0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views26 pages

Cost Flow Methods in Inventory Management

The document discusses various cost flow assumptions for inventory management, including Specific Identification, FIFO, and Average Cost methods. It explains how to calculate the cost of goods available for sale and the implications of each method on financial reporting. Additionally, it covers the Lower-of-Cost-or-Net Realizable Value (LCNRV) principle and the Gross Profit and Retail Inventory methods for estimating inventory values.

Uploaded by

seid mohammed
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views26 pages

Cost Flow Methods in Inventory Management

The document discusses various cost flow assumptions for inventory management, including Specific Identification, FIFO, and Average Cost methods. It explains how to calculate the cost of goods available for sale and the implications of each method on financial reporting. Additionally, it covers the Lower-of-Cost-or-Net Realizable Value (LCNRV) principle and the Gross Profit and Retail Inventory methods for estimating inventory values.

Uploaded by

seid mohammed
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

WHICH COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS TO ADOPT?

Cost Flow Methods


 Specific Identification
or
 Two cost flow assumptions
► First-in, First-out (FIFO) or

► Average Cost

9-1
Cost Flow Methods
To illustrate the cost flow methods, assume that ABC CO. had the following transactions in its
first month of operations.

Calculate cost of Goods Available for Sale


Beginning inventory (2,000 x Br.4) Br. 8,000
Purchases:
6,000 x Br.4.40 26,400
2,000 x Br.4.75 9,500
Goods available for sale Br.43,900
9-2
Cost Flow Methods

Specific Identification
 IASB requires in cases where inventories are not ordinarily interchangeable or
for goods and services produced or segregated for specific projects.
 Cost of goods sold includes costs of the specific items sold.
 Used when handling a relatively small number of costly, easily distinguishable
items.
 Matches actual costs against actual revenue.
 Cost flow matches the physical flow of the goods.

 May allow a company to manipulate net income.


9-3
Specific Identification

Illustration: ABC CO’s 6,000 units of inventory consists of 1,000 units from the March
2 purchase, 3,000 from the March 15 purchase, and 2,000 from the March 30 purchase.
Compute the amount of ending inventory and cost of goods sold.

9-4
Cost Flow Assumptions

Average-Cost
 Prices items in the inventory on the basis of the average
cost of all similar goods available during the period.
 Not as subject to income manipulation.
 Measuring a specific physical flow of inventory is often
impossible.

9-5
Average-Cost
Weighted-Average Method

9-6
Average-Cost
Moving-Average Method

In this method, ABC CO. computes a new average unit cost each time it
makes a purchase.
9-7
Cost Flow Assumptions

First-In, First-Out (FIFO)


 Assumes goods are used in the order in which they are
purchased.
 Approximates the physical flow of goods.
 Ending inventory is close to current cost.
 Fails to match current costs against current revenues on the
income statement.
9-8
First-In, First-Out (FIFO)
Periodic Inventory System

Determine cost of ending inventory by taking the cost of the most recent
purchase and working back until it accounts for all units in the inventory.
9-9
First-In, First-Out (FIFO)
Perpetual Inventory System

In all cases where FIFO is used, the inventory and cost of goods sold
would be the same at the end of the month whether a perpetual or
periodic system is used.
9-10
LOWER-OF-COST-OR-NET REALIZABLE
VALUE (LCNRV)

A company abandons the historical cost principle when the


future utility (revenue-producing ability) of the asset drops
below its original cost.

9-11
LCNRV

Net Realizable Value


• Estimated selling price in the normal course of business less
 estimated costs to complete and
 estimated costs to make a sale.

9-12
LCNRV

Illustration of LCNRV: Marcilas Foods computes its inventory at LCNRV


(amounts in thousands).

