0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views6 pages

Understanding Information Assurance and Cybersecurity

Information assurance encompasses risk management related to information and systems, focusing on confidentiality, integrity, availability, nonrepudiation, and authentication. The document discusses cybersecurity threats and trends for 2020, including sophisticated phishing, ransomware, and IoT attacks, as well as advanced persistent threats and the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain model. It also outlines methods for detecting, denying, disrupting, degrading, deceiving, and destroying cyber threats during various attack phases.

Uploaded by

linardtipagad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views6 pages

Understanding Information Assurance and Cybersecurity

Information assurance encompasses risk management related to information and systems, focusing on confidentiality, integrity, availability, nonrepudiation, and authentication. The document discusses cybersecurity threats and trends for 2020, including sophisticated phishing, ransomware, and IoT attacks, as well as advanced persistent threats and the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain model. It also outlines methods for detecting, denying, disrupting, degrading, deceiving, and destroying cyber threats during various attack phases.

Uploaded by

linardtipagad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Information Assurance

Information assurance is the overarching approach for identifying, understanding, and managing risk
through an organization’s use of information and information systems.

It has the objectives of maintaining the following services or attributes:

• Confidentiality - Confidentiality refers to our ability to protect our data from those who are not
authorized to view it.

• Integrity - Integrity is the ability to prevent people from changing your data in an unauthorized or
undesirable manner. As well the ability to reverse unwanted authorized changes.

• Availability - Availability refers to the ability to access our data when we need it.

• Nonrepudiation - it refers to the ability to ensure that someone cannot deny the authenticity of their
actions.

• Authentication - refers to the process of verifying the identity of users, devices, or systems before
granting them access to sensitive information or resources.

Information Security - Information security is a subdomain of information assurance. It focuses on the


CIA triad.

Information Protection - It is best viewed as a subset of information security. It is often defined in terms
of protecting the confidentiality and integrity of information through a variety of means such as policy,
standards, physical controls, technical controls, monitoring, and information classification or
categorization

Cybersecurity - It is used to describe the measures taken to protect electronic information systems
against unauthorized access or attack.

It is primarily concerned with the same objectives of information security within the scope of electronic
information systems’ CIA.

Cybersecurity Threats and Trends for 2020

 Phishing Gets More Sophisticated —


 Ransomware Strategies Evolve — Ransomware attacks are believed to cost victims billions of dollars
every year, as hackers deploy technologies that enable them to literally kidnap an individual or
organization’s databases and hold all of the information for ransom.
 Cyber-Physical Attacks — The same technology that has enabled us to modernize and computerize
critical infrastructure also brings risk. The ongoing threat of hacks targeting electrical grids,
transportation systems, water treatment facilities, etc., represent a major vulnerability going
forward. According to a recent report in The New York Times, even America’s multibillion-dollar
military systems are at risk of high-tech foul play.
 IoT Attacks — The Internet of Things is becoming more ubiquitous by the day (according to
[Link], the number of devices connected to the IoT is expected to reach 75 billion by 2025). It
includes laptops and tablets, of course, but also routers, webcams, household appliances, smart
watches, medical devices, manufacturing equipment, automobiles and even home security systems.
 Cryptojacking
 Smart Medical Devices and Electronic Medical Records (EMRs)
 Connected Cars and Semi-Autonomous Vehicles
 Social Engineering
 A Severe Shortage of Cybersecurity Professionals

ADVANCED PERSISTENT THREATS

An advanced persistent threat is an attack in which an unauthorized user gains access to a system or
network and remains there for an extended period of time without being detected. The goal of advanced
persistent threats is most often data theft.

Advanced persistent threats are highly customized and sophisticated, designed specifically to get around
the existing security measures in place within a company.

Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain

When discussing the persistent nature of the APT, Lockheed Martin developed a model in 2011 called
the Cyber Kill Chain, as shown here, adapted to show cost to remediate.

Reconnaissance

Reconnaissance are the steps taken by an adversary prior to the attack. They often involve techniques
that are both passive and active. Passive techniques are performed without even sending a packet to the
target of the attack. Instead, metadata is gathered indirectly through public documents, public sources,
search engines, and cached web archives. Active reconnaissance, on the other hand, involves interacting
with the target’s website, open interfaces, and may even involve port and service scanning, API scanning
(enumeration), and vulnerability scanning.

