by the author’s own account and supports his argument that it is necessary to
reevaluate how rural Thailand—especially the countryside—is defined.
Chapters 6 and 7, “Land” and “Labor” respectively, provide a natural progression
following the author’s investigation into the social condition of the rural. Chapter 6
expands on why and how smallholdings in rural Thailand have remained so resilient
to economic stressors. Over fifty-three years, the average area of farm holdings has
dropped by only .3 hectares (118). The author offers five possible arguments while
implying some universality to his theory. Nonetheless, he leaves the reader wondering
how substance agriculture, such as rice farming in Thailand, can still generate enough
rice to be the second-largest exporter of rice globally. This paradox does not get ad-
dressed. One could assume that the 3.2 hectares that the average smallholder tends is
more than subsistence agriculture. Although the author states that Thailand has not
taken advantage of economies of scale in agriculture, it is still a smallholder society
where farming is less a business than a way of life (122). This way of life creates some
challenges and barriers, which are discussed throughout chapter 6 and into chapter 7.
Chapter 8, “Livelihoods,” does a nice job of tying the previous chapters together by
examining how the agrarian transformation in the rural has influenced the livelihood
of its citizens irrespective of space. On initial reflection, the linkage between livelihood
and agrarian transformation is not clear. However, the author provides clarity by cor-
rectly turning to the work of Robert Chambers and his approach to sustainable rural
412 | Asian Ethnology 79/2 • 2020

livelihoods. This approach utilizes elements of SE, such as coping with stressors and
shocks, along with elements of Sen’s approach that explore capabilities and function-
ings. He nicely packages these approaches, which are purposefully open to interpreta-
tion, with Deborah Bryceson’s notation of “deagrarianization” but cautions against
some of its fundamental principles, specifically as they relate to the movement of so-
cietal structures (170). When deliberating deagrarianization, the author argues that
Bryceson’s multidimensional process does not account for spatial interpenetration. He
supports this claim through a longitudinal study conducted around the northeast prov-
ince of Maha Sarakham—showing how rural livelihoods extend beyond clearly deline-
ated borders and how farming has moved from a primary to a more tertiary activity.
Chapter 9, “Class,” is the last of the core chapters. It synthesizes the author’s nar-
rative from the previous chapters to help define the identity of citizens living in the
countryside. Historically viewed as peasants, this categorization of people living in
the countryside may no longer be suitable. The author’s contribution to this popular
discourse is to move beyond the stereotypical class distinction and view the traditional
peasantry as something more. The post-productivist position of the author has been
vividly illustrated throughout the previous chapters—guiding readers through an eth-
nographic account of the transformation taking place in the Thai countryside. It is a
challenge to discuss class distinctions and identity in Thailand without touching on
the Red Shirt/Yellow Shirt movements. This book was no exception, particularly since
the Red Shirts are synonymous with the rural countryside, where they are referred to
as Red Buffalo. Buffalo, as the author describes in his first chapter, is a term used to
refer to rural farmers as “slow moving, dim, and loyal but easily led astray” (3). This
label is contested by the author but conceded in the sense that as a political movement
the Red Shirts fall along grassroots ideologies regardless of class distinctions.
Chapter 10, “Futures,” reiterates the author’s discourse that rural Thailand is more
than rural—as a unit of measurement and as a space for scholarship. The author convinc-
ingly argues the distention between the Thai rural and rural Thailand while proposing
two alternative yet extreme paths forward. At one extreme is classic modernization,
which by the author’s own account could lead Thailand out of its middle-income trap,
and at the other is the status quo where smallholders continue their distributed liveli-
hoods impeding economic progress for regressive economic security.
More Than Rural guides readers through an enlightening perspective on the impor-
tance of the Thai countryside. It uses a combination of longitudinal research mixed
with socio-economic approaches to explore how Thailand’s agrarian transformation
is reshaping the livelihood aspects of citizens regardless of shifting societal structures.
While economists may find Rigg’s assertations unfulfilling, his book caters to a broad
audience of readers from the social sciences and delivers a compelling story of the rural
complemented with rich ethnographic research.
Benjamin D. Huffman
University of Maryland

View publication stats

Common questions

Powered by AI

The author proposes two alternative paths for rural Thailand's future: one path follows classic modernization, potentially leading the country out of its middle-income trap, and the other maintains the status quo where smallholders continue with distributed livelihoods. The potential impacts of classic modernization include accelerated economic growth and integration with global markets, potentially increasing urbanization. Conversely, the status quo emphasizes sustaining local cultures and economies, which may impede rapid economic progress but could offer resilience against global economic shocks .

