1. Was the sponsor provided with an actual risk management plan?
The sponsor was given a documentary called "Risk Management Plan", but it ended as
low in several key areas which reduced its effectiveness: Firstly, the Plan formulated 100 risk
events, under WBS yet and secondly the candidates failed in their categorization by the impact
they could possibly bring or the probability of occurrence. In this case, cost analysis provides the
project team with an application concerning the priority setting of risks. While impact-ranking
probability risks, high impact-high ranking probability risks clearly demand more attention and
serious strategic mitigation measures while low impact- low probability risk demands further
watch. In the absence of this categorization, resources are therefore allocated, and bias on the
critical threats, is awkward. Risk management is not in risk identification, but in having clear
strategies when dealing or managing the risks—The specific activities, accountability, and
timeframes of such activities will be elaborated. There was also no clear identification and
control of risks throughout the project’s life cycle in the plan. Risk management is not an end
procedure; it is continuous and is to be checked and altered periodically. Effective risk
management strategies will spell out how the realization of risks is to be monitored, how new
risks are to be identified, and how responses are to be modified.
In conclusion, the “Risk Management Plan,” was handed over, yet the plan is not fully
developed. Ideally it is suppose to have risk categorization on impact and probability, risk
mitigation measures and precise risk monitoring and control.
2. Did the project manager perform effective risk management?
As it can be seen from the details provided the efficiency of the managing of risks by the
project manager can be in doubt. The aggressive identification of one hundred risk events
proves the effectiveness of the identification stage but an absence of categorizing the identified
risks according to their early impact and probability demonstrates several weaknesses in the
risk management procedure. Risk management entails several activities, including:
Risk Identification: The activity of realizing the risks that can influence the project. The project
manager believes that he or she has come up with a long list of risks, which is commendable.
Risk Analysis: This requires assessment of each risk in terms of risk probability and risk severity.
Something was lacking in the risk management plan stated and this was not words well said.
Risk Response Planning: Activities undertaken to find how best to manage, share, tolerate or
escape the aforesaid risks. Listening to impact and probability assessments, formulation of
response plans is considered rather challenging.
Risk Monitoring and Control: On-going recognition of the presence of identified risks,
assessment of residual risks, new risks, and the efficiency of risk response plans.