Weaponization

Weaponization involves the crafting of, or selection of, existing exploits to take advantage of the
vulnerabilities found during the reconnaissance phase. Normally, an APT does not have to do anything
fancy or use a zero-day exploit at this stage of the attack. There are normally unpatched publicly known
vulnerabilities that may be used. However, in rare cases, an adversary may craft a special exploit to a
custom payload, containing a trojan or other backdoor, that provides command and control and further
functionality as desired.

Delivery

During this phase of the attack, the attacker sends the exploit and payload to the target to take
advantage of a discovered vulnerability. This may involve exploiting a discovered web or e-mail
vulnerability, or perhaps an open API interface. Unfortunately, there are often easier ways into an
enterprise, such as a simple phishing attack, which is still effective after billions of dollars in training and
awareness. Other forms of social engineering attacks may be used here as well.

Exploitation

During this phase, the cyber weapon is detonated and executed in some fashion, either by that “helpful”
user or automatically by an application such as an e-mail client or web browser plugin. At this point, the
attacker’s code is executing on the target host. When directly attacking a port or service, the delivery and
exploitation phase are the same.

Installation

During this phase, the attacker normally performs two actions:

Gain persistence

Download and execute a secondary payload.

When it comes to persistence, the worst thing that can happen to an attacker at this phase is the user
closing the application running the malicious code or, even worse, rebooting the computer, severing all
connections. Therefore, the first intention of the adversary is to quickly gain some form of persistence.

This secondary payload is normally required, as the primary payload must be small, evade anti-virus, and
often fit within the confines of a carrier document or file. However, this secondary payload may be much
larger in size, may execute entirely in memory, and further evade many antivirus technologies. The
secondary payload may contain a standard and readily available attack framework, such as a remote
access trojan (RAT). Some attackers have even started to use our own tools against us, such as
Metasploit.

Command and Control (C2)

After the execution of the secondary payload, the attacker will normally have some form of command
and control (C2), a military phrase, whereby the attacker may direct the activities of the remote access
tool (RAT) or attack framework. This may be a simple form of communication that perhaps sleeps for a
day (or longer) and then wakes up and phones home, checking for commands to execute. Further, this
C2 may leverage a more sophisticated scheme of tunneling through common traffic, custom encryption,
or communication protocols.

Actions on Objectives
Finally, after all that effort, which may only take seconds to complete, the adversary will perform actions
on objectives, which is also a military phrase that means complete the mission, complete the task you
came to do. Often, this involves moving laterally across the organization, discovering sensitive
information, gaining enterprise administrative privilege, establishing more forms of persistence and
access, and ultimately exfiltration of the sensitive data, extortion through ransomware, bitcoin mining,
or some other profit motive.

(Methods)Courses of Action for the Cyber Kill Chain

During each phase of the Cyber Kill Chain, there are methods of dealing with an active attack and
breaking the Cyber Kill Chain of an adversary, as discussed next.

Detect

During each phase, you may detect the attacker, but it is often more feasible to detect the attack in its
early phases. The further the attacker digs into the network, the more they begin to look like a normal
user and the harder it is to detect them. There is one prominent exception here, the “deceive” method,
which we will discuss in a moment.

Deny

An effective method to deal with an attacker is to “deny” them access to sensitive resources. However,
that turns out to be harder than it sounds. Again, if an attacker is simply taking advantage of a
discovered vulnerability that bypasses the built-in access control mechanisms, it may not be possible to
deny access to that system, particularly if it is Internet-facing. However, for secondary systems, further
network segmentation and access controls should be deployed to deny the attacker. On the extreme end
of this defense is Zero Trust, which is becoming popular and, if properly deployed, would greatly improve
this method.

Disrupt

The act of disrupting the attacker involves increasing their cost, either through new forms of antivirus or
operating system updates that bring new forms of memory protection, such as Data Execution
Prevention (DEP), address space layout randomization (ASLR), and Stack Canaries. As the attacker
evolves, we as defenders should evolve too. This is particularly important on external-facing systems, but
we cannot stop there. All systems and internal segments of the network should be considered vulnerable
and employ methods to disrupt the attacker, thus slowing them down and buying precious time to
detect them.

