Scribd
Upload
26 views8 pages

YouTube Design Evaluation Report

The document is a Design Evaluation Form for YouTube, assessing various interface criteria such as predictability, clarity, and responsiveness. The evaluation, conducted by Duong Duy Anh, provides scores and suggestions for improvement across multiple aspects of the platform's user interface. The overall evaluation resulted in a 'Not Pass' score of 40, indicating areas that require enhancement.

Uploaded by

dumb ass
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
26 views8 pages

YouTube Design Evaluation Report

The document is a Design Evaluation Form for YouTube, assessing various interface criteria such as predictability, clarity, and responsiveness. The evaluation, conducted by Duong Duy Anh, provides scores and suggestions for improvement across multiple aspects of the platform's user interface. The overall evaluation resulted in a 'Not Pass' score of 40, indicating areas that require enhancement.

Uploaded by

dumb ass
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Revision history

Version Date Description


Author
Design Evaluation Form
Interface ID:

Interface purpose:
ID Category
1 Predicability

3 Synthesizability

4 Simplicity

5 Familiarity

6 Generalizability

7 Consistency

8 Dialog initiative

9 Multi-threading

10 Task migratability

11 Substitutivity

12 Customisability

13 Observability

14 Recoverability

15 Responsiveness
Design Evaluation Form
Youtube

Video content browsing and consumption platform


Evaluation criteria
Clarity and immediacy of understanding element purpose

Ability to understand effects of past actions

Balance between functionality and interface complexity

Consistency with common web conventions

Similar operations work similarly across the interface

Visual and functional consistency across the platform

System provides appropriate prompts and feedback

Ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously

Flexibility in how tasks can be accomplished

Alternative ways to accomplish the same task

User ability to tailor interface to preferences

System state visibility and transparency

Ability to undo actions or recover from errors

System reaction time to user inputs


n Form
Evaluato Duong Duy Anh
r:
Date: 3/6/2025
Result Score Suggestion Note
Most elements have clear purpose 2 Consider adding text
with standard icons (home, search, labels to lesser-known
notifications). Some icons may be icons
unclear to new users.

Past viewed videos are clearly 5 Consider reorganizing


marked, with watch history accessible some secondary
features
Good balance with primary functions 4
easily accessible, but some features
buried in menus
Follows standard video platform 5
conventions with recognizable icons
and layouts
Consistent interaction patterns for 5
video selection, menu navigation
Strong visual language consistency 5
with persistent navigation
Limited proactive guidance, relies on 3 Add more contextual
user to discover features prompts for new users
Can browse while video plays in mini- 5
player, can navigate between tabs
Multiple navigation paths to content 4 Improve cross-device
(search, recommendations, task continuity
categories)
Multiple ways to find content 4 Add more filtering
(categories, search, channels) options
Limited customization beyond 2 Add more interface
dark/light mode and some content customization options
preferences
Clear indicators for loading, video 4 Improve transparency
progress, subscription status of recommendation
algorithms
History tracking allows recovery of 3 Add more robust undo
previously viewed content, limited functionality
true undo
Generally responsive with quick load 4 Optimize for slower
times for interface elements connections
Total score: 40
Overall evaluation: Not Pass

You might also like