In 'More Than Rural,' the concept of 'sufficiency economy' is pivotal in discussing Thailand's development narrative as it seeks to balance economic growth with environmental sustainability and social well-being. Its role is to provide a holistic framework that aligns with local cultural values and socio-economic conditions. However, Rigg points out its shortcomings, such as its limited practical application across rural Thailand and inadequate emphasis on broader socio-political contexts. The policy lacks traction in some regions, partly due to its idealistic framework not being thoroughly integrated with regional economic realities .

Jonathan Rigg employs the concept of 'deagrarianization' to analyze the shift in rural livelihoods from primarily agricultural to more diversified economic activities. He critiques it by highlighting its failure to account for the spatial complexities and interpenetration between rural and urban areas. Rigg argues that traditional interpretations of deagrarianization don't fully capture the nuanced changes in rural Thailand where economic activities and cultural identities are fluid and interlaced. This misalignment underscores the need for broader frameworks that better accommodate the socio-economic transitions in rural areas .

Rigg challenges conventional class distinctions in rural Thailand by questioning the relevance of the traditional 'peasant' label, as rural areas have evolved beyond mere agricultural classes. He offers an alternative perspective that views rural inhabitants as dynamic participants in a post-productivist society, involved in diverse economic activities outside agriculture. This new perspective highlights the fluidity and complexity of rural identities, nuanced with socio-political movements like the Red Shirt movement, which align more with grassroots ideologies than rigid class structures .

'More Than Rural' reflects on changing family dynamics in rural Thailand by highlighting the increasing spatial division caused by migration and modern economic activities. Rigg discusses how families, like that of Mr. and Mrs. Weerakul, face challenges in maintaining traditional roles as family members move to urban centers for work. This spatial and economic shift has implications for rural development, such as redefining community ties and altering traditional social structures. The changing dynamics also affect rural identity by challenging the traditional concept of the rural family and introducing new social norms and expectations .

'More Than Rural' integrates Amartya Sen's and Robert Chambers' works by combining the capability approach with sustainable rural livelihood frameworks to examine livelihood strategies in rural Thailand. The book uses Sen's focus on capabilities and individuals' functionings to assess well-being and quality of life in rural contexts, while Chambers' concepts address coping mechanisms and resilience to economic and environmental stressors. Rigg leverages these theories to highlight complex socio-economic transformations, supporting his argument for a more diversified understanding of rural livelihoods that extends beyond traditional agricultural dependence .

Jonathan Rigg identifies several limitations in using a money-metric, poverty-based approach to development policies in Thailand. He argues that such an approach fails to fully capture the complexities of human flourishing, as it overlooks non-monetary aspects of well-being and happiness. He contends that this focus on economic metrics neglects the broader social and cultural dynamics that contribute to people's quality of life, particularly in rural areas, where community ties and non-economic values play a crucial role in sustenance and happiness. These limitations highlight the need for policies that incorporate a broader set of indicators beyond mere economic measures .

The book suggests that spatial and cultural interconnections between rural and urban areas blur traditional boundaries and significantly influence the identity and economic activities of rural communities. The mutual shaping of urban and rural norms challenges binary categorizations, redefining what it means to be rural. Economic activities in rural areas are increasingly influenced by urban practices, leading to a diversified livelihood that includes non-agricultural work. This not only affects the economic structure but also transforms cultural identities, leading to a more integrated socio-economic fabric .

In 'More Than Rural,' the author redefines rural areas in Thailand by moving beyond traditional definitions that exclusively link rurality with agriculture. Rigg argues that rural Thailand has undergone significant transformations, marked by urbanization and the blending of urban and rural characteristics. He presents the rural not just as an economic space, but as a social and cultural milieu that interacts with urban influences. The author supports this through a nuanced exploration of the social, economic, and cultural dimensions of rural life, challenging the conventional binary views of urban versus rural .

Rigg explains 'smallholding resilience' in rural Thailand as the ability of small-scale farms to withstand economic stressors over decades. This resilience is attributed to several factors, including strong community networks, adaptive farming practices, and diversification of income sources. Smallholders often engage in supplementary economic activities beyond farming, which enhances their capacity to cope with economic pressures. Moreover, Rigg points out the cultural importance of farming as a livelihood rather than just a business, which adds a layer of social and cultural sustainability to the economic dimension .

You might also like