Degrade
To degrade an attacker means to limit their ability to be su ccessful. For example, you may throttle
outbound data over a certain threshold to limit exfiltration. Further, you may block all outbound traffic,
except through approved and authenticated proxies, which may buy you time as you detect those
attempts before the attacker figures it out and then uses those proxies.

Deceive

To deceive the enemy is, again, as old as warfare itself. It is a basic element of cyber operations and is
most effective for an attacker who has made it past all other defenses but is lurking and poking around
the internal network. The hope is that the attacker steps on one of the digital mouse traps (i.e.,
honeypots) you deployed for the purpose of detecting that very act.

Destroy

Unless you happen to work for a nation-state-level cyber force, you probably won’t be able to “hack
back.” However, you may destroy an attacker’s foothold in your own network when it’s discovered. A
word of caution here: you will need to perform careful planning and ensure that you pull the attacker out
by the roots; otherwise, you may start a dangerous game of hide-and-seek, angering the attacker, who
may be deeper in your network than you originally think.

Footprinting refers to the process of gathering information about a target, including its IP address range,
domain names, network infrastructure, and other publicly available details. The goal is to map out the
organization’s infrastructure and identify areas that could be vulnerable to attack.

Types of Footprinting:

1. Passive Footprinting: Involves collecting publicly available information without directly


interacting with the target system. This might include searching through public records, domain
registration details, and social media sites.

2. Active Footprinting: Involves directly interacting with the target network or system, such as
scanning its ports or testing for open vulnerabilities. This method is riskier as it can alert the
target to potential malicious activity.

Key Footprinting Techniques:

1. DNS Interrogation
2. Network Scanning
3. Website Footprinting
4. Social Engineering
5. Publicly Available Information

Information Gathering Tools:


Nmap: For network mapping and scanning, detecting open ports and services.

Netcat: A versatile networking tool used for port scanning, banner grabbing, and more.

Whois Lookup: Provides information about domain registration details.

Shodan: A search engine that helps identify IoT devices and systems exposed to the internet.

DNSstuff: A toolset for looking up DNS records, Whois information, and other networking details.

Maltego: A powerful tool for collecting open-source intelligence (OSINT) that links entities like
names, email addresses, domains, and social media accounts.

Google Dorking: Using advanced Google search operators to discover sensitive information indexed
by Google.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Organizations can defend against the stages of the Cyber Kill Chain by implementing various strategies. In the 'Deny' phase, they can deploy network segmentation, enhance access control mechanisms, and apply the Zero Trust model which significantly limits unauthorized access . Denying access is challenging if attackers exploit discovered vulnerabilities, highlighting the need for diligent security updates and patches. In the 'Deceive' phase, organizations can use digital traps like honeypots to detect attackers that bypass initial defenses. These deceptive measures aim to mislead attackers into revealing their presence without gaining access to critical resources . By deploying these strategies, organizations increase the difficulty for adversaries to progress through the kill chain, effectively mitigating potential damage.

The Cyber Kill Chain model developed by Lockheed Martin in 2011 consists of several components: Reconnaissance, Weaponization, Delivery, Exploitation, Installation, Command and Control (C2), and Actions on Objectives. Reconnaissance involves both passive and active techniques to gather information about the target . Weaponization uses the information to select or craft exploits tailored to the vulnerabilities discovered . Delivery refers to transmitting the exploit and payload to the target . Exploitation is the phase where the attack is executed . Installation secures persistence by deploying additional malicious payloads . The C2 phase establishes remote control over the compromised system . Finally, Actions on Objectives involve achieving the attacker's ultimate goal, such as data theft . Each phase is essential to understanding and mitigating advanced persistent threats by identifying the attack stages and potential interruption points in the attack chain.

Cryptojacking impacts an organization's resource allocation by covertly utilizing computing resources for mining cryptocurrency, thus degrading system performance and increasing operational costs due to higher electricity consumption and wear on hardware . This unauthorized use of resources can strain IT budgets and divert attention from legitimate business operations or IT projects. Additionally, cryptojacking can signify underlying security weaknesses, such as inadequate endpoint protection or unpatched vulnerabilities, potentially exposing the organization to more severe threats. Addressing cryptojacking requires reinforcing security measures, including deploying robust antivirus solutions, implementing network monitoring to detect unusual activity, and ensuring regular updates and patches to systems, thereby strengthening the organization's broader security posture.

