0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views9 pages

Soil Classification and Analysis Report

The document presents a problem set for a Soil Mechanics course at Mindanao State University, detailing soil classification using USDA and AASHTO systems. It includes specific soil data and calculations for various soil samples, classifying them based on their composition and properties. The results indicate classifications such as Clay, Sandy Loam, A-4, A-6, and ML for different soil samples.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views9 pages

Soil Classification and Analysis Report

The document presents a problem set for a Soil Mechanics course at Mindanao State University, detailing soil classification using USDA and AASHTO systems. It includes specific soil data and calculations for various soil samples, classifying them based on their composition and properties. The results indicate classifications such as Clay, Sandy Loam, A-4, A-6, and ML for different soil samples.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Mindanao State UniverSity

Barangay Fatima, General Santos City

Problem Set # 2

By

Cabarrubias, Jocel S.

Cantoja, Danica S.

Tuscano, Jackielyn B.

Soil Mechanics – CVE131

Civil Engineering Department

September, 2024
Problem 5.1. Classify the following soil using the U.S Department of Agriculture textural classification chart.

Soil Sand % Silt % Clay %


A 20 20 60
E 70 15 15

For soil A:

Answer: Based on the provided soil percentages and using the USDA soil classification chart, Soil A is
classified as Clay.
For Soil E:

Answer: Based on the provided soil percentages and using the USDA soil classification chart, Soil E is
classified as Sandy Loam.
Problem 5.2. The sieve analysis of various soils and the liquid and plastic limits of the fraction passing
through the No. 40 sieve are given below. Classify the soils using the AASHTO classification system and give
the group indexes.

Sieve Analysis (Percent Finer)


Soil No. No. 10 No. 40 No. 200 Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
1 98 80 50 38 29
3 100 88 65 37 22
9 100 78 8 - NP

For soil no. 1:

Since 50% of the soil passes through No. 200, the soil is considered a silt-clay material.

PI=LL-PL
PI= 38-29
PI= 9
Using the data given for the soil, it is classified as a silty soil
A-4.
This soil has a fair or poor quality as a subgrade for its Group Index;

G.I .  0.2a  0.005ac  0.01bd


Given:

PL  29
LL  38 G.I .  0.02( F  35)  0.005( F  35)( wt  40)  0.01( F  15)(lp  10)
F  50 G.I .  0.2(15)  0.005(15)(2)  0.01(35)(1)
wt  38 G.I .  2 .5
PI  LL  PL G.I .  3
PI  9

Thus, the soil is A-4 (3).

For Soil no.3 :

Since 65% of the oil passes through No. 200 sieve, it is classified as a silt clay material. Based on the given
data and a plasticity index of 15, it is considered a clayey soil. This indicates a fair to poor quality for
subgrade material.

G.I .  0.2a  0.005ac  0.01bd

Given:
PL  22
G.I .  0.02( F  35)  0.005( F  35)( wt  40)  0.01( F  15)(lp  10)
LL  37
G.I .  0.2(65  35)  0.005(65  35)(37  40)  0.01(65  15)(15  10)
F  65
G.I .  8.05
wt  37
G.I .  8
PI  15

Hence, the soil is A-6 (8).


For Soil no.9 :

Since only 8% of the soil passed through the No. 200 sieve, it is considered a granular material. Based on the
provided soil data, it is classified as fine sand. This soil has excellent quality for use as subgrade material.

G.I .  0.2a  0.005ac  0.01bd

Given:
PL  none
F  8%
wt  none
PI  none

Since 8% of the soil passes through the No. 200 sieve, which is less than 35%, a  0

�. �. = 0.2� + 0.005�� + 0.1��


�. �. = 0.2 0 + 0.005 0 0 + 0.01 8 − 15 0
�. �. = 0

Therefore, ���� ���� ������� �� � − � (0)


Problem 5.4. For an inorganic soil, the following grain-size analysis is given.