9-13
LCNRV

Methods of Applying LCNRV

9-14
Recording Net Realizable Value

Illustration: Data for Ricardo Company


Cost of goods sold (before adj. to NRV) Br.108,000
Ending inventory (cost) 82,000
Ending inventory (at NRV) 70,000

Loss Loss Due to Decline to NRV 12,000


Method Inventory (Br.82,000 - Br.70,000) 12,000

COGS Cost of Goods Sold 12,000


Method
Inventory 12,000

9-15
LCNRV
Use of an Allowance
Instead of crediting the Inventory account for net realizable
value adjustments, companies generally use an allowance
account.
Loss Method

Loss Due to Decline to NRV 12,000


Allowance to Reduce Inventory to NRV 12,000
9-16
Use of an Allowance
Partial Statement of Financial Position
No
Allowance Allowance
Current assets:
Inventory € 70,000 € 82,000
Allowance to reduce inventory (12,000)
Inventory at NRV 70,000
Prepaids 20,000 20,000
Accounts receivable 350,000 350,000
Cash 100,000 100,000
Total current assets 540,000 540,000

9-17
LCNRV
Recovery of Inventory Loss
 Amount of write-down is reversed.
 Reversal limited to amount of original write-down.
Continuing the Ricardo example, assume the net realizable value
increases to Br.74,000 (an increase of Br.4,000). Ricardo makes the
following entry, using the loss method.

Allowance to Reduce Inventory to NRV 4,000


Recovery of Inventory Loss 4,000
9-18
GROSS PROFIT METHOD OF ESTIMATING
INVENTORY
• Substitute Measure to Approximate Inventory
Relies on three assumptions:
1. Beginning inventory plus purchases equal total goods to be
accounted for.
2. Goods not sold must be on hand.
3. The sales, reduced to cost, deducted from the sum of the opening
inventory plus purchases, equal ending inventory.
9-19
GROSS PROFIT METHOD

Illustration: Cetus Corp. has a beginning inventory of Br.60,000 and purchases of


Br.200,000, both at cost. Sales at selling price amount to Br.280,000. The gross
profit on selling price is 30 percent. Cetus applies the gross margin method as
follows.

9-20
GROSS PROFIT METHOD
Computation of Gross Profit Percentage
Illustration: In previous Illustration, the gross profit was a given. But
how did Cetus derive that figure? To see how to compute a gross profit
percentage, assume that an article cost Br.15 and sells for Br.20, a gross
profit of Br.5.

9-21
GROSS PROFIT METHOD

9-22
RETAIL INVENTORY METHOD
Method used by retailers to compile inventories at retail prices. Retailer
can use a formula to convert retail prices to cost.
Requires retailers to keep a record of:

1) Total cost and retail value of goods purchased.


2) Total cost and retail value of the goods available for sale.
3) Sales for the period.

9-23
Retail Inventory Method
Exercise: The following data pertain to a single department for the month of
October for Fuque Inc. Prepare a schedule computing retail inventory using
the Conventional and Cost methods.

COST RETAIL
Beg. inventory, Oct. 1 £ 52,000 £ 78,000
Purchases 272,000 423,000
Freight in 16,600
Purchase returns 5,600 8,000
Additional markups 9,000
Markup cancellations 2,000
Markdowns (net) 3,600
Normal spoilage and breakage 10,000
Sales 390,000
9-24
Retail Inventory Method

COST RETAIL Retail %


Cost to
Beginning inventory £ 52,000 £ 78,000
Purchases 272,000 423,000
Purchase returns (5,600) (8,000)
Freight in 16,600
Markdowns, net (3,600)
Markups, net 7,000
Current year additions 283,000 418,400
Goods available for sale 335,000 496,400 67.49%
Normal spoilage and breakage (10,000)
Sales (390,000)
Ending inventory at retail £ 96,400

Ending inventory at Cost:


9-25
96,400 x 67.49% = £ 65,060
The End of Chapter 4

Thank You!!!

9-26

Common questions

Powered by AI

The LCNRV rule impacts a company's liquidity analysis by potentially decreasing the inventory value on the balance sheet when a write-down is required, thus reducing current assets and potentially altering liquidity ratios like the current and quick ratios. This can signal a weaker financial position on paper, affecting stakeholders' perception of the company's liquidity and solvency. The adjustments can lead to immediate losses on the income statement, impacting retained earnings and overall equity as well .