Passive footprinting techniques involve collecting information from publicly available sources without direct interaction with the target system. This might include examining public records, domain registration details, and social media sites, which carries minimal risk to the target as it does not alert them to potential malicious activity . In contrast, active footprinting involves directly interacting with the target system, such as scanning its ports or probing for vulnerabilities. This method is riskier because it can alert the target, potentially triggering their security mechanisms . Understanding these differences helps cybersecurity experts balance the need to gather information against the risk of detection.

A severe shortage of cybersecurity professionals significantly impairs an organization's ability to protect itself against emerging threats. This shortage leads to increased workloads for existing staff, possibly causing oversight and errors that could be exploited by attackers . Additionally, it limits the organization's capacity to implement and maintain up-to-date security measures, perform regular monitoring, and respond promptly to incidents. The lack of qualified personnel can also hinder strategic planning and execution of comprehensive security programs. Organizations must prioritize investing in cybersecurity training, developing recruitment strategies, and utilizing automated tools to alleviate some of the burdens faced by understaffed teams, thus enhancing their defenses against evolving threats.

Detecting and mitigating a social engineering attack requires a combination of awareness, technology, and processes. Organizations can implement regular security training to educate employees about recognizing social engineering tactics such as phishing and pretexting . Technology-wise, email filtering systems and intrusion detection systems can be employed to identify and block suspicious communications before they reach end-users. Processes such as multi-factor authentication and the establishment of a culture where employees verify requests for sensitive information through separate communication channels can help mitigate the impact of such attacks. Additionally, fostering an environment where employees feel encouraged to report suspicious activities without fear of repercussions is crucial for early detection and intervention . By combining these strategies, organizations can effectively reduce the risk of falling victim to social engineering.

The increasing sophistication of ransomware strategies significantly impacts organizational preparedness and response to cyber threats. As attackers deploy advanced technologies to compromise systems and demand ransom, organizations must enhance their cybersecurity measures. This includes investing in robust backup solutions to ensure data recovery without paying ransoms, implementing comprehensive security training to reduce susceptibility to phishing, and utilizing advanced detection and mitigation technologies to identify and neutralize threats early . Proactive measures, such as regularly updating systems and conducting penetration testing, are crucial in adapting to evolving ransomware tactics, thereby strengthening an organization's resilience against such attacks.

Zero Trust architecture plays a pivotal role in mitigating cyber attacks by adopting a 'never trust, always verify' stance, which is crucial for defending against advanced persistent threats (APTs). This approach involves continually verifying the identity and access rights of both internal and external entities, thereby minimizing the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive resources . Zero Trust emphasizes strict identity verification, segmentation of networks, and least privilege access to reduce the attack surface. By making it more challenging for attackers to move laterally and access critical systems, this architecture significantly hinders the execution and persistence phases of APTs, ensuring better protection of organizational assets.

Smart medical devices and EMRs are vulnerable to cybersecurity threats due to their integration into networked environments and the sensitive data they handle . Risks include unauthorized access, data breaches, and manipulation of medical data, potentially impacting patient care and privacy. Protection measures include implementing stringent access controls to ensure only authorized personnel access the data, employing encryption to secure data in transit and storage, and instituting regular security assessments to identify and rectify vulnerabilities . Additionally, healthcare facilities should establish incident response plans to mitigate damage in the event of a breach.

The proliferation of IoT devices poses significant implications for cybersecurity, particularly in industry sectors such as healthcare, transportation, and critical infrastructure. These devices often lack robust security features, creating vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to disrupt operations, steal information, or launch further attacks . In healthcare, the compromise of IoT medical devices can impact patient safety and data integrity. In transportation, IoT vulnerabilities can jeopardize vehicle controls and safety systems. For critical infrastructure, IoT security lapses could lead to the disruption of essential services such as power grids or water supply . To mitigate these risks, industries must adopt stricter IoT regulations, implement comprehensive device management strategies, and integrate IoT security into their overall cybersecurity frameworks, focusing on segmentation, monitoring, and rapid response to detected threats.

You might also like