U.S Sleeve No. Percent passing

4 100
10 90

20 64
40 38

80 18

200 13

For this soil, LL  23 and PL  19 . Classify the soil by using


a. AASHTO soil classification system
b. Unified soil classification system
Give group names and group symbol

a.) AASHTO soil classification system

Since only 13% passed through no.200, this soil is considered a Granular material.
With the given data in U.S Sleeve No. and plasticity index of 4 ; The type of soil is a stone fragment-gravel
and sand ; A-1-b
G.I .  0.2a  0.005ac  0.01bd

Since 13<35 ; a  0

Given:

PL  19
G.I .  0.01(13  15)(4  10)
F  13
G.I .  0.12
wt  LL  23
G.I .  0
PI  lp  4

As indicated in the text-book : A-1-b;


Group Index is 0
as it failed to meet-various condition.

b.)USCS
Given:
PL  19
wt  LL  23
PI  4
soil ; Inorganic
13% or soil passes no.200

Therefore,
The green soil belongs to the Fine-grained soil category ;

Symbol and Names : ML means “Inorganic Silt of low plasticity”

Common questions

Powered by AI

An engineer dealing with silt-clay materials faces challenges like low strength, high compressibility, and susceptibility to expansive behavior (shrinking and swelling). These soils can lead to settlement and instability in structures. Mitigation strategies include soil stabilization using lime or cement, proper drainage design to prevent moisture accumulation, and applying a geotextile layer to improve soil performance and support .

The percentage of particles passing through the No. 200 sieve is pivotal in classifying soil types across different systems. In the USDA system, this percentage determines the textural class—more than 35% typically implies a fine-textured soil like clay or silt. In the AASHTO system, soils with less than 35% passing are considered granular, suitable for construction as subgrade materials. High percentages passing the sieve often indicate silty or clayey soils, which can have lower load-bearing capacities and are sensitive to moisture content changes .

Civil engineers prefer granular materials like Soil No. 9 for pavement subgrades due to their excellent load-bearing capacity and drainage properties. Granular soils reduce the risk of water retention and frost heave, which can cause pavement failure, while silt-clay materials, like those classified as A-4 or A-6, tend to retain moisture and exhibit low strength and high plasticity, making them less stable under loads .

The USCS classification ML refers to inorganic silts of low plasticity . Soils with this classification typically have moderate compressibility and may present challenges in load-bearing capacity, requiring careful consideration in engineering projects such as pavements and foundations. They might need stabilization or conditioning before construction to prevent issues like settlement or instability.

A soil classified as A-4 (3) under the AASHTO system is considered a silt material with fair to poor quality as a subgrade. This classification indicates that the soil has a Plasticity Index of 9 and passes 50% through the No. 200 sieve, which limits its ability to support loads, making it less suitable for use as a subgrade material in road construction .

The Group Index (GI) in the AASHTO classification system is calculated using the formula: GI = 0.2a + 0.005b + 0.1c, where 'a' is the percentage passing No. 200 minus 35, 'b' is the Plasticity Index minus 10, and 'c' is the Liquid Limit minus 40 . The GI helps determine the soil's quality as a subgrade material—the higher the GI, the poorer the soil's quality as a subgrade. It is crucial for assessing how suitable a soil is for construction applications, particularly for determining necessary soil treatment or stabilization.

Soil A is classified as Clay according to the USDA soil classification chart because it contains 20% sand, 20% silt, and 60% clay . In civil engineering, clay soils typically have poor mechanical properties, such as low bearing capacity and high expansiveness, which can lead to stability and foundation issues in construction projects.

Soil No. 9 is considered to have excellent quality for use as subgrade material because it is classified as a fine sand with only 8% passing through the No. 200 sieve, qualifying it as a granular material in the AASHTO system . Granular soils with low percentages of fines generally exhibit high strength and good drainage properties, making them ideal for supporting loads as subgrade materials.

A soil classified as A-6 (8) is identified as a clayey material with moderate to poor properties for use as a subgrade . The classification indicates this soil may have issues with volume changes, such as shrinking and swelling, which can affect the stability of structures built on it. The Group Index of 8 suggests that the soil has quite significant limitations in its natural state, requiring treatment or stabilization to improve its load-bearing capacity and reduce moisture susceptibility.

For a soil with high sand content, such as Soil E which contains 70% sand, 15% silt, and 15% clay, the USDA system classifies it as Sandy Loam, indicating good drainage and moderate fertility . The AASHTO classification would likely categorize it in the A-1 or A-3 groups, which are considered excellent for subgrade materials because they consist mostly of granular materials with minimal fines, suitable for high load-bearing capacity and excellent drainage properties.

You might also like