The Gross Profit Method estimates inventory by subtracting sales reduced to cost from the sum of the beginning inventory and purchases. The assumptions include the stability of the gross profit margin and that sales can be accurately converted to cost. Inaccuracies in estimating the gross profit margin, variations in sales pricing, or errors in the assumptions on return and obsolescence can lead to significant discrepancies in reported inventory levels. Such inaccuracies affect financial reporting as they misrepresent the cost of goods sold and ending inventory, potentially misleading stakeholders about profitability and asset valuation .

The LCNRV principle is applied by valuing the inventory at the lower of its historical cost or its net realizable value. If the net realizable value, which is the estimated selling price less estimated costs to complete and sell, drops below the historical cost, the company must write down the inventory. This write-down results in an immediate recognition of a loss, reducing net income. If the net realizable value later increases, the amount of the write-down may be reversed up to the original write-down amount, improving the income statement for that period .

The FIFO method assumes that goods are sold in the order they are purchased, resulting in the cost of goods sold being based on older inventory costs during periods of rising prices, which typically reports higher profits. It closely approximates the physical flow of goods and does not match current costs against current revenues, potentially skewing the income statement during inflation. In contrast, the Moving-Average method generates a new average cost with each purchase, which smooths out price fluctuations over time, providing a more consistent expense pattern across periods. This method reflects a more stable depiction of income and inventory valuation, avoiding some of the distortion seen in FIFO during volatile pricing environments .

Reversing an inventory write-down under the LCNRV rule increases the inventory's book value back up to the net realizable value, improving the balance sheet by enhancing asset valuation. This reversal boosts net income in the period when reversed, as the write-down amount is recognized as income, correcting prior period understatements of profit. However, frequent reversals can raise concerns regarding the company's inventory management and market condition forecasts credibility .

The Retail Inventory Method estimates the ending inventory by converting retail sales values to cost using a cost-to-retail ratio. It requires records on the total cost and retail value of goods purchased, goods available for sale, and sales during the period. For businesses with fluctuating markups, this method may not be suitable because it relies on a consistent markup to accurately estimate inventory cost. Fluctuations in markups can lead to incorrect approximations of inventory cost figures, affecting gross margin assessments and financial reporting accuracy .

Using an allowance account for LCNRV adjustments involves maintaining the original inventory cost on the books while separately accounting for the difference between cost and net realizable value. This method preserves inventory historical cost information and provides a clearer depiction of valuation adjustments. In contrast, direct write-downs permanently alter the recorded inventory value, eliminating the original cost record. Allowance accounts offer greater flexibility for reporting and reversal of write-downs if market conditions improve, unlike direct write-downs which cannot be revised upwards .

The Specific Identification cost flow method is used when inventories are not ordinarily interchangeable or when dealing with a relatively small number of costly, easily distinguishable items. It matches actual costs against actual revenue, thereby providing a precise allocation of cost to goods sold. However, this method may allow a company to manipulate net income through the specific selection of which cost is associated with the sold goods, as this can affect both inventory valuation and reported profits .

Using the FIFO method in a perpetual inventory system can lead to challenges in accurately matching current costs against current revenues, especially during periods of price volatility. As older costs are matched against current revenues, there can be a lag effect that distorts profitability metrics. For inventory turnover analysis, FIFO may overstate inventory levels and understate cost of goods sold, leading to underestimated inventory turnover ratios, which can misinform about stock liquidity and efficiency .

In both Weighted-Average and Moving-Average methods, the timing of purchases critically affects inventory costing. Each purchase updates the average cost, reflecting recent price changes in the inventory valuation. When prices are rising, later purchases boost the average cost, increasing the cost of goods sold and reducing reported profits. Conversely, when prices fall, the average cost decreases, enhancing profit margins. This timing effect leads to variations in financial performance reporting, affecting profit margins and inventory valuation consistency across periods .

You might also like